Seymour Flops
Diamond Member
- Nov 25, 2021
- 14,685
- 11,802
Exchange at 26
![45 :45: :45:](/styles/smilies/new/45.gif)
Congressman: Now, my understanding is that the AR he used, uh, on the thirteenth, was his father's, is that correct?
Wray: Well, yes and no. It was orig - his father bought it, legally, but then, our understanding so far is that his father then conveyed it to him, sold it, in fact, to his son. Ah, so, originally his father's, at the time of the shooting, the shooter's.
Congressman: Ok, so that's new information and was that provided to you by the father?
Wray: Uh . . . I think it was partly from that. I think we also saw some documentation to support it.
Sold his own son a gun, with documentation? That would make sense only to someone who did not grow up around guns, and knows nothing about them.
I've given each of my kids a gun, from our family collection, and I never considered charging them for it, nor having them sign for it.
I'd say that best interpretation is that the dad was very aware of the Ethan Crumbley case in which the school shooter's parents were sentenced to ten years for providing him a pistol.
This dad needs to be looked into. He cannot be allowed to get away with any culpability in trying to not only kill a man, but to kill a future president and ignite a civil war in this country. If the Crumbleys are guilty, so is he, because he also provided a gun to a mass shooter.