Trump calls for new 2020 election or declare he won

[Ray From Cleveland]

Where in the Constitution did the five Catholic Judges, three from Trump, find “personhood” for a one cell fertilized egg; inside a Fallopian tube, in a thirty trillion cell human being’s body?

Why did they decide religious majorities in each state can take away the natural right to control what goes on inside her own body when no other ”person” is harmed, because she lives in a white authoritarian Christian ruled state?

WTF Ray? The Catholic judges didn’t rule on a Constitutional basis -They ruled to satisfy the religious Americans they agree with on personhood of a brainless zygote. END2209071445

You're bringing up arguments never made before the court. They didn't base their decision on when a baby is a baby, they based their decision on the fact abortion is not protected in the US Constitution. That's all the Supreme Court does. They rule if laws were followed properly or if an issue is a constitutional one or not.

Your liars on the left are trying to convince their sheep that the SC ruled that abortion was illegal. Nothing close happened to that. We had abortions before Dobbs and we have them today. The Supreme Court doesn't create law on the bench. They have no authority to rule if abortion should be legals or not. That's up to the representatives we vote on every election.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

NFBW: They could have ruled the truth , Ray! There is no constitutional objections or restrictions against the medical procedure of abortion and a woman’s right to choose having one
END2209071422

Yes, that's the way they ruled, so what are you complaining about?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Ukraine needed to attract foreign investment and they couldn't because Shokin was so corrupt.

Why would the US stick their nose in Ukraine's business? That was not why he had Shokin fired. He was looking into the corruption of Burisma and Hunter's involvement in it.

 

[surada]

Why would the US stick their nose in Ukraine's business? That was not why he had Shokin fired. He was looking into the corruption of Burisma and Hunter's involvement in it.

Nope. Ukraine had a terrible reputation for corruption. They hired Hunter Biden to teach highest and best business practices. Getting rid of Shokin was US foreign policy and backed by the EU and UN.

 

[surada]

Why would the US stick their nose in Ukraine's business? That was not why he had Shokin fired. He was looking into the corruption of Burisma and Hunter's involvement in it.

No he wasn't looking in to Burisma or Hunter Biden. Shokin refused to prosecute corruption. You got it all wrong. The EU wants Ukraine to be stable and prosperous. With so much corruption they were a poor investment risk.

 

[otto105]

Nothing is proof to you liberals.

Nothing is what you have as proof.

 

[Toro]

Nothing is proof to you liberals.

LOL

Precious snowflake needs his Orange Jesus safe space.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

No he wasn't looking in to Burisma or Hunter Biden. Shokin refused to prosecute corruption. You got it all wrong. The EU wants Ukraine to be stable and prosperous. With so much corruption they were a poor investment risk.

Oh please. Ukraine was corrupt 10 years ago, they are corrupt today, and they'll be corrupt 10 years from now. Why do you think out of the 1.24 million attorneys in the US, Bursima would choose a low-life drug addict with no experience in energy? It's called an insurance policy.

 

[surada]

Oh please. Ukraine was corrupt 10 years ago, they are corrupt today, and they'll be corrupt 10 years from now. Why do you think out of the 1.24 million attorneys in the US, Bursima would choose a low-life drug addict with no experience in energy? It's called an insurance policy.

You don't know anything about Hunter Biden's career experience.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

You don't know anything about Hunter Biden's career experience.

It's all over the internet. I bet next you're going to tell me I know nothing about art now that he's selling his paint-by-numbers art work for up to a half-million dollars to anonymous buyers.

You leftists have corruption going on right in front of your face and you refuse to acknowledge it

 

[NotfooledbyW]

You're bringing up arguments never made before the court.

NFBW: You are a liar. They made the argument that the Constitution does not give women the right to privacy

The Catholic TRUMP threeocracy on SCOTUS for religious reasons due to pleading Republican Party ‘fetal personhood for zygotes’ activists nationwide, shed the implicit Constitution’s protection of privacy with Dobbs’ dismissive rejection of a privacy right to abortion for woman having an unwanted pregnancy

NFBW2209071422 They could have ruled the truth , Ray! There is no constitutional objections or restrictions against the medical procedure of abortion and a woman’s right to choose having one
END2209071422

Because the Constitution is silent on Reproductive rights, the three Trump Taliban judges could have recognized the right to privacy as an implicit natural and human right and that no state shall have autonomy over every female citizens ‘ reproductive organs.

But they didn’t side with liberty for the human being with thirty Trillion cells managed by a brain that has been producing conscious thoughts for at least a dozen years; they decided in favor of Catholic belief that life begins at conception so states can ban abortions based on majority rule of self-righteous voters holding that religious belief.

That is sick letting people who believe their God wrote a book and sent his only begotten son to earth to bleed to death on a cross to rise from the dead which was the only way mankind can be saved from the original sin of the first two humans he created.

