This is Why Blacks Don't Listen to Black Sellouts

[John T. Ford]

IM2 and MarcATL will spend their lives pouring over history books and Democrat funded Racism "Studies", all to justify the hatred they carry around. Life is too short to hate anyone.

Dude ...

These sick Leftist RACIST fvcks don't read books.

They are only capable of parroting what the Marxist Fake News MSM tells them.

You give these RACIST sick FVCKS way to much credit!!!

 

[cnm]

“Society” does not provide it.

I'd like to see you get it without 'society'.

 

[cnm]

Starting in the 1920s and surging in the 1940s, blacks left the farms and flocked to the cities. The cities provided good paying jobs where blacks could buy homes and raise families


By the 1970s, those manufacturing jobs left the cities and blacks were left behind to fend for themselves. That led to a break up of black families

And Blacks had been/were formally prevented from investing in property in the suburbs to generate a wealth foundation.

 

[cnm]

IM2 and MarcATL will spend their lives pouring over history books and Democrat funded Racism "Studies", all to justify the hatred they carry around. Life is too short to hate anyone.

It appears life is also too short to recognise even recent injustices, let alone older ones.

 

[IM2]

What have Republicans done to help minorities or poor people?

Can you point to a single piece of GOP legislation that helped the poor or minorities more than the rich?

Ever heard of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Go ahead with your psycho Leftist history revisionist LIES and say that was Democrat legislation.

Nah, we don't have to do that. Not when we have the vote totals.

As it pertains to the Civil Rights Act, 153 democrats and 139 republicans voted in favor of the legislation in the house . In the senate, 46 democrats and 27 republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act.

HR. 7152, Senate vote on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Jun 19, 1964 HR. 7152. PASSAGE. -- Senate Vote #409 -- Jun 19, 1964

H.R. 7152. Civil Rights Act of 1964. Adoption of a resolution (h. Res. 789) providing for house approval of the bill as amended by the Senate, Jul 2, 1964 H.R. 7152. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. ADOPTION OF A ... -- House Vote #182 -- Jul 2, 1964.

 

[IM2]

IM2 and MarcATL will spend their lives pouring over history books and Democrat funded Racism "Studies", all to justify the hatred they carry around. Life is too short to hate anyone.

You're the one carrying hatred. Marc and I use facts to end it.

 

[John T. Ford]

IM2 and MarcATL will spend their lives pouring over history books and Democrat funded Racism "Studies", all to justify the hatred they carry around. Life is too short to hate anyone.

It appears life is also too short to recognise even recent injustices, let alone older ones.

I am sorry my sick Leftist friends ...


Your delusional injustices do not calculate in reality.

Thanks for playing anyway.

 

[IM2]

What did you root for him to do for Black people?

I didn't root for Obama to do shit.

That Marxist POS is responsible for more poverty and suffering among Black Americans since any President in modern history.

But, your boi Bejing Biden is about to break that record.

How does t make you feel to watch "your people" suffer under Marxism.

You should be a proud racist POS !!!

No he isn't . But that's what you racists tell yourselves.

 

[IM2]

IM2 and MarcATL will spend their lives pouring over history books and Democrat funded Racism "Studies", all to justify the hatred they carry around. Life is too short to hate anyone.

It appears life is also too short to recognise even recent injustices, let alone older ones.

I am sorry my sick Leftist friends ...


Your delusional injustices do not calculate in reality.

Thanks for playing anyway.

Except you are the delusional one. That's why you're in here, off topic talking about anything but the OP.

 

[John T. Ford]

What have Republicans done to help minorities or poor people?

Can you point to a single piece of GOP legislation that helped the poor or minorities more than the rich?

Ever heard of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Go ahead with your psycho Leftist history revisionist LIES and say that was Democrat legislation.

Nah, we don't have to do that. Not when we have the vote totals.

As it pertains to the Civil Rights Act, 153 democrats and 139 republicans voted in favor of the legislation in the house . In the senate, 46 democrats and 27 republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act.

HR. 7152, Senate vote on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Jun 19, 1964 HR. 7152. PASSAGE. -- Senate Vote #409 -- Jun 19, 1964

H.R. 7152. Civil Rights Act of 1964. Adoption of a resolution (h. Res. 789) providing for house approval of the bill as amended by the Senate, Jul 2, 1964 H.R. 7152. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. ADOPTION OF A ... -- House Vote #182 -- Jul 2, 1964.

History revisionist SHIT .....

Exactly what I expected from a RACIST POS like you ...

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. warn us against RACIST POS like you on August 28, 1963.

We know who you sick fvcks are .....

And, we are paying attention ....

