Trump asserts Executive privilege to block CRAZY DEMOCRATS

It’s against the law for Barr to turn over Unredacted parts on the information submitted.. Democrats can change that law.. but they are a joke
No, it is against the law to make them public. Giving everything to Congress is not a legal issue.
Congress made the law not me
Congress is NOT the public, they are on par with the DOJ. There is no law forbidding Congress from getting the full report, only 'executive privilege'.
They absolutely can’t see it it’s rule 6c ... ITS A LAW read it
 
They absolutely can’t see it it’s rule 6c ... ITS A LAW read it
Where does it say that?
Imparting of nonpublic informationIt shall be unlawful for any employee or agent of any department or agency of the Federal Government or any Member of Congress or employee of Congress or any judicial officer or judicial employee who, by virtue of the employment or position of the Member,officer, employee or agent, acquires information that may affect or tend to affect the price of anycommodity in interstate commerce, or for future delivery, or any swap, and which information has not been disseminated by thedepartment or agency of the Federal Government holding or creating the information or by Congress or by the judiciary in a manner which makes it generally available to the trading public, or disclosed in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing, or
 
It’s against the law for Barr to turn over Unredacted parts on the information submitted.. Democrats can change that law.. but they are a joke
No, it is against the law to make them public. Giving everything to Congress is not a legal issue.
Yes it is. Oversight is not an enumerated power of Congress and it is only justified if it aids Congress in carrying out its enumerated powers, so Congress is entitled to nothing unless it can show why it needs it. This is especially true since the Democrats are demanding classified materials and grand jury testimony.
 
They absolutely can’t see it it’s rule 6c ... ITS A LAW read it
Where does it say that?
Imparting of nonpublic informationIt shall be unlawful for any employee or agent of any department or agency of the Federal Government or any Member of Congress or employee of Congress or any judicial officer or judicial employee who, by virtue of the employment or position of the Member,officer, employee or agent, acquires information that may affect or tend to affect the price of anycommodity in interstate commerce, or for future delivery, or any swap, and which information has not been disseminated by thedepartment or agency of the Federal Government holding or creating the information or by Congress or by the judiciary in a manner which makes it generally available to the trading public, or disclosed in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing, or
It just says Congress is under the same rules as the DOJ, they can't release the info to the public but nowhere does it say they can't legally see it.
 
They absolutely can’t see it it’s rule 6c ... ITS A LAW read it
Where does it say that?
Imparting of nonpublic informationIt shall be unlawful for any employee or agent of any department or agency of the Federal Government or any Member of Congress or employee of Congress or any judicial officer or judicial employee who, by virtue of the employment or position of the Member,officer, employee or agent, acquires information that may affect or tend to affect the price of anycommodity in interstate commerce, or for future delivery, or any swap, and which information has not been disseminated by thedepartment or agency of the Federal Government holding or creating the information or by Congress or by the judiciary in a manner which makes it generally available to the trading public, or disclosed in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing, or
It just says Congress is under the same rules as the DOJ, they can't release the info to the public but nowhere does it say they can't legally see it.
No it clearly states no information shall be passed to congress
 
They absolutely can’t see it it’s rule 6c ... ITS A LAW read it
Where does it say that?
Imparting of nonpublic informationIt shall be unlawful for any employee or agent of any department or agency of the Federal Government or any Member of Congress or employee of Congress or any judicial officer or judicial employee who, by virtue of the employment or position of the Member,officer, employee or agent, acquires information that may affect or tend to affect the price of anycommodity in interstate commerce, or for future delivery, or any swap, and which information has not been disseminated by thedepartment or agency of the Federal Government holding or creating the information or by Congress or by the judiciary in a manner which makes it generally available to the trading public, or disclosed in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing, or
It just says Congress is under the same rules as the DOJ, they can't release the info to the public but nowhere does it say they can't legally see it.
They can't see classified materials or grand jury testimony unless they unless they can show in federal court they have a need to see it in order to carry out their enumerated powers.
 
They absolutely can’t see it it’s rule 6c ... ITS A LAW read it
Where does it say that?
Imparting of nonpublic informationIt shall be unlawful for any employee or agent of any department or agency of the Federal Government or any Member of Congress or employee of Congress or any judicial officer or judicial employee who, by virtue of the employment or position of the Member,officer, employee or agent, acquires information that may affect or tend to affect the price of anycommodity in interstate commerce, or for future delivery, or any swap, and which information has not been disseminated by thedepartment or agency of the Federal Government holding or creating the information or by Congress or by the judiciary in a manner which makes it generally available to the trading public, or disclosed in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing, or
It just says Congress is under the same rules as the DOJ, they can't release the info to the public but nowhere does it say they can't legally see it.
They can't see classified materials or grand jury testimony unless they unless they can show in federal court they have a need to see it in order to carry out their enumerated powers.

simple simon ^^^^^^^

you need to get out more -
 
They absolutely can’t see it it’s rule 6c ... ITS A LAW read it
Where does it say that?
Imparting of nonpublic informationIt shall be unlawful for any employee or agent of any department or agency of the Federal Government or any Member of Congress or employee of Congress or any judicial officer or judicial employee who, by virtue of the employment or position of the Member,officer, employee or agent, acquires information that may affect or tend to affect the price of anycommodity in interstate commerce, or for future delivery, or any swap, and which information has not been disseminated by thedepartment or agency of the Federal Government holding or creating the information or by Congress or by the judiciary in a manner which makes it generally available to the trading public, or disclosed in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing, or
Wrong law.
 
