Tolerance? Not for Christians...

And if as she grows up she comes to realize that she was wrong and can work with such students?

Both sides of the issue are not known, but I see this as the professors persecuting a student that won't comply with their wishes. They are using their authoritative power to beat her down and under no circumstances should that be allowed.

She is being ordered to undergo diversity training. Other students are not! They have pulled her out of the other students in her class and put additional requirements upon her (one wonders if they are going to make her pay for this additional requirement as well) and that is the problem.

If they think "diversity training" is a necessity for the profession then they should include in in the curriculum for all students, not just Ms. Keeton.

Immie

persecuting? what a terrible misnomer. is is 'persecution' for a medical student to study biology? chemistry? or should he whine if he's tossed from a pre-med program if he says the world is 6,000 years old?

no one is talking about 'diversity training', they're talking about the radical deciding she should pick and choose what she feels like from the course requirements.

like i said earlier, is a muslim being *persecuted* if he gets fired from a butcher shop for refusing to work with pork?

You are incorrect in this. They are talking about diversity training. They told her she could continue if she went through "remediation training" = diversity training and they want her to attend a gay pride parade.

They are not insisting that other students attend these events.

As for your comment about pre-med, if passing those courses is required for the program for all students and someone does not pass those courses then he should be expelled. That is not the case here. Here the only indication we have as to what is going on, is that the school wants to segregate her and force her to change her beliefs or lose every dime she has paid into the program and get nothing in return.

Immie

Is her faith in Christianity so weak that she would lose it going to a gay pride parade or taking diversity training? We don't know how Keeton behaved in class but it must have been mighty extreme for the professors to have gone this route.
 
Last edited:
And if as she grows up she comes to realize that she was wrong and can work with such students?

Both sides of the issue are not known, but I see this as the professors persecuting a student that won't comply with their wishes. They are using their authoritative power to beat her down and under no circumstances should that be allowed.

She is being ordered to undergo diversity training. Other students are not! They have pulled her out of the other students in her class and put additional requirements upon her (one wonders if they are going to make her pay for this additional requirement as well) and that is the problem.

If they think "diversity training" is a necessity for the profession then they should include in in the curriculum for all students, not just Ms. Keeton.

Immie

persecuting? what a terrible misnomer. is is 'persecution' for a medical student to study biology? chemistry? or should he whine if he's tossed from a pre-med program if he says the world is 6,000 years old?

no one is talking about 'diversity training', they're talking about the radical deciding she should pick and choose what she feels like from the course requirements.

like i said earlier, is a muslim being *persecuted* if he gets fired from a butcher shop for refusing to work with pork?

You are incorrect in this. They are talking about diversity training. They told her she could continue if she went through "remediation training" = diversity training and they want her to attend a gay pride parade.

They are not insisting that other students attend these events.

As for your comment about pre-med, if passing those courses is required for the program for all students and someone does not pass those courses then he should be expelled. That is not the case here. Here the only indication we have as to what is going on, is that the school wants to segregate her and force her to change her beliefs or lose every dime she has paid into the program and get nothing in return.

Immie

they only told her to go for remediation because she refused to complete her coursework.

would it be terrible for her to learn not to discriminate?

you can think what you want about this extremist trying to impose her agenda on the school SHE chose and no one forced her to go to...

i think she's out...

and so will any court hearing the case.
 
I haven't had a chance to read this whole thread but I was thinking of this example last night....What if a student going for their law degree refused to defend a rapist in a mock trial during class...? Wouldn't the student fail the class for refusing to defend the rapist on the grounds they were morally opposed to rape?

A defense attorney needs to be able to defend clients regardless of the crime or wheher the defendant is guilty.


Yes, that's what I'm saying...So if the student refuses to perform the legal exercise on the grounds it is against their morality to ever defend a rapist, would they not also fail law school just like this counseling student failed counseling school...?





Sorry, that's not to equate homosexuality with rape, just the issue of people trying to pull their morality into the picture, I think it's a good analogy. Part of the degree process is demonstrating the capacity to remain objective and professional.
 
Last edited:
I haven't had a chance to read this whole thread but I was thinking of this example last night....What if a student going for their law degree refused to defend a rapist in a mock trial during class...? Wouldn't the student fail the class for refusing to defend the rapist on the grounds they were morally opposed to rape?

A defense attorney needs to be able to defend clients regardless of the crime or wheher the defendant is guilty.


