This is definitely a lawless presidency

That's ok dear. Only about six more years and another REP President for two terms and a REP Senate majority.
Any luck selling all those 'Hands Up Don't Shoot' hoodies?
The IG report is coming out soon.
Buckle up pal!
Already Comey and Lynch are accusing each other of lying.
Talking juvenile stupid talk won't change the law or reality with Trump. He has committed obstruction of justice to add to many other crimes that gave us an illegal election, and delivered a criminal onto the front door of the WH. That has already been established. And the stonewalling of witnesses and violating subpoenas
puts a nice bow on top of Trump's obvious impeachment credentials.

LOLOLOLOL. There's that "illegal election" again.
And of course it sticks, because the truth is more powerful than your bs.

Accept it's not true, of course. The fatal flaw in your crazy argument. It's why we laugh.
I've been posting this all day, and not one challenge to the argument; Nadler: 'We will hold this president accountable — one way, or the other.' And you know why? Because Nadler is reading off word for word from Mueller and he is laying out a 100% convincing case for obstruction through Don McGhan. We now know why McGhan didn't show up. Lol! The failed posters on this board have had plenty of chances to challenge Mueller, but they haven't got a prayer, so they never tried.

You failed yet again to demonstrate why the election was illegal. I don't expect anything different.
 
Really? BWK makes all manner of silly claims ... among them that Trump has been proven guilty of pretty much every crime in the book (yet never convicted of any) but can't seem to explain why our hysterical House Dems still refuse to initiate impeachment proceedings. Can you help him out with that?
TIA. :lol:
Um, okay, so the rules are that they can't indict until out of office. And second, Dems will be working on hearings and impeachment proceedings if Trump keeps obstructing and breaking the law, while having others cover for him.
Wait ... Pelosi, Nadler, Schiff and you all claim to already have evidence of Trump's guilt yet there has been no impeachment proceedings. Instead of spinning like a top why not try to explain the House Dem's failure to perform their sworn duty to impeach a Repub POTUS?
Procedure, procedure! Follow the facts, and if Trump and his goons keep obstructing testimony to get to those facts, the case will be to bring up their own obstruction in hearings, then decide impeachment. Right now they subpoenaed Hope Hicks and Annie Donaldson. They're moving along quickly. If McGhan won't testify, so be it. We have Mueller's testimony in the report.
Once more for all brain-dead leftarded: if as Pelosi, Nadler, Schiff and you all claim you already have evidence of Trump's guilt WTF is the delay? If they have the evidence WTF are they waiting for?
Mostly for some conservatives to drop the Saint Ronnie pledge to never go against another republican.
To join Pelosi, Fat Nadler, Lyin' Schiff, and you? Yeah ... no thanks. :lol:

BTW, our Crazy House Dems have the authority - and if you take them at their word the evidence - to impeach, they are and have been shirking their sworn duty by allowing Trump to remain another day, right? So WTF is the delay?
 
Last edited:
Um, okay, so the rules are that they can't indict until out of office. And second, Dems will be working on hearings and impeachment proceedings if Trump keeps obstructing and breaking the law, while having others cover for him.
Wait ... Pelosi, Nadler, Schiff and you all claim to already have evidence of Trump's guilt yet there has been no impeachment proceedings. Instead of spinning like a top why not try to explain the House Dem's failure to perform their sworn duty to impeach a Repub POTUS?
Procedure, procedure! Follow the facts, and if Trump and his goons keep obstructing testimony to get to those facts, the case will be to bring up their own obstruction in hearings, then decide impeachment. Right now they subpoenaed Hope Hicks and Annie Donaldson. They're moving along quickly. If McGhan won't testify, so be it. We have Mueller's testimony in the report.
Once more for all brain-dead leftarded: if as Pelosi, Nadler, Schiff and you all claim you already have evidence of Trump's guilt WTF is the delay? If they have the evidence WTF are they waiting for?
Mostly for some conservatives to drop the Saint Ronnie pledge to never go against another republican.
To join Pelosi, Fat Nadler, Lyin' Schiff, and you? Yeah ... no thanks. :lol:

BTW, our Crazy House Dems have the authority - and if you take them at their word the evidence to impeach - they are and have been shirking their sworn duty by allowing Trump to remain another day, right? So WTF is the delay?

