Trump Directs The EPA to Begin Dismantling the Clean Water Rule

They can't call it a law because it was never passed by congress . It's a massive power grab by the federal government based on nothing but a hastily written executive order. Characterizing it as "the clean water rule" is part of the fake news propaganda generated by the left wing media. If you want the EPA to assume sweeping jurisdiction over wetlands and virtually all the water supply for farms and ranches for the alleged purpose of " combating global warming" then let's have a discussion about it instead of a decree issued in the middle of the night like some half assed 3rd world monarch.
 
Last edited:
Now, you won't have to move to Flint, MI to experience poisoned water.

Yeah the EPA did such a good job in Flint right. Cognitive dissonance at its finest.

The EPA did not exist when Flint built their water system with lead pipes. it is the EPA that is requiring Flint to replace them. You don't think before you post, do you?
/——-/ Gee, the EPA was started in the Nixon administration. It took them 40 years to get around to Flint? What about the Michigan state agencies? The Flint city agency?

OK, Cell, you win Clean water is a luxury we can not afford. Besides, we all miss the good old days when toxic waste was just dumped in lakes and streams. We all miss things, like when lake Erie caught fire, I think in 1968, and Love Canal, of course. Allowing industry to destroy the environment is GOOD for the USA!

Tar Creek Superfund site - Wikipedia
/——/ Ok - you win the Straw Man argument of the day. Congratulations
 
Now, you won't have to move to Flint, MI to experience poisoned water.

Yeah the EPA did such a good job in Flint right. Cognitive dissonance at its finest.

The EPA did not exist when Flint built their water system with lead pipes. it is the EPA that is requiring Flint to replace them. You don't think before you post, do you?
/——-/ Gee, the EPA was started in the Nixon administration. It took them 40 years to get around to Flint? What about the Michigan state agencies? The Flint city agency?

OK, Cell, you win Clean water is a luxury we can not afford. Besides, we all miss the good old days when toxic waste was just dumped in lakes and streams. We all miss things, like when lake Erie caught fire, I think in 1968, and Love Canal, of course. Allowing industry to destroy the environment is GOOD for the USA!

Tar Creek Superfund site - Wikipedia
/——/ Ok - you win the Straw Man argument of the day. Congratulations

Only Trump would appoint someone from Dow Chemical to head the EPA. It is an insult to anyone who gives a rat's ass about the environment.
 
Yeah the EPA did such a good job in Flint right. Cognitive dissonance at its finest.

The EPA did not exist when Flint built their water system with lead pipes. it is the EPA that is requiring Flint to replace them. You don't think before you post, do you?
/——-/ Gee, the EPA was started in the Nixon administration. It took them 40 years to get around to Flint? What about the Michigan state agencies? The Flint city agency?

OK, Cell, you win Clean water is a luxury we can not afford. Besides, we all miss the good old days when toxic waste was just dumped in lakes and streams. We all miss things, like when lake Erie caught fire, I think in 1968, and Love Canal, of course. Allowing industry to destroy the environment is GOOD for the USA!

Tar Creek Superfund site - Wikipedia
/——/ Ok - you win the Straw Man argument of the day. Congratulations

Only Trump would appoint someone from Dow Chemical to head the EPA. It is an insult to anyone who gives a rat's ass about the environment.
/——-/ Dems would appoint someone from SNL to run the EPA
 
B6B99CB1-BCE9-4660-8BE2-F70207731458.jpeg

The Manson Girls


Yeah the EPA did such a good job in Flint right. Cognitive dissonance at its finest.

The EPA did not exist when Flint built their water system with lead pipes. it is the EPA that is requiring Flint to replace them. You don't think before you post, do you?
/——-/ Gee, the EPA was started in the Nixon administration. It took them 40 years to get around to Flint? What about the Michigan state agencies? The Flint city agency?

OK, Cell, you win Clean water is a luxury we can not afford. Besides, we all miss the good old days when toxic waste was just dumped in lakes and streams. We all miss things, like when lake Erie caught fire, I think in 1968, and Love Canal, of course. Allowing industry to destroy the environment is GOOD for the USA!