Yes, that's what I'm saying...So if the student refuses to perform the legal exercise on the grounds it is against their morality to ever defend a rapist, would they not also fail law school just like this counseling student failed counseling school...?

To my knowledge she has not refused to perform any of the requirements in the course except for attending a gay pride parade which no other students were required to attend and the diversity training that no other student was required to attend.

It is wrong to make her perform additional tasks that other students are not required to complete and to require "passing" grades on these additional tasks for her to graduate.

Immie
 
Sorry, that's not to equate homosexuality with rape, just the issue of people trying to pull their morality into the picture, I think it's a good analogy. Part of the degree process is demonstrating the capacity to remain objective and professional.

She should have faked it and got a pass like the rest of the bigoted people who will graduate. I can just imagine a liberal counselor setting aside all of his/her biases to help a conservative Christian client.
 
Immie, there is alot more to this story than meets the eye. I don't give Ms Keeton the benefit of the doubt because I have run into fanatics like her before.

She should not be licensed by the ACA or APA .

I don't care if she gets her degree I just want her to stay the hell away from vulnerable gay clients.

She needs to work for a Christian agency.

And if as she grows up she comes to realize that she was wrong and can work with such students?

Both sides of the issue are not known, but I see this as the professors persecuting a student that won't comply with their wishes. They are using their authoritative power to beat her down and under no circumstances should that be allowed.

She is being ordered to undergo diversity training. Other students are not! They have pulled her out of the other students in her class and put additional requirements upon her (one wonders if they are going to make her pay for this additional requirement as well) and that is the problem.

If they think "diversity training" is a necessity for the profession then they should include in in the curriculum for all students, not just Ms. Keeton.

Immie

Ms Keeton is clearly in need of diversity training. Diversity training introduces the participant to cultural values other than their own.

Maybe Keeton needs to study with this gal instead of trying to make in a secular counseling program:

"Cindy Jacobs claims the power to cast out gay demons. During an evening ceremony at the conference Jacobs conducted a mass exorcism, casting out not only “spirits” of homosexuality but also spirits of pornography, addiction, lust, bisexuality, and perversion."
“Gay Demon” Exorcist Cindy Jacobs To Share Stage With Virginia GOP Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli SpeakEasy

Why is Ms. Keeton in need of diversity training?

Simply because she does not agree with your point of view?

Maybe some people on this site would benefit from "diversity training"... wait, there is no maybe about that. ;)

Immie
 
And if as she grows up she comes to realize that she was wrong and can work with such students?

Both sides of the issue are not known, but I see this as the professors persecuting a student that won't comply with their wishes. They are using their authoritative power to beat her down and under no circumstances should that be allowed.

She is being ordered to undergo diversity training. Other students are not! They have pulled her out of the other students in her class and put additional requirements upon her (one wonders if they are going to make her pay for this additional requirement as well) and that is the problem.

If they think "diversity training" is a necessity for the profession then they should include in in the curriculum for all students, not just Ms. Keeton.

Immie

Ms Keeton is clearly in need of diversity training. Diversity training introduces the participant to cultural values other than their own.

Maybe Keeton needs to study with this gal instead of trying to make in a secular counseling program:

"Cindy Jacobs claims the power to cast out gay demons. During an evening ceremony at the conference Jacobs conducted a mass exorcism, casting out not only “spirits” of homosexuality but also spirits of pornography, addiction, lust, bisexuality, and perversion."
“Gay Demon” Exorcist Cindy Jacobs To Share Stage With Virginia GOP Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli SpeakEasy

Why is Ms. Keeton in need of diversity training?

Simply because she does not agree with your point of view?

Maybe some people on this site would benefit from "diversity training"... wait, there is no maybe about that. ;)

Immie

IMO everyone can benefit from diversity training. One of the things it does is help a person look at their own biases.

Obviously, I have biases myself.

Keeton is biased against homosexuality and she wouldn't shut up about it in class. She brought her bias to the faculty's attention repeatedly.

I don't know why it seems so threatening to a supposedly strong Christian to attend diversity training.

My guess is her faith is weak.
 
Sorry, that's not to equate homosexuality with rape, just the issue of people trying to pull their morality into the picture, I think it's a good analogy. Part of the degree process is demonstrating the capacity to remain objective and professional.

She should have faked it and got a pass like the rest of the bigoted people who will graduate. I can just imagine a liberal counselor setting aside all of his/her biases to help a conservative Christian client.

I wouldn't counsel a conservative Christian. I would refer to another counselor.
 