 

[IM2]

This is the OP:

"In the late 1800s, depending on the city, 70% to 80% of black households were two-parent. Dr. Thomas Sowell has argued, “The black family, which had survived centuries of slavery and discrimination, began rapidly disintegrating in the liberal welfare state that subsidized unwed pregnancy and changed welfare from an emergency rescue to a way of life.”

The Social Security Act of 1935 created the Social Security program, state unemployment insurance, and assistance to single women with children. Today most Americans love the program. However, when the act was signed, the law was made to exclude occupations that were mainly occupied by blacks. When President Roosevelt signed the law, 65 percent of blacks in America were ineligible. So for years a majority of blacks were excluded from social security savings and could not get unemployment.

Time out! Hold up! Whoa! Let’s take a short break from the action to talk about the assistance to single women with children part of the Social Security Act. Title 4 or IV of the social security act of 1935 called for grants in aid to be provided to each stated as Aid To Dependent Children. “ For the purpose of enabling each State to furnish financial assistance, as far as practicable under the conditions in such State, to needy dependent children, there is hereby authorized to be appropriated for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1936, the sum of $24,750,000, and there is hereby authorized to be appropriated for each fiscal year thereafter a sum sufficient to carry out the purposes of this title. The sums made available under this section shall be used for making payments to States which have submitted, and had approved by the Board, State plans for aid to dependent children.”

This was welfare folks. Assistance for single moms with children without daddy at home. In 1935. Blacks were excluded. Seems that Sowell is unable to point this out and in fact this is part of long tradition of taking care of poor single parent white families.

Aid to Dependent Children or ADC (later renamed Aid to Families with Dependent Children, AFDC) was Title IV of the Social Security Act of 1935. At first it functioned mainly to provide federal grants to help the states maintain their mothers’ aid laws that had been passed in 40 states between 1910 and 1920. With the federal government providing 1/3 of costs, the program offered aid to poor parents, imagined at that time to be always female, caring for children without a husband.

The ADC plan was written by the former directors of the U.S. Children’s Bureau in the Department of Labor, Grace Abbott and Katherine Lenroot. They lobbied hard to get this program added to the Social Security bill, which was aimed at male breadwinners, reflecting the masculinist assumptions and composition of the Committee on Economic Security (CES) that wrote the bill. The Children’s Bureau’s goal was to provide aid to all children whose mothers lacked the support of a breadwinner, no matter how they got to that position.

Aid To Dependent Children: The Legal History​

For its first three decades, AFDC operated much like a private charity, with its case workers given discretion in investigating clients, cutting off benefits to those determined to be unsuitable, a…

socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu

Children’s Bureau​

Written by Kriste Lindenmeyer, Ph.D., Professor of History, University of Maryland, Baltimore County. The establishment of the U.S. Children’s Bureau in 1912 marked a high point in the effort by ma…

socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu

From the time of the Childrens Bureau until 1965 no one talked about how the welfare state was wrong and subsisided the disintegration of the white family. It was seen as essential assistance needed to help women without husbands who had children. Only when the law required that others be included did the story change to how the welfare state was wrong and destructive.

As late as 1950, only 18% of black households were single parent. From 1890 to 1940, a slightly higher percentage of black adults had married than white adults. In 1938, black illegitimacy was about 11% instead of today’s 75%. In 1925, 85% of black households in New York City were two-parent. Today, the black family is a mere shadow of its past."-Walter Williams

In 1938 During this time of great black 2 parent family morality, the poverty rate for blacks was 80 percent. In 1959, it was 55 percent. These sky high rates of poverty occurred during the time these fools rant about the black 2 parent family. Today due to the " liberal welfare state breaking up the black family by giving them welfare" black poverty is half of what it was in 1959 and more than 1/3 of what it was in those grand old glorious days of the two parent black family.

Blacks afflicted with Internalized racism repeating bs from Daniel Moynihan should not be taken seriously in any discussion on matters of race in America.

Ross, C., Danziger, S. & Smolensky, E. The level and trend of poverty in the United States, 1939–1979. Demography 24, 587–600 (1987). The level and trend of poverty in the United States, 1939–1979 | Demography | Duke University Press

Table 2. Poverty Status of People by Family Relationship, Race, and Hispanic Origin: 1959 to 2014, US Department of the Census, http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/historical/people.html

And the OP shows that both Sowell and Williams were completely wrong.

 

[cnm]

Your delusional injustices do not calculate in reality.

This lies?

How the GI Bill's Promise Was Denied to a Million Black ...​

While the GI Bill's language did not specifically exclude African-American veterans from its benefits, it was structured in a way that ultimately shut doors for the 1.2 million Black veterans ...​

 

[IM2]

What have Republicans done to help minorities or poor people?

