Transgender Mom commercial.................

[Nosmo King]

He takes issue with the transgender being called a "Mom" (as if that affects him).

I wonder how he feels about adoptive Moms. They didn't give birth, either.

He takes issue with a biological man, putting his penis into the vagina of a woman. Ejaculating into that vagina which biologically joins with the female ova and creating a child, calling himself a mother. The precise and correct term is FATHER.

An adoptive MOM did not use her penis and active sperm to create a child. If that MOM did put his penis into a vagina, ejaculate in that vagina and send sperm off to join with an ovum, that MOM is a FATHER too.

If you do not understand this, perhaps you need a remedial biology course.

You're worried about titles. If a person identifies as a woman, isn't it also a natural thing that such an identity comes with the emotional understanding of a woman, not merely the biological. And doesn't such an emotional being also identify with the maternal?

A person could call him or her self the Scarlet Pimpernel of the family and, so long as the needs of the children are fulfilled, why not? They could call themselves the Tipsycatlover of the family. Or the Nosmo King. The real meaningful part comes from the heart, not the title.

Who ever thought that the issue of motherhood itself would be so contentious. And we can lay that contentiousness squarely at the feet of the uptight Right. Nothing to see here, unless you're suspicious and fearful.

Because it is insanity and insanity harms everyone that comes into contact with that insanity. It isn't a title, it is a biological truth, a fact. A person might identify as Queen Elizabeth. The family might get on their knees to ask for the boone of going to bed. There is a huge world that is going to say this is insanity. This is enabling insanity. No Queen Elizabeth cannot send the children to the dungeon.

This is not a MOTHER. This is a FATHER. It is a biological truth. He may wear a dress and put curlers in his hair, it doesn't make him a mother. He is a father. He performed all biological functions to make him a father. It's not a title. It is a biological TERM OF ART. The MOTHER of those children, who gave birth to them, who took that penis into her vagina and provided the ova that make them children is sitting right there! She is the mother. She's not the father. She was pregnant. She gave birth to them. She's right there sitting right next to their FATHER!

That's why this is insanity and the needs, the emotional needs and educational needs of the children are not and cannot be met.

How do you know that to be true? What experience did you have with this particular situation? Or are you making an anecdotal point? Is it your fears and suspicions driving your argument?

 

[Nosmo King]

Leave it to the Right Wing to be wrapped so tight that a soap commercial riles them into a lather! Why I said the Right so uptight about below the belt issues? Aren't they supposed to be champions of small, less intrusive government?

They want to shrink the scope and size of government. Make it just small enough to fit into a bedroom or restroom.

Yeah, yeah...those Righties are crazy...how dare they expect any sort of standard upheld among society. The anything goes free for all is awesome...Shit, look how productive households are than follow that ideology...they turn out all kinds of positive contributors...You people blow my mind.

How did you get the job? Arbiter of Society. Gaudy title, but how did you get it? What powers, other than the power to tell people how to live their private lives, does the job come with? Can you censor what we see, read and listen to? Is there a copy of the Standards of Society I can peruse so I can know if I'm in accordance with your standards? How will I know when you've peeked under a skirt or into a fly on your pursuit of conformity, purity and production?

And on productivity, are only the poor and struggling middle class exclusively saddled with sexuality that you find icky, or are there LGBT "successful" people too? Do you use your template of acceptability to measure worth based on productivity? My 83 year old mother no longer enjoys a career. Does her worthiness decline because she no longer works? My eight year old grandson doesn't work either. No productivity at all. Is he a greater or lesser threat to you than transgender Moms?

Who the hell are you to judge anyone who is not a criminal or physical threat?

He takes issue with the transgender being called a "Mom" (as if that affects him).

I wonder how he feels about adoptive Moms. They didn't give birth, either.

He takes issue with a biological man, putting his penis into the vagina of a woman. Ejaculating into that vagina which biologically joins with the female ova and creating a child, calling himself a mother. The precise and correct term is FATHER.

An adoptive MOM did not use her penis and active sperm to create a child. If that MOM did put his penis into a vagina, ejaculate in that vagina and send sperm off to join with an ovum, that MOM is a FATHER too.

If you do not understand this, perhaps you need a remedial biology course.

You're worried about titles. If a person identifies as a woman, isn't it also a natural thing that such an identity comes with the emotional understanding of a woman, not merely the biological. And doesn't such an emotional being also identify with the maternal?

