Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

No way, "steel and concrete hull and core" is what is described specifically for the Twins.



You've shown very well you cannot post an image of steel core columns on 9-11.
you are totally fucking delusional
and you lack reading comprehension
 
A picture is worth a thousand words. You have no 9-11 pictures of steel core columns.

End view of concrete core wall.

wtc1spirecorewall.jpg
 
As the stage curtain parts, and the house lights go down, the agent chri$$y dummy sits on my left leg, looks straight at the audience and declares "I guess the perps would want you to take turns lying!"

I am going to get BIG laughs with that one!
 
A picture is worth a thousand words. You have no 9-11 pictures of steel core columns.

End view of concrete core wall.

wtc1spirecorewall.jpg

Since that is the same image you've posted dozens of times, claiming (without any hint of credibility) that it depicts concrete, and since you've been told by everyone who sees it that they see the steel but not a speck of concrete, it appears that you, NULL POSTER are suffering from some psychotic delusion or that you are stupidly lying -- unless you have somehow mistaken something else for a concrete core.

I know you've got the ability to do the following, since you've used that easy skill in the past on other images.

CIRCLE, in a broad and vivid red line of color the precise portion of the image that YOU claim shows a concrete core.
 
A picture is worth a thousand words. You have no 9-11 pictures of steel core columns.

End view of concrete core wall.

wtc1spirecorewall.jpg

a picture certainly is worth a thousand words. you just posted a picture of the steel core columns on 9/11 without even a hint of a concrete core in it.

anyone that sees a fucking concrete core in that pic is a completely delusional retard. no amount of words from you will turn that pic of the steel core into a pic containing concrete!! :lol:
 
You just exposed the fact that you are unreasonable.

What is on the left bears no resemblence to steel columns. The right, yes, an interior box column outside the core area. The spire. There was only one and these photos, what you quote above and of this post below, shows it is outside the core.

superimp.spire.wtc1.jpg


And NO, the slightly different angle of superimposed images has no significant effect.

What does have an effect is that you cannot show this core, in the core area AT ALL on 9-11.

femacore.gif
 
You just exposed the fact that you are unreasonable.

What is on the left bears no resemblence to steel columns. The right, yes, an interior box column outside the core area. The spire. There was only one and these photos, what you quote above and of this post below, shows it is outside the core.

superimp.spire.wtc1.jpg


And NO, the slightly different angle of superimposed images has no significant effect.

What does have an effect is that you cannot show this core, in the core area AT ALL on 9-11.

femacore.gif
that IS steel columns
you are a fucking moron and the very photos you post PROVE it
 
more delusional bullshit. this crap was already debunked. there is not a SLIGHT difference in angle on your overlay.... THE BUILDINGS ARE IN THE WRONG FUCKING PLACE!! :lol:

it shows what a lying sack of shit you are that you keep using it instead of showing the pictures from the same EXACT angle that prove what you claim was "columns outside the core area" (there's no such thing and you have yet to show where you get this info from) is actually the center two rows of the steel core.

all your crap has been debunked already. come up with something new please because i've heard more intelligent conversations from a parrot. at least he throws in a whistle every once in a while while saying the same stupid shit over and over again. :cuckoo:
 
Last edited:
look at the two buildings on the far left of both photos again and tell us how the angles are almost the same!!! :lol::lol:

9790d1269213739-fema-deceives-nation-about-twin-towers-core-wtc-fizz7.jpg


214_fema_report_2050081722-9661.jpg
 
well, he sees concrete where none was, i guess he cant tell the angles either

some fucking surveyor he must have been, huh? :lol:

(that would be before he applied for disability while still working under the table, of course)
 
Not enough difference to change identification of location of the spire.
says who?

another stupid text assertion from the delusional moron.

see if you can follow even a small, little, tiny bit of logic.....

the pictures taken from the same angle show the steel core spire to be the middle two rows of the building.

your picture taken from a different angle and overlaid on top, apparently randomly and not lined up with anything and just plopped down anywhere, still shows steel core columns inside the tower but in a slightly different place.

so the logical conclusions drawn from this are:
A. the pictures taken from the same angle are more accurate.
B. the overlay from a different angle is not as accurate but still shows the steel core columns on 9/11 in direct contrast to chrisspoo's claims there are no pictures of steel core columns on 9/11.
C. chrissypoo is not interested in accuracy since he posts the less accurate image and then makes the unfounded claim that "the spire was outside the core area" which is completely untrue. there was no vertical steel outside of the core except the perimeter walls. clearly the spire is not the perimeter walls.
 
Last edited:
Upon close inspection, I've concluded that the 2 photos are taken from almost the same location. Zapp drive. The space between the world financial buildings on the left is proportionately the same.

This shows the spire outside of the core area and an end view of the west concrete core wall after the north wall has fallen.

wtc1spirecorewall.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top