The Original Tree
Diamond Member
Wouldn't it be easier just to call your bosses Putin and Xi and ask what I meant?Reaching by my conserabonics decoder…
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wouldn't it be easier just to call your bosses Putin and Xi and ask what I meant?Reaching by my conserabonics decoder…
Wouldn’t it be easier for you just to post in normal language and use common sense?Wouldn't it be easier just to call your bosses Putin and Xi and ask what I meant?
So the fact that a minority of voters have voted for the President in 2016 and yet gained the Presidency doesn't bother youWrong again, Letch. My insistence on speaking correctly is because it furthers a quality and accurate discussion on this matter, and it serves to correct your misbegotten and ignorant assertions. I do not, in fact, support a rule of (or by) a minority; nor would I support a majority rule which violates our basic rights. That is without regard to your shallow understanding of our Famers’ intent.
Of course you don't...since they don't agree with your warped politicsI again don’t care what any one of the Framers would have envisioned.
You mean like you DemTard DemNazi brainwashed religious zealots communicate with anyone or anything they view as Conservative like below?Wouldn’t it be easier for you just to post in normal language and use common sense?
When he became an operative for pseudo-conservative voodoo economics and a paid climate science denier. His academic credibility has disappeared. Now he is just crowd funding his retirement by preying on stupid people.When did tom sewell give up on Democracy?
Does he mention it?
Your question is really simple. Do I favor the Electoral College? The answer is also simple. Yes. I do. It doesn’t bother me at all.So the fact that a minority of voters have voted for the President in 2016 and yet gained the Presidency doesn't bother you
Nope. It didn’t seem to bother you when the SCOTUS had a significant liberal voting block. I’m more concerned with whether they employ rational and meaningful legal analysis in determining big cases and controversies.The fact that that same minority is responsible for 6 of the 9 SC Justices doesn't bother you
Not even a little. It was designed to accommodate differences between states of larger populations vs states with smaller populations. Another method to avoid the tyranny of a minority (or a majority).The fact that Republican voters cast millions fewer votes for Senate and House and still have almost equal representation doesn't bother you.
One might think you were dishonest...DOUCHEBAG (since we're calling names)
My politics aren’t the warped ones, child. I survived an overtly liberal activist SCOTUS for a very long time. Now, you’re bellyaching that the pendulum has started to swing back a bit. Too bad. So sad. Get over yourself.Of course you don't...since they don't agree with your warped politics
So you're OK with people voting for NAZIs?And there it is, the admission of authoritarianism because people don’t vote the way I want them to.
You obviously don't know a thing about him. You're regurgitating leftwing smears.When he became an operative for pseudo-conservative voodoo economics and a paid climate science denier. His academic credibility has disappeared. Now he is just crowd funding his retirement by preying on stupid people.
The Stoopid is strong in you, and your friend Hunter too.When he became an operative for pseudo-conservative voodoo economics and a paid climate science denier. His academic credibility has disappeared. Now he is just crowd funding his retirement by preying on stupid people.
Infinitely more than you ever will, because you don't read. You are astonishingly and aggressively ignorant, and your baby posts are ineffectual.You obviously don't know a thing about him.
Would it bother you if the majority were NAZIs and they selected the SC judges?So the fact that a minority of voters have voted for the President in 2016 and yet gained the Presidency doesn't bother you
The fact that that same minority is responsible for 6 of the 9 SC Justices doesn't bother you
The fact that Republican voters cast millions fewer votes for Senate and House and still have almost equal representation doesn't bother you.
One might think you were dishonest...DOUCHEBAG (since we're calling names)
Of course you don't...since they don't agree with your warped politics
It's far more than the Electoral College. Republicans have an outsized representation in all three branches of government and you love thatYour question is really simple. Do I favor the Electoral College? The answer is also simple. Yes. I do. It doesn’t bother me at all.
There was never a liberal majority in the SC in my lifetime. I'm 68Nope. It didn’t seem to bother you when the SCOTUS had a significant liberal voting block.
Just making a stupid claim like that shows how warped your politics are...assholeMy politics aren’t the warped ones, child. I survived an overtly liberal activist SCOTUS for a very long time.
I've read almost every book he ever wrote. You obviously haven't. You apparently believe he once stupported prog horseshit, which he never has.Infinitely more than you ever will, because you don't read. You are astonishingly and aggressively ignorant, and your baby posts are ineffectual.
Great! Some decent ones in there.I've read almost every book he ever wrote.
It is what it is. But your reference to “outsized” is really just your petty complaint that you don’t care for that result. So what? I don’t care for the fact that big cities are being ruined by Democrap governments.It's far more than the Electoral College. Republicans have an outsized representation in all three branches of government and you love that
Bullshit.There was never a liberal majority in the SC in my lifetime. I'm 68
Just denying it shows what a totally dishonest hack you are, you shlub. Your politics are the warped ones by the way.Just making a stupid claim like that shows how warped your politics are...asshole
Great! Some decent ones in there.
But that was then, and this is now. Times have changed. Sowell has obliterated his academic credibility. He should have stayed in his intellectual lane.
No, the global scientific community doesn't agree with the paid denier Sowell.Translation: Farty doesn’t agree now with Sowell.
What has he said that "obliterated his academic credibility?"Great! Some decent ones in there.
But that was then, and this is now. Times have changed. Sowell has obliterated his academic credibility. He should have stayed in his intellectual lane.
Did you get your free Hunter and Joe Biden Autographed Crack Pipe today or did you run out of Puberty Blockers?Infinitely more than you ever will, because you don't read. You are astonishingly and aggressively ignorant, and your baby posts are ineffectual.
The idea that "global scientific community" on a given controversial topic is the sure sign of an ignoramus.No, the global scientific community doesn't agree with the paid denier Sowell.
Not that this matters to a person like you.