It’s all absurd unless you believe it on faith that the story buoy are being told is the truth. It has nothing to do with law, science or the CONSTITUTION END2209072117

 

[otto105]

Oh please. Ukraine was corrupt 10 years ago, they are corrupt today, and they'll be corrupt 10 years from now. Why do you think out of the 1.24 million attorneys in the US, Bursima would choose a low-life drug addict with no experience in energy? It's called an insurance policy.

Yeah, because you want the former 1-term favor president to be what?

Come on ray.

Be better.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

NFBW: You are a liar. They made the argument that the Constitution does not give women the right to privacy

The Catholic TRUMP threeocracy on SCOTUS for religious reasons due to pleading Republican Party ‘fetal personhood for zygotes’ activists nationwide, shed the implicit Constitution’s protection of privacy with Dobbs’ dismissive rejection of a privacy right to abortion for woman having an unwanted pregnancy

NFBW2209071422 They could have ruled the truth , Ray! There is no constitutional objections or restrictions against the medical procedure of abortion and a woman’s right to choose having one
END2209071422

Because the Constitution is silent on Reproductive rights, the three Trump Taliban judges could have recognized the right to privacy as an implicit natural and human right and that no state shall have autonomy over every female citizens ‘ reproductive organs.

But they didn’t side with liberty for the human being with thirty Trillion cells managed by a brain that has been producing conscious thoughts for at least a dozen years; they decided in favor of Catholic belief that life begins at conception so states can ban abortions based on majority rule of self-righteous voters holding that religious belief.

That is sick letting people who believe their God wrote a book and sent his only begotten son to earth to bleed to death on a cross to rise from the dead which was the only way mankind can be saved from the original sin of the first two humans he created.

It’s all absurd unless you believe it on faith that the story buoy are being told is the truth. It has nothing to do with law, science or the CONSTITUTION END2209072117

Well there you go. There is no right to privacy in the US Constitution. Furthermore, what does privacy have to do with abortion? Did somebody in some state make a law that when a woman has an abortion, they must post a sign on their front porch or something? Whether a woman had an abortion five years ago or will have one in five days, nobody has to know about it. And you are correct when you say the Constitution has no language for reproductive rights. That's why they allow states to decide what rights people have with abortion.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Yeah, because you want the former 1-term favor president to be what?

I have no idea what that question has to do with my comment? Elaborate please.

 

[zaangalewa]

Donald Trump owned or operated over 500 businesses in his career including a hit television series.

Whatelse should someone do with his billions? To build the first personal computer in the own garage?

Yes, I would call that a businessman.

Al Capone also had been a businessman. And Al Capone did do a lot of things also for the poor people before they arrested him because of a minor case of tax fraud. So I had partially respected a man like Al Capone not because of fear. But why for heavens sake to respect a narcissist like Donald Trump? Because he is rich? One of your Hollywood stars - unfortunatelly I forgot the name - said once something like this: "If you will give money to a poor idiot then he will become a rich idiot!"

 

[zaangalewa]

You're hearing wrong.

I doubt this. My sources are normally very reliable.

I posted a Politiafact link on it. If you don't have time to scroll back or search it, I'll post it again if you'd like.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I doubt this. My sources are normally very reliable.

Did Donald Trump inherit $100 million?

Donald Trump often talks about his success as a businessman creating thousands of jobs. But Marco Rubio says Trump hardl

www.politifact.com

 

[scruffy]

This is dangerous rhetoric.

Only dangerous for you

 

[zaangalewa]

Where in the Constitution did the five Catholic Judges, three from Trump, find “personhood” for a one cell fertilized egg; inside a Fallopian tube, in a thirty trillion cell human being’s body?

Why did they decide religious majorities in each state can take away the natural right to control what goes on inside her own body when no other ”person” is harmed, because she lives in a white authoritarian Christian ruled state?

WTF Ray? The Catholic judges didn’t rule on a Constitutional basis -They ruled to satisfy the religious Americans they agree with on personhood of a brainless zygote. END2209071445

I am a Catholic. Explain to me please why someone has the right to kill an unborn human being but has not the right to kill a born human being. How is logically the killing of a helpless human being against the will of this human being able to be a written and/or still unwritten human right? And what has this thought to do with my Catholicism? Would a Buddhist not ask the same?

 

[zaangalewa]

Did Donald Trump inherit $100 million?

Donald Trump often talks about his success as a businessman creating thousands of jobs. But Marco Rubio says Trump hardl

www.politifact.com

What did you read when you read this? I'm reading Donald Trump always had an immense amout of money when he grew up in the sky over New York. Even in thousand or tenth of thousands of years he could waste all the money under normal conditions which he got for nothing else than to be born on planet Earth.