Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

There is no reason why anyone should believe anything you state.

Particularly because the below photo shows the same exact box column that the spire is comprised of, just left of the massive concrete wall segment bellow. To the right where the core area is there is nothing. Empty.

The spire is one of the columns left of the concrete base wall but this one is on the opposite side of the building from the spire. The interior box columns are the inner wall of the outer steel framework. The perimeter walls stand to the left and in the background and in the photo in question that shows the spire, the perimeter walls have fallen.. Your efforts to misinterpret the image are obvious.

wtc1.core.wall.base.annot4.jpg

Agent CriscoFEARa:

The insight seems to always elude you. When you (as you so often do) post an image of the steel core structure showing not a speck of concrete and try to tell us that you aree somehow offering "proof" of a concrete core, you are establishing nothing other than the fact that you are a liar or retarded.

For, to put a point on it for you, moron, there ain't no concrete in the image you keep posting.

Agent CriscoFEARa looks at the following image and, like Pavlov's dog at the sound of the bell, starts to salivate :cuckoo: and happily cry out, "Concrete!"
steel_beams1.jpg


And yet, as everyone else can clearly see, it's still steel.
 
hey jackass. see where you claim the 12 foot concrete core is in this picture?
wtc1.core.wall.base.annot4.jpg


well we can see right through it in this picture!! YOUR CONCRETE CORE DOESNT EXIST!! :lol::lol:
9973d1271009130-fema-deceives-nation-about-twin-towers-core-wtccoreshilouette-where.jpg
 
There is no reason why anyone should believe anything you state.

Particularly because the below photo shows the same exact box column that the spire is comprised of, just left of the massive concrete wall segment bellow. To the right where the core area is there is nothing. Empty.

The spire is one of the columns left of the concrete base wall but this one is on the opposite side of the building from the spire. The interior box columns are the inner wall of the outer steel framework. The perimeter walls stand to the left and in the background and in the photo in question that shows the spire, the perimeter walls have fallen.. Your efforts to misinterpret the image are obvious.

wtc1.core.wall.base.annot4.jpg
hey dipshit, where is this concrete in that photo?
i see steel and gypsum wall planks


btw, the width of those excavators you see in that photo are aprox. 12'
if you look at the one closest to your alledged 12' of concrete, you can see that space is not even CLOSE to being 12' accross
another FAIL by dipshit delusional christoFEARa


source for the width of excavator
http://www.hitachi-c-m.com/global/products/excavator/medium/zx400lch-3/dimension_1.html
(and that is using the LARGEST model of the type excavator they make)
 
Last edited:
In service to the infiltrating perpetrators you pretend you have not resized the image by clicking on the yellow bar at top.

Once that is done it is quite clear that the annotated dimensioning of the concrete core wall at its base is very close to the width of the excavators counterweight which might be slightly less than 12 where the track width is over 12 with that size machine.
 
In service to the infiltrating perpetrators you pretend you have not resized the image by clicking on the yellow bar at top.

Once that is done it is quite clear that the annotated dimensioning of the concrete core wall at its base is very close to the width of the excavators counterweight which might be slightly less than 12 where the track width is over 12 with that size machine.
not the one closest to it which would have the closest perspective
you remain a fucking imbecile

and besides, there is NO CONCRETE SHOWN IN THAT PHOTO
 
In service to the infiltrating perpetrators you pretend you have not resized the image by clicking on the yellow bar at top.

Once that is done it is quite clear that the annotated dimensioning of the concrete core wall at its base is very close to the width of the excavators counterweight which might be slightly less than 12 where the track width is over 12 with that size machine.

its not even close, jackass!! :lol:
 
divot said:
not the one closest to it which would have the closest perspective
you remain a fucking imbecile
divot said:
not the one closest to it which would have the closest perspective
you remain a fucking imbecile

You pretend I would use the other which would make a 30 foot wide core. Have you changed you game to pretending you are an imbecile now?