Perhaps no valid reason? :rolleyes:

Why not try to do something good for all Americans? :tomato:
 
On what grounds?
It’s so sad to see people as uninformed as you are
Really? BWK makes all manner of silly claims ... among them that Trump has been proven guilty of pretty much every crime in the book (yet never convicted of any) but can't seem to explain why our hysterical House Dems still refuse to initiate impeachment proceedings. Can you help him out with that?
TIA. :lol:
Yea, he pretty much is guilty of most everything in the book. And don't bother with the help. I'm okay on my own. I've been right about Trump on everything so far. I'll be okay, believe me.
Yet you still fail to explain why no articles of impeachment. Can it be that beneath their bluster our Hysterical House Dems know the evidence just doesn't support impeachment and the voters will punish them for being petulant, bat-shit crazy A-holes in 2020?

They want a campaign issue. They know that trying to take him out now would be a losing proposition, since the Mueller report and the economy have drastically weakened their hand. That's why Pelosi is at odds with the rabid base. She knows it's a loser, they want it anyway. It's entertaining.
So they fill the otherwise empty heads of our BWKs with delusions of sugarplum fairies? What kind of traitors are our Democrat Socialists anyway?

BTW, it's gonna be tough to run against Trump's results using their failure to impeach as a campaign issue: "yeah, we had the evidence but chose not to impeach." They are gonna get slaughtered. :lol:
 
It’s so sad to see people as uninformed as you are
Really? BWK makes all manner of silly claims ... among them that Trump has been proven guilty of pretty much every crime in the book (yet never convicted of any) but can't seem to explain why our hysterical House Dems still refuse to initiate impeachment proceedings. Can you help him out with that?
TIA. :lol:
Yea, he pretty much is guilty of most everything in the book. And don't bother with the help. I'm okay on my own. I've been right about Trump on everything so far. I'll be okay, believe me.
Yet you still fail to explain why no articles of impeachment. Can it be that beneath their bluster our Hysterical House Dems know the evidence just doesn't support impeachment and the voters will punish them for being petulant, bat-shit crazy A-holes in 2020?

They want a campaign issue. They know that trying to take him out now would be a losing proposition, since the Mueller report and the economy have drastically weakened their hand. That's why Pelosi is at odds with the rabid base. She knows it's a loser, they want it anyway. It's entertaining.
So they fill the otherwise empty heads of our BWKs with delusions of sugarplum fairies? What kind of traitors are our Democrat Socialists anyway?

BTW, it's gonna be tough to run against Trump's results using their failure to impeach as a campaign issue: "yeah, we had the evidence but chose not to impeach." They are gonna get slaughtered. :lol:

I ain't counting any chickens before they hatch. One more globalist or leftist president right now, and we may as well burn the Constitution or give your life trying to defend it at all costs.

To the man, if we're real Americans. I think the real Americans would win in a situation like that, and there would be no more "resistance" to the ways of the Forefathers for a long time. Not every real American would make it through to the other side of a conflict such as that, though. Messy; perhaps necessary, perhaps not. America is teetering on the brink right now of continuing as the wise forefathers intended, or being rotted from the inside out by piece of shit leftists.
 
Last edited:
It’s so sad to see people as uninformed as you are
Really? BWK makes all manner of silly claims ... among them that Trump has been proven guilty of pretty much every crime in the book (yet never convicted of any) but can't seem to explain why our hysterical House Dems still refuse to initiate impeachment proceedings. Can you help him out with that?
TIA. :lol:
Yea, he pretty much is guilty of most everything in the book. And don't bother with the help. I'm okay on my own. I've been right about Trump on everything so far. I'll be okay, believe me.
Yet you still fail to explain why no articles of impeachment. Can it be that beneath their bluster our Hysterical House Dems know the evidence just doesn't support impeachment and the voters will punish them for being petulant, bat-shit crazy A-holes in 2020?
LOl! Of course it supports impeachment. And anyone who would tell you different is a liar. Trump blew the doors off high crimes and misdemeanors.
You and I are not alone. The new yorker has an article on the lawlessness of rump.
THE
NEW YORKER

