Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
stay naiveNone of this will matter regarding the election. Only the rabid winguts get fired up about rabid wingnut stuff.
If the economy is up...the Dems will keep their majority.
Injecting ACORN and fox news into a thread about Town Hall Meetings.
I don't see the correlation, unless you're simply playing the party hack.
Fox news has been brought up several times as they are one of the primary (vocal) sponsors of "Tea Parties" and this Town hall stuff.
Talking about that has nothing to do with being a "party hack".
Fox News is a "Sponsor" of the Tea Parties?
Link please.
Fox News is a "Sponsor" of the Tea Parties?
Link please.
Sponsor: (verb) back up, support...promote
"Fair and balanced" Fox News aggressively promotes "tea party" protests
Glenn Beck and Fox News Sponsoring "Tea Parties"
Fox promoting anti-health reform disruptions of town halls
JUST WHAT KIND OF A DUMBASS ARE YOU????
You post two links to Media Matters???? That discredited piece of shit site? It's lucky the IRS hasn't shut them down for violating their 501 (c)(3) status. As they say in Jamaica, "Soon come, mon"
And then you top that off with a link to a comedian's site. WTF?????
Is this what passes for legitimate information to you???? I'll bet you're one the 8% of people who actually respond to spam ads.
Get out of here until you have something legit.
Fox news has been brought up several times as they are one of the primary (vocal) sponsors of "Tea Parties" and this Town hall stuff.
Talking about that has nothing to do with being a "party hack".
Fox News is a "Sponsor" of the Tea Parties?
Link please.
It was, but I don't know if it's sponsoring any new ones.
uh, thats called "news coverage of an event"Fox news has been brought up several times as they are one of the primary (vocal) sponsors of "Tea Parties" and this Town hall stuff.
Talking about that has nothing to do with being a "party hack".
Fox News is a "Sponsor" of the Tea Parties?
Link please.
It was, but I don't know if it's sponsoring any new ones.
didn't base my comment on my opinon. I took it from this: Project for Excellence in Journalism (PEJ) | Understanding News in the Information Age
Thanks, I'll check that out, including who contributed and who funded the project, (primary in determining bias, if any).
Our Universities are just chock full of losers then.People who shout down other people and prevent them from speaking are losers.
WOW, is this really the best you've got??
He advertised for weeks that he was going to be at the event, bring an entertainer and then the event itself altered their schedule to accomodate hannity's program and you are still trying to claim that foxnews, who hannity works for, didn't sponsor/promote the teaparty??
Sorry but the facts show otherwise.
So I guess that means if you go to a political rally/demonstration/etc., your employer is sponsoring/promoting said event, just because you work for him/her?
Very interesting concept. Strange but interesting.
And over the past few months been seeing the 'Hallelujahs' about pro-endorsements by Walmart, AMA, Mayo, two of which have been denied by the 'endorser'. LOL! Only if it fits the left wing nut jobs are endorsements ok.WOW, is this really the best you've got??
He advertised for weeks that he was going to be at the event, bring an entertainer and then the event itself altered their schedule to accomodate hannity's program and you are still trying to claim that foxnews, who hannity works for, didn't sponsor/promote the teaparty??
Sorry but the facts show otherwise.
So I guess that means if you go to a political rally/demonstration/etc., your employer is sponsoring/promoting said event, just because you work for him/her?
Very interesting concept. Strange but interesting.
Are you really this stupid?? Hannity took his FONXEWS program to a tea party, broadcasted his FOXNEWS program from the event LIVE on the FOXNEWS channel, advertised it for weeks ahead of time and brought an entertainer to perform AT the event. Don't you think the network would have to approve of this move?? Or do you believe that hannity is a maverick and can do whatever he wants to do?
And over the past few months been seeing the 'Hallelujahs' about pro-endorsements by Walmart, AMA, Mayo, two of which have been denied by the 'endorser'. LOL! Only if it fits the left wing nut jobs are endorsements ok.WOW, is this really the best you've got??
He advertised for weeks that he was going to be at the event, bring an entertainer and then the event itself altered their schedule to accomodate hannity's program and you are still trying to claim that foxnews, who hannity works for, didn't sponsor/promote the teaparty??
