Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To take the topic seriously for a moment, the organizing bodies really need to make some rules regarding this type of occurrence. It will not be long until the NCAA women’s teams are dominated by males transitioning into women. While it is their right and privilege to do this, the organizing bodies are not beholden to accept them. We are going to be getting into the area where your college scholarship is denied because a 6’6” point guard who used to be a male is bigger, faster, and stronger than you are. And that goes beyond the fun and games that sports are supposed to be.
Of course a better thing to do would be to get rid of all intermural collegiate sports at State colleges and universities and the scholarships that goes with them.
Scholarships provide a lot of students an opportunity they would not otherwise have, including a lot of minorities.
Sports costs colleges money. That raises the tuition for all students. If it’s a tax-payer supported school, they shouldn’t be sending teams across the state or country or even the county to play other teams. Private schools? Have at it! I’ll be happy to watch.
Do sports cost colleges money? really? Colleges make a lot of money when they fill up Ohio Stadium and have huge network deals.
. Apparently it should be going down with all of the Suckeye fans, right? Where is the money going?
Congratulations for stumbling onto the point I made that you originally responded to.Pfft….how are you being forced to accept it?It is the solution to a great many things. Not just this. Colleges lose money on sports in almost every case. If that wasn’t the case, those who do make money (Alabama, Ohio State etc) charge more than ever for tuition if they have all this money coming in?To take the topic seriously for a moment, the organizing bodies really need to make some rules regarding this type of occurrence. It will not be long until the NCAA women’s teams are dominated by males transitioning into women. While it is their right and privilege to do this, the organizing bodies are not beholden to accept them. We are going to be getting into the area where your college scholarship is denied because a 6’6” point guard who used to be a male is bigger, faster, and stronger than you are. And that goes beyond the fun and games that sports are supposed to be.
Of course a better thing to do would be to get rid of all intermural collegiate sports at State colleges and universities and the scholarships that goes with them.
Why is the solution to remove sports entirely?
The gender issue would be solved but that isn’t the reason to get rid of state-sponsored hopscotch. It’s a funding issue.
Addressed already.Why does the majority have to bend to the will of a tiny tiny minority, especially in something as non-essential as sports?
And how is it "their right and privilege" to do this? I didn't get to participate in said sports because I suck at sports, it doesn't mean that just because someone is good at it and they feel like a girl that they get to override the overall purpose of female sports, which is to level the playing field between females in a given sport.
It’s their right and privilege to be whatever they want to be. If we’re going to have intermurals though and offer scholarships, the organizing bodies have no responsibility to cosign the clear advantage a transitioning male has over most scientifically native females. Scholarships and the women’s futures are at stake.
They can be what they want to be, however they have no right to force the rest of us to accept it.
Losing money on sports (as you acknowledge) causes colleges to have to raise revenue elsewhere. Hence higher tuition for all students.And athletic scholarships are a gateway for many poorer people to get an education. Considering the size of the endowments most of the bigger schools have, losing $$ on some sports here and there isn't really a big deal.
Again, the “poorer people” could apply to private schools who can spend whatever they want without the inherent penalty to the taxpayers.
okIf anyone would have a personal axe to grind about the advantage good student athletes have when it comes to getting $$ from schools, it could be me, as one of the worst athletes on the planet. However unlike a lot of people, I don't begrudge the differing talents of others in their path to success. I got an academic scholarship, others got athletic ones.
The women in those sports sure as hell are being forced to accept it. Again, unlike some people on this board, i can think of others, not just my own petty interests.
Oh brother.What is causing revenue issues with colleges these days is their bloated administration staffs.
Again, college sports have been around for decades, some of them make money, some of them lose money, the biggest ones draw students to the schools and increase their prestige.
Congratulations for stumbling onto the point I made that you originally responded to.Pfft….how are you being forced to accept it?It is the solution to a great many things. Not just this. Colleges lose money on sports in almost every case. If that wasn’t the case, those who do make money (Alabama, Ohio State etc) charge more than ever for tuition if they have all this money coming in?Why is the solution to remove sports entirely?