A person could call him or her self the Scarlet Pimpernel of the family and, so long as the needs of the children are fulfilled, why not? They could call themselves the Tipsycatlover of the family. Or the Nosmo King. The real meaningful part comes from the heart, not the title.

Who ever thought that the issue of motherhood itself would be so contentious. And we can lay that contentiousness squarely at the feet of the uptight Right. Nothing to see here, unless you're suspicious and fearful.

Look, this debate between mentally unstable whackos and "normal" folks has been had a million times over....You've clearly lost your mind and probably due to a traumatic experience that most of us haven't gone through. We can't level with you bud...THANK GOD!
How does one convince a whacko that he or she is a nutcase? It can't be done.

Are you a psychologist? A sociologist? A psychiatrist? How did you come to a diagnosis of insanity? Are your findings published? Peer reviewed? Does the American Society of Psychology agree with your hypothesis?

Or are you speaking out of suspicion and fear?

 

[BrokeLoser]

He takes issue with the transgender being called a "Mom" (as if that affects him).

I wonder how he feels about adoptive Moms. They didn't give birth, either.

He takes issue with a biological man, putting his penis into the vagina of a woman. Ejaculating into that vagina which biologically joins with the female ova and creating a child, calling himself a mother. The precise and correct term is FATHER.

An adoptive MOM did not use her penis and active sperm to create a child. If that MOM did put his penis into a vagina, ejaculate in that vagina and send sperm off to join with an ovum, that MOM is a FATHER too.

If you do not understand this, perhaps you need a remedial biology course.

You're worried about titles. If a person identifies as a woman, isn't it also a natural thing that such an identity comes with the emotional understanding of a woman, not merely the biological. And doesn't such an emotional being also identify with the maternal?

A person could call him or her self the Scarlet Pimpernel of the family and, so long as the needs of the children are fulfilled, why not? They could call themselves the Tipsycatlover of the family. Or the Nosmo King. The real meaningful part comes from the heart, not the title.

Who ever thought that the issue of motherhood itself would be so contentious. And we can lay that contentiousness squarely at the feet of the uptight Right. Nothing to see here, unless you're suspicious and fearful.

Because it is insanity and insanity harms everyone that comes into contact with that insanity. It isn't a title, it is a biological truth, a fact. A person might identify as Queen Elizabeth. The family might get on their knees to ask for the boone of going to bed. There is a huge world that is going to say this is insanity. This is enabling insanity. No Queen Elizabeth cannot send the children to the dungeon.

This is not a MOTHER. This is a FATHER. It is a biological truth. He may wear a dress and put curlers in his hair, it doesn't make him a mother. He is a father. He performed all biological functions to make him a father. It's not a title. It is a biological TERM OF ART. The MOTHER of those children, who gave birth to them, who took that penis into her vagina and provided the ova that make them children is sitting right there! She is the mother. She's not the father. She was pregnant. She gave birth to them. She's right there sitting right next to their FATHER!

That's why this is insanity and the needs, the emotional needs and educational needs of the children are not and cannot be met.

How do you know that to be true? What experience did you have with this particular situation? Or are you making an anecdotal point? Is it your fears and suspicions driving your argument?

Nosmo, you're flat out creepy...maybe even Hannibal Lecter creepy. Get yourself right man.

 

[Nosmo King]

He takes issue with the transgender being called a "Mom" (as if that affects him).

I wonder how he feels about adoptive Moms. They didn't give birth, either.

He takes issue with a biological man, putting his penis into the vagina of a woman. Ejaculating into that vagina which biologically joins with the female ova and creating a child, calling himself a mother. The precise and correct term is FATHER.

An adoptive MOM did not use her penis and active sperm to create a child. If that MOM did put his penis into a vagina, ejaculate in that vagina and send sperm off to join with an ovum, that MOM is a FATHER too.

If you do not understand this, perhaps you need a remedial biology course.

You're worried about titles. If a person identifies as a woman, isn't it also a natural thing that such an identity comes with the emotional understanding of a woman, not merely the biological. And doesn't such an emotional being also identify with the maternal?

A person could call him or her self the Scarlet Pimpernel of the family and, so long as the needs of the children are fulfilled, why not? They could call themselves the Tipsycatlover of the family. Or the Nosmo King. The real meaningful part comes from the heart, not the title.