A defense attorney needs to be able to defend clients regardless of the crime or wheher the defendant is guilty.


Yes, that's what I'm saying...So if the student refuses to perform the legal exercise on the grounds it is against their morality to ever defend a rapist, would they not also fail law school just like this counseling student failed counseling school...?

To my knowledge she has not refused to perform any of the requirements in the course except for attending a gay pride parade which no other students were required to attend and the diversity training that no other student was required to attend.

It is wrong to make her perform additional tasks that other students are not required to complete and to require "passing" grades on these additional tasks for her to graduate.

Immie




Yeah, I'm mixing up this story with the the other one who refused to even meet with them as part of her random assignment.

Still, the professional standard needs to be met either way if you want to achieve a professional degree...Not a Christian standard or a Liberal standard, a professional standard, be it law or counseling...

A law student required to defend a criminal is not being forced to "embrace" a crime, is he? His legal defense does not equal an endorsement of the crime, right?
 
persecuting? what a terrible misnomer. is is 'persecution' for a medical student to study biology? chemistry? or should he whine if he's tossed from a pre-med program if he says the world is 6,000 years old?

no one is talking about 'diversity training', they're talking about the radical deciding she should pick and choose what she feels like from the course requirements.

like i said earlier, is a muslim being *persecuted* if he gets fired from a butcher shop for refusing to work with pork?

You are incorrect in this. They are talking about diversity training. They told her she could continue if she went through "remediation training" = diversity training and they want her to attend a gay pride parade.

They are not insisting that other students attend these events.

As for your comment about pre-med, if passing those courses is required for the program for all students and someone does not pass those courses then he should be expelled. That is not the case here. Here the only indication we have as to what is going on, is that the school wants to segregate her and force her to change her beliefs or lose every dime she has paid into the program and get nothing in return.

Immie

Is her faith in Christianity so weak that she would lose it going to a gay pride parade or taking diversity training? We don't know how Keeton behaved in class but it must have been mighty extreme for the professors to have gone this route.

You're missing the point, Sky. She shouldn't be required to do things that other students aren't required to do, BASED UPON HER FAITH ONLY.

And I don't believe it was even that stuff that she balked at. It was being required to promise to AFFIRM homosexuality to her patients. That's NOT a requirement of a counselor, it flies in the face of her faith, and it isn't required of other students.

This is like asking black students to attend special classes (aka, segregation) based on the fact that they're black. Or asking gay students to "affirm" the lifestyle of patients who admit they bash gays. It's the same thing exactly. Just because you happen to agree with this particular bias doesn't make it ok.
 
You are incorrect in this. They are talking about diversity training. They told her she could continue if she went through "remediation training" = diversity training and they want her to attend a gay pride parade.

They are not insisting that other students attend these events.

As for your comment about pre-med, if passing those courses is required for the program for all students and someone does not pass those courses then he should be expelled. That is not the case here. Here the only indication we have as to what is going on, is that the school wants to segregate her and force her to change her beliefs or lose every dime she has paid into the program and get nothing in return.

Immie

Is her faith in Christianity so weak that she would lose it going to a gay pride parade or taking diversity training? We don't know how Keeton behaved in class but it must have been mighty extreme for the professors to have gone this route.

You're missing the point, Sky. She shouldn't be required to do things that other students aren't required to do, BASED UPON HER FAITH ONLY.

And I don't believe it was even that stuff that she balked at. It was being required to promise to AFFIRM homosexuality to her patients. That's NOT a requirement of a counselor, it flies in the face of her faith, and it isn't required of other students.

This is like asking black students to attend special classes (aka, segregation) based on the fact that they're black. Or asking gay students to "affirm" the lifestyle of patients who admit they bash gays. It's the same thing exactly. Just because you happen to agree with this particular bias doesn't make it ok.

Allie--

She is not being asked to take diversity training based her her religion. She is being asked to take because of her anti-gay bigotry.

Bigotry is not a Christian value.
 
The Bible apparently says that homosexuality is a sin. But so what Ms Keeton?

This does not make any sense.

Yes, the Bible states that homosexuality is a sin, but so is a man trimming his beard.

The Bible does not say that homosexuality is the "unforgivable" sin.

My belief about the "Law", is that it was given to mankind to show us that we are all sinners and that we need a savior. It shows us all that we are separated from God. The law condemns while the Gospel saves. I believe that is how Ms. Keeton sees the Law and the Gospel. I do not believe that she sees the homosexual as "lost" anymore than she sees any other human being as lost.