May 13 2019 THE TALK OF THE TOWN


If there is one thing that Attorney General William Barr’s testimony in the Senate last week made abundantly clear, it’s that he is fine with acting less like the chief law-enforcement officer of the United States and more like the personal lawyer for a tantrum-prone client named Donald Trump. Barr dissembled when answering questions about his handling of the Mueller report, then mis-characterized Robert Mueller’s objections to his spin on it, saying that the special counsel had been primarily troubled by how “the media was playing this." In fact, Mueller had written, in a letter to Barr, that he was concerned because the Attorney General’s summary “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of his team’s work. Barr described that letter as “snitty” and probably written by “staff people,” thereby dismissing objections that Mueller clearly wanted in the historical record. By the end of the day, Barr had said that he would not come back and testify in the House, as he was scheduled to do. Nancy Pelosi, the House Speaker, then said that, in misrepresenting Mueller’s discontent, the Attorney General had lied to Congress, which is “a crime.”
Barr is apparently a believer in the “unitary executive” theory, an expansive reading of the powers of the Presidency that’s popular in conservative legal circles. Theory aside, though, serving as Trumps Attorney General—and keeping the job—-seems to mean signing on to the Roy Cohn approach that Trump so admires: treating anything, including the Constitution, that does not serve Trump’s interests as an urgent threat; projecting Trump’s own venal motives onto his critics and opponents; denying and stonewalling.
As a businessman, Trump was notably litigious. In 2016, when he was running for President, USA Today found that he had been involved in thirty—five hundred lawsuits, and was the plaintiff in nearly two thousand of them. That volume of litigation was extraordinary not only for a Presidential candidate but even for a real—estate mogul. As President, he is pursuing a similar strategy—stacking up lawsuits and thwarting investigations in the hope that he can run out the clock before the 2020 election. Last month, he sued the chairman of the House Oversight and Reform Committee, Representative Elijah Cummings, who had requested some of his financial records from an accounting firm. Then Trump, three of his children, and his private company sued Deutsche Bank and Capital One to prevent them from releasing information about his financial arrangements, which Democrats had subpoenaed. Trump also went to court to try to block a lawsuit brought by two hundred members of Congress, which alleges that his business dealings violate the emoluments clause of the Constitution. And Trump and his Treasury Secretary, Steven Mnuchin, have so far declined to produce the President's tax returns for the House Ways and Means Committee, which requested them from the I.R.S. in early April. Since Richard Nixon, it has been the practice for Presidents to release their returns, but, in Mnuchin’s words, Congress is making an “unprecedented” demand—“exposure for the sake of exposure.”
Meanwhile, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said no to a request from the Senate Appropriations Committee to testify about his departments budget. In- deed, Trump has declared a near-blanket denial of all congressional requests for information and testimony from members of his Administration; after Barr’s testimony, Trump said that he would not allow the former White House counsel Don McGahn to appear before the Senate. “I don’t want people testifying to a party, because that is what they’re doing if they do this,” Trump told the Washington Post‘, in April. Cummings told reporters, “To date, the White House has refused to produce a single piece of paper or a single witness in any of the committee’s investigations this entire year.”
The Administration's persistent attempts to stymie congressional oversight don’t bear much in the way of legal merit. In April, a district court in Washington, D.C., denied Trumps motion to dismiss the emoluments lawsuit brought by the members of Congress. The clause was intended to prevent corruption, by banning federal officials from accepting financial benefits from foreign governments without first obtaining congressional approval. Trump contends that any such profits he has received-—ranging from Trump trademarks being granted by the Chinese government to Saudi—funded lobbyists staying in Trump hotels—don’t count, because he didn’t come by them as a direct result of duties performed in office The court concluded that this argument is not only “inconsistent with the text, structure, historical interpretation, adoption and purpose of the clause” but also “contrary to Executive branch practice over the course of many years.”
Democrats may be leading the House investigations, but their queries are rooted in historical practice and established understanding of the separation of powers. They are looking into matters of legitimate importance, from how the White House has handled security clearances to obstruction of justice. The purpose is not only to enforce accountability but also to establish grounds for legislation to avert future abuses. The congressional authority to investigate, which includes issuing subpoenas, has been upheld repeatedly by the Supreme Court. As a 1927 Court opinion explained, “the power of inquiry, with enforcing process,” has long been “a necessary and appropriate attribute of the power to legislate.”
What Trump denounces as “Presidential harassment" is, in fact, the means by which our government, with its coequal branches, works. But the way he talks about those branches makes them sound as divorced from the public good as he is. He refers to the Supreme Court, with his two appointees, as a venue in which he’ll get “a fair shake," which he doesn’t seem to think the lower courts offer. In March, the Washington Post reported that federal courts had ruled against the Administration sixty—three times,“an extraordinary record of legal defeat” that Trump blamed on “Obamajudges”—even though a quarter of the judges are Republican appointees, and the defeats resulted from a sloppy approach to rule-making and his own prejudicial comments on immigration and other matters. The former F.B.I. director James Comey wrote an Op—Ed in the Times last Week, in which he noted, in part about Barr’s behavior, that “accomplished people lacking inner strength can’t resist the compromises necessary to survive Mr. Trump and that adds up to something they will never recover from.”Until the next election, the scrutiny that Congress and the courts are applying to Trump may provide the best hope that our government will.