Sorry but the facts show otherwise.
So I guess that means if you go to a political rally/demonstration/etc., your employer is sponsoring/promoting said event, just because you work for him/her?
Very interesting concept. Strange but interesting.
Are you really this stupid?? Hannity took his FONXEWS program to a tea party, broadcasted his FOXNEWS program from the event LIVE on the FOXNEWS channel, advertised it for weeks ahead of time and brought an entertainer to perform AT the event. Don't you think the network would have to approve of this move?? Or do you believe that hannity is a maverick and can do whatever he wants to do?
Keep singing it loud and proud, "STFU if you are NOT an Obamabot!"
And over the past few months been seeing the 'Hallelujahs' about pro-endorsements by Walmart, AMA, Mayo, two of which have been denied by the 'endorser'. LOL! Only if it fits the left wing nut jobs are endorsements ok.Are you really this stupid?? Hannity took his FONXEWS program to a tea party, broadcasted his FOXNEWS program from the event LIVE on the FOXNEWS channel, advertised it for weeks ahead of time and brought an entertainer to perform AT the event. Don't you think the network would have to approve of this move?? Or do you believe that hannity is a maverick and can do whatever he wants to do?
Keep singing it loud and proud, "STFU if you are NOT an Obamabot!"
Is that supposed to make any sense??
Uh that was already explained for you. His foxnews show was LIVE at the event and he brought in an entertainer to perform for the crowd. I don't know how much more simple I can make it.
Hannity was advertising that he and his show would be at the events weeks BEFORE the event.
Does that count?
FOXNews.com - Sean Hannity 'On the Record' on the Anti-Tax Tea Party Protests - Greta Van Susteren | On The Record With Greta
Hannity is a right-wing political commentator who has a show on Fox. It is not surprising nor does it cross some kind of journalistic line to have him at or even involved in an event. As noted in your article, the event was already scheduled, not something that he or Fox thought up or created. He went to an already scheduled event.
Now if you care to argue that his participation made the event larger than it would otherwise be. I would agree with you. By saying he would do his show live from there and bring some entertainer with him, I'm sure it was a bigger event than it would otherwise have been.
Not sponsorship though. Unless you just want to stretch the meaning to prove your point.
WOW, is this really the best you've got??
He advertised for weeks that he was going to be at the event, bring an entertainer and then the event itself altered their schedule to accomodate hannity's program and you are still trying to claim that foxnews, who hannity works for, didn't sponsor/promote the teaparty??
Sorry but the facts show otherwise.
Republicans aren't winning any new converts with this tactic - they aren't winning THIS former Republican back anyway.
It's the Palin strategy - fire up the base, but destroy any hopes you have at winning the middle.
And over the past few months been seeing the 'Hallelujahs' about pro-endorsements by Walmart, AMA, Mayo, two of which have been denied by the 'endorser'. LOL! Only if it fits the left wing nut jobs are endorsements ok.
Keep singing it loud and proud, "STFU if you are NOT an Obamabot!"
Is that supposed to make any sense??
Indeed it does. If the Obamabots have their way, we are seeing the beginnings of the likes of KGB/SS type tactics. None of this is good for US.
Republicans aren't winning any new converts with this tactic - they aren't winning THIS former Republican back anyway.
It's the Palin strategy - fire up the base, but destroy any hopes you have at winning the middle.
One thing for sure, the Democrats are not winning votes by calling constituents swastika carrying, Neanderthals that dress too well for town meetings. Setting up 'report your neighbors' hotline to white house has to be the most dangerous move I've ever seen, if not unconstitutional.
Republicans aren't winning any new converts with this tactic - they aren't winning THIS former Republican back anyway.
It's the Palin strategy - fire up the base, but destroy any hopes you have at winning the middle.
One thing for sure, the Democrats are not winning votes by calling constituents swastika carrying, Neanderthals that dress too well for town meetings. Setting up 'report your neighbors' hotline to white house has to be the most dangerous move I've ever seen, if not unconstitutional.
The constituents of Democrats don't carry swastikas - Democrats are never going to be popular with THAT crowd anyway - and I don't think they WANT to be.
I don't think the Democrats aren't worried about offending the skinheads. Those folks are pretty solid Republican voters.
