Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Suck for your Jihad, but his word. That's all it takes for a President to declassify something.
Why do you worship Biden? At least the pussies Trump grabs are old enough to have hair on them.
No Tump does NOT have to provide evidence of having declassified documents.
If somone is accsin him of semething the burder of proof is on THEM. Always on the accuser,
The way it doesn't work is what you said. No Tump does NOT have to provide evidence of having declassified documents. If somone is accsin him of semething the burder of proof is on THEM. Always on the accuser,
That's an outright lie.He admitted on tape that he did not have the power to declassify any of the material found at Shit-A-Lago.
Says the most vapid idiot on this forum.You must be really stupid.
Now everyone is wondering what he lost, sold, what...IIRC, on Jun 3, 2022, Trump lawyers handed over an envelope containing some papers to visiting FBI agents, said a diligent search had been conducted and they didn't have any more documents/copies, etc. The FBI agents were prevented from searching any more boxes. Yet, on Aug 8, more documents were found when the FBI served a search warrant.
In Dec 22, some more were found in a storage facility. Finally, in Feb '23, Trump's attorneys handed over a laptop and thumb drive belonging to an aide who worked for a Trump PAC, onto which classified docs were found to have been copied, and had been taken away from MAL.
smh
The national security infrastructure cannot function in a reasonable way if the same information is both classified and declassified at the same time simply because the POTUS chooses not to tell anyone.
Kind of a Schrodinger's Classified document where the same information is both classified and declassified at the same time until someone asks the FPOTUS to find out if he mentally and secretly declassified it without telling anyone while still POTUS. Normal people wouldn't know just be looking at the document.
Pffft, now you're lying..I don't, but I prefer a statesman to a chaotic clown.
1. Just if there were documents found (or planted) in Mar-a-Lago, that doesnt establish that Trump was "in possession" of them. NOBODY can ascertain that Trump had any knowledge that any document ever left the White House. So everything you're saying is moot.He does because the documents are marked classified, and he is in possession of those documents as a private citizen. There has to be some evidence that they were de-classified while he was president.
If Trump has an email or a memo saying "I'd like these documents de-classified" and people just didn't get around to it, you'd have a point.
But what appears to be the case is that he never intended to de-classify any of them. And if he's in possession of nuclear documents, the president can't declassify them unilaterally -- Congressional authority comes into play.
Trump confessed that he took them....and falsely claims he could do so if he wanted to....1. Just if there were documents found (or planted) in Mar-a-Lago, that doesnt establish that Trump was "in possession" of them. NOBODY can ascertain that Trump had any knowledge that any document ever left the White House. So everything you're saying is moot
Pffft, now you're lying..
1. Just if there were documents found (or planted) in Mar-a-Lago, that doesnt establish that Trump was "in possession" of them. NOBODY can ascertain that Trump had any knowledge that any document ever left the White House. So everything you're saying is moot.
2. You still don't seem to get it. The burden of proof still lies with the accuser (who has no way of showing/proving that Trump knew anythng of any documents moving about anywhere.
3. What you claim "appears" only appears in the most subjective of any analysis, not worthy of any courtroom prosecution. Even if anything at all were wrong about these documents, to prosecute Trump, criminal intent would have to be shown - when it can't even be shown that he knew any documents ever were in Mar-a-Lago, IF they even were (rather than planted) which also can't be shown.
Biden doesn't fit that profile, but you wanted him, so you are lying. So what is it that you truly want ? Is it the agenda's that matter most to you(?), and Biden was just stupid enough to be your gullible (possibly compromised), knucklehead that would work for you on that ??Nope. I want candidates who are calm, intelligent and decent. ... educated instead of vulgar.
1). You aren't showing here any such "confession", as you claim.Trump confessed that he took them....and falsely claims he could do so if he wanted to....
1). You aren't showing here any such "confession", as you claim.
2. There is no such thing as confessing to take documents, since, as Trump correctly claims he could do so if he wanted to. He's right. You're wrong.
Section 2205 (3) of the Presidential Records Act (USC 44 Ch 22) clearly says >>> "(3) the Presidential records of a former President shall be available to such former President or the former President's designated representative."
Not only is Trump entitled to possess the documents, but so are anyone who he designates (Mark Meadows, Rudy Guiliani, etc)
View attachment 791550
From your own link.
Presidential records are the property of the US Government and are to be retained by the NARA.
"Having access" and "being in possession of" are two very different things. Section 2205 (3) means that the former President (or his designee) can arrange with the NARA for access to their facilities to review materials. It doesn't mean the FPOTUS gets to keep the documents.
WW
