Trump: Bush lied about reason for invading Iraq

Trump says George W. Bush ‘lied’ to get U.S. into Iraq

I agree w/ him

Any Trump- supporters care to chime-in, agreeing? I don't expect this thread to have many responses given all Trump-supporters on this forum are rw'ers

They, like other instances, will now start to parrot Trump and they after years of defense they will turn on a dime.

It's fun to watch them flow which ever way the wind is blowing. Remember! Trump said he can shoot someone and wouldn't lose support. He's conditioned them that way.
 
Well aren't you an articulate fellow...
You haven't been here long enough to get the meaning...and I'm not going to tell you. You'll learn.
Some secret, ridiculous slur or code....get over yourselves. You some sort of elitist club....HAAAAAA!
Im not that interested....just responding to gibberish I guess.
You almost broke the code. "Oh" is my response to gibberish or the droning on of a Libtard. In some cases it mimics my response to my wife when she whines about the condition of the back yard.
 
Trump says George W. Bush ‘lied’ to get U.S. into Iraq

I agree w/ him

Any Trump- supporters care to chime-in, agreeing? I don't expect this thread to have many responses given all Trump-supporters on this forum are rw'ers

They, like other instances, will now start to parrot Trump and they after years of defense they will turn on a dime.

It's fun to watch them flow which ever way the wind is blowing. Remember! Trump said he can shoot someone and wouldn't lose support. He's conditioned them that way.
Trump says George W. Bush ‘lied’ to get U.S. into Iraq

I agree w/ him

Any Trump- supporters care to chime-in, agreeing? I don't expect this thread to have many responses given all Trump-supporters on this forum are rw'ers

They, like other instances, will now start to parrot Trump and they after years of defense they will turn on a dime.

It's fun to watch them flow which ever way the wind is blowing. Remember! Trump said he can shoot someone and wouldn't lose support. He's conditioned them that way.
Yo wrathbone....closed caption deserves a"oh" ...right here!
 
Obama's presidency - made history being first african-american president
accepted the nobel peace prize
haphazardly exited from Iraq and Afghanistan
let Iraq and Syria run amok
constant battle with Republican congress
inviting illegal aliens to breach our borders
Immigrants bankrupting our economy and continues to be a chronic stick in the ass
inviting refugees to our country
muslim sympathizer
Did nothing for the Black population that elected him

Shall I continue?
 
Didn't see Clinton sending in 100,000 troops
Didn't see Clinton having 5000 Americans killed

Clinton used containment effectively for 8 years....Bush couldn't wait to invade

But rightwingNUT, Clinton LET BIN LADEN GO FREE KNOWING THAT HE INTENDED TO ATTACK AMERICA...In Blow Jobs own words....Blow Job COULD HAVE PREVENTED 9/11 AND FUCKED UP CAUSING ALL YOUR COMPLAINTS...as all SOCIALIST/DemoRATS do!


Clinton came closer to killing bin Laden than Bush did in seven years of combat and killing 6000 Americans


Blow Job could have PREVENTED it all....and DIDN'T..another COWARD, DemocRAT, pervert, as most seem to be, especially in here!


You think 9-11 couldn't happen without bin Laden?

Khalil Sheik Mohammad planned the attacks, bin Laden approved the plans. Blaming Clinton for not killing Mohammad now?


I find it interesting that you haven't got an honest bone in your body when incontrovertible evidence is presented that Blow Job let Bin Laden go, and NO, 9/11 wouldn't have happened without Bin Laden...Prove it would! :ahole-1:

And the blind sheik was incarcerated when 9/11 happened and couldn't approve shit!

The evidence shows that Clinton could not have killed bin Laden without killing a thousand innocents
Clinton passed

The evidence also shows that Bush allowed bin Laden to escape at Tora Bora

AlQaeda would have existed without bin Laden. It still exists today. If bin Laden were not alive, nothing says his replacement would not have approved the same attacks
 
But rightwingNUT, Clinton LET BIN LADEN GO FREE KNOWING THAT HE INTENDED TO ATTACK AMERICA...In Blow Jobs own words....Blow Job COULD HAVE PREVENTED 9/11 AND FUCKED UP CAUSING ALL YOUR COMPLAINTS...as all SOCIALIST/DemoRATS do!


Clinton came closer to killing bin Laden than Bush did in seven years of combat and killing 6000 Americans


Blow Job could have PREVENTED it all....and DIDN'T..another COWARD, DemocRAT, pervert, as most seem to be, especially in here!


You think 9-11 couldn't happen without bin Laden?

Khalil Sheik Mohammad planned the attacks, bin Laden approved the plans. Blaming Clinton for not killing Mohammad now?


I find it interesting that you haven't got an honest bone in your body when incontrovertible evidence is presented that Blow Job let Bin Laden go, and NO, 9/11 wouldn't have happened without Bin Laden...Prove it would! :ahole-1:

And the blind sheik was incarcerated when 9/11 happened and couldn't approve shit!



