Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

[DiveCon]

You and your evasion. What's the matter gumjob? Can't come up with an image of the core you try to assert existed?

of course an agent would never recognize that the ex NYC mayor took the building plans enabling NIST to conduct a forensic analysis of collapse WITHOUT plans.

Your support for secret methods of mass murder is sickening.

Where were the elevators of WTC2 located Chris? Inside or outside your core? Or maybe you just don't have a clue and are just making things up?

hes that delusional
LOL

 

[Christophera]

Clearly, gummie does not have any evidence of the supposed steel core structure.

No plans, no photos from 9-11 - NOTHING can provide verification that the core FEMA presents in this graphic, the ONLY official graphic of any kind of the Twin towers core structure, is correct.

On the other hand, the concrete core is independently verified and is umistakably seen as concrete in 9-11 photos. Agents try to get people to make the mistake of not realizing what is quite obvious so their masters can destroy the Consitution from their positions as infiltrators of government.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick,

all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

 

[DiveCon]

Clearly, gummie does not have any evidence of the supposed steel core structure.

clearly you have no evidence of a concrete core
your paranoid delusions and lack of reading comprehension do NOT equal evidence

 

[Gamolon]

Clearly, gummie does not have any evidence of the supposed steel core structure.

No plans, no photos from 9-11 - NOTHING can provide verification that the core FEMA presents in this graphic, the ONLY official graphic of any kind of the Twin towers core structure, is correct.

On the other hand, the concrete core is independently verified and is umistakably seen as concrete in 9-11 photos. Agents try to get people to make the mistake of not realizing what is quite obvious so their masters can destroy the Consitution from their positions as infiltrators of government.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick,

all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

Where were the express elevators in WTC2 Chris? Inside or outside your concrete core?

 

[Christophera]

What a stupid question, the express elevators were inside the core.

Where are the images of the FEMA core and its needed diagonal braces from construction and 9-11?

Where is the independent verification of the supposed steel core columns?

There is none. The entire steel core column info is MISINFORMATION and a part of the FEMA deception.

 

[DiveCon]

What a stupid question, the express elevators were inside the core.

then PROVE IT

make them fit

 

[Gamolon]

What a stupid question, the express elevators were inside the core.

Interesting. That makes your core walls no thicker that 3' per this photo. That totally kills your theory right there.

 

[Gamolon]

Where are the images of the FEMA core and its needed diagonal braces from construction and 9-11?.

Given the fact that you claimed the core needed to withstand wind forces makes you an idiot and PROVES you don't have a clue about the towers, how they were designed, and how they handled loads.

 

[Gamolon]

Your admitted 3' thick concrete core walls could not have withstood tons of steel and equipment crashing down around it as you claim this did.

 

[DiveCon]

Where are the images of the FEMA core and its needed diagonal braces from construction and 9-11?.

Given the fact that you claimed the core needed to withstand wind forces makes you an idiot and PROVES you don't have a clue about the towers, how they were designed, and how they handled loads.

especially when they were not designed to withstand them, but to sway with them

 

[Christophera]

The concrete core was designed to be rigid, not sway.

The concrete can survive the crash and did. It is seen in the photo.

And NO steel core columns are seen in the core area where they would be seen IF they existed.

None are seen in this image where the north wall has fallen but the west wall of WTC 1 still stands and is seen in and end view on the left with the spire, outside the core on the right.

 

[DiveCon]

more proof you are a fucking idiot, it is KNOWN fact the buildings swayed in the wind and were designed to do just such

 

[Gamolon]

The concrete core was designed to be rigid, not sway.

The concrete can survive the crash and did. It is seen in the photo.

Illogical. Just like you claim.

3' thick concrete walls, 1350' high, are NOT going to stand up to tons of steel and machinery crashing down around it.

Isn't that right Chris?

 

[Gamolon]

Just like the photo shows Chris.

3' thick concrete core wall?????

You're nuts.

 

[Christophera]

Just like the photo shows Chris.

3' thick concrete core wall?????

You're nuts.

Locate the outside of the elevator door. It's a lot further than 3 feet. More like 8.
The last person you can see is in the elevator agent.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Just like the photo shows Chris.

3' thick concrete core wall?????

You're nuts.

Locate the outside of the elevator door. It's a lot further than 3 feet. More like 8.
The last person you can see is in the elevator agent.

Great, now we have elevator agents too!

Hey Chri$$y, is there anyone outside of yourself who is NOT an agent????

 

[Christophera]

Only an agent can be so selective and insincere that they use part of a sentence.

gumjob convienently forgets that WTC had strict shearwall construction tapering on the outside face and WTC 2 had shear/cell design and every 4 floors the section dimensions decreased gaining the same effect over all.

Independently verified evidence of the concrete core.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

 

[Christophera]

Watch divot try and justify the other agents nonsense selectivity now.

 

[DiveCon]

Only an agent can be so selective and insincere that they use part of a sentence.

.

removing youir delusional bullshit is needed because its all the same bullshit over and over and over again

 

[Christophera]

Who is delusional?

You say the core looked like this.

and can produce NO IMAGE OF IT ON 9-11

I say it was a rectangular concrete tube that looked like this image from 9-11.

You are an agent working to protect the secret methods of mass murder and the infiltrators of the US government.