TRAITOR: Former NATO Commander Wesley Clark ACCUSES Trump of TREASON

[Nostra]

Actually it doesn't have have to be an act of war. Russia interfering in the 2016 election wasn't an act of war, but an American knowingly helping them do it would be guilty of treason.

Sorry. Not according to the statute.

 

[Nostra]

Benedict Donald's would only support less than half of Americans. Benedict and his party would be fine with locking up Americans who opposed Benedict Donald's treasonous rhetoric into Russian style Gulags.

That was unhinged.

 

[BlindBoo]

That was unhinged.

The unhinged one is your God of Retribution.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Benedict Donald's would only support less than half of Americans. Benedict and his party would be fine with locking up Americans who opposed Benedict Donald's treasonous rhetoric into Russian style Gulags.

Nice PROJECTION, you fucking PSYCHOPATH.

 

[Billiejeens]

Each NATO country pays a minimum percentage of their annual budget to defense. The US simply exceeds the minimum percentage required under the treaty. The US paying far more than they are required to as a member of NATO isn't the same as other member nations not paying their fair share.

Your math is spot on.
Your conclusion is not.

 

[Billiejeens]

The unhinged one is your God of Retribution.

I wish that he was the person that you crazy fucks think that he is.

 

[Thunderbird]

If anyone is dangerous it’s Wesley Clark. That guy almost started WW III!

"I'm not going to start Third World War for you," Jackson told Clark

Nato supreme commander General Wesley Clark is not being allowed to fade away quietly. Days after the Clinton administration relieved him of his command two months early, Newsweek is reporting that the victor of Kosovo was blocked from sending paratroopers to Pristina airport to pre-empt an...

www.theguardian.com

 

[22lcidw]

Show me that NATO bill - otherwise keep your brainless Trump parroting for yourself.

The Europeans are laughing at us. We pay for everyone. Our politicians made it our birthright.

 

[Godboy]

View attachment 902545

A ridiculous story from a self-important would-be autocrat, or a dangerous threat and call to action?

Donald Trump said at a weekend rally that he would refuse to protect U.S. NATO allies from Russia, and even “encourage” Russia to attack. It’s potentially one of the most dangerous things Trump has ever said (a high bar!) and while a handful of his most sycophantic Republicans defend him, the rest of the world is speaking out.

Among those who are calling out the threat is General Wesley Clark, a retired U.S. Army Officer who also served as the Supreme Allied Commander Europe of NATO until he left that post in 2000.

Clark is calling on Republicans to stand up to their leader and denounce this kind of rhetoric.

Asked about Trump’s invitation to Russia to attack NATO allies, Clark was clear and direct: the threat is treasonous.



Clark also posted on social media about Trump’s dangerous summons. He implored the right to see through the facade. He wrote:



Those allies and friends are already taking Trump’s words into account. European nations have known that Russia could become a threat, but are, for the first time, forced to consider the possibility that in an attack, they wouldn’t have support from the United States.

European Council President Charles Michel, for one, said that the comment was “reckless” and would serve the interests of Russian dictator Vladimir Putin. Other leaders are considering what this means in the event of an attack. NBC reported:



TRAITOR: Former NATO Commander Wesley Clark ACCUSES Trump of Treason

I agree with General Clark! Seems like treason to me! What do you think?

Why do you agree with him? What does an alliance with other countries have to do with "treason"? You cant commit treason against a foreign nation, can you?

 

[Godboy]

Bullshit. Who cares if Luxembourg pays 2 % of their GDP on defense?

I do.

 

[eagle1462010]

The Europeans are laughing at us. We pay for everyone. Our politicians made it our birthright.

Money Laundering without Representation.

 

[eagle1462010]

Bullshit. Who cares if Luxembourg pays 2 % of their GDP on defense?

So they refuse to Honor their part of the NATO agreement. Then expect protection when they dont pay shit??

Yeah I have a problem with these countries fucking us over as we pay for their defense.

 

[Lesh]

So they refuse to Honor their part of the NATO agreement. Then expect protection when they dont pay shit??

Yeah I have a problem with these countries fucking us over as we pay for their defense.

Really?

Luxembourg?

 

[Nostra]

Really?

Luxembourg?

Would Luxembourg expect us to come to their defense in they were attacked?

 

[Lesh]

Would Luxembourg expect us to come to their defense in they were attacked?

Who’s gonna attack em? Lichtenstein?

 

[Nostra]

Who’s gonna attack em? Lichtenstein?

Non answer, Simp.

Try again.

 

[Lesh]

Non answer, Simp.

Try again.

Ok. Yes if Lichtenstein attacks Luxembourg we will come to their aid

 

[Nostra]

Ok. Yes if Lichtenstein attacks Luxembourg we will come to their aid

Why? If they are in violation of their NATO agreement why would we be obligated to do that?

 

[Nostra]

Ok. Yes if Lichtenstein attacks Luxembourg we will come to their aid

So your scenario has a country with no military fighting it's way thru either Austria or Switzerland to attack Luxembourg.

Awesome plan, Patton.

 

[BlindBoo]

Nice PROJECTION, you fucking PSYCHOPATH.

Another Triggered Trumphlake.

The Europeans are laughing at us. We pay for everyone. Our politicians made it our birthright.

Were they laughing when hundreds of EU NATO soldiers were KIA in our invasion and occupation of Afghanistan?