berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 16,012
- 13,429
- 2,320
Because the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming.Trump Campaign was prepared for a guilty verdict.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming.Trump Campaign was prepared for a guilty verdict.
WORTH REPEATING, ALL JURORS APPROVED BY BOTH PROSECUTION AND DEFENCE.12 jurors approved by both the defence and the prosecution decided the case.
That is how the USjustice system works, dumbass.
Everyone found guilty feels they were screwd.
Trump has his brain dead cult followers that do what he tells them.
In the minds of Trump's brain dead cult members, only.This was the most obvious case of kangaroo Justice in the past decade on show as a national trial. It won't last..... The case was too anemic and the methods used far too suspect to withstand any type of higher scrutiny.
Like I said the verdict is basically irrelevant. Nothing has changed....except that now the Genie is out of the bottle.In the minds of Trump's brain dead cult members, only.
The jury was only a fixture in this trial..not a part of it.WORTH REPEATING, ALL JURORS APPROVED BY BOTH PROSECUTION AND DEFENCE.
Tell us about the genie that is out of the bottle.Like I said the verdict is basically irrelevant. Nothing has changed....except that now the Genie is out of the bottle.
Do you understand the jurors vote on innocence or guilt?The jury was only a fixture in this trial..not a part of it.
The jury was only a fixture in this trial not a part of it.Do you understand the jurors vote on innocence or guilt?
You need a lot of help in understanding the US justice system.
How far did you go in school?
OKThe jury was only a fixture in this trial not a part of it.
What a stupid thing to say.The jury was only a fixture in this trial not a part of it.
Actually we all knew the judge and jury were a Kangaroo Court.He actually said the jury couldn’t convict based on Cohen’s testimony alone.
As to this thread… they were ready for a guilty verdict because they knew he was guilty
Actually you don't, or you could argue it with evidence. You dont have either of these things. So the only thing you know is that you are mindlessly parroting whatever some paid liar tells you.Actually we all knew the judge and jury were a Kangaroo Court.
Election interference in the 2016 election is Federal not State jurisdiction. So are campaign finance violations, etc.Its not likely Trump will get an appeal nor if he did that he would win.
Counting on SCOTUS would require a Federal issue. There is none
Both stupid and wrong. States have such laws.on the books.Election interference in the 2016 election is Federal not State jurisdiction. So are campaign finance violations, etc.
I could argue it with evidence. How about 3 missing witnesses for starters?Actually you don't, or you could argue it with evidence. You dont have either of these things. So the only thing you know is that you are mindlessly parroting whatever some paid liar tells you.
Read and learn.Both stupid and wrong. States have such laws.on the books.
Trump was neither charged nor convicted of election interferenceElection interference in the 2016 election is Federal not State jurisdiction. So are campaign finance violations, etc.
Its not the bookkeeping crime, its the crime supposedly covered up, take your pick (tax, election interference, hiding voter info, etc.)
1. Exactly. So why is the expired misdemeanor bookkeeping error a 34-count FELONY?Trump was neither charged nor convicted of election interference
It’s a felony because he engaged in those activities to hide a crime committed by someone else1. Exactly. So why is the expired misdemeanor bookkeeping error a 34-count FELONY?
2. ANS: Because the hush-money payment covered up another crime, a super-secret crime that wasn't charged.
"So this is the case: A serial perjurer used to convert a dead state misdemeanor into a felony based on an alleged federal election crime that was rejected by the Justice Department."The Trump Trial in Manhattan is an Indictment of the New York Legal System
Below is my column in the New York Post on the start of the Trump trial today in New York. I have long been critical of the case as a clear example of the weaponization of the criminal justice syst…jonathanturley.org