Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The reverse of what agents say is usually true, meaning this is is evidence,
of a concrete core, I'm an American defending the Constitution and you are criminal.
The reverse of what agents say is usually true, meaning this is is evidence,
of a concrete core, I'm an American defending the Constitution and you are criminal.
you arent defending the constitution. you are abusing the legal system.
you have no evidence of a concrete core. the picture you just posted is of the steel core with gypsum walls collapsing.
you've already been shown a picture of the same structure from the other side.
The reverse of what agents say is usually true, meaning this is is evidence,
of a concrete core, I'm an American defending the Constitution and you are criminal.
you arent defending the constitution. you are abusing the legal system.
you have no evidence of a concrete core. the picture you just posted is of the steel core with gypsum walls collapsing.
you've already been shown a picture of the same structure from the other side.
The reverse of what agents say is usually true, meaning this is is evidence,
of a concrete core, I'm an American defending the Constitution and you are criminal.
you arent defending the constitution. you are abusing the legal system.
You have the judges in the family law court,
SB.Superior Court case 209449, Declaration of Colleen Sterne, January 17, 2008
who file erroneous declarations, and clerks refuse to stamp motions to strike errors,
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice3/famlaw/famfaces/209449mot.strik.dec.face1.jpg
confused with my filing proving treasonous concealment of information needed to make a proper due process determination of cause of death.
you have no evidence of a concrete core. the picture you just posted is of the steel core with gypsum walls collapsing.
You can see a 3/4 piece thick piece of gypsum at 7,500 feet? Where are the steel core columns the gypsum must be fastened to?
you've already been shown a picture of the same structure from the other side.
And the picture was seconds earlier where the steel interior box columns of the inner framed wall still surounded the concrete core. Why didn't you post the images again?
Probably because it also show concrete exploding through the framework of interior box columns.
you arent defending the constitution. you are abusing the legal system.
You have the judges in the family law court,
SB.Superior Court case 209449, Declaration of Colleen Sterne, January 17, 2008
who file erroneous declarations, and clerks refuse to stamp motions to strike errors,
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice3/famlaw/famfaces/209449mot.strik.dec.face1.jpg
confused with my filing proving treasonous concealment of information needed to make a proper due process determination of cause of death.
You can see a 3/4 piece thick piece of gypsum at 7,500 feet? Where are the steel core columns the gypsum must be fastened to?
you've already been shown a picture of the same structure from the other side.
And the picture was seconds earlier where the steel interior box columns of the inner framed wall still surounded the concrete core. Why didn't you post the images again?
Probably because it also show concrete exploding through the framework of interior box columns.
it doesnt show exploding concrete. there is no concrete.
whats with the 3/4 inch comment? tell us what the height and width are along with how thick it is, jackass..
did you pay your court ordered child support of $30,000 yet?
* * * *
Americans have lost all right to common law estoppel, meaning government can fail in its duty and there is no consideration for the impacts.
SB.Superior Court case 209449, Child Support, Motion to Quash Contempt
You have the judges in the family law court,
SB.Superior Court case 209449, Declaration of Colleen Sterne, January 17, 2008
who file erroneous declarations, and clerks refuse to stamp motions to strike errors,
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice3/famlaw/famfaces/209449mot.strik.dec.face1.jpg
confused with my filing proving treasonous concealment of information needed to make a proper due process determination of cause of death.
You can see a 3/4 piece thick piece of gypsum at 7,500 feet? Where are the steel core columns the gypsum must be fastened to?
And the picture was seconds earlier where the steel interior box columns of the inner framed wall still surounded the concrete core. Why didn't you post the images again?
Probably because it also show concrete exploding through the framework of interior box columns.
it doesnt show exploding concrete. there is no concrete.
whats with the 3/4 inch comment? tell us what the height and width are along with how thick it is, jackass..
did you pay your court ordered child support of $30,000 yet?
What is proven is that you've shown no steel core columns on 9-11. What is proven is there was concrete because we see it left of the spire, and interior box columns outside the core.
Gypsum maximums are 6x10x3/4" from what I remember.
Americans have lost all right to common law estoppel, meaning government can fail in its duty and there is no consideration for the impacts.
