Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

[DiveCon]

damn, you are too fucking stupid

the reason you dont SEE the shapes as well is because the image is not as CLOSE

 

[Christophera]

and the spire is about the same height in both

The spire is structural steel and has rectangular shapes formed by floor beams and interior box column outside the concrete core.

The spire no longer exists in the second image which shows a non solid object that is slightly lower. No rectangle exists below and to the right of the tallest portion. Light is seen through/between the obects.

You are about exposing yourself as an agent of treason.

damn, you are too fucking stupid

the reason you dont SEE the shapes as well is because the image is not as CLOSE

Hmmmm, it appears you misrepresent the images. The distance is about the same, the level of zoom is a little different, but not near enough to cause what is seen. We are looking at 2 different structural elements and you are an agent working to conceal the methods of mass murder used.

 

[DiveCon]

you are a fucking MORON

 

[Christophera]

Not a very creative agent at that.

This shows the west concrete core wall of WTC 1 on the left. Right, outside the core is the spire comprised of an interior box columns. The north wall has already fallen s we can see into the core. It is empty.

 

[DiveCon]

Not a very creative agent at that.

This shows the west concrete core wall of WTC 1 on the left. Right, outside the core is the spire comprised of an interior box columns. The north wall has already fallen s we can see into the core. It is empty.

no concrete in that photo
NONE

 

[Gamolon]

These are different structural objects photographed at slightly different times with the same camera at differen zoom levels.

The first image taken. Note the height of the top of the spire.

The second image shows the top of the fine vertical elements with the arc, passing light through them, is LOWER

How can it be from the same camera, when the photos are SECONDS apart. The first photo shows the man with his hand on his head with the light post to his RIGHT. In the second photo, the man with his hand on his head has the light post on his left.

The photos were taken from Audrey Zapp drive. The black guy in the first photo is security watching traffic for cameras. Which is why the photo was taken while moving.

It's not "fine vertical elements" you idiot. It's dust, smoke, and debris coming off of the steel. Once again you try and use distant photos that lack clarity to try and get peopel to believe your fantasies.

The reason the one part in one photo is LOWER than the other is because it COLLAPSED DOWNWARD as I have shown you here in another sequence of photos taken from the opposite side. First frame shows the steel. The third frame shows the SAME steel, but collapsing. It's lower then the first photo. What a moron!!!

These photos were taken seconds apart weasel. How can they be different structural elements?

 

[Gamolon]

and the spire is about the same height in both

The spire is structural steel and has rectangular shapes formed by floor beams and interior box column outside the concrete core.

The spire no longer exists in the second image which shows a non solid object that is slightly lower. No rectangle exists below and to the right of the tallest portion. Light is seen through/between the obects.

You are about exposing yourself as an agent of treason.

damn, you are too fucking stupid

the reason you dont SEE the shapes as well is because the image is not as CLOSE

Hmmmm, it appears you misrepresent the images. The distance is about the same, the level of zoom is a little different, but not near enough to cause what is seen. We are looking at 2 different structural elements and you are an agent working to conceal the methods of mass murder used.

The zoom level is a LITTLE different? What are you smoking? I did a pixel measurement of the front face of the tower in the foreground with the half dome on top. In the first picture I get 86 pixels wide. The second one I get 41 pixels. That's 110% increase in size.

The photos are also seconds apart. How can they be of different structural elements???

 

[Gamolon]

Hey Chris.

Here's proof that you're full of shit. Watch this video. It's a compilation of videos showing the spire. You can CLEARLY see it's the columns that fall downward AND has the arc in it. The "fine structural elements" you think you see is nothing more than dust coming off the steel as it collapses.

Proven wrong again weasel.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W0-W582fNQ]YouTube - 9/11: North Tower "Spire" Collapse[/ame]

 

[Christophera]

Hey Chris.

Here's proof that you're full of shit. Watch this video. It's a compilation of videos showing the spire. You can CLEARLY see it's the columns that fall downward AND has the arc in it. The "fine structural elements" you think you see is nothing more than dust coming off the steel as it collapses.

Proven wrong again weasel.

YouTube - 9/11: North Tower "Spire" Collapse

Haaaaaaaaahaha, your foot is bleeding with a big hole in it.

