what plea deal are you talking about? The one after the trial? ok....Mueller didn't go to court to enter the plea deal either....Weismann didThe plea deal had nothing to do with that. That was a separate indictment.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
what plea deal are you talking about? The one after the trial? ok....Mueller didn't go to court to enter the plea deal either....Weismann didThe plea deal had nothing to do with that. That was a separate indictment.
Weissmann was picked because he is not burdened by ethics, and the DOJ knew the Mueller probe was a fraud from the very start. There was nothing about that investigation or subsequent prosecutions that was legitimate.yep, nothing wrong with them working together on a case.
agreed, a lot of FBI agents and police officers are able to secure an indictment. Then US Attorneys, or AUSAs, folks like Andrew Weissman, got into Court
what plea deal are you talking about? The one after the trial? ok....Mueller didn't go to court to enter the plea deal either....Weismann did
Yes, and Mueller was never in court for any of thoseNo, there were two separate indictments in two separate jurisdictions. In one, he was found guilty by a jury, and the other, he pleaded guilty before the jury could be seated.
what? hahahh law enforcment brings evidence to the proseuctors, after they conduct investigations.No, they're not. Only prosecutors can bring evidence to secure an indictment.
Yes, and Mueller was never in court for any of those
Show meWell that's not true. He filed motions in court Same as Jack Smith.
what? hahahh law enforcment brings evidence to the proseuctors, after they conduct investigations.
Yep, Andrew Weissman did that for the mueller investigationAnd prosecutors present such evidence to the grand jury to secure an indictment. A pity you don't know that.
Show me
Yep, Andrew Weissman did that for the mueller investigation
Mueller signed the indictment for Manafort, dope.Show me when Mueller showed up to court of Manafort's case.
And we both know this USSC will take up cases it should not, when it comes to Trump.AFAIK the only times they have passed USSC scrutiny is when they were appointed pursuant to statute.
Demonstrating her incompetence and unfitness, IMO.The Amicus brief from the former AG's and Thomas's separate concurrence in the immunity case laid it out clearly, and that is what Cannon was obviously relying on.
Indeed they do."Elections have consequences"-Barry Hussein Obama.
![]()
Not accurate. I called them out for their corruption the moment they deceived Congress and the American public in their hearings.Cry more, Buttercup..
It's fun to watch you clowns whine and cry about corruption just because a ruling doesn't go your way.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()