Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

[Gamolon]

I don't know or care about elevators and they don't matter

Here is a scaled drawing you did of your core some time ago. This drawing is based upon information you said you got from the documentary you saw. It is a drawing at the lobby level of WTC1.

The drawing above shows an inside rectangular dimension of 80' x 120'. Also note that at the lobby level, the short axis wall is 17' thick and the long axis wall is 12' thick. The next drawing is a scaled drawing I did using Chris dimensions. This shows the two banks of express elevators and all 24 LOCAL elevators. The red rectangles are the express elevators and the blue rectangles are the local elevators.

Now keep in mind the following when looking at my drawing. I STILL have not added the location of the 16' wide skylobby hallway on the 1st, 44th, and 78th floors. This hallway HAS to be positioned right next to the back of express elevators not only for people to exit into when reaching the 47th floor, but so that it didn't interfere with the express elevators that continued on to the higher floors. Also not that the there was a second 17' wide hallway on the next skylobby for the other bank of express elevators. The two 16' wide hallways were offset from one another. Chris even admitted this.

There were also three stairwells in the core.

Also note that the express elevators (red rectangles) had access doors on BOTH sides. One to enter from the lobby level and one to exit into the skylobby hallway. Look at my drawing. How in the hell did people get AROUND to the express elevator access doors that were against the wall when there is only about 2' clearance????

How do I fit the two 16' wide skylobby hallways into the core so as not to interfere with the two banks of express elevator shafts?

How does it all fit Chris? It can't!!!!!!!

Impossible.

So please. Tell me what I am getting wrong dimensionally and I'll fix it.

As of right now, your core theory is looking quite dead.

Try it yourself Chris. You can't make it work.

Here is a drawing I did to show how the hallways were laid out. This represents the 16' skylobby hallways on the 1st floor and 44th floors. It also includes the smaller perpendicular hallway located on other floors.

As you can see, since the hallways take up space for the express elevator shafts, they HAD to go where Chris puts his concrete core walls making it a physical impossibility.

Here is a picture of the 16' wide hallway on the 1st floor. The blue rectangle is the hallway. The red rectangle is where a back of express elevators is located. Where would his 12' thick core wall go????

Here is the 44th floor 17' wide skylobby hallway. PROOF that the hallway directly accessed the express elevators on the right.

You've got a MAJOR problem Chris.

 

[Christophera]

You have not provided your source for elevator dimensions. Only official sources are acceptable because you have no direct evdence from 9-11 for the steel core columns.

I see no elevators or access to elevators in the red square. You are obsfucating. trying to distract from the fact you have no evidence.

Elevators do not matter, the core matters and elevators cannot prove anything about the core unless you have official sources for elevator dimensions. You do not, AND you refuse to recognize violations of law that deprive the public of official plans.

Agents of secret methods of mass murder seeking to conceal those methods have shame heaped upon them.

 

[Gamolon]

You have not provided your source for elevator dimensions. Only official sources are acceptable because you have no direct evdence from 9-11 for the steel core columns.

I see no elevators or access to elevators in the red square. You are obsfucating. trying to distract from the fact you have no evidence.

So are you saying that there is not a bank of 11/12 express elevators on that side in that wall?

 

[Gamolon]

Uh oh Chris.

Better read this article from USA Today:
USATODAY.com - Elevators were disaster within disaster

The caption for this photo in the USA Today article:

That the elevators in the BACKGROUND were never checked AND it states they were in the North tower.

More proof that the express elevator opened into the lobby in WTC1.

Just saying...

 

[Gamolon]

You have not provided your source for elevator dimensions. Only official sources are acceptable because you have no direct evdence from 9-11 for the steel core columns.

Are you denying the fact that the express elevators were designed to accomodate 50-55 people????

Yes or no?

 

[Christophera]

gummie, you are a photoshopper and the USA today info is from a video that has been intentionally edited to support the FEMA deception,

You photoshopped a WTC 2 lobby picture to appear as WTC 1 by cutting and pasting WTC 1 exterior behind the windows of WTC 2.

Proving this is the footbridge windows BLEEDING THROUGH the periemter columns.

WHY have you NOT posted an image of the supposed steel core column in the core area on 9-11?

WHY? WHY? WHY?

justice demands truth.

 

[DiveCon]

gummie, you are a photoshopper and the USA today info is from a video that has been intentionally edited to support the FEMA deception,

You photoshopped a WTC 2 lobby picture to appear as WTC 1 by cutting and pasting WTC 1 exterior behind the windows of WTC 2.

Proving this is the footbridge windows BLEEDING THROUGH the periemter columns.



WHY have you NOT posted an image of the supposed steel core column in the core area on 9-11?

WHY? WHY? WHY?



justice demands truth.

you are fucking INSANE

 

[Christophera]

The perpetrating infiltrators of the US government would approve of your post because it works to help them keep their methods of mass murder secret.