Who ever thought that the issue of motherhood itself would be so contentious. And we can lay that contentiousness squarely at the feet of the uptight Right. Nothing to see here, unless you're suspicious and fearful.

Because it is insanity and insanity harms everyone that comes into contact with that insanity. It isn't a title, it is a biological truth, a fact. A person might identify as Queen Elizabeth. The family might get on their knees to ask for the boone of going to bed. There is a huge world that is going to say this is insanity. This is enabling insanity. No Queen Elizabeth cannot send the children to the dungeon.

This is not a MOTHER. This is a FATHER. It is a biological truth. He may wear a dress and put curlers in his hair, it doesn't make him a mother. He is a father. He performed all biological functions to make him a father. It's not a title. It is a biological TERM OF ART. The MOTHER of those children, who gave birth to them, who took that penis into her vagina and provided the ova that make them children is sitting right there! She is the mother. She's not the father. She was pregnant. She gave birth to them. She's right there sitting right next to their FATHER!

That's why this is insanity and the needs, the emotional needs and educational needs of the children are not and cannot be met.

How do you know that to be true? What experience did you have with this particular situation? Or are you making an anecdotal point? Is it your fears and suspicions driving your argument?

Nosmo, you're flat out creepy...maybe even Hannibal Lecter creepy. Get yourself right man.

I'm looking for truth, not anecdote. If you don't want to traffic in the truth, how does that make me creepy? It makes you non credible.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

He takes issue with the transgender being called a "Mom" (as if that affects him).

I wonder how he feels about adoptive Moms. They didn't give birth, either.

He takes issue with a biological man, putting his penis into the vagina of a woman. Ejaculating into that vagina which biologically joins with the female ova and creating a child, calling himself a mother. The precise and correct term is FATHER.

An adoptive MOM did not use her penis and active sperm to create a child. If that MOM did put his penis into a vagina, ejaculate in that vagina and send sperm off to join with an ovum, that MOM is a FATHER too.

If you do not understand this, perhaps you need a remedial biology course.

You're worried about titles. If a person identifies as a woman, isn't it also a natural thing that such an identity comes with the emotional understanding of a woman, not merely the biological. And doesn't such an emotional being also identify with the maternal?

A person could call him or her self the Scarlet Pimpernel of the family and, so long as the needs of the children are fulfilled, why not? They could call themselves the Tipsycatlover of the family. Or the Nosmo King. The real meaningful part comes from the heart, not the title.

Who ever thought that the issue of motherhood itself would be so contentious. And we can lay that contentiousness squarely at the feet of the uptight Right. Nothing to see here, unless you're suspicious and fearful.

Because it is insanity and insanity harms everyone that comes into contact with that insanity. It isn't a title, it is a biological truth, a fact. A person might identify as Queen Elizabeth. The family might get on their knees to ask for the boone of going to bed. There is a huge world that is going to say this is insanity. This is enabling insanity. No Queen Elizabeth cannot send the children to the dungeon.

This is not a MOTHER. This is a FATHER. It is a biological truth. He may wear a dress and put curlers in his hair, it doesn't make him a mother. He is a father. He performed all biological functions to make him a father. It's not a title. It is a biological TERM OF ART. The MOTHER of those children, who gave birth to them, who took that penis into her vagina and provided the ova that make them children is sitting right there! She is the mother. She's not the father. She was pregnant. She gave birth to them. She's right there sitting right next to their FATHER!

That's why this is insanity and the needs, the emotional needs and educational needs of the children are not and cannot be met.

How do you know that to be true? What experience did you have with this particular situation? Or are you making an anecdotal point? Is it your fears and suspicions driving your argument?

No one needs to have fears or suspicions to know that this is insanity. And, insanity getting a national audience in this commercial.

 

[Bassman007]

He takes issue with a biological man, putting his penis into the vagina of a woman. Ejaculating into that vagina which biologically joins with the female ova and creating a child, calling himself a mother. The precise and correct term is FATHER.

An adoptive MOM did not use her penis and active sperm to create a child. If that MOM did put his penis into a vagina, ejaculate in that vagina and send sperm off to join with an ovum, that MOM is a FATHER too.

If you do not understand this, perhaps you need a remedial biology course.

You're worried about titles. If a person identifies as a woman, isn't it also a natural thing that such an identity comes with the emotional understanding of a woman, not merely the biological. And doesn't such an emotional being also identify with the maternal?