divot said:
and besides, there is NO CONCRETE SHOWN IN THAT PHOTO

It has a 3x7 hallway running the length of the wall segment. Read the annotation. Enough of this pretending!

wtc1.core.wall.base.annot4.jpg



and besides, there is NO CONCRETE SHOWN IN THAT PHOTO
 
divot said:
not the one closest to it which would have the closest perspective
you remain a fucking imbecile
divot said:
not the one closest to it which would have the closest perspective
you remain a fucking imbecile

You pretend I would use the other which would make a 30 foot wide core. Have you changed you game to pretending you are an imbecile now?

divot said:
and besides, there is NO CONCRETE SHOWN IN THAT PHOTO

It has a 3x7 hallway running the length of the wall segment. Read the annotation. Enough of this pretending!

wtc1.core.wall.base.annot4.jpg



and besides, there is NO CONCRETE SHOWN IN THAT PHOTO
dipshit, you post images that show STEEL CORE
yet you claim concrete
you are the fucking imbecile
 
The images do not show ANYTHING in the core. Only steel surrounding the core, just like the steel in this image is on the right. What is on the left is too thick and has the appearance of fractured concrete on the edge facing the camera.

wtc1spirecorewall.jpg
 
The images do not show ANYTHING in the core. Only steel surrounding the core, just like the steel in this image is on the right. What is on the left is too thick and has the appearance of fractured concrete on the edge facing the camera.

wtc1spirecorewall.jpg
that image shows STEEL CORE COLUMNS
dipshit
 
You can pretend you believe that all you want, but no one will believe it with you, . . . except your fellow agents in your false society of deception.
 
They don't have to believe me, they can believe the buildings engineer of record.
By Katherine Stroup Newsweek Web Exclusive.
Sept. 13 - Leslie Robertson, one of two engineers who designed the World Trade Center[/img]
1166187.standard.jpg

“It was just terrible to watch, painful and horrible.”
Still, Robertson, whose firm is responsible for three of the six tallest buildings in the world, feels a sense of pride that the massive towers, supported by a steel-tube exoskeleton and a reinforced concrete core, held up as well as they did—managing to stand for over an hour despite direct hits from two massive commercial jetliners.


They can believe Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Innovation, published in 1992..

They can use common sense with EVIDENCE, and KNOW there was a concrete core.

southcorestands.gif
 
There is no reason why anyone should believe anything you state.

Particularly because the below photo shows the same exact box column that the spire is comprised of, just left of the massive concrete wall segment bellow. To the right where the core area is there is nothing. Empty.

The spire is one of the columns left of the concrete base wall but this one is on the opposite side of the building from the spire. The interior box columns are the inner wall of the outer steel framework. The perimeter walls stand to the left and in the background and in the photo in question that shows the spire, the perimeter walls have fallen.. Your efforts to misinterpret the image are obvious.

wtc1.core.wall.base.annot4.jpg

It's just too bad for Chrissy-poo that the only concrete I see is in the buildings around the WTC site, and not in the rubble of the towers.

Hey Chrissy, why is there no concrete in the mixed load of scrap in the bed of the dump truck they are loading? It's not like they made an effort to sort the dump loads, they just wanted to get the debris off site. Surely if there were thousands of tons of concrete in the core (as only you claim) then there would have to be some visible on the truck.
 
They don't have to believe me, they can believe the buildings engineer of record.
By Katherine Stroup Newsweek Web Exclusive.
Sept. 13 - Leslie Robertson, one of two engineers who designed the World Trade Center[/img]
1166187.standard.jpg

“It was just terrible to watch, painful and horrible.”
Still, Robertson, whose firm is responsible for three of the six tallest buildings in the world, feels a sense of pride that the massive towers, supported by a steel-tube exoskeleton and a reinforced concrete core, held up as well as they did—managing to stand for over an hour despite direct hits from two massive commercial jetliners.


They can believe Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Innovation, published in 1992..

