Trump argument bolstered: Clinton could have received 800,000 votes from noncitizens, study finds

[BULLDOG]

It may not be the reported margin but who knows if the illegal votes carried some states for Hillary and made others close?

Hillary Clinton received 800,000 votes from noncitizens, bolsters Trump argument, study finds

That study is bogus because it doesn't support the left

The study is bogus because it's not peer reviewed and there is no basis for the data. Unless you are there, looking at the ID's, how can you possible tell that 800,000 illegals voted, or who they voted for? You can't. And therefore the study is bogus.

And you have just accurately shown how Democrats protect voter fraud. Anyone trying to check IDs to validate voters are legitimate you'd scream bloody murder. So you block that then declare every study bogus because they didn't do what you would never allow them to do. I make that point all the time, and once again you confirmed I'm right

So you want to limit people's right to vote for the sake of a study to prove if you should limit people's right to vote? That's just nuts.

I said I want to limit the right to vote where? Making up shit that I didn't say and don't support is a terrible way to argue anything

The courts have determined that the voter ID laws that you advocate limit people's right to vote. Don't get mad at me. The courts made that determination.

 

[kaz]

That study is bogus because it doesn't support the left

The study is bogus because it's not peer reviewed and there is no basis for the data. Unless you are there, looking at the ID's, how can you possible tell that 800,000 illegals voted, or who they voted for? You can't. And therefore the study is bogus.

And you have just accurately shown how Democrats protect voter fraud. Anyone trying to check IDs to validate voters are legitimate you'd scream bloody murder. So you block that then declare every study bogus because they didn't do what you would never allow them to do. I make that point all the time, and once again you confirmed I'm right

So you want to limit people's right to vote for the sake of a study to prove if you should limit people's right to vote? That's just nuts.

I said I want to limit the right to vote where? Making up shit that I didn't say and don't support is a terrible way to argue anything

The courts have determined that the voter ID laws that you advocate limit people's right to vote. Don't get mad at me. The courts made that determination.

You're an idiot. Verifying that someone says they are who they are isn't restricting shit other than cheating.

Why do you have to prove who you are when you cash a check if no one would lie about who they are?

 

[BULLDOG]

The study is bogus because it's not peer reviewed and there is no basis for the data. Unless you are there, looking at the ID's, how can you possible tell that 800,000 illegals voted, or who they voted for? You can't. And therefore the study is bogus.

And you have just accurately shown how Democrats protect voter fraud. Anyone trying to check IDs to validate voters are legitimate you'd scream bloody murder. So you block that then declare every study bogus because they didn't do what you would never allow them to do. I make that point all the time, and once again you confirmed I'm right

So you want to limit people's right to vote for the sake of a study to prove if you should limit people's right to vote? That's just nuts.

I said I want to limit the right to vote where? Making up shit that I didn't say and don't support is a terrible way to argue anything

The courts have determined that the voter ID laws that you advocate limit people's right to vote. Don't get mad at me. The courts made that determination.

You're an idiot. Verifying that someone says they are who they are isn't restricting shit other than cheating.

Why do you have to prove who you are when you cash a check if no one would lie about who they are?

The courts have determined that the voter ID laws that you are advocating restrict and limit people's constitutionally granted right to vote. Any silly games you might want to play can't do that.

 

[Dragonlady]

You're an idiot. Verifying that someone says they are who they are isn't restricting shit other than cheating.

Why do you have to prove who you are when you cash a check if no one would lie about who they are?

It's not verifying who someone is that's the problem, it's the forms of ID which discriminate. If you are a married woman who has taken her husband's surname, your driver's license (photo ID) and your birth certificate are not going to have the same last name. When I go to do anything which requires my birth certificate and my driver's license, I also take along my first marriage certificate, my divorce certificate, and my second marriage certificate to prove to show how I started out as Jane Smith and ended up as Jane Doe. I spent close to $200 filing for and getting all of that paperwork together, yet in some states, if your driver's license and birth certificate show a different last name, you can't get on the voter rolls. Such restrictive rules disenfranchise anyone who doesn't have the money or the knowledge of official records as senior law clerk who works with government records for a living.