Watch at 1:06 and a massive concrete wall topples from the east core wall into the empty core. All od what you misrepresent as 'core columns" are either elevator guide rail support steel or interior box columns that were outside the core. The 3" REBAR ON 4' CENTERS is not visible in that video.

The only true full length columns are OUTSIDE the concrete core. In these stills from that video they are seen and elevator guide rail supports are seen with concrete wall fastened to them.

Why haven't you posted an image of the core on 9-11 that FEMA presents in the first WTC report?

 

[DiveCon]

Hey Chris.

Here's proof that you're full of shit. Watch this video. It's a compilation of videos showing the spire. You can CLEARLY see it's the columns that fall downward AND has the arc in it. The "fine structural elements" you think you see is nothing more than dust coming off the steel as it collapses.

Proven wrong again weasel.

YouTube - 9/11: North Tower "Spire" Collapse

Haaaaaaaaahaha, your foot is bleeding with a big hole in it.

Watch at 1:06 and a massive concrete wall topples from the east core wall into the empty core. All od what you misrepresent as 'core columns" are either elevator guide rail support steel or interior box columns that were outside the core. The 3" REBAR ON 4' CENTERS is not visible in that video.

The only true full length columns are OUTSIDE the concrete core. In these stills from that video they are seen and elevator guide rail supports are seen with concrete wall fastened to them.

Why haven't you posted an image of the core on 9-11 that FEMA presents in the first WTC report?

holy shit
i see STEEL CORE COLUMNS where you claim concrete
you are a fucking MORON

 

[Christophera]

The image in PANEL 2 shows elevator guide rail support steel falling
You see 2 kinds of steel, some in the core, just a few, and some outside the core. The steel in the core is mostly falling, because it is elevator guide rail support steel, not strong, and the steel standing is outside the concrete core wall.

Here is the concrete wall on the opposite side of WTC 1 at about the same time. Major piece of concrete toppling into the empty core behids it.

That steel is very strong, but outside the core as shown here outside the west concrete core wall of WTC 1.

 

[Christophera]

Your false social group are the only one that can see this core in ANY 9-11 image.

 

[DiveCon]

Your false social group are the only one that can see this core in ANY 9-11 image.

its not false, dipshit
its a social group of SANE people telling you that your bullshit is INSANE

 

[Christophera]

Your false social group are the only one that can see this core in ANY 9-11 image.

its not false, dipshit
its a social group of SANE people telling you that your bullshit is INSANE

That's a lie. You agree with the agent just busted obfuscating.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2628872-post7499.html

 

[DiveCon]

Your false social group are the only one that can see this core in ANY 9-11 image.

its not false, dipshit
its a social group of SANE people telling you that your bullshit is INSANE

That's a lie. You agree with the agent just busted obfuscating.

you calling anyone that is sane, an agent, only further proves you are INSANE

 

[Christophera]

If that is true, why is it that you cannot show this core on 9-11?

WHY?







No, we need to see more than a single piece of steel falling. What you have shown is exactly what I've asserted existed. The bottom image shows elevator guide rail support steel falling. Note the floor beams on the right side that were of the exterior steel, not the core. Note the falling steel has none of that.

The guide rail support steel was very weak. No lateral strength. Dependent on the concrete core.

Which is why the core is empty on 9-11.

 

[DiveCon]

If that is true, why is it that you cannot show this core on 9-11?

its been shown
many times
you dont get it from those times, you wont get it now
you are too fucking delusional to get it

i blame Reagan for cutting the funding for state mental institutions to keep nutters like YOU locked up and under treatment

 

[Christophera]

Hmmmmmm, divvie seems completely unable to support its assertion that the core of the Twin Towers looked like FEMA said looked like this with the first WTC report.

Must be an agent.

Independently verified evidence of the concrete core.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work for justifying explanation for collapse, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

 

[DiveCon]

Hmmmmmm, divvie seems completely unable to support its assertion that the core of the Twin Towers looked like FEMA said looked like this with the first WTC report..

dipshit cant prove his concrete core hoax
and the more you call everyone an "agent" the bigger dipshit you become

 

[Christophera]

Your behavior is described in my sig.