They can use common sense with EVIDENCE, and KNOW there was a concrete core.

southcorestands.gif


common sense (something which you are severely lacking, by the way) says that you are lying and claiming robertson said something that was actually said by a reporter.

find any pictures of a concrete core yet?
find any documentation to your claim of "elevator guide rail support" that you pulled out of your ass?
find any documentation to support your claim that the cores were radically different?
find any pictures of the concrete core getting constructed?
find any building plans for a concrete core?

corecloseupbest.jpg



Image194Resized.jpg



nocore.jpg



d5.jpg



im958lguq5.jpg



im_652_lg.jpg



im_612_lg.jpg



im_580_lg.jpg



im534lgwo5.jpg



im_853_lg.jpg



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB6xdCS9NJU]YouTube - 9/11: Why They Fell pt 2[/ame]


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqDTEZIdg7g&feature=PlayList&p=A6382FD1025BACE9&index=62]YouTube - WTC 1&2 UNIQUE DESIGN.[/ame]


"For a combination of historical, cultural and economic reasons, tall, concrete-core buildings dedicated to office use are unusual in New York, where builders prefer the wallboard-enclosed cores with steel frames that Mr. Robertson pioneered in the trade center."
New York Timeshere


"Engineers are still debating whether the Twin Towers' unique structure should be credited for surviving the initial crashes, or blamed for collapsing in the subsequent fires, or both. But the point is that it was unique, utilizing closely spaced columns connected to a steel core by relatively lightweight floor trusses. "
Newsweek. Newsweek.com


"Each of the towers, more than 200 ft. wide on each side, contained a central steel core surrounded by open office space. Eighteen-inch steel tubes ran vertically along the outside, providing much of the support for the building"
Time Magazine.TIME.com


"The twin towers were the first supertall buildings designed without any masonry. Worried that the intense air pressure created by the building's high speed elevators might buckle conventional shafts, engineers designed a solution using a drywall system fixed to the reinforced steel core. "
engineering.comENGINEERING.com


"Like many high-rises built in the 1960s, the Twin Towers were constructed with their weight distributed between a hollow steel core (containing services like elevators) and steel columns around the perimeter, maximizing open floor space. Many believe the older high-rise design, in which steel columns are often encased in concrete, is more fire resistant.

“A lot of people have told me, ‘You should have used more concrete in the structure,’” said Robertson. However, his chart plotting the strength of steel vs. concrete at various temperatures showed that at the incendiary levels that raged in the towers, the two materials become similarly weak."
Berkeley 04.17.2002 - World Trade Center remembered


"Yamasaki has switched from concrete, his favorite medium, to steel because of the sheer height of the towers, and instead of having the weight of the structure carried by the frame and the elevator core, the great steel columns of the exterior walls will support it."
Time Magazine article from 1964!! Art: Onward & Upward - TIME

im_837_lg.jpg


9689d1268553338-fema-deceives-nation-about-twin-towers-core-screencaptureinsidewtc.jpg

9983d1271115398-fema-deceives-nation-about-twin-towers-core-5712.jpg
 
They don't have to believe me, they can believe the buildings engineer of record.
By Katherine Stroup Newsweek Web Exclusive.
Sept. 13 - Leslie Robertson, one of two engineers who designed the World Trade Center[/img]
1166187.standard.jpg

“It was just terrible to watch, painful and horrible.”

that is all you have actually quoted
the rest is a stupid reporters words
 
In service to the infiltrators of the US government, usurpers of the Constitution, perpetrators of mass murder, you attempt to conceal felony and futher the acts of treason.

Many people know deep inside that this is happening. If they read your words, they would have knowledge it is happening.

jpayne-2001Sep22-012-pr.jpg
 
In service to the infiltrators of the US government, usurpers of the Constitution, perpetrators of mass murder, you attempt to conceal felony and futher the acts of treason.

Many people know deep inside that this is happening. If they read your words, they would have knowledge it is happening.
most people see you for the dipshit you are

thank God
 
Since you fail to recognize the violation of law relating to the deprivation of public records for public buildings, your act is revolting.
i recognize violations of the law, like YOU not paying your child support
pay your support, dipshit
 

Forum List

Back
Top