 

[bodecea]

It may not be the reported margin but who knows if the illegal votes carried some states for Hillary and made others close?

Hillary Clinton received 800,000 votes from noncitizens, bolsters Trump argument, study finds

"could have"....and the Moon "could have" been made of green cheese too.

 

[kaz]

And you have just accurately shown how Democrats protect voter fraud. Anyone trying to check IDs to validate voters are legitimate you'd scream bloody murder. So you block that then declare every study bogus because they didn't do what you would never allow them to do. I make that point all the time, and once again you confirmed I'm right

So you want to limit people's right to vote for the sake of a study to prove if you should limit people's right to vote? That's just nuts.

I said I want to limit the right to vote where? Making up shit that I didn't say and don't support is a terrible way to argue anything

The courts have determined that the voter ID laws that you advocate limit people's right to vote. Don't get mad at me. The courts made that determination.

You're an idiot. Verifying that someone says they are who they are isn't restricting shit other than cheating.

Why do you have to prove who you are when you cash a check if no one would lie about who they are?

The courts have determined that the voter ID laws that you are advocating restrict and limit people's constitutionally granted right to vote. Any silly games you might want to play can't do that.

Name any citizen who is denied being the ability to vote

 

[kaz]

You're an idiot. Verifying that someone says they are who they are isn't restricting shit other than cheating.

Why do you have to prove who you are when you cash a check if no one would lie about who they are?

It's not verifying who someone is that's the problem, it's the forms of ID which discriminate. If you are a married woman who has taken her husband's surname, your driver's license (photo ID) and your birth certificate are not going to have the same last name. When I go to do anything which requires my birth certificate and my driver's license, I also take along my first marriage certificate, my divorce certificate, and my second marriage certificate to prove to show how I started out as Jane Smith and ended up as Jane Doe. I spent close to $200 filing for and getting all of that paperwork together, yet in some states, if your driver's license and birth certificate show a different last name, you can't get on the voter rolls. Such restrictive rules disenfranchise anyone who doesn't have the money or the knowledge of official records as senior law clerk who works with government records for a living.

Name anyone being denied the right to vote

 

[Dragonlady]

So you want to limit people's right to vote for the sake of a study to prove if you should limit people's right to vote? That's just nuts.

I said I want to limit the right to vote where? Making up shit that I didn't say and don't support is a terrible way to argue anything

The courts have determined that the voter ID laws that you advocate limit people's right to vote. Don't get mad at me. The courts made that determination.

You're an idiot. Verifying that someone says they are who they are isn't restricting shit other than cheating.

Why do you have to prove who you are when you cash a check if no one would lie about who they are?

The courts have determined that the voter ID laws that you are advocating restrict and limit people's constitutionally granted right to vote. Any silly games you might want to play can't do that.

Name any citizen who is denied being the ability to vote

Well apparently enough of them are being denied the right to vote that this matter went to the Supreme Court which has ruled on a number of occasions that the voter ID laws, as written, are intended to disenfranchise poor voters.

In fact, some of these laws are specifically targeted at poor black voters, and elderly women, with laser precision. These are the words of your RIGHT WING SUPREME COURT, not a leftist feminist from Canada.

 

[kaz]

I said I want to limit the right to vote where? Making up shit that I didn't say and don't support is a terrible way to argue anything

The courts have determined that the voter ID laws that you advocate limit people's right to vote. Don't get mad at me. The courts made that determination.

You're an idiot. Verifying that someone says they are who they are isn't restricting shit other than cheating.

Why do you have to prove who you are when you cash a check if no one would lie about who they are?

The courts have determined that the voter ID laws that you are advocating restrict and limit people's constitutionally granted right to vote. Any silly games you might want to play can't do that.

Name any citizen who is denied being the ability to vote

Well apparently enough of them are being denied the right to vote that this matter went to the Supreme Court which has ruled on a number of occasions that the voter ID laws, as written, are intended to disenfranchise poor voters.

