Kondor3
Cafeteria Centrist
- Jul 29, 2009
- 34,063
- 10,005
It says no such thing and you know it.Really... because it seemed like a letter letting Iran know that it should buckle down and pursue it's nukes because America will just betray them anyways.It was an informative letter to remind a President who seems to not understand his place, that the most he can do is cut a deal, and that anything permanent will need the approval of congress. Do you disagree with the fact that the content of the letter is accurate?This was a direct attempt to torpedo negotiations that will otherwise result in Iran continuing their nuclear program without having to answer to anyone. The Ayatollah is probably pretty happy at the approval rating bump you all gave him too.You mean the traitors like Pelosi and Kennedy, and the rest who spoke with foreign leaders against their President?So do you pity the traitor senators who put their party before America to warn them not to trust us and stay on their path?![]()
BTW...did you call Pelosi & Company traitors? Did you claim that they were trying to torpedo a GOP President when they did far worse?
Its funny that you think that Obama is going to somehow keep them from getting nukes with this deal to begin with, but even more amazing that you would actually trust them to keep their word with out a treaty that is enforceable by International Law.....Oh wait....he can't get one without Congress.....amazing how right those 47 Senators are, isn't it?
Their Failed Messiah has apparently been 'channeling' the ghost of Neville Chamberlain in all of this Iranian nuclear treaty business...
![neville-chamberlain.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scifiideas.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F06%2Fneville-chamberlain.jpg&hash=bb48f9e949b172147e950d9ccbb864cc)
And they don't see anything wrong with that...
They're beyond saving in such matters...
Another argument in favor of Senatorial Intervention, and putting the President on a short leash for the remainder of his term...