The gender issue would be solved but that isn’t the reason to get rid of state-sponsored hopscotch. It’s a funding issue.
Addressed already.Why does the majority have to bend to the will of a tiny tiny minority, especially in something as non-essential as sports?
And how is it "their right and privilege" to do this? I didn't get to participate in said sports because I suck at sports, it doesn't mean that just because someone is good at it and they feel like a girl that they get to override the overall purpose of female sports, which is to level the playing field between females in a given sport.
It’s their right and privilege to be whatever they want to be. If we’re going to have intermurals though and offer scholarships, the organizing bodies have no responsibility to cosign the clear advantage a transitioning male has over most scientifically native females. Scholarships and the women’s futures are at stake.
They can be what they want to be, however they have no right to force the rest of us to accept it.
Losing money on sports (as you acknowledge) causes colleges to have to raise revenue elsewhere. Hence higher tuition for all students.And athletic scholarships are a gateway for many poorer people to get an education. Considering the size of the endowments most of the bigger schools have, losing $$ on some sports here and there isn't really a big deal.
Again, the “poorer people” could apply to private schools who can spend whatever they want without the inherent penalty to the taxpayers.
okIf anyone would have a personal axe to grind about the advantage good student athletes have when it comes to getting $$ from schools, it could be me, as one of the worst athletes on the planet. However unlike a lot of people, I don't begrudge the differing talents of others in their path to success. I got an academic scholarship, others got athletic ones.
The women in those sports sure as hell are being forced to accept it. Again, unlike some people on this board, i can think of others, not just my own petty interests.
Oh brother.What is causing revenue issues with colleges these days is their bloated administration staffs.
Again, college sports have been around for decades, some of them make money, some of them lose money, the biggest ones draw students to the schools and increase their prestige.
Yeah, I can still remember the 2012 NCAA Basketball Final Four. Oh wait, few if anyone can. Without looking it up…can you remember who won? Yeah, me neither. Surely you can recall who won the Fiesta Bowl last year, right? Yeah…me neither. Well, clearly the time U of H went to the NCAA championship under Clyde Drexler and company was important to the students there now, right? Oh yeah, their fathers were likely not born when that was taking place.
There is some truth to the drawing of students.
Prestige? Zero effect.
Congratulations for stumbling onto the point I made that you originally responded to.Pfft….how are you being forced to accept it?It is the solution to a great many things. Not just this. Colleges lose money on sports in almost every case. If that wasn’t the case, those who do make money (Alabama, Ohio State etc) charge more than ever for tuition if they have all this money coming in?
The gender issue would be solved but that isn’t the reason to get rid of state-sponsored hopscotch. It’s a funding issue.
Addressed already.
It’s their right and privilege to be whatever they want to be. If we’re going to have intermurals though and offer scholarships, the organizing bodies have no responsibility to cosign the clear advantage a transitioning male has over most scientifically native females. Scholarships and the women’s futures are at stake.
They can be what they want to be, however they have no right to force the rest of us to accept it.
Losing money on sports (as you acknowledge) causes colleges to have to raise revenue elsewhere. Hence higher tuition for all students.And athletic scholarships are a gateway for many poorer people to get an education. Considering the size of the endowments most of the bigger schools have, losing $$ on some sports here and there isn't really a big deal.
Again, the “poorer people” could apply to private schools who can spend whatever they want without the inherent penalty to the taxpayers.
okIf anyone would have a personal axe to grind about the advantage good student athletes have when it comes to getting $$ from schools, it could be me, as one of the worst athletes on the planet. However unlike a lot of people, I don't begrudge the differing talents of others in their path to success. I got an academic scholarship, others got athletic ones.
The women in those sports sure as hell are being forced to accept it. Again, unlike some people on this board, i can think of others, not just my own petty interests.
Oh brother.What is causing revenue issues with colleges these days is their bloated administration staffs.
Again, college sports have been around for decades, some of them make money, some of them lose money, the biggest ones draw students to the schools and increase their prestige.
