Titanic was an inside job

Are you fucking kidding me??
Somebody is saying the Titanic was a conspiracy??
You people are fucking nutcases ~LoL~

I mentioned in another thread about the Titanic, Dr. Robert Ballard did a special on NatGeo Channel just a couple of nights ago.
He showed in great detail, exactly how it happened, and how the ship broke apart and how long it took to fall to the bottom of the ocean.
The Titanic was designed to take on water, as long as it only flooded the first 4 bottom compartments.
Sadly....the 5th compartment became flooded, and that is what caused the ship to sink, taking on too much water.
It hit the iceberg, grazed if you will.....and it popped out the rivets.....which caused the water to start leaking in.

You actually buy onto the fairy tale that "ice" could sink a ship?

Some people are so gullible.

RW, a BIG chunk of ice on the head might cure you of disbelief.:eusa_angel:

You are aware that ice is just frozen water aren't you?

It doesn't bother you that all of the survivors are now dead? Convenient isn't it?
 
Last edited:
Are you fucking kidding me??
Somebody is saying the Titanic was a conspiracy??
You people are fucking nutcases ~LoL~

I mentioned in another thread about the Titanic, Dr. Robert Ballard did a special on NatGeo Channel just a couple of nights ago.
He showed in great detail, exactly how it happened, and how the ship broke apart and how long it took to fall to the bottom of the ocean.
The Titanic was designed to take on water, as long as it only flooded the first 4 bottom compartments.
Sadly....the 5th compartment became flooded, and that is what caused the ship to sink, taking on too much water.
It hit the iceberg, grazed if you will.....and it popped out the rivets.....which caused the water to start leaking in.

You actually buy onto the fairy tale that "ice" could sink a ship?

Some people are so gullible.

She's a paid Titanic dupe! :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: The paid trolls that come here to deny the Titanic conspiracy are idiit.s If refuses to read the book I told her to read and watch 347 youtube vidoes. :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: She should worry aout the titanic murderers walking free instead of little things like her children. :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: titanic dupe. paid troll. fart. :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
It has been proven beyond any reasonable doubt that the ship which Ballard investigated is indeed the Titanic, her internal fixtures were different to Olympic as well as having an enclosed promenade deck. The yard numbers have been located on several parts of the ship on parts such as propellors which could not be changed in the few hours they had on the 2nd of April before setting of on the ships maiden voyage. The Olympic survived and was eventually scrapped in 1935.
 
It has been proven beyond any reasonable doubt that the ship which Ballard investigated is indeed the Titanic, her internal fixtures were different to Olympic as well as having an enclosed promenade deck. The yard numbers have been located on several parts of the ship on parts such as propellors which could not be changed in the few hours they had on the 2nd of April before setting of on the ships maiden voyage. The Olympic survived and was eventually scrapped in 1935.

There has never been any question that Titanic sleeps with the fishes

The question is, why after 100 years people still believe that ice could bring down the mighty ship
 
when a ship hits a lump of ice weighing millions of tonnes there can only be one outcome, you need to remeber that 85% of the iceberg was below the water line. Drive a metal car into a lump of ice weighing several hundred tonnes for a comparrison, the car will loose. The reason the ship sank was beacuse the water tight chambers did not reach the ceilings to allow air to escape as water entered the ship, due to the list of the ship the chambers over flowed into each other slowly which is why the ship took so long to sink. The original design had water tight chambers which extened fully to the ceilings with vent pipes running through to the main upper deck to vent the air, these pipes were removed by Ismay as they intruded into the first class compartments meaning the chambers could not extend to ceiling level. Ismay also atlered the original double skin design due to costs and also removed the original 64 lifeboats for cosmetic reasons.
 
when a ship hits a lump of ice weighing millions of tonnes there can only be one outcome, you need to remeber that 85% of the iceberg was below the water line. Drive a metal car into a lump of ice weighing several hundred tonnes for a comparrison, the car will loose. The reason the ship sank was beacuse the water tight chambers did not reach the ceilings to allow air to escape as water entered the ship, due to the list of the ship the chambers over flowed into each other slowly which is why the ship took so long to sink. The original design had water tight chambers which extened fully to the ceilings with vent pipes running through to the main upper deck to vent the air, these pipes were removed by Ismay as they intruded into the first class compartments meaning the chambers could not extend to ceiling level. Ismay also atlered the original double skin design due to costs and also removed the original 64 lifeboats for cosmetic reasons.

Some people are so gullible. They believe whatever the Lamestream media wants them to believe. It is simple science. Hit a block of ice with a hammer and see what breaks

Titanic was built with Freezomite rivets which were activated by contact with ice. Definite inside job
 
Last edited:
Nothing to do with the tensile strength of the steel or the ice which are very similar, the ship was a riveted ship which bacically fell apart due to the inertial forces created when the ship weighting thousands of tons hit a larger soild mass weighting millions of tonnes @ around 22 knots. Larger mass wins, simple as that. Had the ship hit a rock, wood, ice weighting the same the outcome would have been the same. The strengh of the steel compared to the ice has no bearing on the damage caused, small lighter object hits much much larger solid object, lighter object looses every time.
 
it was an inside job??? ice can't sink a ship ??? put this one in the humor forum. and send a life boat for the OP. he's goin' down by the head

490.gif
 
it was an inside job??? ice can't sink a ship ??? put this one in the humor forum. and send a life boat for the OP. he's goin' down by the head

490.gif

Another shameless hack spouting what he has been told to say. Amazing people still believe ice could sink a metal ship after 100 years.
 
it was an inside job??? ice can't sink a ship ??? put this one in the humor forum. and send a life boat for the OP. he's goin' down by the head

490.gif

Another shameless hack spouting what he has been told to say. Amazing people still believe ice could sink a metal ship after 100 years.

AND the survivors cannot now speak. You are correct, absurd:D
 
Nothing to do with the tensile strength of the steel or the ice which are very similar, the ship was a riveted ship which bacically fell apart due to the inertial forces created when the ship weighting thousands of tons hit a larger soild mass weighting millions of tonnes @ around 22 knots. Larger mass wins, simple as that. Had the ship hit a rock, wood, ice weighting the same the outcome would have been the same. The strengh of the steel compared to the ice has no bearing on the damage caused, small lighter object hits much much larger solid object, lighter object looses every time.

Yea....like ice could sink a ship


Ship-Iceberg-Ice-Cube-Tray-cool-gifts.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top