Top IRS Official: Agency Targeted Conservative Groups Based on Guilt By Association And Party

[Timmy]

I don't see why righties are so upset . It's like a paperwork "stop n frisk " .

Suddenly they care about laws enforcement targeting groups ?

Without evidence that said groups are breaking laws, yes. When, OTOH, said groups ARE breaking laws, it makes no sense to go after everyone else but them.

Well well well . Righties get a small taste profiling and suddenly its a great injustice!?

Hypocrites. You are usually calling FOR profiling .

Exercising freedom of speech vs. carryin an illegal gun to commit murder.....of course you lefties support illegal gun carrying as long as it is a black in a democrat voting district......

Funny how you compare filling out extra forms for a tax exemption to being manhandled on the street for doing nothing .

 

[hadit]

I don't see why righties are so upset . It's like a paperwork "stop n frisk " .

Suddenly they care about laws enforcement targeting groups ?

Without evidence that said groups are breaking laws, yes. When, OTOH, said groups ARE breaking laws, it makes no sense to go after everyone else but them.

Well well well . Righties get a small taste profiling and suddenly its a great injustice!?

Hypocrites. You are usually calling FOR profiling .

Sure, when the law has already been broken. You do realize, don't you, that the law had not been broken in this case? IOW, when there is a rash of bombs being carried on airplanes by young black men, it makes no sense to pat down Swedish Grandmothers on their way to visit their grandchildren. OTOH, if there is no rash of bombs on planes, it would be racial profiling to pull aside young black men for extra searches on the suspicion that they may be carrying a bomb. That in essence is what the IRS was doing in this case.

 

[LaDexter]

since I'm not a Jew and I have no love for the Zionist's quest

You are not fooling anyone.

You love those behind 911. You just want the truth exterminated, just like you cheered when Tenet's CIA successfully steered the 767 cargo drone into the South Tower.

 

[boedicca]

You're saying the IRS discriminated against them because of their politics?

That's hilarious. They were applying for tax exemptions that required them NOT to be political.

You people will never get that.

Like how the Clinton Foundation is totally non-political?

 

[BlindBoo]

since I'm not a Jew and I have no love for the Zionist's quest

You are not fooling anyone.

You love those behind 911. You just want the truth exterminated, just like you cheered when Tenet's CIA successfully steered the 767 cargo drone into the South Tower.

Are there a lot of Zionist in Saudi Arabia in your weird world?

You get the Famed 3 Idiots in a twirling in a chair award.



Congrats.

 

[LaDexter]

The ruling families of Saudi always side with Israel.

Gaddafy in Libya was....

Gaddafi killed anyone who discovered his mother was Jewish, aide claims

Google


I suspect the Saudi rulers are really JDAAMs, Jews disguised as Muslims, just like Gaddafy.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Lois Lerner acted on orders from Obama.

So then, if he fails to pardon her, she could implicate him in criminal wrong doing.

I don't think anyone would ever prosecute an ex-president, but the implications of Obama being proven to have engaged in racketeering against political enemies is still profound.

I don't think even the New York Times could cover that level of crime up

I don't think even the New York Times could cover that level of crime up

Why not? They covered up a genocide.
Ukrainian Genocide: NY Times Still Covering Up

 

[Timmy]

I don't see why righties are so upset . It's like a paperwork "stop n frisk " .

Suddenly they care about laws enforcement targeting groups ?

Without evidence that said groups are breaking laws, yes. When, OTOH, said groups ARE breaking laws, it makes no sense to go after everyone else but them.

Well well well . Righties get a small taste profiling and suddenly its a great injustice!?

Hypocrites. You are usually calling FOR profiling .

Sure, when the law has already been broken. You do realize, don't you, that the law had not been broken in this case? IOW, when there is a rash of bombs being carried on airplanes by young black men, it makes no sense to pat down Swedish Grandmothers on their way to visit their grandchildren. OTOH, if there is no rash of bombs on planes, it would be racial profiling to pull aside young black men for extra searches on the suspicion that they may be carrying a bomb. That in essence is what the IRS was doing in this case.

Then you agree with the IRS did. After all they would give an extra scrutiny for an organization whose sole purpose is to stop taxation.

 

[hadit]

I don't see why righties are so upset . It's like a paperwork "stop n frisk " .

Suddenly they care about laws enforcement targeting groups ?

Without evidence that said groups are breaking laws, yes. When, OTOH, said groups ARE breaking laws, it makes no sense to go after everyone else but them.

Well well well . Righties get a small taste profiling and suddenly its a great injustice!?

Hypocrites. You are usually calling FOR profiling .

