Tom Cotton Explains Iran Letter to Bob Schieffer -Video

So do you pity the traitor senators who put their party before America to warn them not to trust us and stay on their path?
You mean the traitors like Pelosi and Kennedy, and the rest who spoke with foreign leaders against their President?
This was a direct attempt to torpedo negotiations that will otherwise result in Iran continuing their nuclear program without having to answer to anyone. The Ayatollah is probably pretty happy at the approval rating bump you all gave him too. :cool:
It was an informative letter to remind a President who seems to not understand his place, that the most he can do is cut a deal, and that anything permanent will need the approval of congress. Do you disagree with the fact that the content of the letter is accurate?

BTW...did you call Pelosi & Company traitors? Did you claim that they were trying to torpedo a GOP President when they did far worse?
Really... because it seemed like a letter letting Iran know that it should buckle down and pursue it's nukes because America will just betray them anyways.
It says no such thing and you know it.

Its funny that you think that Obama is going to somehow keep them from getting nukes with this deal to begin with, but even more amazing that you would actually trust them to keep their word with out a treaty that is enforceable by International Law.....Oh wait....he can't get one without Congress.....amazing how right those 47 Senators are, isn't it?

Their Failed Messiah has apparently been 'channeling' the ghost of Neville Chamberlain in all of this Iranian nuclear treaty business...

neville-chamberlain.jpg


And they don't see anything wrong with that...

They're beyond saving in such matters...

Another argument in favor of Senatorial Intervention, and putting the President on a short leash for the remainder of his term...
 
Interesting how many on the right are incapable of simply admitting that the letter was a mistake and wrong.
 
Interesting how many on the right are incapable of simply admitting that the letter was a mistake and wrong.

Interesting how many on the left still believe a president that is a proven liar and a completely incompetent negotiator.
 
You mean the traitors like Pelosi and Kennedy, and the rest who spoke with foreign leaders against their President?
This was a direct attempt to torpedo negotiations that will otherwise result in Iran continuing their nuclear program without having to answer to anyone. The Ayatollah is probably pretty happy at the approval rating bump you all gave him too. :cool:
It was an informative letter to remind a President who seems to not understand his place, that the most he can do is cut a deal, and that anything permanent will need the approval of congress. Do you disagree with the fact that the content of the letter is accurate?

BTW...did you call Pelosi & Company traitors? Did you claim that they were trying to torpedo a GOP President when they did far worse?
Really... because it seemed like a letter letting Iran know that it should buckle down and pursue it's nukes because America will just betray them anyways.
It says no such thing and you know it.

Its funny that you think that Obama is going to somehow keep them from getting nukes with this deal to begin with, but even more amazing that you would actually trust them to keep their word with out a treaty that is enforceable by International Law.....Oh wait....he can't get one without Congress.....amazing how right those 47 Senators are, isn't it?

Their Failed Messiah has apparently been 'channeling' the ghost of Neville Chamberlain in all of this Iranian nuclear treaty business...

neville-chamberlain.jpg


And they don't see anything wrong with that...

They're beyond saving in such matters...

Another argument in favor of Senatorial Intervention, and putting the President on a short leash for the remainder of his term...
You recall that Chamberlain was Conservative, Right?
 
This was a direct attempt to torpedo negotiations that will otherwise result in Iran continuing their nuclear program without having to answer to anyone. The Ayatollah is probably pretty happy at the approval rating bump you all gave him too. :cool:
It was an informative letter to remind a President who seems to not understand his place, that the most he can do is cut a deal, and that anything permanent will need the approval of congress. Do you disagree with the fact that the content of the letter is accurate?

BTW...did you call Pelosi & Company traitors? Did you claim that they were trying to torpedo a GOP President when they did far worse?
Really... because it seemed like a letter letting Iran know that it should buckle down and pursue it's nukes because America will just betray them anyways.
It says no such thing and you know it.

Its funny that you think that Obama is going to somehow keep them from getting nukes with this deal to begin with, but even more amazing that you would actually trust them to keep their word with out a treaty that is enforceable by International Law.....Oh wait....he can't get one without Congress.....amazing how right those 47 Senators are, isn't it?

Their Failed Messiah has apparently been 'channeling' the ghost of Neville Chamberlain in all of this Iranian nuclear treaty business...

neville-chamberlain.jpg


And they don't see anything wrong with that...

They're beyond saving in such matters...

Another argument in favor of Senatorial Intervention, and putting the President on a short leash for the remainder of his term...
You recall that Chamberlain was Conservative, Right?
You do understand that an European Conservative is not the same thing as an American Conservative, right?
 
Interesting how many on the right are incapable of simply admitting that the letter was a mistake and wrong.
Interesting how many on the left simply ignore the previous seven times a Democrat went to a foreign leader to undermine a GOP President, fail to admit THEY were wrong, while condemning a letter that makes the simple factual statement that any deal that is not a treaty is temporary.

Funny how that works, isn't it?
 
Interesting how many on the right are incapable of simply admitting that the letter was a mistake and wrong.
Interesting how many on the left simply ignore the previous seven times a Democrat went to a foreign leader to undermine a GOP President, fail to admit THEY were wrong, while condemning a letter that makes the simple factual statement that any deal that is not a treaty is temporary.

Funny how that works, isn't it?
Links?
 
This was a direct attempt to torpedo negotiations that will otherwise result in Iran continuing their nuclear program without having to answer to anyone. The Ayatollah is probably pretty happy at the approval rating bump you all gave him too. :cool:
It was an informative letter to remind a President who seems to not understand his place, that the most he can do is cut a deal, and that anything permanent will need the approval of congress. Do you disagree with the fact that the content of the letter is accurate?

BTW...did you call Pelosi & Company traitors? Did you claim that they were trying to torpedo a GOP President when they did far worse?
Really... because it seemed like a letter letting Iran know that it should buckle down and pursue it's nukes because America will just betray them anyways.
It says no such thing and you know it.

Its funny that you think that Obama is going to somehow keep them from getting nukes with this deal to begin with, but even more amazing that you would actually trust them to keep their word with out a treaty that is enforceable by International Law.....Oh wait....he can't get one without Congress.....amazing how right those 47 Senators are, isn't it?

Their Failed Messiah has apparently been 'channeling' the ghost of Neville Chamberlain in all of this Iranian nuclear treaty business...

neville-chamberlain.jpg


And they don't see anything wrong with that...

They're beyond saving in such matters...

Another argument in favor of Senatorial Intervention, and putting the President on a short leash for the remainder of his term...
You recall that Chamberlain was Conservative, Right?
His politics are immaterial.

His appeasement and naivete and pathetic outcomes are what he is remembered for.
 
Interesting how many on the right are incapable of simply admitting that the letter was a mistake and wrong.
Interesting how many on the right (and the center) firmly believe that this Senatorial Intervention was necessary and correct, so no admission is necessary.
 
Interesting how many on the right are incapable of simply admitting that the letter was a mistake and wrong.
Interesting how many on the left simply ignore the previous seven times a Democrat went to a foreign leader to undermine a GOP President, fail to admit THEY were wrong, while condemning a letter that makes the simple factual statement that any deal that is not a treaty is temporary.

Funny how that works, isn't it?
they were wrong also.
 

Forum List

Back
Top