So on one side, we have Clinton administration officials who say that there were no credible offers on the table, and on the other, we have claims by a Sudanese government that was (and still is) listed as an official state sponsor of terrorism. It’s possible, of course, that both sides are telling the truth: It could be that Erwa did make an offer, but the offer was completely disingenuous. What is clear is that the 9/11 Commission report totally discounts the Sudanese claims. Unless further evidence arises, that has to be the final word.


Ultimately, however, it doesn’t matter. What is not in dispute at all is the fact that, in early 1996, American officials regarded Osama bin Laden as a financier of terrorism and not as a mastermind largely because, at the time, there was no real evidence that bin Laden had harmed American citizens. So even if the Sudanese government really did offer to hand bin Laden over, the U.S. would have had no grounds for detaining him. In fact, the Justice Department did not secure an indictment against bin Laden until 1998 – at which point Clinton did order a cruise missile attack on an al Qaeda camp in an attempt to kill bin Laden.

We have to be careful about engaging in what historians call "Whig history," which is the practice of assuming that historical figures value exactly the same things that we do today. It’s a fancy term for those "why didn’t someone just shoot Hitler in 1930?" questions that one hears in dorm-room bull sessions. The answer, of course, is that no one knew quite how bad Hitler was in 1930. The same is true of bin Laden in 1996.


READ MORE HERE:
Clinton Passed on Killing bin Laden?


You mean WHAT BLOW JOB CLIUNTON "SAID" ON THAT YouTube AUDIO FILE IS A "LIE"....BLOW JHOB 'LIED ABOUT IT???......C4A I thought more of you, but it seems you've drifted back to being a SLURPER for Blow Job!
 
Who was/is the biggest threat to the US?

Saddam
Mubarak
Qadaffi
Assad
Kohmeni

to this country? none of them.
So...as I said to someone else...bush fucked up once...Obama four times.

Four times four thousand Americans needlessly killed?
As a Libtard you are supposed to mourn the hundreds of thousands of Muslims and Christian Arabs who have died as Obama dithers and calls for another strong leader to be overthrown.
 
Clinton came closer to killing bin Laden than Bush did in seven years of combat and killing 6000 Americans

Blow Job could have PREVENTED it all....and DIDN'T..another COWARD, DemocRAT, pervert, as most seem to be, especially in here!

You think 9-11 couldn't happen without bin Laden?

Khalil Sheik Mohammad planned the attacks, bin Laden approved the plans. Blaming Clinton for not killing Mohammad now?

I find it interesting that you haven't got an honest bone in your body when incontrovertible evidence is presented that Blow Job let Bin Laden go, and NO, 9/11 wouldn't have happened without Bin Laden...Prove it would! :ahole-1:

And the blind sheik was incarcerated when 9/11 happened and couldn't approve shit!


So on one side, we have Clinton administration officials who say that there were no credible offers on the table, and on the other, we have claims by a Sudanese government that was (and still is) listed as an official state sponsor of terrorism. It’s possible, of course, that both sides are telling the truth: It could be that Erwa did make an offer, but the offer was completely disingenuous. What is clear is that the 9/11 Commission report totally discounts the Sudanese claims. Unless further evidence arises, that has to be the final word.


Ultimately, however, it doesn’t matter. What is not in dispute at all is the fact that, in early 1996, American officials regarded Osama bin Laden as a financier of terrorism and not as a mastermind largely because, at the time, there was no real evidence that bin Laden had harmed American citizens. So even if the Sudanese government really did offer to hand bin Laden over, the U.S. would have had no grounds for detaining him. In fact, the Justice Department did not secure an indictment against bin Laden until 1998 – at which point Clinton did order a cruise missile attack on an al Qaeda camp in an attempt to kill bin Laden.

We have to be careful about engaging in what historians call "Whig history," which is the practice of assuming that historical figures value exactly the same things that we do today. It’s a fancy term for those "why didn’t someone just shoot Hitler in 1930?" questions that one hears in dorm-room bull sessions. The answer, of course, is that no one knew quite how bad Hitler was in 1930. The same is true of bin Laden in 1996.


READ MORE HERE:
Clinton Passed on Killing bin Laden?

You mean WHAT BLOW JOB CLIUNTON "SAID" ON THAT YouTube AUDIO FILE IS A "LIE"....BLOW JHOB 'LIED ABOUT IT???......C4A I thought more of you, but it seems you've drifted back to being a SLURPER for Blow Job!
Bush spent seven years and lost 6000 Soldiers and couldn't kill bin Laden
Bush even let him escape at Tora Bora

When Clinton warned about the threat of AlQaeda....Republicans claimed he was trying to divert attention away from their blowjob investigation
 
But rightwingNUT, Clinton LET BIN LADEN GO FREE KNOWING THAT HE INTENDED TO ATTACK AMERICA...In Blow Jobs own words....Blow Job COULD HAVE PREVENTED 9/11 AND FUCKED UP CAUSING ALL YOUR COMPLAINTS...as all SOCIALIST/DemoRATS do!


Clinton came closer to killing bin Laden than Bush did in seven years of combat and killing 6000 Americans


Blow Job could have PREVENTED it all....and DIDN'T..another COWARD, DemocRAT, pervert, as most seem to be, especially in here!


You think 9-11 couldn't happen without bin Laden?