Sure, when the law has already been broken. You do realize, don't you, that the law had not been broken in this case? IOW, when there is a rash of bombs being carried on airplanes by young black men, it makes no sense to pat down Swedish Grandmothers on their way to visit their grandchildren. OTOH, if there is no rash of bombs on planes, it would be racial profiling to pull aside young black men for extra searches on the suspicion that they may be carrying a bomb. That in essence is what the IRS was doing in this case.

Then you agree with the IRS did. After all they would give an extra scrutiny for an organization whose sole purpose is to stop taxation.

What law was broken that gave cause for the profiling? Until you get that one right, you got nothing.

 

[LaDexter]

Obama's administration will go down in history as

The most bigoted
The most corrupt
The least patriotic
The most unfair
The least meritorious

 

[kaz]

I don't see why righties are so upset . It's like a paperwork "stop n frisk " .

Suddenly they care about laws enforcement targeting groups ?

Without evidence that said groups are breaking laws, yes. When, OTOH, said groups ARE breaking laws, it makes no sense to go after everyone else but them.

Well well well . Righties get a small taste profiling and suddenly its a great injustice!?

Hypocrites. You are usually calling FOR profiling .

Sure, when the law has already been broken. You do realize, don't you, that the law had not been broken in this case? IOW, when there is a rash of bombs being carried on airplanes by young black men, it makes no sense to pat down Swedish Grandmothers on their way to visit their grandchildren. OTOH, if there is no rash of bombs on planes, it would be racial profiling to pull aside young black men for extra searches on the suspicion that they may be carrying a bomb. That in essence is what the IRS was doing in this case.

Then you agree with the IRS did. After all they would give an extra scrutiny for an organization whose sole purpose is to stop taxation.

Tea partiers aren't trying to stop taxation. Why do you make up stupid shit like that?

 

[hadit]

I don't see why righties are so upset . It's like a paperwork "stop n frisk " .

Suddenly they care about laws enforcement targeting groups ?

Without evidence that said groups are breaking laws, yes. When, OTOH, said groups ARE breaking laws, it makes no sense to go after everyone else but them.

Well well well . Righties get a small taste profiling and suddenly its a great injustice!?

Hypocrites. You are usually calling FOR profiling .

Sure, when the law has already been broken. You do realize, don't you, that the law had not been broken in this case? IOW, when there is a rash of bombs being carried on airplanes by young black men, it makes no sense to pat down Swedish Grandmothers on their way to visit their grandchildren. OTOH, if there is no rash of bombs on planes, it would be racial profiling to pull aside young black men for extra searches on the suspicion that they may be carrying a bomb. That in essence is what the IRS was doing in this case.

Then you agree with the IRS did. After all they would give an extra scrutiny for an organization whose sole purpose is to stop taxation.

Tea partiers aren't trying to stop taxation. Why do you make up stupid shit like that?

And even if they were, it's not illegal, so again no justification for profiling.

 

[Timmy]

I don't see why righties are so upset . It's like a paperwork "stop n frisk " .

Suddenly they care about laws enforcement targeting groups ?

Without evidence that said groups are breaking laws, yes. When, OTOH, said groups ARE breaking laws, it makes no sense to go after everyone else but them.

Well well well . Righties get a small taste profiling and suddenly its a great injustice!?

Hypocrites. You are usually calling FOR profiling .

Sure, when the law has already been broken. You do realize, don't you, that the law had not been broken in this case? IOW, when there is a rash of bombs being carried on airplanes by young black men, it makes no sense to pat down Swedish Grandmothers on their way to visit their grandchildren. OTOH, if there is no rash of bombs on planes, it would be racial profiling to pull aside young black men for extra searches on the suspicion that they may be carrying a bomb. That in essence is what the IRS was doing in this case.

Then you agree with the IRS did. After all they would give an extra scrutiny for an organization whose sole purpose is to stop taxation.

Tea partiers aren't trying to stop taxation. Why do you make up stupid shit like that?

Tea = taxed enough already .

 

[kaz]

Without evidence that said groups are breaking laws, yes. When, OTOH, said groups ARE breaking laws, it makes no sense to go after everyone else but them.

Well well well . Righties get a small taste profiling and suddenly its a great injustice!?

Hypocrites. You are usually calling FOR profiling .

Sure, when the law has already been broken. You do realize, don't you, that the law had not been broken in this case? IOW, when there is a rash of bombs being carried on airplanes by young black men, it makes no sense to pat down Swedish Grandmothers on their way to visit their grandchildren. OTOH, if there is no rash of bombs on planes, it would be racial profiling to pull aside young black men for extra searches on the suspicion that they may be carrying a bomb. That in essence is what the IRS was doing in this case.

Then you agree with the IRS did. After all they would give an extra scrutiny for an organization whose sole purpose is to stop taxation.

Tea partiers aren't trying to stop taxation. Why do you make up stupid shit like that?

Tea = taxed enough already .

Agreed.