Yeah, I can still remember the 2012 NCAA Basketball Final Four. Oh wait, few if anyone can. Without looking it up…can you remember who won? Yeah, me neither. Surely you can recall who won the Fiesta Bowl last year, right? Yeah…me neither. Well, clearly the time U of H went to the NCAA championship under Clyde Drexler and company was important to the students there now, right? Oh yeah, their fathers were likely not born when that was taking place.
There is some truth to the drawing of students.
Prestige? Zero effect.
Typical progressive. It's all about you. nevermind that others find enjoyment from it, or schools get spirit and camaraderie from it.
I remember each time my school went to the NCAA's and we are a mid major at best.
I went to a Major College football game back in October. SEC Football; there is nothing like the atmosphere. The Pac 12 is more like going to study hall.
Congratulations for stumbling onto the point I made that you originally responded to.Pfft….how are you being forced to accept it?They can be what they want to be, however they have no right to force the rest of us to accept it.
Losing money on sports (as you acknowledge) causes colleges to have to raise revenue elsewhere. Hence higher tuition for all students.And athletic scholarships are a gateway for many poorer people to get an education. Considering the size of the endowments most of the bigger schools have, losing $$ on some sports here and there isn't really a big deal.
Again, the “poorer people” could apply to private schools who can spend whatever they want without the inherent penalty to the taxpayers.
okIf anyone would have a personal axe to grind about the advantage good student athletes have when it comes to getting $$ from schools, it could be me, as one of the worst athletes on the planet. However unlike a lot of people, I don't begrudge the differing talents of others in their path to success. I got an academic scholarship, others got athletic ones.
The women in those sports sure as hell are being forced to accept it. Again, unlike some people on this board, i can think of others, not just my own petty interests.
Oh brother.What is causing revenue issues with colleges these days is their bloated administration staffs.
Again, college sports have been around for decades, some of them make money, some of them lose money, the biggest ones draw students to the schools and increase their prestige.
Yeah, I can still remember the 2012 NCAA Basketball Final Four. Oh wait, few if anyone can. Without looking it up…can you remember who won? Yeah, me neither. Surely you can recall who won the Fiesta Bowl last year, right? Yeah…me neither. Well, clearly the time U of H went to the NCAA championship under Clyde Drexler and company was important to the students there now, right? Oh yeah, their fathers were likely not born when that was taking place.
There is some truth to the drawing of students.
Prestige? Zero effect.
Typical progressive. It's all about you. nevermind that others find enjoyment from it, or schools get spirit and camaraderie from it.
I remember each time my school went to the NCAA's and we are a mid major at best.
Typical conservative; Can’t read or comprehend anything.
From earlier in this thread...
I went to a Major College football game back in October. SEC Football; there is nothing like the atmosphere. The Pac 12 is more like going to study hall.
Congratulations for stumbling onto the point I made that you originally responded to.Pfft….how are you being forced to accept it?
Losing money on sports (as you acknowledge) causes colleges to have to raise revenue elsewhere. Hence higher tuition for all students.
Again, the “poorer people” could apply to private schools who can spend whatever they want without the inherent penalty to the taxpayers.
ok
The women in those sports sure as hell are being forced to accept it. Again, unlike some people on this board, i can think of others, not just my own petty interests.
Oh brother.What is causing revenue issues with colleges these days is their bloated administration staffs.
Again, college sports have been around for decades, some of them make money, some of them lose money, the biggest ones draw students to the schools and increase their prestige.
Yeah, I can still remember the 2012 NCAA Basketball Final Four. Oh wait, few if anyone can. Without looking it up…can you remember who won? Yeah, me neither. Surely you can recall who won the Fiesta Bowl last year, right? Yeah…me neither. Well, clearly the time U of H went to the NCAA championship under Clyde Drexler and company was important to the students there now, right? Oh yeah, their fathers were likely not born when that was taking place.
There is some truth to the drawing of students.
Prestige? Zero effect.
Typical progressive. It's all about you. nevermind that others find enjoyment from it, or schools get spirit and camaraderie from it.