Can you point to a single piece of GOP legislation that helped the poor or minorities more than the rich?

Ever heard of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Go ahead with your psycho Leftist history revisionist LIES and say that was Democrat legislation.

Nah, we don't have to do that. Not when we have the vote totals.

As it pertains to the Civil Rights Act, 153 democrats and 139 republicans voted in favor of the legislation in the house . In the senate, 46 democrats and 27 republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act.

HR. 7152, Senate vote on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Jun 19, 1964 HR. 7152. PASSAGE. -- Senate Vote #409 -- Jun 19, 1964

H.R. 7152. Civil Rights Act of 1964. Adoption of a resolution (h. Res. 789) providing for house approval of the bill as amended by the Senate, Jul 2, 1964 H.R. 7152. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. ADOPTION OF A ... -- House Vote #182 -- Jul 2, 1964.

History revisionist SHIT .....

Exactly what I expected from a RACIST POS like you ...

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. warn us against RACIST POS like you on August 28, 1963.

We know who you sick fvcks are .....

And, we are paying attention ....

Nothing revised about documented congressional records.

You can't accurately quote King any better than your racist ass can hamdle the truth.

On May 8, 1967, King warned us about racists like you:
MLK: 'My Dream Has Become A Nightmare'


You missed that one, didn't ya boy?

 

[IM2]

Your delusional injustices do not calculate in reality.

This lies?

How the GI Bill's Promise Was Denied to a Million Black ...​

While the GI Bill's language did not specifically exclude African-American veterans from its benefits, it was structured in a way that ultimately shut doors for the 1.2 million Black veterans ...​

My father was one of those 1.2 million.

 

[Canon Shooter]

Your delusional injustices do not calculate in reality.

This lies?

How the GI Bill's Promise Was Denied to a Million Black ...​

While the GI Bill's language did not specifically exclude African-American veterans from its benefits, it was structured in a way that ultimately shut doors for the 1.2 million Black veterans ...​

My father was one of those 1.2 million.

C'mon now, IM2, what's the dollar amount? Why are you so afraid to answer that?

 

[IM2]

Only when the law required that others be included did the story change to how the welfare state was wrong and destructive.

Bears repeating. American posters have also told me that's the reason the US cannot go to single payer health care, it doesn't want Blacks getting 'free stuff'. One has only to read this message bored to see that's a reasonable supposition.

That's not correct.
The US healthcare market is valued at around 5 TRILLION dollars
Under Obamacare the insurance company profits on ACA policies was limited to 15%.
Do you think some racism one way or another is really going to impact the decision to walk away from a guaranteed 750 billion annually?

The only color in this equation is green.

Truthfully there are whites out there with this sentiment. Because if gree was the only color that mattered you would not see things like this:

“Striving for racial equity – a world where race is no longer a factor in the distribution of opportunity – is a matter of social justice. But moving toward racial equity can generate significant economic returns as well. When people face barriers to achieving their full potential, the loss of talent, creativity, energy, and productivity is a burden not only for those disadvantaged, but for communities, businesses, governments, and the economy as a whole. Initial research on the magnitude of this burden in the United States (U.S.), as highlighted in this brief, reveals impacts in the trillions of dollars in lost earnings, avoidable public expenditures, and lost economic output.”

The Kellogg Foundation and Altarum Institute

“The U.S. racial welth gap is substantial and is driven by public policy decisions. According to our analysis of the SIPP data, in 2011 the median white household had $111,146 in wealth holdings, compared to just $7,113 for the median Black household and $8,348 for the median Latino household. From the continuing impact of redlining on American homeownership to the retreat from desegregation in public education, public policy has shaped these disparities, leaving them impossible to overcome without racially-aware policy change.”

DEMOS
​

Since 2000, U.S. gross domestic product lost that much as a result of discriminatory practices in a range of areas, including in education and access to business loans, according to a new study by Citigroup. Specifically, the study came up with $16 trillion in lost GDP by noting four key racial gaps between African Americans and whites:

$13 trillion lost in potential business revenue because of discriminatory lending to African American entrepreneurs, with an estimated 6.1 million jobs not generated as a result

$2.7 trillion in income lost because of disparities in wages suffered by African Americans

$218 billion lost over the past two decades because of discrimination in providing housing credit

And $90 billion to $113 billion in lifetime income lost from discrimination in accessing higher education

“It will end up costing the U.S. economy as much as $1 trillion between now and 2028 for the nation to maintain its longstanding black-white racial wealth gap, according to a report released this month from the global consultancy firm McKinsey & Company. That will be roughly 4 percent of the United States GDP in 2028—just the conservative view, assuming that the wealth growth rates of African Americans will outpace white wealth growth at its current clip of 3 percent to .8 percent annually, said McKinsey. If the gap widens, however, with white wealth growing at a faster rate than black wealth instead, it could end up costing the U.S. $1.5 trillion or 6 percent of GDP according to the firm.”