Margaret Talbot
Thanks for the serious take on what's been really going on. But with this thread it's just been funs and giggles today using one linked video, and never once a challenge to it.

And not to worry, I know I am not a lone. You, along with the majority of the country see right through trumps crimes, and even more through his army of Toads who can't see in front of their last bugger.

But thanks! Your professional touch by posting something much more informative and substantial against this disastrous presidency, is just the topping of what has been a very productive day for the truth. Thanks again!
 
On what grounds?
It’s so sad to see people as uninformed as you are
Really? BWK makes all manner of silly claims ... among them that Trump has been proven guilty of pretty much every crime in the book (yet never convicted of any) but can't seem to explain why our hysterical House Dems still refuse to initiate impeachment proceedings. Can you help him out with that?
TIA. :lol:
Yea, he pretty much is guilty of most everything in the book. And don't bother with the help. I'm okay on my own. I've been right about Trump on everything so far. I'll be okay, believe me.
Yet you still fail to explain why no articles of impeachment. Can it be that beneath their bluster our Hysterical House Dems know the evidence just doesn't support impeachment and the voters will punish them for being petulant, bat-shit crazy A-holes in 2020?

They want a campaign issue. They know that trying to take him out now would be a losing proposition, since the Mueller report and the economy have drastically weakened their hand. That's why Pelosi is at odds with the rabid base. She knows it's a loser, they want it anyway. It's entertaining.
The report couldn't be any stronger against Trump after Nadler personally quoted Mueller with his testimony with McGhan. You can't find a more damaging explanation of events then the exchange those two had.
 
Really? BWK makes all manner of silly claims ... among them that Trump has been proven guilty of pretty much every crime in the book (yet never convicted of any) but can't seem to explain why our hysterical House Dems still refuse to initiate impeachment proceedings. Can you help him out with that?
TIA. :lol:
Yea, he pretty much is guilty of most everything in the book. And don't bother with the help. I'm okay on my own. I've been right about Trump on everything so far. I'll be okay, believe me.
Yet you still fail to explain why no articles of impeachment. Can it be that beneath their bluster our Hysterical House Dems know the evidence just doesn't support impeachment and the voters will punish them for being petulant, bat-shit crazy A-holes in 2020?

They want a campaign issue. They know that trying to take him out now would be a losing proposition, since the Mueller report and the economy have drastically weakened their hand. That's why Pelosi is at odds with the rabid base. She knows it's a loser, they want it anyway. It's entertaining.
So they fill the otherwise empty heads of our BWKs with delusions of sugarplum fairies? What kind of traitors are our Democrat Socialists anyway?

