Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Research shows that a majority of people will have to be exposed to a mass shooting incident before attitudes change sufficiently. Until then its in the 'hasn't happened in my back yard' category, which is not enough incentive to reduce easy access to handguns and military style semi automatics, (mssa)...
Using data from multiple sources on mass public shootings merged with the 2010 Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES), we show that increased proximity to a mass shooting is associated with heightened public support for stricter government regulation of firearms. Importantly, we show that this main effect does not vary by partisanship.
https://www.cambridge.org/
All the more reason to be trained, armed, and to carry every day. It hasn't happened in my back yard but if it does, I will be ready to counter whatever threat with an immediate response.
Sure ya will, Rambo. Lol.
Why wouldn't he? That's the point of carrying to protect yourself, your children and property
Everyone thinks they know how they'll react in a situation like that. In reality, his body would probably just freeze up and he would just be another helpless lamb among many. Even if he managed to draw his weapon, he'd be more likely to shoot an innocent person than the actual shooter.
I carry and can promise you if anyone threatened myself or our children I would not hesitate to ventilate them. No pause, no thought, nothing. Airhole them.
Sure ya will, Rambo. Lol.
Why wouldn't he? That's the point of carrying to protect yourself, your children and property
Everyone thinks they know how they'll react in a situation like that. In reality, his body would probably just freeze up and he would just be another helpless lamb among many. Even if he managed to draw his weapon, he'd be more likely to shoot an innocent person than the actual shooter.
I carry and can promise you if anyone threatened myself or our children I would not hesitate to ventilate them. No pause, no thought, nothing. Airhole them.
Yeah, sure you would. Lol. Sure ya would.
I would. Now run along novice...you are wasting bandwidth.
Why wouldn't he? That's the point of carrying to protect yourself, your children and property
Everyone thinks they know how they'll react in a situation like that. In reality, his body would probably just freeze up and he would just be another helpless lamb among many. Even if he managed to draw his weapon, he'd be more likely to shoot an innocent person than the actual shooter.
I carry and can promise you if anyone threatened myself or our children I would not hesitate to ventilate them. No pause, no thought, nothing. Airhole them.
Yeah, sure you would. Lol. Sure ya would.
I would. Now run along novice...you are wasting bandwidth.
This whole site is a waste of bandwidth.
No one cares what a bunch of internet tough guys think they would do in an active shooter situation. There's a reason police don't want people to play hero; because, even though many of them may be trained, the real thing ... AIN'T TRAINING! Who'd have thought?
All the more reason to be trained, armed, and to carry every day. It hasn't happened in my back yard but if it does, I will be ready to counter whatever threat with an immediate response.
Sure ya will, Rambo. Lol.
Why wouldn't he? That's the point of carrying to protect yourself, your children and property
Everyone thinks they know how they'll react in a situation like that. In reality, his body would probably just freeze up and he would just be another helpless lamb among many. Even if he managed to draw his weapon, he'd be more likely to shoot an innocent person than the actual shooter.
I carry and can promise you if anyone threatened myself or our children I would not hesitate to ventilate them. No pause, no thought, nothing. Airhole them.
Concealed carry holders aren't bound by the same laws that law-enforcement officers are. We have no "duty to arrest" or obligation to talk an assailant down, disarm, or shoot to "wound". I can pretty much shoot an armed assailant in the back if I wanted to with no warning, and would not be held liable.
Sure ya will, Rambo. Lol.
Why wouldn't he? That's the point of carrying to protect yourself, your children and property
Everyone thinks they know how they'll react in a situation like that. In reality, his body would probably just freeze up and he would just be another helpless lamb among many. Even if he managed to draw his weapon, he'd be more likely to shoot an innocent person than the actual shooter.
I carry and can promise you if anyone threatened myself or our children I would not hesitate to ventilate them. No pause, no thought, nothing. Airhole them.