That being said, she needs to keep her beliefs to herself in a professional setting. If she can't do that then she should not be in the profession.

That being said, it is not up to ASU to fail her on religious grounds which is exactly what they seem to be attempting to do here. If she has passed the course work, which it appears she has and they are attempting to fail her because she believes that homosexuality is a choice because that is what her faith has taught her. Even though she has discussed conversion therapy as a viable method, it is still the responsibility of the school to give her the degree.

She has paid the university for the education and the degree. She has not asked them to license her to practice psychology. That comes at the next level. It is up to the state to determine whether or not she is qualified to practice.

Immie
 
Sorry, that's not to equate homosexuality with rape, just the issue of people trying to pull their morality into the picture, I think it's a good analogy. Part of the degree process is demonstrating the capacity to remain objective and professional.

She should have faked it and got a pass like the rest of the bigoted people who will graduate. I can just imagine a liberal counselor setting aside all of his/her biases to help a conservative Christian client.

I wouldn't counsel a conservative Christian. I would refer to another counselor.

Another student was ousted from another school when she asked to refer a client to a different counselor.

Not this one, though. Keeton never refused to treat gay clients; nor did she say anything that could be interpreted as an intent to preach to them or even bring up her religion in counseling sessions.
 
The Bible apparently says that homosexuality is a sin. But so what Ms Keeton?

This does not make any sense.

Yes, the Bible states that homosexuality is a sin, but so is a man trimming his beard.

The Bible does not say that homosexuality is the "unforgivable" sin.

My belief about the "Law", is that it was given to mankind to show us that we are all sinners and that we need a savior. It shows us all that we are separated from God. The law condemns while the Gospel saves. I believe that is how Ms. Keeton sees the Law and the Gospel. I do not believe that she sees the homosexual as "lost" anymore than she sees any other human being as lost.

That being said, she needs to keep her beliefs to herself in a professional setting. If she can't do that then she should not be in the profession.

That being said, it is not up to ASU to fail her on religious grounds which is exactly what they seem to be attempting to do here. If she has passed the course work, which it appears she has and they are attempting to fail her because she believes that homosexuality is a choice because that is what her faith has taught her. Even though she has discussed conversion therapy as a viable method, it is still the responsibility of the school to give her the degree.

She has paid the university for the education and the degree. She has not asked them to license her to practice psychology. That comes at the next level. It is up to the state to determine whether or not she is qualified to practice.

Immie

It is up to the university to insist that Keeton be educated.
 
She should have faked it and got a pass like the rest of the bigoted people who will graduate. I can just imagine a liberal counselor setting aside all of his/her biases to help a conservative Christian client.

I wouldn't counsel a conservative Christian. I would refer to another counselor.

Another student was ousted from another school when she asked to refer a client to a different counselor.

Not this one, though. Keeton never refused to treat gay clients; nor did she say anything that could be interpreted as an intent to preach to them or even bring up her religion in counseling sessions.

How do you know Allie? You don't. We're all speculating wildly.

As far as the other case is concerned, it is perfectly acceptable to refer a client to another counselor. The problem in that case was the gay client was suicidal. The counselor had a responsibility to not dump the client out in the middle of a crisis due to personal moral aversion.
 
Last edited:
The only "standards" that she is seeking to be exempted from are the ones that the university has added to her requirement to graduate that are not being forced upon all students i.e. diversity training and attendance at a gay pride parade.

Immie

No - the standards required by the program itself are the ones she wishes to be exempt from via lawsuit.

All of this was posted by Sky through out this thread in considerable detail, with links.

The school, in order to maintain it's accredidation for that degree must meet the following:
From just page 5 of the 2009 Standards of The Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP)…..

I. The Academic Unit
P. The program faculty conducts a systematic developmental assessment of each student’s progress throughout the program, including consideration of the student’s academic performance, professional development, and personal development. Consistent with established institutional due process policy and the American Counseling Association’s (ACA) code of ethics and other relevant codes of ethics and standards of practice, if evaluations indicate that a student is not appropriate for the program, faculty members help facilitate the student’s transition out of the program and, if possible, into a more appropriate area of study.

As Sky already posted, ASU, specifically states:
The ASU Counselor Education program is committed to ensuring that graduates both understand and can fulfill their obligations to set personal values aside and empower clients to solve their own problems. As counselor educators in a CACREP accredited program, faculty have a duty to ensure that those completing our program will affirm and abide by these ethical codes in all counseling situations.