A person could call him or her self the Scarlet Pimpernel of the family and, so long as the needs of the children are fulfilled, why not? They could call themselves the Tipsycatlover of the family. Or the Nosmo King. The real meaningful part comes from the heart, not the title.

Who ever thought that the issue of motherhood itself would be so contentious. And we can lay that contentiousness squarely at the feet of the uptight Right. Nothing to see here, unless you're suspicious and fearful.

Because it is insanity and insanity harms everyone that comes into contact with that insanity. It isn't a title, it is a biological truth, a fact. A person might identify as Queen Elizabeth. The family might get on their knees to ask for the boone of going to bed. There is a huge world that is going to say this is insanity. This is enabling insanity. No Queen Elizabeth cannot send the children to the dungeon.

This is not a MOTHER. This is a FATHER. It is a biological truth. He may wear a dress and put curlers in his hair, it doesn't make him a mother. He is a father. He performed all biological functions to make him a father. It's not a title. It is a biological TERM OF ART. The MOTHER of those children, who gave birth to them, who took that penis into her vagina and provided the ova that make them children is sitting right there! She is the mother. She's not the father. She was pregnant. She gave birth to them. She's right there sitting right next to their FATHER!

That's why this is insanity and the needs, the emotional needs and educational needs of the children are not and cannot be met.

How do you know that to be true? What experience did you have with this particular situation? Or are you making an anecdotal point? Is it your fears and suspicions driving your argument?

Nosmo, you're flat out creepy...maybe even Hannibal Lecter creepy. Get yourself right man.

I'm looking for truth, not anecdote. If you don't want to traffic in the truth, how does that make me creepy? It makes you non credible.

Look moron, you are creepy to anyone who feels that you are creepy. What fucktards like you can not comprehend, is that you can not tell other people how to feel. You got that creepy?

Good now go hang upside down with the other batshit crazies

 

[Nosmo King]

He takes issue with the transgender being called a "Mom" (as if that affects him).

I wonder how he feels about adoptive Moms. They didn't give birth, either.

He takes issue with a biological man, putting his penis into the vagina of a woman. Ejaculating into that vagina which biologically joins with the female ova and creating a child, calling himself a mother. The precise and correct term is FATHER.

An adoptive MOM did not use her penis and active sperm to create a child. If that MOM did put his penis into a vagina, ejaculate in that vagina and send sperm off to join with an ovum, that MOM is a FATHER too.

If you do not understand this, perhaps you need a remedial biology course.

You're worried about titles. If a person identifies as a woman, isn't it also a natural thing that such an identity comes with the emotional understanding of a woman, not merely the biological. And doesn't such an emotional being also identify with the maternal?

A person could call him or her self the Scarlet Pimpernel of the family and, so long as the needs of the children are fulfilled, why not? They could call themselves the Tipsycatlover of the family. Or the Nosmo King. The real meaningful part comes from the heart, not the title.

Who ever thought that the issue of motherhood itself would be so contentious. And we can lay that contentiousness squarely at the feet of the uptight Right. Nothing to see here, unless you're suspicious and fearful.

Because it is insanity and insanity harms everyone that comes into contact with that insanity. It isn't a title, it is a biological truth, a fact. A person might identify as Queen Elizabeth. The family might get on their knees to ask for the boone of going to bed. There is a huge world that is going to say this is insanity. This is enabling insanity. No Queen Elizabeth cannot send the children to the dungeon.

This is not a MOTHER. This is a FATHER. It is a biological truth. He may wear a dress and put curlers in his hair, it doesn't make him a mother. He is a father. He performed all biological functions to make him a father. It's not a title. It is a biological TERM OF ART. The MOTHER of those children, who gave birth to them, who took that penis into her vagina and provided the ova that make them children is sitting right there! She is the mother. She's not the father. She was pregnant. She gave birth to them. She's right there sitting right next to their FATHER!

That's why this is insanity and the needs, the emotional needs and educational needs of the children are not and cannot be met.

How do you know that to be true? What experience did you have with this particular situation? Or are you making an anecdotal point? Is it your fears and suspicions driving your argument?

No one needs to have fears or suspicions to know that this is insanity. And, insanity getting a national audience in this commercial.

How did you come to your diagnosis? If transgender folks are insane, wouldn't there be a pile of evidence proving it so? Or are psychiatrists and psychologists disagreeing with you and have evidence that has been published and peer reviewed?