Tar Creek Superfund site - Wikipedia
/——/ Ok - you win the Straw Man argument of the day. Congratulations

Only Trump would appoint someone from Dow Chemical to head the EPA. It is an insult to anyone who gives a rat's ass about the environment.
Not one member of the Trump cult cares about the environment or their health.
It’s the least they can do for their cult leader..
 
The EPA did not exist when Flint built their water system with lead pipes. it is the EPA that is requiring Flint to replace them. You don't think before you post, do you?
/——-/ Gee, the EPA was started in the Nixon administration. It took them 40 years to get around to Flint? What about the Michigan state agencies? The Flint city agency?

OK, Cell, you win Clean water is a luxury we can not afford. Besides, we all miss the good old days when toxic waste was just dumped in lakes and streams. We all miss things, like when lake Erie caught fire, I think in 1968, and Love Canal, of course. Allowing industry to destroy the environment is GOOD for the USA!

Tar Creek Superfund site - Wikipedia
/——/ Ok - you win the Straw Man argument of the day. Congratulations

Only Trump would appoint someone from Dow Chemical to head the EPA. It is an insult to anyone who gives a rat's ass about the environment.
/——-/ Dems would appoint someone from SNL to run the EPA
Yet every head of the EPA under a dem President was highly qualified and PROTECTED the environment.
Does Trump and Pruitt even know what the P stands for in the EPA? Because they’re doing just the opposite.
 
/——-/ Gee, the EPA was started in the Nixon administration. It took them 40 years to get around to Flint? What about the Michigan state agencies? The Flint city agency?

OK, Cell, you win Clean water is a luxury we can not afford. Besides, we all miss the good old days when toxic waste was just dumped in lakes and streams. We all miss things, like when lake Erie caught fire, I think in 1968, and Love Canal, of course. Allowing industry to destroy the environment is GOOD for the USA!

Tar Creek Superfund site - Wikipedia
/——/ Ok - you win the Straw Man argument of the day. Congratulations

Only Trump would appoint someone from Dow Chemical to head the EPA. It is an insult to anyone who gives a rat's ass about the environment.
/——-/ Dems would appoint someone from SNL to run the EPA
Yet every head of the EPA under a dem President was highly qualified and PROTECTED the environment.
Does Trump and Pruitt even know what the P stands for in the EPA? Because they’re doing just the opposite.
"Qualified" meaning they are hardcore Marxists with an ideological axe to grind. Pruitt is qualified to know that the so-called Clean water rule is a disaster. Good riddance.

Sent from my SM-G935P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app
 
They can't call it a law because it was never passed by congress . It's a massive power grab by the federal government based on nothing but a hastily written executive order. Characterizing it as "the clean water rule" is part of the fake news propaganda generated by the left wing media. If you want the EPA to assume sweeping jurisdiction over wetlands and virtually all the water supply for farms and ranches for the alleged purpose of " combating global warming" then let's have a discussion about it instead of a decree issued in the middle of the night like some half assed 3rd world monarch.

Well, the joke will be on you and your family when you die younger than you should have. You hate the government so much that you're willing to take years off your life so that Trump and Repugs can somehow "win"....well so be it, sucker.
 
They can't call it a law because it was never passed by congress . It's a massive power grab by the federal government based on nothing but a hastily written executive order. Characterizing it as "the clean water rule" is part of the fake news propaganda generated by the left wing media. If you want the EPA to assume sweeping jurisdiction over wetlands and virtually all the water supply for farms and ranches for the alleged purpose of " combating global warming" then let's have a discussion about it instead of a decree issued in the middle of the night like some half assed 3rd world monarch.

Well, the joke will be on you and your family when you die younger than you should have. You hate the government so much that you're willing to take years off your life so that Trump and Repugs can somehow "win"....well so be it, sucker.
/——/ Calm down Drama Queen. Trump is just rolling back Obozo’s over reach.
 
Now, you won't have to move to Flint, MI to experience poisoned water.

Yeah the EPA did such a good job in Flint right. Cognitive dissonance at its finest.

The EPA did not exist when Flint built their water system with lead pipes. it is the EPA that is requiring Flint to replace them. You don't think before you post, do you?

Flint Michigan needed the epa to tell them not to drink lead?

