Time to Recuse: Tanya Chutkan, Trump's January 6 DC Judge, Donated Thousands to Barack Obama From 2008-2012

She won't recuse herself - Democrats are stacking the deck.

BS 1st Amendment-criminalizing charges,
Trial in Washington
Biased Obama judge who hates protestors

Trump will be found guilty
The USSC is going to overturn at least some of the charges / ruling

Why would she recuse herself? She gave no political donations to anyone involved in the case.
 
This is why I’m against religion. If you’ll believe that lie, then you’ll believe any lie. Jesus rose from the dead and trump dindu nuthin wrong.
Its not religion I have a problem with. Its the terrifying certainty that these headjobs have that they and ONLY they speak for God.

And thus their words are divine, infallible, and can justify any degree of coercion, violence or criminal activity to enforce.
 
If you are trying to compare the 2 no wonder you're goin ta hell...

:auiqs.jpg:
I’m just saying if you believe what preachers tell you then of course you’re dumb enough to listen to conservative republicans who say things like global warming isn’t real. Anti science.
 
Its not religion I have a problem with. Its the terrifying certainty that these headjobs have that they and ONLY they speak for God.

And thus their words are divine, infallible, and can justify any degree of coercion, violence or criminal activity to enforce.
And if god is on their side and they like trump then god must like trump too. They couldn’t possibly be wrong.
 
And if god is on their side and they like trump then god must like trump too. They couldn’t possibly be wrong.

And that's the problem. Not faith. Not religion. Not a relationship with God.

But the certainty that YOU can do no wrong because YOU and ONLY you speak for God. And thus, anything you make up carries with it the authority of the creator of the universe.

That logic has been used to justify every evil you can possibly imagine. From holy wars to slavery to genocide to mass rape.

And as MTG demonstrates elegantly......it can be used to justify smaller crimes. Conspiracy. Obstruction of Justice. Fraud.
 
First you said we were destroying the economy, that never happened.

We can’t have republicans rigging election. 2020 would have been the third time. Enough. You guys clearly don’t really like democracy. We’re not smart enough to vote right? We vote wrong?
~~~~~~
Really? Why was the U.S.A. credit rating downgraded today?
Remember Joey Xi Bai Dung has been running this country for two and a half years. He`s given us high inflation, supply side shortages, high fuel costs. and over 1.5 million unemployed, etc.
National Debit is $32 Trillion and rising.

**********​
**********​
**********​
 
Last edited:
~~~~~~
Really? Why was the U.S.A. credit rating downgraded today?
Remember Joey Xi Bai Dung as been running this country for two and a half years. He`s given us high inflation, supply side shortages, high fuel costs. and over 1.5 million unemployed, etc.

**********​
**********​
**********​
I knew this is how you’d spin it.

well, we either got to cut your social security or roll back the Reagan, bush and trump tax breaks. Which do you pick?
 
She should recuse herself!

But she won't................

Banana Republic of USA.
 
Who was Obama's VP? Yet you can't see the problem. Wow, cluelessness on this level used to be solely reserved for ditzy blondes.

She gave no political donations to anyone involved in the case.

You'll get no recusal.

Its just pre-emptive right wing justification for a Trump criminal conviction. Which tells us all that on some level....your ilk get how much evidence there is against Trump.
 
She's an Obama fanatic who donated to him. Trump's lawyers will seek a recusal from her. She has a huge conflict of interest.