Can you also look at a rumor and proclaim it cancerous?

 

[Nosmo King]

You're worried about titles. If a person identifies as a woman, isn't it also a natural thing that such an identity comes with the emotional understanding of a woman, not merely the biological. And doesn't such an emotional being also identify with the maternal?

A person could call him or her self the Scarlet Pimpernel of the family and, so long as the needs of the children are fulfilled, why not? They could call themselves the Tipsycatlover of the family. Or the Nosmo King. The real meaningful part comes from the heart, not the title.

Who ever thought that the issue of motherhood itself would be so contentious. And we can lay that contentiousness squarely at the feet of the uptight Right. Nothing to see here, unless you're suspicious and fearful.

Because it is insanity and insanity harms everyone that comes into contact with that insanity. It isn't a title, it is a biological truth, a fact. A person might identify as Queen Elizabeth. The family might get on their knees to ask for the boone of going to bed. There is a huge world that is going to say this is insanity. This is enabling insanity. No Queen Elizabeth cannot send the children to the dungeon.

This is not a MOTHER. This is a FATHER. It is a biological truth. He may wear a dress and put curlers in his hair, it doesn't make him a mother. He is a father. He performed all biological functions to make him a father. It's not a title. It is a biological TERM OF ART. The MOTHER of those children, who gave birth to them, who took that penis into her vagina and provided the ova that make them children is sitting right there! She is the mother. She's not the father. She was pregnant. She gave birth to them. She's right there sitting right next to their FATHER!

That's why this is insanity and the needs, the emotional needs and educational needs of the children are not and cannot be met.

How do you know that to be true? What experience did you have with this particular situation? Or are you making an anecdotal point? Is it your fears and suspicions driving your argument?

Nosmo, you're flat out creepy...maybe even Hannibal Lecter creepy. Get yourself right man.

I'm looking for truth, not anecdote. If you don't want to traffic in the truth, how does that make me creepy? It makes you non credible.

Look moron, you are creepy to anyone who feels that you are creepy. What fucktards like you can not comprehend, is that you can not tell other people how to feel. You got that creepy?

Good now go hang upside down with the other batshit crazies

I'm trying to make a rational argument. I haven't attacked anyone. I haven't made any untoward suggestions. My peccadilloes are not the issue or the concern. I never stooped so low to call so,some a fucktard.

And I'm the creepy one.

 

[Bassman007]

Because it is insanity and insanity harms everyone that comes into contact with that insanity. It isn't a title, it is a biological truth, a fact. A person might identify as Queen Elizabeth. The family might get on their knees to ask for the boone of going to bed. There is a huge world that is going to say this is insanity. This is enabling insanity. No Queen Elizabeth cannot send the children to the dungeon.

This is not a MOTHER. This is a FATHER. It is a biological truth. He may wear a dress and put curlers in his hair, it doesn't make him a mother. He is a father. He performed all biological functions to make him a father. It's not a title. It is a biological TERM OF ART. The MOTHER of those children, who gave birth to them, who took that penis into her vagina and provided the ova that make them children is sitting right there! She is the mother. She's not the father. She was pregnant. She gave birth to them. She's right there sitting right next to their FATHER!

That's why this is insanity and the needs, the emotional needs and educational needs of the children are not and cannot be met.

How do you know that to be true? What experience did you have with this particular situation? Or are you making an anecdotal point? Is it your fears and suspicions driving your argument?

Nosmo, you're flat out creepy...maybe even Hannibal Lecter creepy. Get yourself right man.

I'm looking for truth, not anecdote. If you don't want to traffic in the truth, how does that make me creepy? It makes you non credible.

Look moron, you are creepy to anyone who feels that you are creepy. What fucktards like you can not comprehend, is that you can not tell other people how to feel. You got that creepy?

Good now go hang upside down with the other batshit crazies

I'm trying to make a rational argument. I haven't attacked anyone. I haven't made any untoward suggestions. My peccadilloes are not the issue or the concern. I never stooped so low to call so,some a fucktard.

And I'm the creepy one.

Anyone who feels you are creepy, with an avatar of a dogs exposed genitals is vindicated.