I remember each time my school went to the NCAA's and we are a mid major at best.
Typical conservative; Can’t read or comprehend anything.
From earlier in this thread...
I went to a Major College football game back in October. SEC Football; there is nothing like the atmosphere. The Pac 12 is more like going to study hall.
To those PAC-12 people that's how they want to enjoy their football.
Again with the "MEEEEEEEEE" typical of progressives.
--LOL I dont feel sorry for the others at allCheck It Out
HA-HAA !!
He Played Handball For Australia's Men's Team. Now Transgender, He's Dominating Women's Handball.
View attachment 233869
Mouncey also won the LGBTQ John Marriott Sportsperson of the Year award this year.
Tried To Ban Her For Her Size:
and think about the message it sends to women and girls about their bodies: if you’re too big, you can’t play. That is incredibly dangerous and backward,” Mouncey wrote in the Guardian last year.
She's Got His Left-Wing Talking Points Down
Don't "She" ??
View attachment 233870
^ ^ ^ ^ Welcome ^ ^ ^ To The Right Wing, Sista !!
Congratulations for stumbling onto the point I made that you originally responded to.The women in those sports sure as hell are being forced to accept it. Again, unlike some people on this board, i can think of others, not just my own petty interests.
Oh brother.What is causing revenue issues with colleges these days is their bloated administration staffs.
Again, college sports have been around for decades, some of them make money, some of them lose money, the biggest ones draw students to the schools and increase their prestige.
Yeah, I can still remember the 2012 NCAA Basketball Final Four. Oh wait, few if anyone can. Without looking it up…can you remember who won? Yeah, me neither. Surely you can recall who won the Fiesta Bowl last year, right? Yeah…me neither. Well, clearly the time U of H went to the NCAA championship under Clyde Drexler and company was important to the students there now, right? Oh yeah, their fathers were likely not born when that was taking place.
There is some truth to the drawing of students.
Prestige? Zero effect.
Typical progressive. It's all about you. nevermind that others find enjoyment from it, or schools get spirit and camaraderie from it.
I remember each time my school went to the NCAA's and we are a mid major at best.
Typical conservative; Can’t read or comprehend anything.
From earlier in this thread...
I went to a Major College football game back in October. SEC Football; there is nothing like the atmosphere. The Pac 12 is more like going to study hall.
To those PAC-12 people that's how they want to enjoy their football.
Again with the "MEEEEEEEEE" typical of progressives.
Well, I just praised the atmosphere of the SEC. The Pac-12 doesn’t compare. I don’t recall there being a “MEEEEEEEEE” argument that I made. Typical conservative, can’t read or comprehend what you read.
Congratulations for stumbling onto the point I made that you originally responded to.
Oh brother.
Yeah, I can still remember the 2012 NCAA Basketball Final Four. Oh wait, few if anyone can. Without looking it up…can you remember who won? Yeah, me neither. Surely you can recall who won the Fiesta Bowl last year, right? Yeah…me neither. Well, clearly the time U of H went to the NCAA championship under Clyde Drexler and company was important to the students there now, right? Oh yeah, their fathers were likely not born when that was taking place.
There is some truth to the drawing of students.
Prestige? Zero effect.
Typical progressive. It's all about you. nevermind that others find enjoyment from it, or schools get spirit and camaraderie from it.
I remember each time my school went to the NCAA's and we are a mid major at best.
Typical conservative; Can’t read or comprehend anything.
From earlier in this thread...
I went to a Major College football game back in October. SEC Football; there is nothing like the atmosphere. The Pac 12 is more like going to study hall.
To those PAC-12 people that's how they want to enjoy their football.
Again with the "MEEEEEEEEE" typical of progressives.
Well, I just praised the atmosphere of the SEC. The Pac-12 doesn’t compare. I don’t recall there being a “MEEEEEEEEE” argument that I made. Typical conservative, can’t read or comprehend what you read.
It's always there, lurking under the pity pole.
Typical progressive. It's all about you. nevermind that others find enjoyment from it, or schools get spirit and camaraderie from it.