And "taxed enough already" is not equal to "stop taxation"

 

[Timmy]

Well well well . Righties get a small taste profiling and suddenly its a great injustice!?

Hypocrites. You are usually calling FOR profiling .

Sure, when the law has already been broken. You do realize, don't you, that the law had not been broken in this case? IOW, when there is a rash of bombs being carried on airplanes by young black men, it makes no sense to pat down Swedish Grandmothers on their way to visit their grandchildren. OTOH, if there is no rash of bombs on planes, it would be racial profiling to pull aside young black men for extra searches on the suspicion that they may be carrying a bomb. That in essence is what the IRS was doing in this case.

Then you agree with the IRS did. After all they would give an extra scrutiny for an organization whose sole purpose is to stop taxation.

Tea partiers aren't trying to stop taxation. Why do you make up stupid shit like that?

Tea = taxed enough already .

Agreed.

And "taxed enough already" is not equal to "stop taxation"

Then what are they trying to stop ?

Why wouldn't the tax department take a closer look at an anti tax group who (ironically ) is applying for a tax exemption?

That baffles you , but publicly manhandling a black man for no reason. is perfectly fine .

 

[whitehall]

Guilt? By association? Why do we accept the guilt? We think we achieved a victory when the IRS confesses that they assumed responsibility for breaking the law by targeting conservative groups for unfair scrutiny with the lame excuse "guilt by association" without even thinking about it. Even if we understand that the liberal federal government intended to subdue conservative speech what the hell does "guilt by association mean"? "Guilt by association" indicates a systemic disease in the federal government that assumes a peaceful political movement is inherently guilty if their agenda conflicts with government doctrine and media scrutiny. We can't afford to accept lame cliches these day.

 

[Dragonlady]

You're saying the IRS discriminated against them because of their politics?

That's hilarious. They were applying for tax exemptions that required them NOT to be political.

You people will never get that.

The RNC and DNC are tax exempt organizations, dufus.
Honestly, if you had an ounce of knowledge you'd be a conservative.

You cannot have a non-profit organization or corporation which has a political purpose. It violates IRS rules.

Here are the rules:

Can Nonprofits Engage in Political Activity?

 

[Weatherman2020]

You're saying the IRS discriminated against them because of their politics?

That's hilarious. They were applying for tax exemptions that required them NOT to be political.

You people will never get that.

The RNC and DNC are tax exempt organizations, dufus.
Honestly, if you had an ounce of knowledge you'd be a conservative.

You cannot have a non-profit organization or corporation which has a political purpose. It violates IRS rules.

Here are the rules:

Can Nonprofits Engage in Political Activity?

Tax Information for Political Organizations

Exemption Requirements - Political Organizations
A political organization subject to section 527 is a party, committee, association, fund, or other organization (whether or not incorporated) organized and operated primarily for the purpose of directly or indirectly accepting contributions or making expenditures, or both, for an exempt function.

A political organization must be organized for the primary purpose of carrying on exempt function activities. A political organization's primary activities must be exempt function activities. A political organization may engage in activities that are not exempt function activities, but these may not be its primary activities.

To be exempt, a political organization must file a timely notice with the IRS that it is to be treated as a tax-exempt organization.

Weatherman- educating the left since 1978

 

[kaz]

Sure, when the law has already been broken. You do realize, don't you, that the law had not been broken in this case? IOW, when there is a rash of bombs being carried on airplanes by young black men, it makes no sense to pat down Swedish Grandmothers on their way to visit their grandchildren. OTOH, if there is no rash of bombs on planes, it would be racial profiling to pull aside young black men for extra searches on the suspicion that they may be carrying a bomb. That in essence is what the IRS was doing in this case.

Then you agree with the IRS did. After all they would give an extra scrutiny for an organization whose sole purpose is to stop taxation.

Tea partiers aren't trying to stop taxation. Why do you make up stupid shit like that?

Tea = taxed enough already .

Agreed.

And "taxed enough already" is not equal to "stop taxation"

Then what are they trying to stop ?

Why wouldn't the tax department take a closer look at an anti tax group who (ironically ) is applying for a tax exemption?

That baffles you , but publicly manhandling a black man for no reason. is perfectly fine .

It's "ironic" that a group that thinks we pay enough taxes already is applying for a tax exemption?



And by that I mean



You weren't an A student, were you?

 

[owebo]

You're saying the IRS discriminated against them because of their politics?

That's hilarious. They were applying for tax exemptions that required them NOT to be political.

You people will never get that.

The RNC and DNC are tax exempt organizations, dufus.
Honestly, if you had an ounce of knowledge you'd be a conservative.

You cannot have a non-profit organization or corporation which has a political purpose. It violates IRS rules.

Here are the rules:

Can Nonprofits Engage in Political Activity?

Good....then you won't mind us using the IRS to target all your liberal groups.....