Trump admin prosecutes woman for laughing

[mamooth]

The Trump admin is going all out with its attempts to shut down free speech. They're literally prosecuting a woman for laughing.

A Woman Is On Trial For Laughing During A Congressional Hearing | HuffPost
---
Samuel Bogash, a lawyer representing Fairooz, showed a video of the audience laughing at another part of the hearing, when Sessions joked about disagreements with his wife. But [assistant U.S. attorney Jason] Covert argued that it was appropriate for the audience to laugh when Sessions made a joke about his marriage but not when Shelby claimed Sessions had a long record of “treating all Americans equally.”
---

In Stalinist Amerikka, Trump-police decide whether it's appropriate for you to laugh. Laugh at the wrong time, and they haul you away. Soon, failing to laugh at approved party jokes will get you hauled away. After that, failing to applaud loudly enough and for long enough will be an OffenseAgainstTheParty.

Needless to say, almost none of the Trump-snowflakes who pretend to care about free speech will have any problems with big government prosecuting people for laughing. Most of them will be giddy with delight over it, as almost all conservatives want free speech for liberals ended.

And this type of government-endorsed free speech suppression is unique to the Republicans. You didn't see Obama prosecuting the guy who screamed "You lie!" during his speech, though Obama could have invoked the same law to do so.

 

[jc456]

those fking rules.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The Trump admin is going all out with its attempts to shut down free speech. They're literally prosecuting a woman for laughing.

A Woman Is On Trial For Laughing During A Congressional Hearing | HuffPost
---
Samuel Bogash, a lawyer representing Fairooz, showed a video of the audience laughing at another part of the hearing, when Sessions joked about disagreements with his wife. But [assistant U.S. attorney Jason] Covert argued that it was appropriate for the audience to laugh when Sessions made a joke about his marriage but not when Shelby claimed Sessions had a long record of “treating all Americans equally.”
---

In Stalinist Amerikka, Trump-police decide whether it's appropriate for you to laugh. Laugh at the wrong time, and they haul you away. Soon, failing to laugh at approved party jokes will get you hauled away. After that, failing to applaud loudly enough and for long enough will be an OffenseAgainstTheParty.

Needless to say, almost none of the Trump-snowflakes who pretend to care about free speech will have any problems with big government prosecuting people for laughing. Most of them will be giddy with delight over it, as almost all conservatives want free speech for liberals ended.

And this type of government-endorsed free speech suppression is unique to the Republicans. You didn't see Obama prosecuting the guy who screamed "You lie!" during his speech, though Obama could have invoked the same law to do so.

You didn't see Obama prosecuting the guy who screamed "You lie!" during his speech,

Obama should have. Discovery would have been interesting.

 

[Rocko]

Fake news

 

[imawhosure]

The Trump admin is going all out with its attempts to shut down free speech. They're literally prosecuting a woman for laughing.

A Woman Is On Trial For Laughing During A Congressional Hearing | HuffPost
---
Samuel Bogash, a lawyer representing Fairooz, showed a video of the audience laughing at another part of the hearing, when Sessions joked about disagreements with his wife. But [assistant U.S. attorney Jason] Covert argued that it was appropriate for the audience to laugh when Sessions made a joke about his marriage but not when Shelby claimed Sessions had a long record of “treating all Americans equally.”
---

In Stalinist Amerikka, Trump-police decide whether it's appropriate for you to laugh. Laugh at the wrong time, and they haul you away. Soon, failing to laugh at approved party jokes will get you hauled away. After that, failing to applaud loudly enough and for long enough will be an OffenseAgainstTheParty.

Needless to say, almost none of the Trump-snowflakes who pretend to care about free speech will have any problems with big government prosecuting people for laughing. Most of them will be giddy with delight over it, as almost all conservatives want free speech for liberals ended.

And this type of government-endorsed free speech suppression is unique to the Republicans. You didn't see Obama prosecuting the guy who screamed "You lie!" during his speech, though Obama could have invoked the same law to do so.