Apparently so, since the EPA is forcing them to clean up their act. The EPA also completely closed down the entire town in Oklahoma, cited in my post above. Turns out that mining heavy metals requires a certain amount of environmental responsibility of the part of the corporation that was doing it.

The EPA has been in charge of Tar Creek for over 25 years. It is now worse than when they started according to the article.

Interesting article though and timely for me. The area I live in is collapsing under environmental pressures.
 
Last edited:
Yeah the EPA did such a good job in Flint right. Cognitive dissonance at its finest.

The EPA did not exist when Flint built their water system with lead pipes. it is the EPA that is requiring Flint to replace them. You don't think before you post, do you?
/——-/ Gee, the EPA was started in the Nixon administration. It took them 40 years to get around to Flint? What about the Michigan state agencies? The Flint city agency?

OK, Cell, you win Clean water is a luxury we can not afford. Besides, we all miss the good old days when toxic waste was just dumped in lakes and streams. We all miss things, like when lake Erie caught fire, I think in 1968, and Love Canal, of course. Allowing industry to destroy the environment is GOOD for the USA!

Tar Creek Superfund site - Wikipedia
/——/ Ok - you win the Straw Man argument of the day. Congratulations

Only Trump would appoint someone from Dow Chemical to head the EPA. It is an insult to anyone who gives a rat's ass about the environment.

Pruitt isnt from Dow Chemical. And that is the only man he has appointed. The thing I like about Pruitt is he sued the EPA 14 times when he was Oklahoma Attorney General. Now he is in charge of the EPA instead of the Marxist wackos Obama appointed.
 
/——-/ Dems would appoint someone from SNL to run the EPA

Absolutely. They still huddle around their TVs in the evening to "RESIST WE MUCH". SNL and Jimmy Kimmel jokes actually make headlines in the New York Times now!

The make believe world of celebrities and Hollywood serves as a sort of fantasy government for these people who are secretly inclined towards worship of the rich and famous.

inaug.jpg
 
Now, you won't have to move to Flint, MI to experience poisoned water.

Yeah the EPA did such a good job in Flint right. Cognitive dissonance at its finest.

The EPA did not exist when Flint built their water system with lead pipes. it is the EPA that is requiring Flint to replace them. You don't think before you post, do you?

Flint Michigan needed the epa to tell them not to drink lead?

Apparently so, since the EPA is forcing them to clean up their act. The EPA also completely closed down the entire town in Oklahoma, cited in my post above. Turns out that mining heavy metals requires a certain amount of environmental responsibility of the part of the corporation that was doing it.

The EPA has been in charge of Tar Creek for over 25 years. It is now worse than when they started according to the article.

Interesting article though and timely for me. The area I live in is collapsing under environmental pressures.

Being deeply opposed to the work that the EPA does is a noble stance, but is it enough? Shouldn't Trump also roll back American compliance with international law prohibiting the dumping of toxic substances in international water by ships?
 
Yeah the EPA did such a good job in Flint right. Cognitive dissonance at its finest.

The EPA did not exist when Flint built their water system with lead pipes. it is the EPA that is requiring Flint to replace them. You don't think before you post, do you?

Flint Michigan needed the epa to tell them not to drink lead?

Apparently so, since the EPA is forcing them to clean up their act. The EPA also completely closed down the entire town in Oklahoma, cited in my post above. Turns out that mining heavy metals requires a certain amount of environmental responsibility of the part of the corporation that was doing it.

The EPA has been in charge of Tar Creek for over 25 years. It is now worse than when they started according to the article.

Interesting article though and timely for me. The area I live in is collapsing under environmental pressures.

Being deeply opposed to the work that the EPA does is a noble stance, but is it enough? Shouldn't Trump also roll back American compliance with international law prohibiting the dumping of toxic substances in international water by ships?
/——/ Only if they can dump the toxins in your swimming pool.
 
The EPA did not exist when Flint built their water system with lead pipes. it is the EPA that is requiring Flint to replace them. You don't think before you post, do you?

Flint Michigan needed the epa to tell them not to drink lead?

Apparently so, since the EPA is forcing them to clean up their act. The EPA also completely closed down the entire town in Oklahoma, cited in my post above. Turns out that mining heavy metals requires a certain amount of environmental responsibility of the part of the corporation that was doing it.