In fact, some of these laws are specifically targeted at poor black voters, and elderly women, with laser precision. These are the words of your RIGHT WING SUPREME COURT, not a leftist feminist from Canada.

So the poor, elderly and blacks can't vote here? You're going to have to prove that

 

[kaz]

I said I want to limit the right to vote where? Making up shit that I didn't say and don't support is a terrible way to argue anything

The courts have determined that the voter ID laws that you advocate limit people's right to vote. Don't get mad at me. The courts made that determination.

You're an idiot. Verifying that someone says they are who they are isn't restricting shit other than cheating.

Why do you have to prove who you are when you cash a check if no one would lie about who they are?

The courts have determined that the voter ID laws that you are advocating restrict and limit people's constitutionally granted right to vote. Any silly games you might want to play can't do that.

Name any citizen who is denied being the ability to vote

Well apparently enough of them are being denied the right to vote that this matter went to the Supreme Court which has ruled on a number of occasions that the voter ID laws, as written, are intended to disenfranchise poor voters.

In fact, some of these laws are specifically targeted at poor black voters, and elderly women, with laser precision. These are the words of your RIGHT WING SUPREME COURT, not a leftist feminist from Canada.

Also, you're not a "feminist," you're a socialist. You don't give a shit about women, only women victimizing themselves for socialism. If women aren't socialist, you don't give a shit about them. You couldn't name a single thing you want women to have that men have and you don't. Everything you asked for were more handouts

 

[Dragonlady]

The courts have determined that the voter ID laws that you advocate limit people's right to vote. Don't get mad at me. The courts made that determination.

You're an idiot. Verifying that someone says they are who they are isn't restricting shit other than cheating.

Why do you have to prove who you are when you cash a check if no one would lie about who they are?

The courts have determined that the voter ID laws that you are advocating restrict and limit people's constitutionally granted right to vote. Any silly games you might want to play can't do that.

Name any citizen who is denied being the ability to vote

Well apparently enough of them are being denied the right to vote that this matter went to the Supreme Court which has ruled on a number of occasions that the voter ID laws, as written, are intended to disenfranchise poor voters.

In fact, some of these laws are specifically targeted at poor black voters, and elderly women, with laser precision. These are the words of your RIGHT WING SUPREME COURT, not a leftist feminist from Canada.

So the poor, elderly and blacks can't vote here? You're going to have to prove that

No I'm not because the Supreme Court of the United States of America has said so on numerous occasions. Just google Voter ID cases going to the Supreme Court. Here, let me do that for you:

Google

 

[kaz]

You're an idiot. Verifying that someone says they are who they are isn't restricting shit other than cheating.

Why do you have to prove who you are when you cash a check if no one would lie about who they are?

The courts have determined that the voter ID laws that you are advocating restrict and limit people's constitutionally granted right to vote. Any silly games you might want to play can't do that.

Name any citizen who is denied being the ability to vote

Well apparently enough of them are being denied the right to vote that this matter went to the Supreme Court which has ruled on a number of occasions that the voter ID laws, as written, are intended to disenfranchise poor voters.

In fact, some of these laws are specifically targeted at poor black voters, and elderly women, with laser precision. These are the words of your RIGHT WING SUPREME COURT, not a leftist feminist from Canada.

So the poor, elderly and blacks can't vote here? You're going to have to prove that

No I'm not because the Supreme Court of the United States of America has said so on numerous occasions. Just google Voter ID cases going to the Supreme Court. Here, let me do that for you:

Google

You can't name any citizen who is being denied the right to vote because there is no one being denied the right to vote. Anyone who is a citizen unless their right has been restricted with due process of law can register and vote for free. Every State that requires ID provides a free voter ID. You are a full of shit lying leftist

 

[Dragonlady]

Also, you're not a "feminist," you're a socialist. You don't give a shit about women, only women victimizing themselves for socialism. If women aren't socialist, you don't give a shit about them. You couldn't name a single thing you want women to have that men have and you don't. Everything you asked for were more handouts

No, I'm a radical feminist. Pat Buchanan told me that. I believe in equal pay for equal work. I believe in reproductive choice, mandated maternity leave and healthcare for all. This, ladies and gentlemen, is a radical feminist agenda.

