Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She has absolutely no standing at all. Not even the beginnings of standing. And she change in a single-user bathroom if she is that paranoid.
Funny thing is, that it was those on the left—back when that side of the political spectrum still had some vestige of a grasp on reality that it has since completely lost—that first brought up the issue of “sexual harassment”, and pushed for laws to protect against it; and now, a generation later, it is theleftwrong that is calling for policies that effectively mandate sexual harassment and abuse against girls and women.
And don't forget Obergefell which mandates as a contractual and legal bind, the permanent divorce of a child from either a mother or father for life. So the group frequently screaming (using this as their drumbeat to influence Kennedy) "think of the children!!" with respect to marriage, successfully hoodwinked him into a PC fog where his decision on the surface was "to help children" actually wound up hurting them; and institutionalizing that hurt.
You're right; only the insane could engage in such pretzel logic and still be able to function on a rudimentary level.
the o/p has an unhealthy and bizarre obsession with this issue and all other things LGBT. it doesn't matter what the law is. it doesn't matter how the high court rules. nothing matters but the continued (and boring) redundant whining.
East Penn student doesn't want to share gym locker room with transgender students
And it's a case for sexual harassment. She should file against the adults in the school district responsible. Also those at the state level and the Obama Administration.
**If you like this thread, rate it a "winner"..."thank you" or "agree".
Note: the words "transgender students" means the same thing as male students. vv
EMMAUS — An East Penn School District student who is starting high school next week says she should not have to change clothes in the girls locker room with transgender students....Ninth-grader Sigourney Coyle told the East Penn School Board on Monday that she feels her rights to "bodily privacy" would be violated if she is required to get undressed in a locker room with students who were born male but identify as female... East Penn student doesn't want to share gym locker room with transgender students
The LGBT cult claims it isn't an issue because "currently there's no boys trying to use the girls locker room" with Coyle. However, that's not the point. It's like having your boss come up to you and say "I can expose my genitals to you anytime you know.." and then walk off. And having him say that every day. "Any time now, you could be in an exposed situation and I could...you know...just drop my pants right in front of you".
With such a statement and reality looming over a shy and embarrassed teen girl every day, this is no different than sexual harassment in the work place.
What she said was the anxiety that a male could waltz into her shower/locker room at any time was disturbing enough to her that she can't disrobe in the gym. So, you know, she's experiencing a real mental distress at the idea that the authorities at her school (state and fed) would subject her to such an uncertain situation, such intimate exposure. It sounds like she's experiencing a form of sexual harassment at the hands of school officials: "hey little girl, any time now we could let a boy in with you in the showers!" That's damned creepy. And I don't blame her.
She has a case for sexual harassment. And so does any girl in any school placed in the identical situation by adults who should know better. No adult can claim innocence here. It is fully expected and assumed that girls would experience a sense of being violated by adults helping boys come in and undress next to them in the showers.
School districts ignoring common sense and/or fearing repercussions financially in the form of withdrawn funds (the threat promised by the Obama Administration) who are complying with Obama's illegal demands, have their asses hanging out on this one. They should consult with attorneys schooled in sexual harassment cases before they allow one single boy in any girls' bathroom, shower or locker room. Wow!
Attorneys?
If the girl was a satanist who loves gays and hates guns, adults telling her "you will have to now undress in front of boys when we say" is still sexual harassment. Nice try at trying to introduce three strawmen in one post. I think that's a record for you.They continue to cling to their bibles, guns, and homophobia.
RICHMOND, Va. (AP) August 29, 2016..The Gloucester County School Board wants the justices to review a decision from the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which said the board's policy barring 17-year-old Gavin Grimm from using the restroom that matches his gender identity violates Title IX, a federal law that prohibits discrimination in schools...The school board said in its filing Monday that Grimm's case provides an excellent vehicle for "resolving once and for all the current nationwide controversy" over transgender bathroom access. It argues the 4th Circuit was wrong to defer to education department's interpretation of the law, which for years has allowed schools to provide "separate toilet, locker rooms and shower facilities on the basis of sex.".