The EPA has been in charge of Tar Creek for over 25 years. It is now worse than when they started according to the article.

Interesting article though and timely for me. The area I live in is collapsing under environmental pressures.

Being deeply opposed to the work that the EPA does is a noble stance, but is it enough? Shouldn't Trump also roll back American compliance with international law prohibiting the dumping of toxic substances in international water by ships?
/——/ Only if they can dump the toxins in your swimming pool.

There are two kinds of people, Cell. Those that care about the world that we are only borrowing from the next generation, and those that still throw their beer cans out of the window of their pickup trucks. 'nuf said.
 
Flint Michigan needed the epa to tell them not to drink lead?

Apparently so, since the EPA is forcing them to clean up their act. The EPA also completely closed down the entire town in Oklahoma, cited in my post above. Turns out that mining heavy metals requires a certain amount of environmental responsibility of the part of the corporation that was doing it.

The EPA has been in charge of Tar Creek for over 25 years. It is now worse than when they started according to the article.

Interesting article though and timely for me. The area I live in is collapsing under environmental pressures.

Being deeply opposed to the work that the EPA does is a noble stance, but is it enough? Shouldn't Trump also roll back American compliance with international law prohibiting the dumping of toxic substances in international water by ships?
/——/ Only if they can dump the toxins in your swimming pool.

There are two kinds of people, Cell. Those that care about the world that we are only borrowing from the next generation, and those that still throw their beer cans out of the window of their pickup trucks. 'nuf said.
And then there are Nazis who believe if you dig a pond on your property that you should go to a concentration camp. Thank god we kicked those kind out of office in the last election.
 
Flint Michigan needed the epa to tell them not to drink lead?

Apparently so, since the EPA is forcing them to clean up their act. The EPA also completely closed down the entire town in Oklahoma, cited in my post above. Turns out that mining heavy metals requires a certain amount of environmental responsibility of the part of the corporation that was doing it.

The EPA has been in charge of Tar Creek for over 25 years. It is now worse than when they started according to the article.

Interesting article though and timely for me. The area I live in is collapsing under environmental pressures.

Being deeply opposed to the work that the EPA does is a noble stance, but is it enough? Shouldn't Trump also roll back American compliance with international law prohibiting the dumping of toxic substances in international water by ships?
/——/ Only if they can dump the toxins in your swimming pool.

There are two kinds of people, Cell. Those that care about the world that we are only borrowing from the next generation, and those that still throw their beer cans out of the window of their pickup trucks. 'nuf said.
/——/ Ever see the aftermath of an Earth Day or any Green rally? Wall to wall garbage. So you libs are in the second group. Tea Party cleans up their rally mess.
 
Being deeply opposed to the work that the EPA does is a noble stance, but is it enough? Shouldn't Trump also roll back American compliance with international law prohibiting the dumping of toxic substances in international water by ships?

If you have a problem with it write your congressman. Make a case for ocean dumping.
 
Being deeply opposed to the work that the EPA does is a noble stance, but is it enough? Shouldn't Trump also roll back American compliance with international law prohibiting the dumping of toxic substances in international water by ships?

If you have a problem with it write your congressman. Make a case for ocean dumping.

No need. I'm sure Trump will decide that it is a good thing to dump in the ocean, and write an executive order to encourage it...probably in the new oil drilling fields that he just opened in the Atlantic. Or, he could just open up the area south of the Mississippi River. That is already a giant dead zone in the ocean anyway.
 
Being deeply opposed to the work that the EPA does is a noble stance, but is it enough? Shouldn't Trump also roll back American compliance with international law prohibiting the dumping of toxic substances in international water by ships?

If you have a problem with it write your congressman. Make a case for ocean dumping.

No need. I'm sure Trump will decide that it is a good thing to dump in the ocean, and write an executive order to encourage it...probably in the new oil drilling fields that he just opened in the Atlantic. Or, he could just open up the area south of the Mississippi River. That is already a giant dead zone in the ocean anyway.
/——/ Squirm loser. Next time pick a viable candidate. Bwhahahaha Bwhahahaha
 

Forum List

Back
Top