BTW, it's gonna be tough to run against Trump's results using their failure to impeach as a campaign issue: "yeah, we had the evidence but chose not to impeach." They are gonna get slaughtered. :lol:

I ain't counting any chickens before they hatch. One more globalist or leftist president right now, and we may as well burn the Constitution or give your life trying to defend it at all costs.

To the man, if we're real Americans. I think the real Americans would win in a situation like that, and there would be no more "resistance" to the ways of the Forefathers for a long time. Not every real American would make it through to the other side of a conflict such as that, though. Messy; perhaps necessary, perhaps not. America is teetering on the brink right now of continuing as the wise forefathers intended, or being rotted from the inside out by piece of shit leftists.
You've been burning the shit out of it ever since Trump stole the office.
 
Yea, he pretty much is guilty of most everything in the book. And don't bother with the help. I'm okay on my own. I've been right about Trump on everything so far. I'll be okay, believe me.
Yet you still fail to explain why no articles of impeachment. Can it be that beneath their bluster our Hysterical House Dems know the evidence just doesn't support impeachment and the voters will punish them for being petulant, bat-shit crazy A-holes in 2020?

They want a campaign issue. They know that trying to take him out now would be a losing proposition, since the Mueller report and the economy have drastically weakened their hand. That's why Pelosi is at odds with the rabid base. She knows it's a loser, they want it anyway. It's entertaining.
So they fill the otherwise empty heads of our BWKs with delusions of sugarplum fairies? What kind of traitors are our Democrat Socialists anyway?

BTW, it's gonna be tough to run against Trump's results using their failure to impeach as a campaign issue: "yeah, we had the evidence but chose not to impeach." They are gonna get slaughtered. :lol:

I ain't counting any chickens before they hatch. One more globalist or leftist president right now, and we may as well burn the Constitution or give your life trying to defend it at all costs.

To the man, if we're real Americans. I think the real Americans would win in a situation like that, and there would be no more "resistance" to the ways of the Forefathers for a long time. Not every real American would make it through to the other side of a conflict such as that, though. Messy; perhaps necessary, perhaps not. America is teetering on the brink right now of continuing as the wise forefathers intended, or being rotted from the inside out by piece of shit leftists.
You've been burning the shit out of it ever since Trump stole the office.

In what manner? I haven't changed in the least.
 
Really? BWK makes all manner of silly claims ... among them that Trump has been proven guilty of pretty much every crime in the book (yet never convicted of any) but can't seem to explain why our hysterical House Dems still refuse to initiate impeachment proceedings. Can you help him out with that?
TIA. :lol:
Yea, he pretty much is guilty of most everything in the book. And don't bother with the help. I'm okay on my own. I've been right about Trump on everything so far. I'll be okay, believe me.
Yet you still fail to explain why no articles of impeachment. Can it be that beneath their bluster our Hysterical House Dems know the evidence just doesn't support impeachment and the voters will punish them for being petulant, bat-shit crazy A-holes in 2020?

They want a campaign issue. They know that trying to take him out now would be a losing proposition, since the Mueller report and the economy have drastically weakened their hand. That's why Pelosi is at odds with the rabid base. She knows it's a loser, they want it anyway. It's entertaining.
So they fill the otherwise empty heads of our BWKs with delusions of sugarplum fairies? What kind of traitors are our Democrat Socialists anyway?

BTW, it's gonna be tough to run against Trump's results using their failure to impeach as a campaign issue: "yeah, we had the evidence but chose not to impeach." They are gonna get slaughtered. :lol:

I ain't counting any chickens before they hatch. One more globalist or leftist president right now, and we may as well burn the Constitution or give your life trying to defend it at all costs.

To the man, if we're real Americans. I think the real Americans would win in a situation like that, and there would be no more "resistance" to the ways of the Forefathers for a long time. Not every real American would make it through to the other side of a conflict such as that, though. Messy; perhaps necessary, perhaps not. America is teetering on the brink right now of continuing as the wise forefathers intended, or being rotted from the inside out by piece of shit leftists.
The Right has been trying to hijack the forefathers for years to change the meaning of the Constitution. And you're still fos.
 