Grimm’s is just one of several fights over transgender access to public facilities that is brewing around the country. A North Carolina law, House Bill 2, that places broad restrictions on public restroom and locker room access, not just in schools, is being challenged by the federal government, several students and teachers in the state’s public school and university system. North Carolina has slapped the federal government with a countersuit......On Friday, 10 states filed suit against the Obama administration’s requirement that public schools allow transgender students to use bathrooms and locker rooms consistent with their gender identity. That lawsuit followed a similar challenge that 11 other states launched in May. Virginia school board takes transgender bathroom case to supreme court
So...it seems that the pending creepy adult mandate as sexual harassment of girls in their shower areas has reached the shores of Virginia. You don't even need a degree in law to know that adults ordering minor girls to undress in front of boys is A BIG FAT LAWSUIT.
I think the real tragedy is the notion that it's so terrible for opposite genders to see each other in a state of undress.
Well then you never took biology
Actually, I did.
How sad that you consider it "paranoid" for a young girl to not want boys watching her shower, pee, or change her clothes. You are disgusting. Shame on you.She has absolutely no standing at all. Not even the beginnings of standing. And she change in a single-user bathroom if she is that paranoid.
Well there is some fine liberal "logic" for you. Because there isn't a transgender in her school now, it means there won't be one tomorrow, right Betty?She's isn't changing in front of males. There isn't even a transgender student in her entire school that she knows of. Just another kid whose parents are trying to make a splash like the little girl who wanted gay marriage banned for her birthday. Total fuckin' crap.
Just as if a woman's boss hasn't actually thrown her up against a wall and raped her, it doesn't mean that his daily promises that he could do that at any time he chose, with no way for her to fight back or protest, "isn't sexual harassment"...Well there is some fine liberal "logic" for you. Because there isn't a transgender in her school now, it means there won't be one tomorrow, right Betty?She's isn't changing in front of males. There isn't even a transgender student in her entire school that she knows of. Just another kid whose parents are trying to make a splash like the little girl who wanted gay marriage banned for her birthday. Total fuckin' crap.
Here's Sigourney Coyle herself at a podium describing the legal and sexual exposure dilemma to her school's board that the BO Administration put her in:
But you are saying here that exposing ones self in a school needs to be legal...........................No one is exposing themselves. Your ideas about this are as total nonsense as your ideas about gay people.Right, because girls being told "we're helping boys to expose themselves to you where you are undressing" doesn't even have a wisp of sexual harassment lingering around it?She has absolutely no standing at all. Not even the beginnings of standing.
And in related news, up is down!
A blistering take down of the ignorant progressive transgender issue. The bottom line - the rights of the mentally disturbed does not supersede my rights. Period. End of story.
When Liberty Forces 18 Girls Into a Single-Stall Shower Room
As the situations in Minnesota, North Carolina, and elsewhere demonstrate, the latest test sites for this theory of “social progress” are locker rooms, showers, and other private changing facilities.....In what would have been an unthinkable battleground just a few short years ago, these tile-floored, plastic-stalled, chrome-fixtured, and (formerly) sex-specific sanctuaries are now ground zero for experiments in the subjective theory of gender.....And the wisdom of the New Regime 2.0 goes like this:....The march toward true liberty requires 18 girls to squeeze into a prison cell-sized changing space or abandon their bodily privacy, and their right to safety and comfort in the most intimate and vulnerable of settings.....Why? So that a “bearded individual” can fully disrobe in the girls’ locker room at a parks department swimming pool on New York City’s Upper West Side. Empowered by the mere proclamation that he is a woman, he appropriates the entire space for himself.
Use whatever analogy you want....The New Regime has flushed common sense down the toilet....The New Regime has pulled back the curtain and washed away any remaining vestiges of bodily privacy.....The New Regime has transformed locker-room peepholes into doorways.....The point is, the New Regime embraces the idea that individuals can stride with impunity into any private space they choose, regardless of biology. This dismissal of biological fact in bathrooms, locker rooms, and showers reeks of irony, in what may be the best example to date of the lengths to which the New Regime will go to impose its orthodoxy.
