*Three Little Rino's*

All three are 100% pure

Zionist 911 W "Biden Republicans"


who care more about preventing 911 truth from coming out than anything else....
Oh, here we go. The spiral down into conspiracy theory looney-tunes has officially begun.
 
Oh, here we go. The spiral down into conspiracy theory looney-tunes has officially begun.
That is a response we expect to hear from you liberal Democrats. You also claimed pizzagate was fake, but Madison Cawthorn proved QAnon was right.
 
Oh, here we go. The spiral down into conspiracy theory looney-tunes has officially begun.


Is it anti semitic to notice the truth that ALL of the "Biden Republicans" are Zionist 911 W supporters....???


Some here just go batshit when truth is posted about Zionist Fascism....


Einstein Letter Warning Of
Zionist Fascism In Israel
Letter That Albert Einstein Sent to the New York Times
1948, Protesting the Visit of Menachem Begin

11-1-4
1036081927.jpeg

Letters to the EditorNew York TimesDecember 4, 1948 TO THE EDITORS OF THE NEW YORK TIMES: Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the "Freedom Party" (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formed out of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine.
einstein.jpg
The current visit of Menachem Begin, leader of this party, to the United States is obviously calculated to give the impression of American support for his party in the coming Israeli elections, and to cement political ties with conservative Zionist elements in the United States. Several Americans of national repute have lent their names to welcome his visit. It is inconceivable that those who oppose fascism throughoutthe world, if correctly informed as to Mr. Begin's political record and perspectives, could add their names and support to the movement he represents. Before irreparable damage is done by way of financial contributions, public manifestations in Begin's behalf, and the creation in Palestine of the impression that a large segment of America supports Fascist elements in Israel, the American public must be informed as to the record and objectives of Mr. Begin and his movement. The public avowals of Begin's party are no guide whatever to its actual character. Today they speak of freedom, democracy and anti-imperialism, whereas until recently they openly preached the doctrine of the Fascist state. It is in its actions that the terrorist party betrays its real character; from its past actions we can judge what it may be expected to do in the future. Attack on Arab Village A shocking example was their behavior in the Arab village of Deir Yassin. This village, off the main roads and surrounded by Jewish lands, had taken no part in the war, and had even fought off Arab bands who wanted to use the village as their base. On April 9 (THE NEW YORK TIMES), terrorist bands attacked this peaceful village, which was not a military objective in the fighting, killed most of its inhabitants ? 240men, women, and children - and kept a few of them alive to parade as captives through the streets of Jerusalem. Most of the Jewish community was horrified at the deed, and the Jewish Agency sent a telegram of apology to King Abdullah of Trans-Jordan. But the terrorists, far from being ashamed of their act, were proud of this massacre, publicized it widely, and invited all the foreign correspondents present in the country to view the heaped corpses and the general havoc at Deir Yassin. The Deir Yassin incident exemplifies the character and actions of the Freedom Party. Within the Jewish community they have preached an admixture of ultranationalism, religious mysticism, and racial superiority. Like other Fascist parties they have been used to break strikes, and have themselves pressed for the destruction of free trade unions. In their stead they have proposed corporate unions on the Italian Fascist model. During the last years of sporadic anti-British violence, the IZL and Stern groups inaugurated a reign of terror in the Palestine Jewish community. Teachers were beaten up for speaking against them, adults were shot for not letting their children join them. By gangster methods, beatings, window-smashing, and wide-spread robberies, the terrorists intimidated the population and exacted a heavy tribute. The people of the Freedom Party have had no part in the constructive achievements in Palestine. They have reclaimed no land, built no settlements, and only detracted from the Jewish defense activity. Their much-publicized immigration endeavors were minute, and devoted mainly to bringing in Fascist compatriots. Discrepancies Seen The discrepancies between the bold claims now being made by Begin and his party, and their record of past performance in Palestine bear the imprint of no ordinary political party. This is the unmistakable stamp of a Fascist party for whom terrorism (against Jews, Arabs, and British alike), and misrepresentation are means, and a "Leader State" is the goal. In the light of the foregoing considerations, it is imperative that the truth about Mr. Begin and his movement be made known in this country. It is all the more tragic that the top leadership of American Zionism has refused to campaign against Begin's efforts, or even to expose to its own constituents the dangers to Israel from support to Begin. The undersigned therefore take this means of publicly presenting a few salient facts concerning Begin and his party; and of urging all concerned not to support this latest manifestation of fascism. ISIDORE ABRAMOWITZHANNAH ARENDTABRAHAM BRICKRABBI JESSURUN CARDOZOALBERT EINSTEINHERMAN EISEN, M.D.HAYIM FINEMANM. GALLEN, M.D.H.H. HARRISZELIG S. HARRISSIDNEY HOOKFRED KARUSHBRURIA KAUFMANIRMA L. LINDHEIMNACHMAN MAISELSEYMOUR MELMANMYER D. MENDELSONM.D., HARRY M. OSLINSKYSAMUEL PITLICKFRITZ ROHRLICHLOUIS P. ROCKERRUTH SAGISITZHAK SANKOWSKYI.J. SHOENBERGSAMUEL SHUMANM. SINGERIRMA WOLFESTEFAN WOLF. New York, Dec. 2, 1948
 