You got that creepy

 

[MaryL]

OK. We all have this thing about false news when it comes to conservatives, let's back up here. A trans gendered MAN that never could have had children from a womb, IS a transformed into a "mother", because liberals say so? I think falsehoods cut both ways. Let's go beyond that...for truth's sake.

 

[Zoom-boing]

There is no such thing as transgender, that's just a bullshit term the left made up. That guy is no more a mother than an ice cube is. That is a guy in drag who is mentally ill.

The problem with this commercial (and anything else that pushes this crap) is that it normalizes a mental illness, treats this guy as if he were the same as non-mentally ill person. Shall we humor anorexics and embrace their mental illness because they 'feel' like they're fat? smdh I predict the decline in Dove sales in 3, 2, 1 . . . .

 

[Nosmo King]

How do you know that to be true? What experience did you have with this particular situation? Or are you making an anecdotal point? Is it your fears and suspicions driving your argument?

Nosmo, you're flat out creepy...maybe even Hannibal Lecter creepy. Get yourself right man.

I'm looking for truth, not anecdote. If you don't want to traffic in the truth, how does that make me creepy? It makes you non credible.

Look moron, you are creepy to anyone who feels that you are creepy. What fucktards like you can not comprehend, is that you can not tell other people how to feel. You got that creepy?

Good now go hang upside down with the other batshit crazies

I'm trying to make a rational argument. I haven't attacked anyone. I haven't made any untoward suggestions. My peccadilloes are not the issue or the concern. I never stooped so low to call so,some a fucktard.

And I'm the creepy one.

Anyone who feels you are creepy, with an avatar of a dogs exposed genitals is vindicated.

You got that creepy

My avatar is my dog in her Playmate of the Month pose.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Nosmo, you're flat out creepy...maybe even Hannibal Lecter creepy. Get yourself right man.

I'm looking for truth, not anecdote. If you don't want to traffic in the truth, how does that make me creepy? It makes you non credible.

Look moron, you are creepy to anyone who feels that you are creepy. What fucktards like you can not comprehend, is that you can not tell other people how to feel. You got that creepy?

Good now go hang upside down with the other batshit crazies

I'm trying to make a rational argument. I haven't attacked anyone. I haven't made any untoward suggestions. My peccadilloes are not the issue or the concern. I never stooped so low to call so,some a fucktard.

And I'm the creepy one.

Anyone who feels you are creepy, with an avatar of a dogs exposed genitals is vindicated.

You got that creepy

My avatar is my dog in her Playmate of the Month pose.

Like I said...CREEPY!
Often times I wonder just what you Loonies might consider to be bizarre?
If you can't find it bizarre that 6'5" 250lb Bubba with an adam's apple and a penis suddenly feels the need to wear a dress and lipstick...then what the fuck do you find to be bizarre?

 

[skye]

This is gonna be funny on take your Dad to school nite

I don't like that commercial.

 

[featherlite]

That's just creepy. I'm really starting to dislike the word "redefine".

 

[Nosmo King]

I'm looking for truth, not anecdote. If you don't want to traffic in the truth, how does that make me creepy? It makes you non credible.

Look moron, you are creepy to anyone who feels that you are creepy. What fucktards like you can not comprehend, is that you can not tell other people how to feel. You got that creepy?

Good now go hang upside down with the other batshit crazies

I'm trying to make a rational argument. I haven't attacked anyone. I haven't made any untoward suggestions. My peccadilloes are not the issue or the concern. I never stooped so low to call so,some a fucktard.

And I'm the creepy one.

Anyone who feels you are creepy, with an avatar of a dogs exposed genitals is vindicated.

You got that creepy

My avatar is my dog in her Playmate of the Month pose.

Like I said...CREEPY!
Often times I wonder just what you Loonies might consider to be bizarre?
If you can't find it bizarre that 6'5" 250lb Bubba with an adam's apple and a penis suddenly feels the need to wear a dress and lipstick...then what the fuck do you find to be bizarre?

Bizarre perhaps. Insane certainly not. And harmful never.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

This is gonna be funny on take your Dad to school nite

I don't like that commercial.

Im giving it two years, by then we will be talking about Transgender Sasquatches, and that they are having a hard time finding a bakeries for their transgender weddings.

 

[miketx]

He takes issue with the transgender being called a "Mom" (as if that affects him).

I wonder how he feels about adoptive Moms. They didn't give birth, either.

As usual, comparing two things not even remotely similar.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Thank God I do not watch TV except for the movie rental I get from Redbox daily and when the Lucifer TV series is on.

