Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #3,181
Why? I'll tell you why. Because I don't need to in order to prove the concrete core. I have independently verified evidence of the concrete core.
Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.
And you have nothing except nonsense questions that have already been answered.
What nonsense. The core was hidden inside the building from 1980 until 9-11.
With violations of law the ex NYC mayor took the plans and 6,000 photo files so that is where the construction photos are that show the concrete core. That is where the correct elevator dimensions are too.
Mr. Paul Laffoley who worked for the engineers states Bin Laden Construction did the concrete. I feel I do remember the 1990 documentary the Dr. Ron Larsen Ph.D found evidence of mentioned that a Saudi contractor finished the concrete after the American contractor gave up because of job site security and secrecy.
Here is his update on the search for the 2, 1 hour VHS cassetes.
http://algoxy.com/psych/audio/rl-cb6-27-07pbs.doc_1-2.mp3