The counseling profession requires its practitioners to recognize that people set and adhere to their own moral compass. The professional counselor's job is to help clients clarify their current feelings and behaviors and to help them reach the goals that they have determine for themselves, not to dictate what those goals should be or what morals they should possess, or what values they should adopt."


Among the guidelines she rejects or wishes exempt from are:

" Each person has the right to be respected, be treated with dignity and have access to a comprehensive school counseling program that advocates for and affirms all students from diverse populations regardless of ethnic/racial status, age, economic status, special needs, English as a second language or other language group, immigration status, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity/expression[/Bn, family type, religious/spiritual identity and appearance……..


Also, http://www.usmessageboard.com/2560136-post167.html
 
A defense attorney needs to be able to defend clients regardless of the crime or wheher the defendant is guilty.


Yes, that's what I'm saying...So if the student refuses to perform the legal exercise on the grounds it is against their morality to ever defend a rapist, would they not also fail law school just like this counseling student failed counseling school...?

To my knowledge she has not refused to perform any of the requirements in the course except for attending a gay pride parade which no other students were required to attend and the diversity training that no other student was required to attend.

It is wrong to make her perform additional tasks that other students are not required to complete and to require "passing" grades on these additional tasks for her to graduate.

Immie


Actually, that was not a requirement - it was one of several suggestions for ways in which she could learn more about the gay community.

How do you know that no other graduate student in that program has not had to a remediation?
 
Last edited:
Yes, that's what I'm saying...So if the student refuses to perform the legal exercise on the grounds it is against their morality to ever defend a rapist, would they not also fail law school just like this counseling student failed counseling school...?

To my knowledge she has not refused to perform any of the requirements in the course except for attending a gay pride parade which no other students were required to attend and the diversity training that no other student was required to attend.

It is wrong to make her perform additional tasks that other students are not required to complete and to require "passing" grades on these additional tasks for her to graduate.

Immie


Actually, that was not a requirement - it was one of several suggestions for ways in which she could learn more about the gay community.

What harm is there in attending a gay pride parade?
 
To my knowledge she has not refused to perform any of the requirements in the course except for attending a gay pride parade which no other students were required to attend and the diversity training that no other student was required to attend.

It is wrong to make her perform additional tasks that other students are not required to complete and to require "passing" grades on these additional tasks for her to graduate.

Immie


Actually, that was not a requirement - it was one of several suggestions for ways in which she could learn more about the gay community.

What harm is there in attending a gay pride parade?

None. I just prefer accuracy.
 
persecuting? what a terrible misnomer. is is 'persecution' for a medical student to study biology? chemistry? or should he whine if he's tossed from a pre-med program if he says the world is 6,000 years old?

no one is talking about 'diversity training', they're talking about the radical deciding she should pick and choose what she feels like from the course requirements.

like i said earlier, is a muslim being *persecuted* if he gets fired from a butcher shop for refusing to work with pork?

You are incorrect in this. They are talking about diversity training. They told her she could continue if she went through "remediation training" = diversity training and they want her to attend a gay pride parade.

They are not insisting that other students attend these events.

As for your comment about pre-med, if passing those courses is required for the program for all students and someone does not pass those courses then he should be expelled. That is not the case here. Here the only indication we have as to what is going on, is that the school wants to segregate her and force her to change her beliefs or lose every dime she has paid into the program and get nothing in return.

Immie

Is her faith in Christianity so weak that she would lose it going to a gay pride parade or taking diversity training? We don't know how Keeton behaved in class but it must have been mighty extreme for the professors to have gone this route.

Who knows about her faith? It really does not matter whether her faith is weak or not. The point is they want her to under go extra curricular activities that are not required of other students.

I really do not care if the professors agree with her or not. That is immaterial. I don't agree with her, but I respect her right to hold beliefs differing from my own just as I respect both your right and Jillian's to hold different faiths than my own. If she cannot perform in a professional manner then she should not be licensed, however, it is not up to the university to license her. It is up to the state.

No, we don't know that her behavior was all that extreme. It might also be that she was a vocal pain in the ass and her professors simply do not like the attitude she has given them. Maybe she had Straight A's (I doubt it or they would have mentioned it in the article) so far and there is simply no way they can expel her on academic grounds so they have chosen this route instead. That is speculation, but as plausible as your "extreme" example.

Immie
 

Forum List

Back
Top