Best thing about TV is you can change the channel or even better shut it off so you do not see those disturbing commercials...

 

[ricechickie]

You're worried about titles. If a person identifies as a woman, isn't it also a natural thing that such an identity comes with the emotional understanding of a woman, not merely the biological. And doesn't such an emotional being also identify with the maternal?

A person could call him or her self the Scarlet Pimpernel of the family and, so long as the needs of the children are fulfilled, why not? They could call themselves the Tipsycatlover of the family. Or the Nosmo King. The real meaningful part comes from the heart, not the title.

Who ever thought that the issue of motherhood itself would be so contentious. And we can lay that contentiousness squarely at the feet of the uptight Right. Nothing to see here, unless you're suspicious and fearful.

Because it is insanity and insanity harms everyone that comes into contact with that insanity. It isn't a title, it is a biological truth, a fact. A person might identify as Queen Elizabeth. The family might get on their knees to ask for the boone of going to bed. There is a huge world that is going to say this is insanity. This is enabling insanity. No Queen Elizabeth cannot send the children to the dungeon.

This is not a MOTHER. This is a FATHER. It is a biological truth. He may wear a dress and put curlers in his hair, it doesn't make him a mother. He is a father. He performed all biological functions to make him a father. It's not a title. It is a biological TERM OF ART. The MOTHER of those children, who gave birth to them, who took that penis into her vagina and provided the ova that make them children is sitting right there! She is the mother. She's not the father. She was pregnant. She gave birth to them. She's right there sitting right next to their FATHER!

That's why this is insanity and the needs, the emotional needs and educational needs of the children are not and cannot be met.

How did you get the job? Arbiter of Society. Gaudy title, but how did you get it? What powers, other than the power to tell people how to live their private lives, does the job come with? Can you censor what we see, read and listen to? Is there a copy of the Standards of Society I can peruse so I can know if I'm in accordance with your standards? How will I know when you've peeked under a skirt or into a fly on your pursuit of conformity, purity and production?

And on productivity, are only the poor and struggling middle class exclusively saddled with sexuality that you find icky, or are there LGBT "successful" people too? Do you use your template of acceptability to measure worth based on productivity? My 83 year old mother no longer enjoys a career. Does her worthiness decline because she no longer works? My eight year old grandson doesn't work either. No productivity at all. Is he a greater or lesser threat to you than transgender Moms?

Who the hell are you to judge anyone who is not a criminal or physical threat?

You're worried about titles. If a person identifies as a woman, isn't it also a natural thing that such an identity comes with the emotional understanding of a woman, not merely the biological. And doesn't such an emotional being also identify with the maternal?

A person could call him or her self the Scarlet Pimpernel of the family and, so long as the needs of the children are fulfilled, why not? They could call themselves the Tipsycatlover of the family. Or the Nosmo King. The real meaningful part comes from the heart, not the title.

Who ever thought that the issue of motherhood itself would be so contentious. And we can lay that contentiousness squarely at the feet of the uptight Right. Nothing to see here, unless you're suspicious and fearful.

Look, this debate between mentally unstable whackos and "normal" folks has been had a million times over....You've clearly lost your mind and probably due to a traumatic experience that most of us haven't gone through. We can't level with you bud...THANK GOD!
How does one convince a whacko that he or she is a nutcase? It can't be done.

But WHY? How is it harming you and yours?

They have the right to be "insane" (as you see it) right up until it hurts you or your family or takes away some rights of yours.

Insanity has to be stopped everywhere before it spreads. When insanity spreads, those who refuse to accept the insanity pay the price.

Insanity is bad. But this "insanity" doesn't hurt any of you.

Guess what? Your hate does more to harm our society than that person's "insanity" does.

There are times when "hate" is called for. If it took "hate" to remove the children from this craziness, then hate is certainly called for.

Well, you've got the hate. But you haven't explained how this hurts the kids.

So far you've followed regressive protocol to the tee. You've publicly professed your love and support for our welfare recipients, our illegals, our gays and trannys...etc etc but I've yet to read anything from you where you publicly display any love or support for anyone or anything that may fall in the "normal" column. Care for any?

I don't believe in "normal."

I'll pause here for your shocked gasps of horror.

That still doesn't answer my question of how a person whose expression of gender you disagree with affects you.

Happy Easter