Brentin Mock, “White Americans’ Hold on Wealth Is Old, Deep, and Nearly Unshakeable”

 

[cnm]

The US healthcare market is valued at around 5 TRILLION dollars
Under Obamacare the insurance company profits on ACA policies was limited to 15%.
Do you think some racism one way or another is really going to impact the decision to walk away from a guaranteed 750 billion annually?

The only color in this equation is green.

It's almost as though insurance companies determine legislation rather than a Congress elected by Americans.

 

[MarathonMike]

You're the one carrying hatred. Marc and I use facts to end it.

I don't hate anyone, certainly not Black people. If I did, I wouldn't be managing a Black Deaths Matter thread calling attention to the Black carnage in the inner cities. I notice that you and Marc do a nice job of ignoring that misery and carnage. Why is that?

 

[Canon Shooter]

Only when the law required that others be included did the story change to how the welfare state was wrong and destructive.

Bears repeating. American posters have also told me that's the reason the US cannot go to single payer health care, it doesn't want Blacks getting 'free stuff'. One has only to read this message bored to see that's a reasonable supposition.

That's not correct.
The US healthcare market is valued at around 5 TRILLION dollars
Under Obamacare the insurance company profits on ACA policies was limited to 15%.
Do you think some racism one way or another is really going to impact the decision to walk away from a guaranteed 750 billion annually?

The only color in this equation is green.

Truthfully there are whites out there with this sentiment. Because if gree was the only color that mattered you would not see things like this:

“Striving for racial equity – a world where race is no longer a factor in the distribution of opportunity – is a matter of social justice. But moving toward racial equity can generate significant economic returns as well. When people face barriers to achieving their full potential, the loss of talent, creativity, energy, and productivity is a burden not only for those disadvantaged, but for communities, businesses, governments, and the economy as a whole. Initial research on the magnitude of this burden in the United States (U.S.), as highlighted in this brief, reveals impacts in the trillions of dollars in lost earnings, avoidable public expenditures, and lost economic output.”

The Kellogg Foundation and Altarum Institute

“The U.S. racial welth gap is substantial and is driven by public policy decisions. According to our analysis of the SIPP data, in 2011 the median white household had $111,146 in wealth holdings, compared to just $7,113 for the median Black household and $8,348 for the median Latino household. From the continuing impact of redlining on American homeownership to the retreat from desegregation in public education, public policy has shaped these disparities, leaving them impossible to overcome without racially-aware policy change.”

DEMOS
​

Since 2000, U.S. gross domestic product lost that much as a result of discriminatory practices in a range of areas, including in education and access to business loans, according to a new study by Citigroup. Specifically, the study came up with $16 trillion in lost GDP by noting four key racial gaps between African Americans and whites:

$13 trillion lost in potential business revenue because of discriminatory lending to African American entrepreneurs, with an estimated 6.1 million jobs not generated as a result

$2.7 trillion in income lost because of disparities in wages suffered by African Americans

$218 billion lost over the past two decades because of discrimination in providing housing credit

And $90 billion to $113 billion in lifetime income lost from discrimination in accessing higher education

“It will end up costing the U.S. economy as much as $1 trillion between now and 2028 for the nation to maintain its longstanding black-white racial wealth gap, according to a report released this month from the global consultancy firm McKinsey & Company. That will be roughly 4 percent of the United States GDP in 2028—just the conservative view, assuming that the wealth growth rates of African Americans will outpace white wealth growth at its current clip of 3 percent to .8 percent annually, said McKinsey. If the gap widens, however, with white wealth growing at a faster rate than black wealth instead, it could end up costing the U.S. $1.5 trillion or 6 percent of GDP according to the firm.”

Brentin Mock, “White Americans’ Hold on Wealth Is Old, Deep, and Nearly Unshakeable”

The vast majority of your posts are cut & paste. That clearly demonstrates that you lack the intellectual prowess required to formulate an original, intelligent thought. Just as you rely on the gub'mint for your monthly check, so do you rely on others for commentary which you present as your own. Plagiarism is sad.

How much are you owed, IM2? How much should you get to satisfy your craving for reparations?

Remember, if you can't come up with a number, you shouldn't expect anyone else to...

 

[cnm]

Why is that?

Probably because Redlining, White Flight, restrictions on accessing the GI Bill and other methods used to corral Blacks in the inner cities were too effective to receive gratitude.