Concealed carry holders aren't bound by the same laws that law-enforcement officers are. We have no "duty to arrest" or obligation to talk an assailant down, disarm, or shoot to "wound". I can pretty much shoot an armed assailant in the back if I wanted to with no warning, and would not be held liable.
Police don't shoot to wound. They always shoot to kill and aim for center of mass. The fact that you don't even know that much tells me that your criticisms of my knowledge are completely meritless; you know even less than I do!
Your racism is showingNope, it's the fucktard that has the gun.So it's the gun's fault.
The natural conclusion to their solution ends with the banning and confiscation of all guns.Conservatives: masters of the red herring fallacy.
Too cowardly to address the issue of school shootings, lacking any constructive solutions to address the problem, rightists engage in failed attempts to deflect from the issue.
So what's YOUR solution?
The natural conclusion to their solution ends with the banning and confiscation of all guns.Conservatives: masters of the red herring fallacy.
Too cowardly to address the issue of school shootings, lacking any constructive solutions to address the problem, rightists engage in failed attempts to deflect from the issue.
So what's YOUR solution?
Short of doing that there is zero chance that this won't happen again. So whatever, legal action we make won't prevent the next one and something else will have to be done, and so on and so on. Until they finally realize that the only thing that will satisfy their Utopian vision is to ban and confiscate guns of law abiding citizens which is what they really wanted to do all along.
The experience of the 'Open Carry' people 'protecting' the Dallas protest shows that attitude is laughable, only falsely credible until something actually happens. Dream on.All the more reason to be trained, armed, and to carry every day. It hasn't happened in my back yard but if it does, I will be ready to counter whatever threat with an immediate response.
Or be taken as a perp and shot himself.Everyone thinks they know how they'll react in a situation like that. In reality, his body would probably just freeze up and he would just be another helpless lamb among many. Even if he managed to draw his weapon, he'd be more likely to shoot an innocent person than the actual shooter.
I like this 'How big a strawman can I construct' game.The natural conclusion to their solution ends with the banning and confiscation of all guns.
This latest mass shooting was in my neck of the woods.
What's got to happen before guns for all gets shitcanned? These parents should sue the government for not protecting kids that are required by law to attend school.
As though military style semi automatics are 'all guns'. An mssa or high capacity handgun is what is necessary to increase the risk of this happening.The natural conclusion to their solution ends with the banning and confiscation of all guns.
Short of doing that there is zero chance that this won't happen again.
Well... not exactly.Bullshit.Hispanic and negro children have way more gun crimes then white kidsHood killings get more coverage because peeps like you will shout What About The Negroes. Look at that fucker trump that can't wait to demonize Hispanic kids while pretending white kids aren't as likely to be fucked up.
Those are exactly the kind of arms the 2nd Amendment is talking about. Do you even history, bro?As though military style semi automatics are 'all guns'. An mssa or high capacity handgun is what is necessary to increase the risk of this happening.The natural conclusion to their solution ends with the banning and confiscation of all guns.
Short of doing that there is zero chance that this won't happen again.
As though military style semi automatics are 'all guns'. An mssa or high capacity handgun is what is necessary to increase the risk of this happening.The natural conclusion to their solution ends with the banning and confiscation of all guns.
Short of doing that there is zero chance that this won't happen again.
The peeps in the hood aren't shooting up schools.How are you going to get rid all the guns in the hood?
The experience of the 'Open Carry' people 'protecting' the Dallas protest shows that attitude is laughable, only falsely credible until something actually happens. Dream on.All the more reason to be trained, armed, and to carry every day. It hasn't happened in my back yard but if it does, I will be ready to counter whatever threat with an immediate response.
In 2013 it wasn't a hill of beans.As though military style semi automatics are 'all guns'. An mssa or high capacity handgun is what is necessary to increase the risk of this happening.The natural conclusion to their solution ends with the banning and confiscation of all guns.
Short of doing that there is zero chance that this won't happen again.
Take all the mass shootings the last ten years in the United States add them all up I doubt if it would equal the Chicago gun deaths in the past 4 months.....