I have always considered myself to be a moderate feminist, since I don't think all men are idiots, not even conservatives. My BF is not only a conservative, but he would have voted for Trump if he lived in the states. And still he lives.

 

[BULLDOG]

The courts have determined that the voter ID laws that you are advocating restrict and limit people's constitutionally granted right to vote. Any silly games you might want to play can't do that.

Name any citizen who is denied being the ability to vote

Well apparently enough of them are being denied the right to vote that this matter went to the Supreme Court which has ruled on a number of occasions that the voter ID laws, as written, are intended to disenfranchise poor voters.

In fact, some of these laws are specifically targeted at poor black voters, and elderly women, with laser precision. These are the words of your RIGHT WING SUPREME COURT, not a leftist feminist from Canada.

So the poor, elderly and blacks can't vote here? You're going to have to prove that

No I'm not because the Supreme Court of the United States of America has said so on numerous occasions. Just google Voter ID cases going to the Supreme Court. Here, let me do that for you:

Google

You can't name any citizen who is being denied the right to vote because there is no one being denied the right to vote. Anyone who is a citizen unless their right has been restricted with due process of law can register and vote for free. Every State that requires ID provides a free voter ID. You are a full of shit lying leftist

Argue your case to the SC. They disagree with you.

 

[kaz]

Name any citizen who is denied being the ability to vote

Well apparently enough of them are being denied the right to vote that this matter went to the Supreme Court which has ruled on a number of occasions that the voter ID laws, as written, are intended to disenfranchise poor voters.

In fact, some of these laws are specifically targeted at poor black voters, and elderly women, with laser precision. These are the words of your RIGHT WING SUPREME COURT, not a leftist feminist from Canada.

So the poor, elderly and blacks can't vote here? You're going to have to prove that

No I'm not because the Supreme Court of the United States of America has said so on numerous occasions. Just google Voter ID cases going to the Supreme Court. Here, let me do that for you:

Google

You can't name any citizen who is being denied the right to vote because there is no one being denied the right to vote. Anyone who is a citizen unless their right has been restricted with due process of law can register and vote for free. Every State that requires ID provides a free voter ID. You are a full of shit lying leftist

Argue your case to the SC. They disagree with you.

You said votes are being restricted. So you should be able to name one citizen who is being denied the right to vote. Obviously you can't, it's a lie

 

[BULLDOG]

Well apparently enough of them are being denied the right to vote that this matter went to the Supreme Court which has ruled on a number of occasions that the voter ID laws, as written, are intended to disenfranchise poor voters.

In fact, some of these laws are specifically targeted at poor black voters, and elderly women, with laser precision. These are the words of your RIGHT WING SUPREME COURT, not a leftist feminist from Canada.

So the poor, elderly and blacks can't vote here? You're going to have to prove that

No I'm not because the Supreme Court of the United States of America has said so on numerous occasions. Just google Voter ID cases going to the Supreme Court. Here, let me do that for you:

Google

You can't name any citizen who is being denied the right to vote because there is no one being denied the right to vote. Anyone who is a citizen unless their right has been restricted with due process of law can register and vote for free. Every State that requires ID provides a free voter ID. You are a full of shit lying leftist

Argue your case to the SC. They disagree with you.

You said votes are being restricted. So you should be able to name one citizen who is being denied the right to vote. Obviously you can't, it's a lie

I don't have to The SC has determined they exist in large enough numbers to be a problem. Go argue with them.

 

[Freewill]

The courts have determined that the voter ID laws that you advocate limit people's right to vote. Don't get mad at me. The courts made that determination.

You're an idiot. Verifying that someone says they are who they are isn't restricting shit other than cheating.

Why do you have to prove who you are when you cash a check if no one would lie about who they are?