Yet you still fail to explain why no articles of impeachment. Can it be that beneath their bluster our Hysterical House Dems know the evidence just doesn't support impeachment and the voters will punish them for being petulant, bat-shit crazy A-holes in 2020?

They want a campaign issue. They know that trying to take him out now would be a losing proposition, since the Mueller report and the economy have drastically weakened their hand. That's why Pelosi is at odds with the rabid base. She knows it's a loser, they want it anyway. It's entertaining.
So they fill the otherwise empty heads of our BWKs with delusions of sugarplum fairies? What kind of traitors are our Democrat Socialists anyway?

BTW, it's gonna be tough to run against Trump's results using their failure to impeach as a campaign issue: "yeah, we had the evidence but chose not to impeach." They are gonna get slaughtered. :lol:

I ain't counting any chickens before they hatch. One more globalist or leftist president right now, and we may as well burn the Constitution or give your life trying to defend it at all costs.

To the man, if we're real Americans. I think the real Americans would win in a situation like that, and there would be no more "resistance" to the ways of the Forefathers for a long time. Not every real American would make it through to the other side of a conflict such as that, though. Messy; perhaps necessary, perhaps not. America is teetering on the brink right now of continuing as the wise forefathers intended, or being rotted from the inside out by piece of shit leftists.
You've been burning the shit out of it ever since Trump stole the office.

In what manner? I haven't changed in the least.
Most of Trump's actions run counter to Constitutional norms. He could give two shits about it.
 
Yea, he pretty much is guilty of most everything in the book. And don't bother with the help. I'm okay on my own. I've been right about Trump on everything so far. I'll be okay, believe me.
Yet you still fail to explain why no articles of impeachment. Can it be that beneath their bluster our Hysterical House Dems know the evidence just doesn't support impeachment and the voters will punish them for being petulant, bat-shit crazy A-holes in 2020?

They want a campaign issue. They know that trying to take him out now would be a losing proposition, since the Mueller report and the economy have drastically weakened their hand. That's why Pelosi is at odds with the rabid base. She knows it's a loser, they want it anyway. It's entertaining.
So they fill the otherwise empty heads of our BWKs with delusions of sugarplum fairies? What kind of traitors are our Democrat Socialists anyway?

BTW, it's gonna be tough to run against Trump's results using their failure to impeach as a campaign issue: "yeah, we had the evidence but chose not to impeach." They are gonna get slaughtered. :lol:

I ain't counting any chickens before they hatch. One more globalist or leftist president right now, and we may as well burn the Constitution or give your life trying to defend it at all costs.

To the man, if we're real Americans. I think the real Americans would win in a situation like that, and there would be no more "resistance" to the ways of the Forefathers for a long time. Not every real American would make it through to the other side of a conflict such as that, though. Messy; perhaps necessary, perhaps not. America is teetering on the brink right now of continuing as the wise forefathers intended, or being rotted from the inside out by piece of shit leftists.
The Right has been trying to hijack the forefathers for years to change the meaning of the Constitution. And you're still fos.

In what way? Are you seriously claiming you want to adhere to the Constitution?
 
They want a campaign issue. They know that trying to take him out now would be a losing proposition, since the Mueller report and the economy have drastically weakened their hand. That's why Pelosi is at odds with the rabid base. She knows it's a loser, they want it anyway. It's entertaining.
So they fill the otherwise empty heads of our BWKs with delusions of sugarplum fairies? What kind of traitors are our Democrat Socialists anyway?

BTW, it's gonna be tough to run against Trump's results using their failure to impeach as a campaign issue: "yeah, we had the evidence but chose not to impeach." They are gonna get slaughtered. :lol:

I ain't counting any chickens before they hatch. One more globalist or leftist president right now, and we may as well burn the Constitution or give your life trying to defend it at all costs.

To the man, if we're real Americans. I think the real Americans would win in a situation like that, and there would be no more "resistance" to the ways of the Forefathers for a long time. Not every real American would make it through to the other side of a conflict such as that, though. Messy; perhaps necessary, perhaps not. America is teetering on the brink right now of continuing as the wise forefathers intended, or being rotted from the inside out by piece of shit leftists.
You've been burning the shit out of it ever since Trump stole the office.