I remember each time my school went to the NCAA's and we are a mid major at best.
Typical conservative; Can’t read or comprehend anything.
From earlier in this thread...
I went to a Major College football game back in October. SEC Football; there is nothing like the atmosphere. The Pac 12 is more like going to study hall.
To those PAC-12 people that's how they want to enjoy their football.
Again with the "MEEEEEEEEE" typical of progressives.
Well, I just praised the atmosphere of the SEC. The Pac-12 doesn’t compare. I don’t recall there being a “MEEEEEEEEE” argument that I made. Typical conservative, can’t read or comprehend what you read.
It's always there, lurking under the pity pole.
Is that what you call your penis? Or did some dude give it that moniker?
I would not worry we stil live on earth. Nature has it's laws. I know a little about gambling. If you think people are not placing bets on these games you would be mistaken. As this idiot rolls the odds one way there will become a time when there is a lot of money to be made by betting against him. This is when the laws of nature will take over. This person will get a knock on thier door and they will be told you do as I say or else. Once you take a dive they own you. Many things do not need to be legislated, nature just takes care of it.That's simply fucked up and unfair to women. If I was women, I'd be pissed right the fuck off about that.
Typical conservative; Can’t read or comprehend anything.
From earlier in this thread...
To those PAC-12 people that's how they want to enjoy their football.
Again with the "MEEEEEEEEE" typical of progressives.
Well, I just praised the atmosphere of the SEC. The Pac-12 doesn’t compare. I don’t recall there being a “MEEEEEEEEE” argument that I made. Typical conservative, can’t read or comprehend what you read.
It's always there, lurking under the pity pole.
Is that what you call your penis? Or did some dude give it that moniker?
Wow, 2/10 on effort there.
Figures a hack like you runs out of actual content in 2-3 pages.
To those PAC-12 people that's how they want to enjoy their football.
Again with the "MEEEEEEEEE" typical of progressives.
Well, I just praised the atmosphere of the SEC. The Pac-12 doesn’t compare. I don’t recall there being a “MEEEEEEEEE” argument that I made. Typical conservative, can’t read or comprehend what you read.
It's always there, lurking under the pity pole.
Is that what you call your penis? Or did some dude give it that moniker?
Wow, 2/10 on effort there.
Figures a hack like you runs out of actual content in 2-3 pages.
You made it personal…now you’re whining like a little bitch. Typical conservative.
Well, I just praised the atmosphere of the SEC. The Pac-12 doesn’t compare. I don’t recall there being a “MEEEEEEEEE” argument that I made. Typical conservative, can’t read or comprehend what you read.
It's always there, lurking under the pity pole.
Is that what you call your penis? Or did some dude give it that moniker?
Wow, 2/10 on effort there.
Figures a hack like you runs out of actual content in 2-3 pages.
You made it personal…now you’re whining like a little bitch. Typical conservative.
Wow, if me implying you are a narcissist results in automatically going with a penis joke, then maybe this message board is beyond your skill level. May I suggest the Hello Kitty Message Board?
It's always there, lurking under the pity pole.
Is that what you call your penis? Or did some dude give it that moniker?
Wow, 2/10 on effort there.
Figures a hack like you runs out of actual content in 2-3 pages.
You made it personal…now you’re whining like a little bitch. Typical conservative.
Wow, if me implying you are a narcissist results in automatically going with a penis joke, then maybe this message board is beyond your skill level. May I suggest the Hello Kitty Message Board?
I debate in the manner in which I’m debated there stubby. If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.
Is that what you call your penis? Or did some dude give it that moniker?
Wow, 2/10 on effort there.
Figures a hack like you runs out of actual content in 2-3 pages.
You made it personal…now you’re whining like a little bitch. Typical conservative.
Wow, if me implying you are a narcissist results in automatically going with a penis joke, then maybe this message board is beyond your skill level. May I suggest the Hello Kitty Message Board?
I debate in the manner in which I’m debated there stubby. If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.
keep it up, that you have to go vulgar in one step shows you have nothing else.
You have the debating skill of an addled toddler.