The courts have determined that the voter ID laws that you are advocating restrict and limit people's constitutionally granted right to vote. Any silly games you might want to play can't do that.

Name any citizen who is denied being the ability to vote

Well apparently enough of them are being denied the right to vote that this matter went to the Supreme Court which has ruled on a number of occasions that the voter ID laws, as written, are intended to disenfranchise poor voters.

In fact, some of these laws are specifically targeted at poor black voters, and elderly women, with laser precision. These are the words of your RIGHT WING SUPREME COURT, not a leftist feminist from Canada.

Also, you're not a "feminist," you're a socialist. You don't give a shit about women, only women victimizing themselves for socialism. If women aren't socialist, you don't give a shit about them. You couldn't name a single thing you want women to have that men have and you don't. Everything you asked for were more handouts

Penis, yes I believe Penis would be the answer.

 

[kaz]

You're an idiot. Verifying that someone says they are who they are isn't restricting shit other than cheating.

Why do you have to prove who you are when you cash a check if no one would lie about who they are?

The courts have determined that the voter ID laws that you are advocating restrict and limit people's constitutionally granted right to vote. Any silly games you might want to play can't do that.

Name any citizen who is denied being the ability to vote

Well apparently enough of them are being denied the right to vote that this matter went to the Supreme Court which has ruled on a number of occasions that the voter ID laws, as written, are intended to disenfranchise poor voters.

In fact, some of these laws are specifically targeted at poor black voters, and elderly women, with laser precision. These are the words of your RIGHT WING SUPREME COURT, not a leftist feminist from Canada.

Also, you're not a "feminist," you're a socialist. You don't give a shit about women, only women victimizing themselves for socialism. If women aren't socialist, you don't give a shit about them. You couldn't name a single thing you want women to have that men have and you don't. Everything you asked for were more handouts

Penis, yes I believe Penis would be the answer.

You have a point. She's also the "Dragon" lady which is another phallic symbol

 

[BULLDOG]

You're an idiot. Verifying that someone says they are who they are isn't restricting shit other than cheating.

Why do you have to prove who you are when you cash a check if no one would lie about who they are?

The courts have determined that the voter ID laws that you are advocating restrict and limit people's constitutionally granted right to vote. Any silly games you might want to play can't do that.

Name any citizen who is denied being the ability to vote

Well apparently enough of them are being denied the right to vote that this matter went to the Supreme Court which has ruled on a number of occasions that the voter ID laws, as written, are intended to disenfranchise poor voters.

In fact, some of these laws are specifically targeted at poor black voters, and elderly women, with laser precision. These are the words of your RIGHT WING SUPREME COURT, not a leftist feminist from Canada.

Also, you're not a "feminist," you're a socialist. You don't give a shit about women, only women victimizing themselves for socialism. If women aren't socialist, you don't give a shit about them. You couldn't name a single thing you want women to have that men have and you don't. Everything you asked for were more handouts

Penis, yes I believe Penis would be the answer.

I wouldn't let any woman go wanting if I could help. They just have to ask.

 

[kaz]

The courts have determined that the voter ID laws that you are advocating restrict and limit people's constitutionally granted right to vote. Any silly games you might want to play can't do that.

Name any citizen who is denied being the ability to vote

Well apparently enough of them are being denied the right to vote that this matter went to the Supreme Court which has ruled on a number of occasions that the voter ID laws, as written, are intended to disenfranchise poor voters.

In fact, some of these laws are specifically targeted at poor black voters, and elderly women, with laser precision. These are the words of your RIGHT WING SUPREME COURT, not a leftist feminist from Canada.

Also, you're not a "feminist," you're a socialist. You don't give a shit about women, only women victimizing themselves for socialism. If women aren't socialist, you don't give a shit about them. You couldn't name a single thing you want women to have that men have and you don't. Everything you asked for were more handouts

Penis, yes I believe Penis would be the answer.

I wouldn't let any woman go wanting if I could help. They just have to ask.

I'm sure. Though if it involves touching like holding your hand while they cross the street you'd go Bob Dole on them