In what manner? I haven't changed in the least.
Most of Trump's actions run counter to Constitutional norms. He could give two shits about it.
So he should be removed from office because in your opinion Trump is a poopy-head? Yeah ... I'll get right on that. :laughing0301:
 
Yet you still fail to explain why no articles of impeachment. Can it be that beneath their bluster our Hysterical House Dems know the evidence just doesn't support impeachment and the voters will punish them for being petulant, bat-shit crazy A-holes in 2020?

They want a campaign issue. They know that trying to take him out now would be a losing proposition, since the Mueller report and the economy have drastically weakened their hand. That's why Pelosi is at odds with the rabid base. She knows it's a loser, they want it anyway. It's entertaining.
So they fill the otherwise empty heads of our BWKs with delusions of sugarplum fairies? What kind of traitors are our Democrat Socialists anyway?

BTW, it's gonna be tough to run against Trump's results using their failure to impeach as a campaign issue: "yeah, we had the evidence but chose not to impeach." They are gonna get slaughtered. :lol:

I ain't counting any chickens before they hatch. One more globalist or leftist president right now, and we may as well burn the Constitution or give your life trying to defend it at all costs.

To the man, if we're real Americans. I think the real Americans would win in a situation like that, and there would be no more "resistance" to the ways of the Forefathers for a long time. Not every real American would make it through to the other side of a conflict such as that, though. Messy; perhaps necessary, perhaps not. America is teetering on the brink right now of continuing as the wise forefathers intended, or being rotted from the inside out by piece of shit leftists.
The Right has been trying to hijack the forefathers for years to change the meaning of the Constitution. And you're still fos.

In what way? Are you seriously claiming you want to adhere to the Constitution?
I've been hearing for decades how the Right cherishes the Constitution. But once the racist in chief got in there, I haven't read one sentence where Republicans even mentioned the Constitution. Why? Because they saw a time in this election where they could push racism to the brink, and the Constitution be damned.
 
They want a campaign issue. They know that trying to take him out now would be a losing proposition, since the Mueller report and the economy have drastically weakened their hand. That's why Pelosi is at odds with the rabid base. She knows it's a loser, they want it anyway. It's entertaining.
So they fill the otherwise empty heads of our BWKs with delusions of sugarplum fairies? What kind of traitors are our Democrat Socialists anyway?

BTW, it's gonna be tough to run against Trump's results using their failure to impeach as a campaign issue: "yeah, we had the evidence but chose not to impeach." They are gonna get slaughtered. :lol:

I ain't counting any chickens before they hatch. One more globalist or leftist president right now, and we may as well burn the Constitution or give your life trying to defend it at all costs.

To the man, if we're real Americans. I think the real Americans would win in a situation like that, and there would be no more "resistance" to the ways of the Forefathers for a long time. Not every real American would make it through to the other side of a conflict such as that, though. Messy; perhaps necessary, perhaps not. America is teetering on the brink right now of continuing as the wise forefathers intended, or being rotted from the inside out by piece of shit leftists.
You've been burning the shit out of it ever since Trump stole the office.

In what manner? I haven't changed in the least.
Most of Trump's actions run counter to Constitutional norms. He could give two shits about it.

Oh? What does Article 4, section 4 of The constitution say? :rolleyes:

Most especially that second part. ;)
 
So they fill the otherwise empty heads of our BWKs with delusions of sugarplum fairies? What kind of traitors are our Democrat Socialists anyway?

BTW, it's gonna be tough to run against Trump's results using their failure to impeach as a campaign issue: "yeah, we had the evidence but chose not to impeach." They are gonna get slaughtered. :lol:

I ain't counting any chickens before they hatch. One more globalist or leftist president right now, and we may as well burn the Constitution or give your life trying to defend it at all costs.

To the man, if we're real Americans. I think the real Americans would win in a situation like that, and there would be no more "resistance" to the ways of the Forefathers for a long time. Not every real American would make it through to the other side of a conflict such as that, though. Messy; perhaps necessary, perhaps not. America is teetering on the brink right now of continuing as the wise forefathers intended, or being rotted from the inside out by piece of shit leftists.
You've been burning the shit out of it ever since Trump stole the office.