Maybe it's time to just junk this thread and toss it in the Conspiracy Forum. Once the nuts get going, it's all over. This is where an irrational insistence on ideological purity always seems to lead. The desperate need to cling to an identity is not a healthy thing. The insistence that every single member of a political party be in ideological lockstep at all times on all issues is unrealistic and self-defeating.
 
have you noticed her skin tone?
Bullshit. If she were as white as Snow White with albinism, but otherwise held the exact politically-ideological views as Judge Brown, I am quite sure she would be opposed to the same degree. This ongoing canard, this mindless platitude, this “go to” accusation to the effect that the GOP is “racist” has no relationship to the real world. It’s easy, cheap and intellectually dishonest to keep resorting to that claim and to never even feel an inclination to support it.

Let’s make it simple. She has smarts. She has legal and judicial experience. She seems like a nice enough person. She Is qualified. But just because she is qualified doesn’t mean she deserves support for the SCOTUS bench. And opposition to her confirmation doesn’t have any nexus to her race.

Instead, her confirmation. is worthy of opposition because her partisan political views seem to govern her judicial philosophy — which they shouldn’t. The polestar OUGHT to be what the Constitution says and what it is intended to permit or to disallow.
 
Where did you get that from


She's praised by libertarian cato institute. So she's approved by the libertarians.
ext, Cruz asked Jackson, “do you hold a position on whether individuals possess natural rights, yes or no?”
“I do not hold a position on whether individuals possess natural rights,” Jackson said.

 
Where did you get that from


She's praised by libertarian cato institute. So she's approved by the libertarians.
They didn't quote a single thing she said in support of freedom. The praised her for bringing "professional diversity
to the court. What the fuck does that have to do with freedom?
 
They didn't quote a single thing she said in support of freedom. The praised her for bringing "professional diversity
to the court. What the fuck does that have to do with freedom?
also it says there she's "active and thoughtful champion of civil liberties. So much so that genuine libertarians—a rare breed, to be sure—are quite enthusiastic about her nomination."

also has support from Justin Amash.
 
also it says there she's "active and thoughtful champion of civil liberties. So much so that genuine libertarians—a rare breed, to be sure—are quite enthusiastic about her nomination."

also has support from Justin Amash.
Didn't Amash vote to impeach Trump?
 
"You also claimed pizzagate was fake, but Madison Cawthorn proved QAnon was right."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I kinda would like to see the good poster, LennyPartiv, use the above as his forum signature.
It is a clear and unambigous identifier of a certain strain of thought we see here on this venue, and at GreatAwakening.win, and Conspiracies.win. The QAnon sites.
The signature would give notice to all on what to expect out of the poster.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"This is where an irrational insistence on ideological purity always seems to lead. The desperate need to cling to an identity is not a healthy thing. The insistence that every single member of a political party be in ideological lockstep at all times on all issues is unrealistic and self-defeating."

A hat-tip to poster Unkotare.
You are doing good work on this thread.
 
also it says there she's "active and thoughtful champion of civil liberties. So much so that genuine libertarians—a rare breed, to be sure—are quite enthusiastic about her nomination."

also has support from Justin Amash.
How do you know they are genuine libertarians? On what basis do you make that claim.

All "supports civil liberties" means is the she supports the right of someone with a penis to take a piss next to my wife or daughter. It sure as hell doesn't mean freedom, and anyone who equates the two is no libertarian.
 
How do you know they are genuine libertarians? On what basis do you make that claim.

All "supports civil liberties" means is the she supports the right of someone with a penis to take a piss next to my wife or daughter. It sure as hell doesn't mean freedom, and anyone who equates the two is no libertarian.
we know genuine by how libertarians define civil liberties ->

 
we know genuine by how libertarians define civil liberties ->

What's your point? Since when do progs believe any of that?
 
Like you did with Cavanaugh?
Or did you know him already.
Don't recall commenting on him beyond the need for a full investigation. something Trump had the FBI squash.

Still, you failed to tell us what you are for.
 
Interesting how liberal Democrats think we should tolerate RINOs.

This confirmation vote is precisely why we can't tolerate RINOs.
 

Forum List

Back
Top