Khalil Sheik Mohammad planned the attacks, bin Laden approved the plans. Blaming Clinton for not killing Mohammad now?


I find it interesting that you haven't got an honest bone in your body when incontrovertible evidence is presented that Blow Job let Bin Laden go, and NO, 9/11 wouldn't have happened without Bin Laden...Prove it would! :ahole-1:

And the blind sheik was incarcerated when 9/11 happened and couldn't approve shit!



So on one side, we have Clinton administration officials who say that there were no credible offers on the table, and on the other, we have claims by a Sudanese government that was (and still is) listed as an official state sponsor of terrorism. It’s possible, of course, that both sides are telling the truth: It could be that Erwa did make an offer, but the offer was completely disingenuous. What is clear is that the 9/11 Commission report totally discounts the Sudanese claims. Unless further evidence arises, that has to be the final word.


Ultimately, however, it doesn’t matter. What is not in dispute at all is the fact that, in early 1996, American officials regarded Osama bin Laden as a financier of terrorism and not as a mastermind largely because, at the time, there was no real evidence that bin Laden had harmed American citizens. So even if the Sudanese government really did offer to hand bin Laden over, the U.S. would have had no grounds for detaining him. In fact, the Justice Department did not secure an indictment against bin Laden until 1998 – at which point Clinton did order a cruise missile attack on an al Qaeda camp in an attempt to kill bin Laden.

We have to be careful about engaging in what historians call "Whig history," which is the practice of assuming that historical figures value exactly the same things that we do today. It’s a fancy term for those "why didn’t someone just shoot Hitler in 1930?" questions that one hears in dorm-room bull sessions. The answer, of course, is that no one knew quite how bad Hitler was in 1930. The same is true of bin Laden in 1996.


READ MORE HERE:
Clinton Passed on Killing bin Laden?


You mean WHAT BLOW JOB CLINTON "SAID" ON THAT YouTube AUDIO FILE IS A "LIE"....BLOW JOB 'LIED ABOUT IT???......C4A I thought more of you, but it seems you've drifted back to being a SLURPER for Blow Job!
But rightwingNUT, Clinton LET BIN LADEN GO FREE KNOWING THAT HE INTENDED TO ATTACK AMERICA...In Blow Jobs own words....Blow Job COULD HAVE PREVENTED 9/11 AND FUCKED UP CAUSING ALL YOUR COMPLAINTS...as all SOCIALIST/DemoRATS do!


Clinton came closer to killing bin Laden than Bush did in seven years of combat and killing 6000 Americans


Blow Job could have PREVENTED it all....and DIDN'T..another COWARD, DemocRAT, pervert, as most seem to be, especially in here!


You think 9-11 couldn't happen without bin Laden?

Khalil Sheik Mohammad planned the attacks, bin Laden approved the plans. Blaming Clinton for not killing Mohammad now?


I find it interesting that you haven't got an honest bone in your body when incontrovertible evidence is presented that Blow Job let Bin Laden go, and NO, 9/11 wouldn't have happened without Bin Laden...Prove it would! :ahole-1:

And the blind sheik was incarcerated when 9/11 happened and couldn't approve shit!



So on one side, we have Clinton administration officials who say that there were no credible offers on the table, and on the other, we have claims by a Sudanese government that was (and still is) listed as an official state sponsor of terrorism. It’s possible, of course, that both sides are telling the truth: It could be that Erwa did make an offer, but the offer was completely disingenuous. What is clear is that the 9/11 Commission report totally discounts the Sudanese claims. Unless further evidence arises, that has to be the final word.


Ultimately, however, it doesn’t matter. What is not in dispute at all is the fact that, in early 1996, American officials regarded Osama bin Laden as a financier of terrorism and not as a mastermind largely because, at the time, there was no real evidence that bin Laden had harmed American citizens. So even if the Sudanese government really did offer to hand bin Laden over, the U.S. would have had no grounds for detaining him. In fact, the Justice Department did not secure an indictment against bin Laden until 1998 – at which point Clinton did order a cruise missile attack on an al Qaeda camp in an attempt to kill bin Laden.

We have to be careful about engaging in what historians call "Whig history," which is the practice of assuming that historical figures value exactly the same things that we do today. It’s a fancy term for those "why didn’t someone just shoot Hitler in 1930?" questions that one hears in dorm-room bull sessions. The answer, of course, is that no one knew quite how bad Hitler was in 1930. The same is true of bin Laden in 1996.


READ MORE HERE:
Clinton Passed on Killing bin Laden?


You mean WHAT BLOW JOB CLINTON "SAID" ON THAT YouTube AUDIO FILE IS A "LIE"....BLOW JOB 'LIED ABOUT IT???......C4A I thought more of you, but it seems you've drifted back to being a SLURPER for Blow Job!
 
Who was/is the biggest threat to the US?

Saddam
Mubarak
Qadaffi
Assad
Kohmeni

to this country? none of them.
So...as I said to someone else...bush fucked up once...Obama four times.

yeah, okie dokie. then why do the whinging whining rightwingnuts keep demanding war?
We demand leadership...not war.

No war is needed if we are the strongest.:thup:

 

Forum List

Back
Top