Those who would impose strict gun laws and gun bans

Lets face it.......gun grabbing nutters are drawn to internet message boards to sound off trying desperately get their message out. Obviously, its a far cry from the public's mindset in 2014. Sucks for them.......but thank God most of society is sensible on this stuff.
You`re kidding right? Look how many threads are begun by gun control advocates and how many are begun by gun fondlers and then tell us again who is using message boards to help spread their paranoia. Paranoia with a side order of racism for good measure.


s0n.......bubble dwelling is gay.

Virtually ALL of the gun threads are started by the mental cases on here like Dot Com and Joe B. Actually.....almost daily!! Not that I'm complaining........they are by far the most fun of all the threads on his particular forum. Making fun of these mental cases is a hoot......especially when they post up stuff as if it is the prevailing consensus of the public. The recent Gallup poll pretty much says it all.......gun grabbing hasnt been this unpopular since...........ready for this..........1959!!! 56 years!!!!!:rock::rock::rock::fu:
I only went back a few pages to find 5 gun threads. 4 of those 5 were started by gunaholics.
 
How do you as an unarmed citizen handle a lone wolf terrorist that is armed and has you in his sight?
They are here and want to do you harm you don't have time to call for the Police so what do you do when you don';t have a gun and he does?

Pretty sure armed or not you are dead. Can't draw and shoot faster than he can pull the trigger.
 
Bigreb has a point

In establishing a national gun policy, we need to weigh the possibility of guns being used to ward off an attack by crazed terrorists against those guns being used in crime, mass killings, murder, domestic violence, suicide and children accidently killing themselves

Once we look at the plusses and minuses of gun ownership we can develop a sensible policy



Yeah....but fringe sentiments have zero impact on public policy s0n. You dont quite get it.:up:

In 2014, "sensible" is defined as run like hell to the gun store and buy a gun and tons of ammo. That's the way the public reacts ( see suburban Boston gun sales/NRS membership explosion after the Boston Bombing ). Of course, this makes the gun grabber fringe heads explode but it just the way it is.
Nobody is screaming for confiscation. That is only a scare tactic of the right. Limiting high capacity magazines, background checks and registration is sensible
 
How do you as an unarmed citizen handle a lone wolf terrorist that is armed and has you in his sight?
They are here and want to do you harm you don't have time to call for the Police so what do you do when you don';t have a gun and he does?

How many lone wolf terrorist have been taken down by Second Amendment Advocates...

Um....

Zero.

but we did have 32,000 gun deaths and 78,000 gun injuries last year. That's like 10 9-11 attacks. Every year.

The terrorists don't need to attack us when we are doing such a number on ourselves.
Most of the deaths were suicides. Be specific, how do you intend to stop suicides? Further there are over 200000 injuries every year from doctors, when will you demand we ban them? 320 million people and yet even counting injuries and suicides that is only 110000. Do the math. More people die and are injured every year in car accidents.
 

Forum List

Back
Top