Here are some of her donation records according to Open Secret:
Screenshot-2023-08-02-164739-1024x497.jpg
Cry harder! 🤣
 
No need to brew tea tonight. Piping hot MAGA tears are way better than Earl Grey.
They're gonna bitch about this judge, but they bitch about Trump-appointed judges, too!
4i6Ckte.gif


And Reagan-appointed judges, and Bush-appointed judges, and Shrub-appointed judges, and of course Clinton-appointed judges and Obama-appointed judges and Biden appointed judges.
qQVgqH1.gif
qQVgqH1.gif
qQVgqH1.gif
 
They're gonna bitch about this judge, but they bitch about Trump-appointed judges, too!
4i6Ckte.gif


And Reagan-appointed judges, and Bush-appointed judges, and Shrub-appointed judges, and of course Clinton-appointed judges and Obama-appointed judges and Biden appointed judges.
qQVgqH1.gif
qQVgqH1.gif
qQVgqH1.gif

Of course. If its a Trump appointed judge, he's a RINO and a traitor. Or a Trump appointed attorney general. Or a Trump appointed head of Cyber Security. Hell, even Trump's own VP.

Any source, any count, any audit, any law enforcement investigation, any ruling, any charges, any recording, any document, any judge....anything.

Anything.

If it doesn't ape what they want to believe, its just folded into a conspiracy.

Anything that doesn't ape the conspiracy becomes part of the conspiracy.
 
it seems that the Trumpists are a bit frightened of a Black woman from Jamaica, who was appointed by a Black President named Barack...do you doubt her impartiality?

***chuckles***

I didnt even know she was black until your racist ass brought up skin color. All I knew is she worked with Hunter Biden at a law firm.

Nice racism, you dirty fuck.
 
She gave no political donations to anyone involved in the case.

You'll get no recusal.

Its just pre-emptive right wing justification for a Trump criminal conviction. Which tells us all that on some level....your ilk get how much evidence there is against Trump.
There are dozens of judges that have no links to the Biden crime family, any of them would be better. Oh well, it only reinforces the appearance of deep seeded corruption in the Democrat party.
 
There are dozens of judges that have no links to the Biden crime family, any of them would be better. Oh well, it only reinforces the appearance of deep seeded corruption in the Democrat party.

What 'crime family'? You can't prove Joe committed so much as a parking violation. You can't get him for *littering*.

Why then would Judge Chatkan 'recuse' herself? Because you've imagined crimes that you can't prove for someone who *isn't* a party in the case?

Good luck with that pseudo-legal nonsense.
 
What 'crime family'? You can't prove Joe committed so much as a parking violation. You can't get him for *littering*.

Why then would Judge Chatkan 'recuse' herself? Because you've imagined crimes that you can't prove for someone who *isn't* a party in the case?

Good luck with that pseudo-legal nonsense.
Aside from Biden stealing and illegally storing classified documents? That is not in dispute. Do better.

Bad enough you clowns support these frivolous witch hunts but every added impropriety just takes us further down the road of a banana republic. The world is watching, what they see is a Democrat clown show, not a respected superpower.
 
Aside from Biden stealing and illegally storing classified documents? That is not in dispute. Do better.

That's what you're making up this whole 'crime family' schtick about?

That's it?

Laughing.....so much for 'judgment day', eh buddy?

Bad enough you clowns support these frivolous witch hunts but every added impropriety just takes us further down the road of a banana republic. The world is watching, what they see is a Democrat clown show, not a respected superpower.

Alas, the evidence kinda breaks your story. You've got absolutely nothing that Biden was bribed, that he extorted, influence peddled, or whatever the accusation dejour is (is it "money laundered" today? . Its why y'all keep switching from "Joe Biden" to the 'Biden Family'.

If you had shit on Joe Biden, you wouldn't have to keep making the switch.

Meanwhile there are recordings of Trump admitting he didn't declassify (two actually), photos, testimony, transcripts, document lists, pages 9 through 43 of the original 49 page indictment was just evidence of crimes.

Its hard to argue 'banana republic' with an indictment that damning.
 
She's an Obama fanatic who donated to him. Trump's lawyers will seek a recusal from her. She has a huge conflict of interest.


Here are some of her donation records according to Open Secret:
Screenshot-2023-08-02-164739-1024x497.jpg
Fat chance of that. The fix is in. It's the only way the left know how to win.
 

Forum List

Back
Top