Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

The west end of the WTC 1 concrete core. End view of the concrete wall on the left, the spire, structural steel outside the core on the right.

wtc1spirecorewall.jpg


FEMA deception[/url
 
No evidence in the post agent.Concrete on the left of the image in my last post.

This one is all concrete. No steel core columns are seen.

southcorestands.gif
 
Last edited:
No evidence in the post agent.Concrete on the left of the image in my last post.

This one is all concrete. No steel core columns are seen.
still no concrete in the photo
even on the 1000th time you post it it will still not be evidence of a concrete core that didnt exist anywhere but in your paranoid delusional mind
 
No evidence in the post agent.Concrete on the left of the image in my last post.

This one is all concrete. No steel core columns are seen.
still no concrete in the photo
even on the 1000th time you post it it will still not be evidence of a concrete core that didnt exist anywhere but in your paranoid delusional mind

Still no truth in the post agent, in fact the reverse is true but the infiltrating perpetrators need you to lie.

Independently verified evidence of the concrete core.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.
 
No evidence in the post agent.Concrete on the left of the image in my last post.

This one is all concrete. No steel core columns are seen.
still no concrete in the photo
even on the 1000th time you post it it will still not be evidence of a concrete core that didnt exist anywhere but in your paranoid delusional mind

Still no truth in the post agent, in fact the reverse is true but the infiltrating perpetrators need you to lie.

Independently verified evidence of the concrete core.
your paranoid delusions do NOT equal evidence
 
I could just have my christophera dummy sit on my leg, look straight at the audience and say;
"I happen to know more about secrecy than the average person so I know how the infiltrations work." "

I bet I will be as popular as Jeff Dunham.....

Damn I just found out how much ventriloquist dummies cost!
I guess a dummy agent chri$$y is worth much more than the living agent chri$$y.

For now I will simply be using a sock puppet, it's more fitting anyway!
 
No evidence in the post agent.Concrete on the left of the image in my last post.

This one is all concrete. No steel core columns are seen.
still no concrete in the photo
even on the 1000th time you post it it will still not be evidence of a concrete core that didnt exist anywhere but in your paranoid delusional mind

Still no truth in the post agent, in fact the reverse is true but the infiltrating perpetrators need you to lie.

Independently verified evidence of the concrete core.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

When every single solitary component of your fraudulent "independently verified" claims has been fully debunked and refuted, your retarded and dishonest efforts to mindlessly repeat them reveals how totally dishonest you are, pigshit.

The next time you post an image of a concrete core will be the first time you do so. To date, however, you merely lie when you mislabel images of steel cores and try to foist them off as concrete. That's not just delusional and dishonest of you, it's insane.

Nobody except a dishonest douche like you could even pretend to see concrete in those images. Why? Because there is no concrete shown and that's predictable since the core was not a concrete construction.
 
The false social group has nothing but itself to attempt to reinforce the FEMA deception.

To demonstrate this fact I will post an image that show only concrete,

southcorestands.gif


and ask where the steel core columns are. The agents will attempt to say that gypsum covers the steel core columns despite the fact that it is absurd to suggest that the drywall would survive the exterior steel, over 100k tons worth, crashing over it near the rates of free fall.

Drywall will not withstand that.
 
Last edited:
The false social group has nothing but itself to attempt to reinforce the FEMA deception.

To demonstrate this fact I will post an image that show only concrete,



and ask where the steel core columns are. The agents will attempt to say that gypsum covers the steel core columns despite the fact that it is absurd to suggest that the drywall would survive the exterior steel, over 100k tons worth, crashing over it near the rates of free fall.

Drywall will not withstand that.
again, you lie
there is no "false social group" it is a very REAL social group, of SANE people


and at the bottom you lie again
no one has said "drywall" it was gypsum wall planking, very different from drywall
it was differently shaped and thicker than normal drywall YOU could buy at a hardware store
 
Oh, so it is a group.

