Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

[Christophera]

The grillage and concrete pad do not constitute a foundation.

WHY do you refuse to acknowledge that guiliani took 6,000 photo files?

WHY?

In those photos AND 15,000 video tapes is all the proof of the concrete core that ANYONE would need, but you fail to recognize this.

WHY?

 

[Gamolon]

The grillage and concrete pad do not constitute a foundation\

Ok "Mr. Construction". What constitutes a "foundation" in your eyes?

 

[Christophera]

It goes down to bedrock and the interio box columns surrounding the core did that, which is why they are the only vertical steel standing aound the core at GZ. The red arrow points to an elevator guide rail support steel in the first row against the inside of the concrete core wall. It is connected by the support brace through where the concrete wall was. The green arrow indicate other elevator guide rail support steel having NO FOUNDATIONS.

The row of vertical steel WITH FOUNDATIONS on the left are interior box columns.

The interior box columns were full lengh single pieces of steel by virtue of the 100% fillet welds joining the sections together. See the spire location page for more on the relationships of the elevator guide rails support steel and interior box columns.

The WTC 1 spire is located outside the core area.

 

[Gamolon]

It goes down to bedrock and the interio box columns surrounding the core did that, which is why they are the only vertical steel standing aound the core at GZ.

Thanks for admitting that stupid. Here is the foundation drawing. The dark grillages are for the "interior box columns".

Which is what this next photo is a closeup of.

That concrete pad goes to the bedrock as you claim. The bedrock was 55 to 80 feet down you jackass. How deep do you think the "bathtub" was? Looks 55 to 80 feet deep to me so that concrete foundation SAT on the damn bedrock.

 

[Gamolon]

The grillage and concrete pad do not constitute a foundation.

That dark grillage IS for the interior box columns that ringed your supposed concrete core walls.

I've proven that already.

 

[Christophera]

You have only proven that you misrepresent and conduct fraud using an altered image.

zoom of WTC 2 lobby w/WTC 1 exterior photoshopped onto a back layer​

Your annotated foundation is a joke. I may have mistaken the perimeter wall for the slurry wall, but the photo is an oblique and not well suited. Your annotations are completely wrong and you have nothing to support them. All other photos disprove the steel core columns. For example, the WTC 1 concrete core base wall. This photo is high quality compared to the frame of the video transferred from film of the foundation.

Of course you refuse to acknowledge the violations of law that derpive us of 6,000 photo files, so again, you've proven you are an agent working to conceal treason.

If this was not true, you could post an image of this core on 9-11.

Why haven't you done that? WHY?

 

[DiveCon]

no concrete in that photo

 

[Rat in the Hat]

You have only proven that you misrepresent and conduct fraud using an altered image.

zoom of WTC 2 lobby w/WTC 1 exterior photoshopped onto a back layer​

Your annotated foundation is a joke. I may have mistaken the perimeter wall for the slurry wall, but the photo is an oblique and not well suited. Your annotations are completely wrong and you have nothing to support them. All other photos disprove the steel core columns. For example, the WTC 1 concrete core base wall. This photo is high quality compared to the frame of the video transferred from film of the foundation.



Of course you refuse to acknowledge the violations of law that derpive us of 6,000 photo files, so again, you've proven you are an agent working to conceal treason.

If this was not true, you could post an image of this core on 9-11.


Why haven't you done that? WHY?

I may have mistaken the perimeter wall for the slurry wall

But you remember that imaginary documentary in such perfect clarity!

 

[Fizz]

The grillage and concrete pad do not constitute a foundation.

WHY do you refuse to acknowledge that guiliani took 6,000 photo files?

WHY?

In those photos AND 15,000 video tapes is all the proof of the concrete core that ANYONE would need, but you fail to recognize this.

WHY?

WHY do you fail to support your concrete core hoax every time a flaw is exposed and instead try to change the subject?

WHY?!!

 

[Christophera]

Agents often reverse the true situation in their effort to conceal treason.

If this is not concrete, what is it standing as the core of WTC 2.

 

[DiveCon]

Agents often reverse the true situation in their effort to conceal treason.

If this is not concrete, what is it standing as the core of WTC 2.

Steel core columns and gypsum wall planks plus the other things know to have been in the core
no concrete as none was ever put in the core

 

[Christophera]

Again, you are suggesting that gypsum can stand the brutal crashing of 100's of thousands of tones of structural steel crashing over it without leaving the supposed steel core columns sticking out the top. That is ludicrious.

This can only be concrete.

 

[DiveCon]

no, that can ONLY be steel core columns and gypsum wall planks because that all that was ever put in

 

[Christophera]

Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 describes a concrete core, so does the engineer of record and on 9-11 this massive concrete wall is seen toppling into the WTC 1 core.

 

[DiveCon]

nope, thats not what they said, you lie

and what you see in that gif is not a concrete core wall
because there was NO CONCRETE IN THE CORE ABOVE GRADE

 

[Christophera]

You are guilty.

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

Section 4 states “Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States” such language is clear in that a citizen is allowed and required under law to disclose if such disclosure is “cognizable by a court of the United States”

TITLE 18, PART I , CHAPTER 115, §2382 U.S. Code as of: 01/19/04
Section 2382. Misprision of treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

 

[DiveCon]

no, that would be YOU
pay you child support you fucking disgusting deadbeat

 

[Fizz]

You are guilty.

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

Section 4 states “Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States” such language is clear in that a citizen is allowed and required under law to disclose if such disclosure is “cognizable by a court of the United States”

TITLE 18, PART I , CHAPTER 115, §2382 U.S. Code as of: 01/19/04
Section 2382. Misprision of treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

so anyone that doesnt believe your concrete core hoax is guilty of treason?!!

you really are retarded!!

 

[Christophera]

Anyone who pretends to not accept independently verified evidence show a concrete core while completely failing to evidence any other core with independent validity is an agent. Do you understand independent?


in·de·pen·dent

ADJECTIVE:

1. Not governed by a foreign power; self-governing.
2. Free from the influence, guidance, or control of another or others; self-reliant: an independent mind.
3. Not determined or influenced by someone or something else; not contingent: a decision independent of the outcome of the study.
4. often Independent Affiliated with or loyal to no one political party or organization.
5. Not dependent on or affiliated with a larger or controlling entity: an independent food store; an independent film.
6.
1. Not relying on others for support, care, or funds; self-supporting.
2. Providing or being sufficient income to enable one to live without working: a person of independent means.
7. Mathematics
1. Not dependent on other variables.
2. Of or relating to a system of equations no one of which can be derived from another equation in the system.


Independently verified evidence of the concrete core.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work for justifying explanation for collapse, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

 

[Fizz]

Anyone who pretends to not accept independently verified evidence show a concrete core while completely failing to evidence any other core with independent validity is an agent. Do you understand independent?

do you understand "verified"?!!

who independently verified (what you call) evidence?!!