Post an image of this core on 9-11.

You traitors cannot even find another drawing that shows diagonal braces and the needed reinforcement of joints between supposed columns and beams in the core. You have nothing.

 

[DiveCon]

see my last post

 

[Christophera]

Just like the engineer of record informed Newsweek in the days after 9-11, the Twins had a concrete core.

This is the west concrete wall afterr the north wall has fallen.

To the right of it is structural steel outside the core that supported the floors.

 

[DiveCon]

Just like the engineer of record informed Newsweek in the days after 9-11, the Twins had a concrete core.

LIES

This is the west concrete wall afterr the north wall has fallen.



To the right of it is structural steel outside the core that supported the floors.

no concrete seen in that photo, another LIE
but we DO see STEEL CORE COLUMNS

 

[Gamolon]

gummie, you are a photoshopper and the USA today info is from a video that has been intentionally edited to support the FEMA deception,

You photoshopped a WTC 2 lobby picture to appear as WTC 1 by cutting and pasting WTC 1 exterior behind the windows of WTC 2.

Sorry weasel, but that's impossible. I GAVE you the link to the photo where I got it. You even conceded that fact and then went on to say that I KNOWINGLY used a photoshopped image from another site, not that I actually DID the photoshopping.

You're so fucked up you can't even remember what lies and garbage you've said.

 

[Gamolon]

Are you denying the fact that the express elevators were designed to hold 50-55 people each?

Yes or no?

 

[Gamolon]

Just like the engineer of record informed Newsweek in the days after 9-11, the Twins had a concrete core.

This is the west concrete wall afterr the north wall has fallen.

To the right of it is structural steel outside the core that supported the floors.

Impossible.

It can't be the concrete core you say existed. You're core didn't fit just like I have proven. You can't prove me wrong which is why you keep posting the same shit and avoid coming up with ANYTHING that is wrong in my elevator proof.

 

[Christophera]

I do not need to prove you wrong because you cannot prove steel core columns while I can prove the concrete core existed just like the engineer of record informed Newsweek, just like Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 published.

Finniston, Monty; Williams, Trevor; Bissell, Christopher, eds (1992). "Skyscraper". Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology. Oxford University Press. p. 322. ISBN 0-19-869138-6

Just like the image of WTC 2 concrete core shows.

Not one stick of structural steel is seen protruding from the core area.

No way gypsum would survive, that is concrete.

 

[Gamolon]

I do not need to prove you wrong because you cannot prove steel core columns while I can prove the concrete core existed ...

Your concrete core is a physical impossibility as I have proven. You can't find one point that is incorrect nor will you try and refute it with a scaled drawing of your own that shows your core WAS possible.

As I said before, you're a beaten man now.

Your core NEVER existed.

You must feel awful! All these years of lies and you get crushed like this.

 

[Gamolon]

I do not need to prove you wrong because you cannot prove steel core columns while I can prove the concrete core existed just like the engineer of record informed Newsweek,

It was the reporter who thought that. You have no proof that Robertson said it. I have proof as he told me he didn't say it in an email. You have nothing from him to confirm what you claim.

I do.

You lose.

just like Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 published.

Finniston, Monty; Williams, Trevor; Bissell, Christopher, eds (1992). "Skyscraper". Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology. Oxford University Press. p. 322. ISBN 0-19-869138-6

That's a mistake.

Just like the image of WTC 2 concrete core shows.

Not one stick of structural steel is seen protruding from the core area.

No way gypsum would survive, that is concrete.

That's an assumption on your part. You have no direct proof from anyone that agrees with you that this photo shows what you claim.

ASSUMPTION!!!!!

You lose again.

 

[Christophera]

You have no proof that Robertson did not give that information to Newsweek/ There has been no correction of that artcle about an interview with the engineer of record.

In fact I have corroboration that he did because in 1992 Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology published this description identifying a concrete core.

I have more corroboration from a safety report by a structural engineer certified in 12 states, August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE.

You are defeated by independently verified evidence.

 

[DiveCon]

You have no proof that Robertson did not give that information to Newsweek,

YES, we do, his own words

In fact I have corroboration that he did because in 1992 Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology published this description identifying a concrete core

FALSE, that does NOT say it had a concrete core you fucking MORON

I have more corroboration from a safety report by a structural engineer certified in 12 states, August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE.

You are defeated by independently verified evidence.

Domel was in ERROR

 

[Christophera]

Again your text following the removal of evidence shows you have no argument.

This is an end view of the WTC 1 west concrete core wall after the north wall has fallen. Steel "Spire" on the right with the concrete core wall on the left.

then the infamous empty core with rebar stadning on the wall line AFTER the spire has fallen which SIZE is shown in the above image.

The structural steel is much larger.