In what manner? I haven't changed in the least.
Most of Trump's actions run counter to Constitutional norms. He could give two shits about it.
So he should be removed from office because in your opinion Trump is a poopy-head? Yeah ... I'll get right on that. :laughing0301:
Nadler: 'We will hold this president accountable — one way, or the other.'

What are you all afraid of? This link is exactly why he should be removed, along with dozens of other reasons.
 
I ain't counting any chickens before they hatch. One more globalist or leftist president right now, and we may as well burn the Constitution or give your life trying to defend it at all costs.

To the man, if we're real Americans. I think the real Americans would win in a situation like that, and there would be no more "resistance" to the ways of the Forefathers for a long time. Not every real American would make it through to the other side of a conflict such as that, though. Messy; perhaps necessary, perhaps not. America is teetering on the brink right now of continuing as the wise forefathers intended, or being rotted from the inside out by piece of shit leftists.
You've been burning the shit out of it ever since Trump stole the office.

In what manner? I haven't changed in the least.
Most of Trump's actions run counter to Constitutional norms. He could give two shits about it.
So he should be removed from office because in your opinion Trump is a poopy-head? Yeah ... I'll get right on that. :laughing0301:
Nadler: 'We will hold this president accountable — one way, or the other.'

What are you all afraid of? This link is exactly why he should be removed, along with dozens of other reasons.

Ok 1/435 with power Nadler says that, meanwhile the CMFIC has much more power.

Mr. 1/435 Nadler can fuck off, dipshit. Perspective, get you some.
 
So they fill the otherwise empty heads of our BWKs with delusions of sugarplum fairies? What kind of traitors are our Democrat Socialists anyway?

BTW, it's gonna be tough to run against Trump's results using their failure to impeach as a campaign issue: "yeah, we had the evidence but chose not to impeach." They are gonna get slaughtered. :lol:

I ain't counting any chickens before they hatch. One more globalist or leftist president right now, and we may as well burn the Constitution or give your life trying to defend it at all costs.

To the man, if we're real Americans. I think the real Americans would win in a situation like that, and there would be no more "resistance" to the ways of the Forefathers for a long time. Not every real American would make it through to the other side of a conflict such as that, though. Messy; perhaps necessary, perhaps not. America is teetering on the brink right now of continuing as the wise forefathers intended, or being rotted from the inside out by piece of shit leftists.
You've been burning the shit out of it ever since Trump stole the office.

In what manner? I haven't changed in the least.
Most of Trump's actions run counter to Constitutional norms. He could give two shits about it.

Oh? What does Article 4, section 4 of The constitution say? :rolleyes:

Most especially that second part. ;)
Is this what you are talking about?
Republic
republic n 1 : a government having a chief of state who is not a monarch and is usually a president; also : a nation or other political unit having such a government 2 : a government in which supreme power is held by the citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives governing according to law; also : a nation or other political unit having such a form of government Source: NMW

In the context of the United States, both definitions apply.
In article 4 section 4 it isn't talking about the Republican party. You see what I mean about hijacking the Constitution and what it "REALLY" means?

It also tells us Trump is not a monarch.The new Republican fad.
 
You've been burning the shit out of it ever since Trump stole the office.

In what manner? I haven't changed in the least.
Most of Trump's actions run counter to Constitutional norms. He could give two shits about it.
So he should be removed from office because in your opinion Trump is a poopy-head? Yeah ... I'll get right on that. :laughing0301:
Nadler: 'We will hold this president accountable — one way, or the other.'

What are you all afraid of? This link is exactly why he should be removed, along with dozens of other reasons.

Ok 1/435 with power Nadler says that, meanwhile the CMFIC has much more power.

Mr. 1/435 Nadler can fuck off, dipshit. Perspective, get you some.
Nadler didn't write the report DA. Mueller did. Lol! see how stupid all this makes you look?

And telling him to fuck off isn't going to work for you either.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top