Absolutely not, Obama couldn't do it, or he woulda been caught, lol!

 

[Dschrute3]

Sounds like Democrat Fake News. I'm sure the OP and HuffPost are distorting and spinning to fit their 'I hate Donald Trump' narrative.

 

[Doc1]

The Trump admin is going all out with its attempts to shut down free speech. They're literally prosecuting a woman for laughing.

A Woman Is On Trial For Laughing During A Congressional Hearing | HuffPost
---
Samuel Bogash, a lawyer representing Fairooz, showed a video of the audience laughing at another part of the hearing, when Sessions joked about disagreements with his wife. But [assistant U.S. attorney Jason] Covert argued that it was appropriate for the audience to laugh when Sessions made a joke about his marriage but not when Shelby claimed Sessions had a long record of “treating all Americans equally.”
---

In Stalinist Amerikka, Trump-police decide whether it's appropriate for you to laugh. Laugh at the wrong time, and they haul you away. Soon, failing to laugh at approved party jokes will get you hauled away. After that, failing to applaud loudly enough and for long enough will be an OffenseAgainstTheParty.

Needless to say, almost none of the Trump-snowflakes who pretend to care about free speech will have any problems with big government prosecuting people for laughing. Most of them will be giddy with delight over it, as almost all conservatives want free speech for liberals ended.

And this type of government-endorsed free speech suppression is unique to the Republicans. You didn't see Obama prosecuting the guy who screamed "You lie!" during his speech, though Obama could have invoked the same law to do so.

Oh look another completely nonsensical thread.

 

[Dschrute3]

The Trump admin is going all out with its attempts to shut down free speech. They're literally prosecuting a woman for laughing.

A Woman Is On Trial For Laughing During A Congressional Hearing | HuffPost
---
Samuel Bogash, a lawyer representing Fairooz, showed a video of the audience laughing at another part of the hearing, when Sessions joked about disagreements with his wife. But [assistant U.S. attorney Jason] Covert argued that it was appropriate for the audience to laugh when Sessions made a joke about his marriage but not when Shelby claimed Sessions had a long record of “treating all Americans equally.”
---

In Stalinist Amerikka, Trump-police decide whether it's appropriate for you to laugh. Laugh at the wrong time, and they haul you away. Soon, failing to laugh at approved party jokes will get you hauled away. After that, failing to applaud loudly enough and for long enough will be an OffenseAgainstTheParty.

Needless to say, almost none of the Trump-snowflakes who pretend to care about free speech will have any problems with big government prosecuting people for laughing. Most of them will be giddy with delight over it, as almost all conservatives want free speech for liberals ended.

And this type of government-endorsed free speech suppression is unique to the Republicans. You didn't see Obama prosecuting the guy who screamed "You lie!" during his speech, though Obama could have invoked the same law to do so.

Oh look another completely nonsensical thread.

Yeah, Trump-Haters are desperate to be outraged. They're very funny at times.

 

[IsaacNewton]

The Trump admin is going all out with its attempts to shut down free speech. They're literally prosecuting a woman for laughing.

A Woman Is On Trial For Laughing During A Congressional Hearing | HuffPost
---
Samuel Bogash, a lawyer representing Fairooz, showed a video of the audience laughing at another part of the hearing, when Sessions joked about disagreements with his wife. But [assistant U.S. attorney Jason] Covert argued that it was appropriate for the audience to laugh when Sessions made a joke about his marriage but not when Shelby claimed Sessions had a long record of “treating all Americans equally.”
---

In Stalinist Amerikka, Trump-police decide whether it's appropriate for you to laugh. Laugh at the wrong time, and they haul you away. Soon, failing to laugh at approved party jokes will get you hauled away. After that, failing to applaud loudly enough and for long enough will be an OffenseAgainstTheParty.