They absolutely can’t see it it’s rule 6c ... ITS A LAW read it
Where does it say that?
Imparting of nonpublic informationIt shall be unlawful for any employee or agent of any department or agency of the Federal Government or any Member of Congress or employee of Congress or any judicial officer or judicial employee who, by virtue of the employment or position of the Member,officer, employee or agent, acquires information that may affect or tend to affect the price of anycommodity in interstate commerce, or for future delivery, or any swap, and which information has not been disseminated by thedepartment or agency of the Federal Government holding or creating the information or by Congress or by the judiciary in a manner which makes it generally available law.Bingoibgo trading public, or disclosed in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing, or
It just says Congress is under the same rules as the DOJ, they can't release the info to the public but nowhere does it say they can't legally see it.
They can't see classified materials or grand jury testimony unless they unless they can show in federal court they have a need to see it in order to carry out their enumerated powers.
Bingo!!!
 
They absolutely can’t see it it’s rule 6c ... ITS A LAW read it
Where does it say that?
Imparting of nonpublic informationIt shall be unlawful for any employee or agent of any department or agency of the Federal Government or any Member of Congress or employee of Congress or any judicial officer or judicial employee who, by virtue of the employment or position of the Member,officer, employee or agent, acquires information that may affect or tend to affect the price of anycommodity in interstate commerce, or for future delivery, or any swap, and which information has not been disseminated by thedepartment or agency of the Federal Government holding or creating the information or by Congress or by the judiciary in a manner which makes it generally available law.Bingoibgo trading public, or disclosed in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing, or
It just says Congress is under the same rules as the DOJ, they can't release the info to the public but nowhere does it say they can't legally see it.
They can't see classified materials or grand jury testimony unless they unless they can show in federal court they have a need to see it in order to carry out their enumerated powers.
Bingo!!!

Impeachment is an enumerated power isn't it? They need to determine if there is evidence, or not, that is being hidden and or obfuscated, to be able to determine if impeachment is the correct course of action.
 
They absolutely can’t see it it’s rule 6c ... ITS A LAW read it
Where does it say that?
Imparting of nonpublic informationIt shall be unlawful for any employee or agent of any department or agency of the Federal Government or any Member of Congress or employee of Congress or any judicial officer or judicial employee who, by virtue of the employment or position of the Member,officer, employee or agent, acquires information that may affect or tend to affect the price of anycommodity in interstate commerce, or for future delivery, or any swap, and which information has not been disseminated by thedepartment or agency of the Federal Government holding or creating the information or by Congress or by the judiciary in a manner which makes it generally available to the trading public, or disclosed in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing, or
It just says Congress is under the same rules as the DOJ, they can't release the info to the public but nowhere does it say they can't legally see it.
You are clearly wrong it says no information passed
 
Imparting of nonpublic informationIt shall be unlawful for any employee or agent of any department or agency of the Federal Government or any Member of Congress or employee of Congress or any judicial officer or judicial employee who, by virtue of the employment or position of the Member,officer, employee or agent, acquires information that may affect or tend to affect the price of anycommodity in interstate commerce, or for future delivery, or any swap, and which information has not been disseminated by thedepartment or agency of the Federal Government holding or creating the information or by Congress or by the judiciary in a manner which makes it generally available law.Bingoibgo trading public, or disclosed in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing, or
It just says Congress is under the same rules as the DOJ, they can't release the info to the public but nowhere does it say they can't legally see it.
They can't see classified materials or grand jury testimony unless they unless they can show in federal court they have a need to see it in order to carry out their enumerated powers.
Bingo!!!

Impeachment is an enumerated power isn't it? They need to determine if there is evidence, or not, that is being hidden and or obfuscated, to be able to determine if impeachment is the correct course of action.

yes, and yes ...

but Congress doesn't need to go that far to read the full report regardless what RW morons believe.
 
Imparting of nonpublic informationIt shall be unlawful for any employee or agent of any department or agency of the Federal Government or any Member of Congress or employee of Congress or any judicial officer or judicial employee who, by virtue of the employment or position of the Member,officer, employee or agent, acquires information that may affect or tend to affect the price of anycommodity in interstate commerce, or for future delivery, or any swap, and which information has not been disseminated by thedepartment or agency of the Federal Government holding or creating the information or by Congress or by the judiciary in a manner which makes it generally available law.Bingoibgo trading public, or disclosed in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing, or
It just says Congress is under the same rules as the DOJ, they can't release the info to the public but nowhere does it say they can't legally see it.
They can't see classified materials or grand jury testimony unless they unless they can show in federal court they have a need to see it in order to carry out their enumerated powers.
Bingo!!!

Impeachment is an enumerated power isn't it? They need to determine if there is evidence, or not, that is being hidden and or obfuscated, to be able to determine if impeachment is the correct course of action.

yes, and yes ...

but Congress doesn't need to go that far to read the full report regardless what RW morons believe.


I understand.
 
Trump asserts executive privilege to block release of full, unredacted Mueller report


Trump asserts executive privilege to block release of full, unredacted Mueller report


Explore the Fox News apps that are right for you at http://www.foxnews.com/apps-products/index.html.


YES YES YES..

I told you democrats to stop after the last 15 losses! You keep embarrassing your selves! You lose again

This spurious claim will be shot down by the courts. Trump has ensured this will remain in the public arena. Trump and his supporters are the embarrassments if you think this will stand.
 
Democrat cvnts keep trying to win 2016, meanwhile they are busy losing 2020.

You people are the ones losing 2020. It would have been smarter to get it out there now. This will be shoved into the 2020 election and Democrats can ask what Trump is hiding.
 

Forum List

Back
Top