Where on earth did you get that idea?It represents his significant failure compared to all other presidents. 3% is the minimum required to keep pace with population growth.What makes 3% a significant number? Or is it just the lowest number Obama has not gone over?Obama failed to achieve 3% growth his entire presidency. Despite record debt and spending he still failed. Not a single year of 3% growth. No other president has failed in such a substantial way. This is what happens when you place a neophyte in charge of anything.That was a reply to one of your posts.
What point do u want to address first ? The "3%" thing ? Which I have pointed out is an odd stat invented by conservatives to downplay the rebounding economy . Something like " he hasn't had 3 quarters in a row of 3% growth." Totally bizzare ?!