Needless to say, almost none of the Trump-snowflakes who pretend to care about free speech will have any problems with big government prosecuting people for laughing. Most of them will be giddy with delight over it, as almost all conservatives want free speech for liberals ended.

And this type of government-endorsed free speech suppression is unique to the Republicans. You didn't see Obama prosecuting the guy who screamed "You lie!" during his speech, though Obama could have invoked the same law to do so.

Yeah the same people screaming like banshees to 'let Ann Coulter speak' are trying to shut down people from laughing! It's laughable! This is something you'd see from SAddam Hussein or Kim Jong iLL. Poor Sessions and drump, their snowflake sensibilities were offended.

Jesus Christ what a bunch of insane pussies drumpf and his fellow Golums are.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Decorum in government hearings should be followed.

But if someone says something laughable, such as Sessions has a history of even handed openness on race, then, yes, that is laughable.

 

[Dschrute3]

The Trump admin is going all out with its attempts to shut down free speech. They're literally prosecuting a woman for laughing.

A Woman Is On Trial For Laughing During A Congressional Hearing | HuffPost
---
Samuel Bogash, a lawyer representing Fairooz, showed a video of the audience laughing at another part of the hearing, when Sessions joked about disagreements with his wife. But [assistant U.S. attorney Jason] Covert argued that it was appropriate for the audience to laugh when Sessions made a joke about his marriage but not when Shelby claimed Sessions had a long record of “treating all Americans equally.”
---

In Stalinist Amerikka, Trump-police decide whether it's appropriate for you to laugh. Laugh at the wrong time, and they haul you away. Soon, failing to laugh at approved party jokes will get you hauled away. After that, failing to applaud loudly enough and for long enough will be an OffenseAgainstTheParty.

Needless to say, almost none of the Trump-snowflakes who pretend to care about free speech will have any problems with big government prosecuting people for laughing. Most of them will be giddy with delight over it, as almost all conservatives want free speech for liberals ended.

And this type of government-endorsed free speech suppression is unique to the Republicans. You didn't see Obama prosecuting the guy who screamed "You lie!" during his speech, though Obama could have invoked the same law to do so.

Yeah the same people screaming like banshees to 'let Ann Coulter speak' are trying to shut down people from laughing! It's laughable! This is something you'd see from SAddam Hussein or Kim Jong iLL. Poor Sessions and drump, their snowflake sensibilities were offended.

Jesus Christ what a bunch of insane pussies drumpf and his fellow Golums are.

More loony Trump-Hater faux outrage. Y'all have lost it.

 

[IsaacNewton]

The Trump admin is going all out with its attempts to shut down free speech. They're literally prosecuting a woman for laughing.

A Woman Is On Trial For Laughing During A Congressional Hearing | HuffPost
---
Samuel Bogash, a lawyer representing Fairooz, showed a video of the audience laughing at another part of the hearing, when Sessions joked about disagreements with his wife. But [assistant U.S. attorney Jason] Covert argued that it was appropriate for the audience to laugh when Sessions made a joke about his marriage but not when Shelby claimed Sessions had a long record of “treating all Americans equally.”
---

In Stalinist Amerikka, Trump-police decide whether it's appropriate for you to laugh. Laugh at the wrong time, and they haul you away. Soon, failing to laugh at approved party jokes will get you hauled away. After that, failing to applaud loudly enough and for long enough will be an OffenseAgainstTheParty.

Needless to say, almost none of the Trump-snowflakes who pretend to care about free speech will have any problems with big government prosecuting people for laughing. Most of them will be giddy with delight over it, as almost all conservatives want free speech for liberals ended.

And this type of government-endorsed free speech suppression is unique to the Republicans. You didn't see Obama prosecuting the guy who screamed "You lie!" during his speech, though Obama could have invoked the same law to do so.

Yeah the same people screaming like banshees to 'let Ann Coulter speak' are trying to shut down people from laughing! It's laughable! This is something you'd see from SAddam Hussein or Kim Jong iLL. Poor Sessions and drump, their snowflake sensibilities were offended.