SB.Superior Court case 209449, Child Support, Motion to Quash Contempt
it doesnt show exploding concrete. there is no concrete.
whats with the 3/4 inch comment? tell us what the height and width are along with how thick it is, jackass..
did you pay your court ordered child support of $30,000 yet?
What is proven is that you've shown no steel core columns on 9-11. What is proven is there was concrete because we see it left of the spire, and interior box columns outside the core.
Gypsum maximums are 6x10x3/4" from what I remember.
Americans have lost all right to common law estoppel, meaning government can fail in its duty and there is no consideration for the impacts.
SB.Superior Court case 209449, Child Support, Motion to Quash Contempt
those are steel core columns on 9/11 right there in your picture. thanks for posting it.
proof please. they are not outside the core. they ARE the core. the only columns outside the core are the exterior walls.What is proven is that you've shown no steel core columns on 9-11. What is proven is there was concrete because we see it left of the spire, and interior box columns outside the core.
Gypsum maximums are 6x10x3/4" from what I remember.
Americans have lost all right to common law estoppel, meaning government can fail in its duty and there is no consideration for the impacts.
SB.Superior Court case 209449, Child Support, Motion to Quash Contempt
those are steel core columns on 9/11 right there in your picture. thanks for posting it.
Those columns are outside of the core.
is this in english? it looks like english but it doesnt make any sense. what is "would have should be seen"??Pretending you don't know what you are looking at will not be accpetable. Your behavior is unreasonable in view of acts of treason alleged and are supporting that treason.
No, I tricked you into admitting that the holes that the 6x10's 3/4 gypsum would have should be seen.
there is nothing standing 400 foot. there is the core crashing to the ground with the rest of the building.It was necessary to get you to admit what you were describing is standing 400 feet, uniformly seen AFTER hundreds of thousands of tons of steel and concrete have crashed over it.
Agents sometimes cannot make sense and that is okay with their masters.
hey dipshitThe perpetrating infiltrators would want you to pretend you did not understand how you are exposed in assisting with their treason by concealment. Your obsfucation, manipulation and deception are very evident so your role is clear.
The spire is outside the NW corner of the core area. ALL perimeter walls are long gone.
The spire, on the right is outside the corner of the core. On the left is the concrete core wall.
The is the opposite end of the core a few seconds earlier.
You are proven wrong again.
hey dipshitThe perpetrating infiltrators would want you to pretend you did not understand how you are exposed in assisting with their treason by concealment. Your obsfucation, manipulation and deception are very evident so your role is clear.
The spire is outside the NW corner of the core area. ALL perimeter walls are long gone.
The spire, on the right is outside the corner of the core. On the left is the concrete core wall.
The is the opposite end of the core a few seconds earlier.
You are proven wrong again.
was the WTC towers 3 dimensional or 2?
hey dipshitThe perpetrating infiltrators would want you to pretend you did not understand how you are exposed in assisting with their treason by concealment. Your obsfucation, manipulation and deception are very evident so your role is clear.
The spire is outside the NW corner of the core area. ALL perimeter walls are long gone.
The spire, on the right is outside the corner of the core. On the left is the concrete core wall.
The is the opposite end of the core a few seconds earlier.
You are proven wrong again.
was the WTC towers 3 dimensional or 2?
You need to show another spire for that argument to work bonehead.
There is only one and it is outside the massive concrete wall shown
oh. and that picture is photoshopped!!
i know this, it sure the fuck aint concreteoh. and that picture is photoshopped!!
Of course it is nummy, it is a superimposition. It is supposed to be. And it proves that the spire is at the NW corner and no perimeter walls stand while the other one,
i know this, it sure the fuck aint concreteoh. and that picture is photoshopped!!
Of course it is nummy, it is a superimposition. It is supposed to be. And it proves that the spire is at the NW corner and no perimeter walls stand while the other one,
why do you continue to fucking lie??????i know this, it sure the fuck aint concreteOf course it is nummy, it is a superimposition. It is supposed to be. And it proves that the spire is at the NW corner and no perimeter walls stand while the other one,
It cannot be anything else and the buildings engineer identified concrete on September 13, 2001 to Newsweek magazine.
No text lies about email from Robertson or LERA because Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Inovation that was published in 1992 also identifies a concrete core.