And since the reverse of what agents say is most often true, you are criminally insane. Your behavior is actually fairly pathological within lawful and compassionate norms, so this is consistent.

Since you've never shown this core on 9-11,

femacore.gif


you technically have no argument because the core of a tower that stood for 33 years would still be seen standing under the conditions of 9-11. Just as is seen here, but NOT steel columns. Concrete.

southcorestands.gif
 
Meaning I've rationally defeated/exposed the psyops agents and all they can do is spew and sputter. Of course the perps cannot let you admit that, so your efforts to maintain the deceptions are noted.

Do you realize how totally youare exposed agent.

D-You post steel columns(?)
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2547786-post7282.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1959274-post145.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1959289-post146.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1959580-post147.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1959351-post3626.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1959578-post3627.html

D-rebar
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2529236-post3044.html

D-claims I've posted steel core
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2525612-post3033.html

D
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2068183-post334.html

D-agent
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2104806-post4606.html

D-rebar & plan links
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2331142-post6209.html

F+D exposed
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2104963-post4610.html

D-SPIRE
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2476643-post7012.html

F+obvious image
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2117758-post842.html

F
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1966323-post158.html

F
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1992513-post3708.html

F+
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2068719-post4238.html

F+photo lie
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2093387-post4486.html

F+photo lie 2
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2094648-post4499.html

F+photoshop lie
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2097563-post650.html

F+plans lie
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2290147-post1829.html

F+mayor microfilm lie
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2429160-post6710.html

F+plan lie confirm
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2290723-post1832.html

F+buckling north tower
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2379590-post2345.html

F+buckling
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2380272-post2348.html



F+newsweek lied
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2431343-post6755.html

F+CAB trounces liar
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2431371-post6756.html

F+misinterp
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2456171-post2744.html

CAB proves it
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2458493-post2745.html

F&G-slam-plans-dimensions-spire
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2483938-post7050.html

PRETENDING
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2484417-post2891.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2513013-post2999.html
 
Meaning I've rationally defeated/exposed the * * * *

Crazy talk. Null Poster, you asshole, it is impossible for you to have "rationally" done anything since you are completely irrational.

I took the liberty of snipping the balance of your null post because saying nothing honest in your long winded way is still saying nothing honest. You get no points for being a verbose liar.

It's all very simple. The core construction involved no concrete. This has been proved to you. You nevertheless persist in your glaringly dishonest way to dispute reality by posting NOTHING akin to concrete and declaring that you somehow are "showing" concrete.
:cuckoo:

Your efforts at repeatedly showing dust from drywall or plasterboard or concrete flooring does not establish in anyway that the non-concrete core construction somehow had a concrete construction. :cuckoo: YOUR ARGUMENT demonstrates only that YOU are absolutely crazy. :cuckoo:

You truly need psychiatric help.

The opposite of your lying contentions are true.

You remain a nullity.
 
Your texting is ineffective in the face of evidence agent. Let's have another sample. Tell us how you see the steel core columns here.

southcorestands.gif
your photo does NOT show concrete

Isn't it amazing that it even requires a post to note such a thing?

He posts an image of some shit that clearly doesn't show concrete, claims nevertheless that it does show concrete and has to be told that something that isn't in the image is not, in fact, in the image.

Between his fervent dependence on his own absolute dishonesty and his tragic mental/psychological state (incredibly low IQ and insanity), the Null Poster is an incredibly sad -- pathetic -- joke.

He absolutely lacks the capacity to grasp the fact that what he insists happened on 9/11/2001 is facially absurd and literally impossible. He's gone. There is no hope for a lost cause like him.
 
i;ve been gone for a few days doing super secret government agent stuff....

has the fucking moron done anything other than babble on with the same old bullshit thats already been debunked a million times? was he able to fit all those elevators inside the concrete core yet? did he come up with a source for the "elevator guide rail support steel" claim yet?

i'm guessing no. :eusa_whistle:
 

Forum List

Back
Top