Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Technically Twitter has the same protections as Verizon, for doing the same service as verizon. Which is transmission of information within it's networks. Remember, verizon does not store any of the content they transmit.Does not matter, the fact is they can be held responsible for things on their platform and Verizon cannot be for thing sent across their network...thus they are not regulated the same.
Verizon is a common carrier, a status well defined by law that removes their liability for content sent on their network.Does not matter, the fact is they can be held responsible for things on their platform and Verizon cannot be for thing sent across their network...thus they are not regulated the same.
And then?Should have done a google search
“In 1911, following the Supreme Court ruling, Standard Oil was broken into seven successor companies; Standard Oil of New Jersey, Standard Oil of New York, Standard Oil of California, Standard Oil of Indiana, Standard Oil of Kentucky, The Standard Oil Company (Ohio), and The Ohio Oil Company.”
Standard Oil Company - Ohio History Central
ohiohistorycentral.org
So there was a paper trail. Good to know.The same with battlefield commissions.
But the verbal commission is immediate, and just as official. The one on paper done for the records.
All came from SOC. Hence they had the same colors.Um....no. Exxon actually con-solidated from Esso, Exxon, Standard, Sohio....and maybe a few others. Mobil was separate bus is now part of Exxon.
Amoco is BP as is Sinclair
Chevron started as Star Oil
Citgo owned by Venezuela
Then you admit I was right and go away.And then?
What is wrong with the concept of "if you do not like how they do things, then do not give them your business"
Both Exxon and Mobil were descendants of Standard Oil, established by John D. Rockefeller and partners in 1870 as the Standard Oil Company of Ohio.Then you admit I was right and go away.
Has nothing to do with the government breaking them up.Both Exxon and Mobil were descendants of Standard Oil, established by John D. Rockefeller and partners in 1870 as the Standard Oil Company of Ohio.
If not broken up there would be no Exxon or Mobil. LOLHas nothing to do with the government breaking them up.
As they do not retain any of that content, they are merely transporters of content.Verizon is a common carrier, a status well defined by law that removes their liability for content sent on their network.
Actually the paper trail is unnecessary. The commission done on the battlefield is the official one, the one on paper only a bureaucratic notice.So there was a paper trail. Good to know.
I'm not really wanting to sift through this entire thread...is it your position that businesses should be permitted the right to discriminate?It is not over yet, that ruling was just a tad over a month ago.
But the fact they can be sued for it while Verizon cannot, proves they are not regulated the same.
End of story, time to go watch the Gator on the big screen and eat some goulash
Actually it's no different than a verbal contract, later reduced to writing. The verbal contract is just as legal and binding.So there was a paper trail. Good to know.
As they do not retain any of that content, they are merely transporters of content.
Twitter also stores the content on their servers, and then "publishes" that content. So they are regulated as publishers.
They however are not content creators, who have strict legal liability.
Whatever helps you sleep at night, leftistI should leave you with your grief, for now.
If it’s not necessary then why does it exist?Actually the paper trail is unnecessary. The commission done on the battlefield is the official one, the one on paper only a bureaucratic notice.
Let me know when you grow up and are capable of admitting you were wrong.Love it. At least you have grown up and quit putting people who disagree with you on ignore like a cowardly leftist. Good job. I am proud of you.
Publishers have legal liability, except that Congress recognized that the internet is just way different than Simon and Schuster. They can’t control the content in the same way.As they do not retain any of that content, they are merely transporters of content.
Twitter also stores the content on their servers, and then "publishes" that content. So they are regulated as publishers.
They however are not content creators, who have strict legal liability.
Have you ever worked with the government? They're the origin of the "everything in triplicate" rule.If it’s not necessary then why does it exist?
Is that from the appendix?If it’s not necessary then why does it exist?