Jesus Christ what a bunch of insane pussies drumpf and his fellow Golums are.

More loony Trump-Hater faux outrage. Y'all have lost it.

 

[mamooth]

So, as expected, not a peep of criticism from the Trump-thugs. Without exception, every one of them enthusiastically supports prosecuting a woman for laughing at the wrong joke.

It's very difficult now to find any Republican who isn't an open Stalinist. They all want free speech to end for their political opponents. The two sides are totally different. Liberals think government should support free speech, while conservatives think government should end free speech.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So, as expected, not a peep of criticism from the Trump-thugs. Without exception, every one of them enthusiastically supports prosecuting a woman for laughing at the wrong joke.

It's very difficult now to find any Republican who isn't an open Stalinist. They all want free speech to end for their political opponents. The two sides are totally different. Liberals think government should support free speech, while conservatives think government should end free speech.

Liberals think government should support free speech,

Oh, man, thanks.
That was funny.

 

[OKTexas]

It was an intentional attempt to disrupt the hearing, she admitted it herself. Don't want to be charged with disorderly conduct, don't be disorderly.

Fairooz said in a statement on Code Pink's website that it was her "responsibility as a citizen to dissent at the confirmation hearing of Senator Jeff Sessions, a man who professes anti-immigrant, anti-LGBT policies, who has voted against several civil rights measures and who jokes about the white supremacist terrorist group the Ku Klux Klan."

Woman Prosecuted for Laughing at Jeff Sessions During Confirmation Hearing

.

 

[Dschrute3]

So, as expected, not a peep of criticism from the Trump-thugs. Without exception, every one of them enthusiastically supports prosecuting a woman for laughing at the wrong joke.

It's very difficult now to find any Republican who isn't an open Stalinist. They all want free speech to end for their political opponents. The two sides are totally different. Liberals think government should support free speech, while conservatives think government should end free speech.

Come on Trump-Haters, this all you got? Seriously, y'all are desperately forcing yourselves to be outraged 24/7. Y'all have lost it bigtime.

 

[OKTexas]

Decorum in government hearings should be followed.

But if someone says something laughable, such as Sessions has a history of even handed openness on race, then, yes, that is laughable.

She laughed and what a congressman said about Session, you might what to know what you talking about ..............OH WAIT...........you never seem to know what you're talking about.

 

[Dschrute3]

So, as expected, not a peep of criticism from the Trump-thugs. Without exception, every one of them enthusiastically supports prosecuting a woman for laughing at the wrong joke.

It's very difficult now to find any Republican who isn't an open Stalinist. They all want free speech to end for their political opponents. The two sides are totally different. Liberals think government should support free speech, while conservatives think government should end free speech.

Liberals think government should support free speech,

Oh, man, thanks.
That was funny.

Yeah, more desperate Trump-Hater faux outrage. They really have no idea how deranged they sound. They don't realize that it's clear to most, they're forcing the faux outrage thing too much now. It's a 'Little Boy who cried Wolf' scenario. Everyday they're desperate to feign outrage over something. It's pretty pathetic. But it's also pretty funny at times.

 

[Dschrute3]

Decorum in government hearings should be followed.

But if someone says something laughable, such as Sessions has a history of even handed openness on race, then, yes, that is laughable.

She laughed and what a congressman said about Session, you might what to know what you talking about ..............OH WAIT...........you never seem to know what you're talking about.

Just more Democrat Fake News. Waddayagunnado, right?

 

[francoHFW]

Decorum in government hearings should be followed.

But if someone says something laughable, such as Sessions has a history of even handed openness on race, then, yes, that is laughable.

She laughed and what a congressman said about Session, you might what to know what you talking about ..............OH WAIT...........you never seem to know what you're talking about.

Just more Democrat Fake News. Waddayagunnado, right?

What's fake about it? You RWNJs are unbelievable...