Trump: 'I will bring back free speech in America'

[Votar Roja]

You're not the brightest bulb in the drawer. Nazi Musk's new fascism . . . . .

You are a moron.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Never vote for Trump.

 

[BlindBoo]

If they restrict political speech, shouldn't the government regulate them?

Nope. They tried the fairness doctrine when we had only three nationwide networks but with the advent of cable tv and then the internet our source of news became so eclectic that it is no longer worth trying.

 

[Votar Roja]

AHa - that's AH. "Asshole" is in Germany sometimes also a fiendly comment under freiunds - but not so in case of Donald Trump. Donald Trump is for very most Germans a "persons non grata".



What a nonsense. Donald Trump never made anythiong speir kly than to be born superrich. Someone who is superrich is not able to become poor again.



Harvesting the money of hard working tenants is one of the most easy jobs in the whole world.



Trump never buuided anything. He financed buildings. Toda yinthe m,soiring for example I read in the newspaper a big company will invests some hduinrd millions now. What means such a "grace" in reöaliaty? The tax payer wil pay a lotof m0opebny for thsi invetsment - and the profust wil make the superrich owners amnd shrehilers of thei company. In case the idea behind this investment will be a so called "Schnapsidee" (a drunken unreal idea made under the influence of Schnapps or drugs and euphoric emotions) then the taxapüüyer will have to take care fot he negative social results.




Trump knows nothing.



A billionaire who pays no taxes although he makes a lot of money knows for sure very well how to make idiots out of everyone else.



Empty nonsense phrase.



The Germans are right? Are you sure you are an US-American?



From my point of view one of the best presidents of the USA in the younger history had been Bill Clinton.

Example:

Berlin (taz) – Jetzt ist es amtlich: Die USA schreiben zum erstenmal seit 29 Jahren ihre Haushaltszahlen mit schwarzer Tinte. Das Haushaltsbüro des Weißen Hauses gab gestern bekannt, daß dieses Jahr die US-Bundesregierung 39 Milliarden US-Dollar mehr einnimmt, als sie ausgibt.
...
Den Republikanern hat Bill Clinton mit diesem Haushalt den Wind aus den Segeln genommen. Den schmachvollen Winter 1995/96 kann der Präsident jetzt endlich vergessen. Damals hatte der konservativ dominierte Kongreß, angeführt von Clintons Gegenspieler Newt Gingrich, Gelder blockiert, so daß der Staat teilweise seine Arbeit einstellen mußte. Die Regierung mußte ein Programm unterzeichnen, wonach sie bis zum Jahr 2002 den Haushalt auszugleichen hatte.
Den Plan hat Clinton übererfüllt. Bis 2002 erwartet sein Haushaltsbüro jetzt bis zu 148 Milliarden Dollar an Überschüssen. Zu dem Erfolg trug nicht nur eine Begrenzung der Staatsausgaben bei. Nur noch 15 Prozent des Etats gehen beispielsweise an das Militär.
Vor allem die immer weiter boomende Konjunktur hat dem Bund noch reichlichere Einnahmen beschert, als die Regierung selbst erwartet hatte. Noch im Februar hatte sie das diesjährige Defizit auf 10 Milliarden Dollar geschätzt. Der selten hohe Beschäftigungsstand bedeutet für den Staat selten hohe Lohnsteuereinnahmen. Auch vom anhaltenden Aktienboom bekommt der Bund durch die Kapitalertragsteuern etwas ab.
Ob etwas von den Überschüssen zum Abbau der Schulden eingesetzt wird, ist indes fraglich. Die jahrzehntelangen Haushaltsdefizite haben in den USA inzwischen eine Staatsverschuldung von 5,6 Billionen US-Dollar auflaufen lassen – das sind 75 Prozent des Bruttoinlandsprodukts. Allein zwischen 1981 und 1992, also in den Jahren der republikanischen Präsidentschaft, vervierfachten sich die Staatsschulden, nicht zuletzt wegen Ronald Reagans Rüstungsmanie, gepaart mit seiner Steuersenkungsphilosophie. ...

Translation:

Berlin (taz) - Now it's official: The U.S. is writing its budget figures in black ink for the first time in 29 years. The White House budget office announced yesterday that this year the US federal government will take in $39 billion more than it spends.

...

Bill Clinton has taken the wind out of the Republicans' sails with this budget. The president can now finally forget the disgraceful winter of 1995-96. Back then, the conservative-dominated Congress, led by Clinton's opponent Newt Gingrich, had blocked funds, so that the state had to partially stop its work. The government had to sign off on a program to balance the budget by 2002.

Clinton overachieved on that plan. By 2002, his budget office now expects up to $148 billion in surpluses. Limiting government spending was not the only factor contributing to the success. Only 15 percent of the budget now goes to the military, for example.

Above all, the ever-booming economy has provided the federal government with even more abundant revenues than the government itself had expected. As recently as February, it had estimated this year's deficit at $10 billion. Rarely high employment levels mean rarely high payroll tax revenues for the government. The federal government also gets something from the ongoing stock boom through capital gains taxes.

Whether any of the surpluses will be used to reduce the debt, however, is questionable. Decades of budget deficits in the U.S. have now accumulated a national debt of $5.6 trillion - that's 75 percent of gross domestic product. Between 1981 and 1992 alone, the years of the Republican presidency, the national debt quadrupled, not least because of Ronald Reagan's arms mania, coupled with his tax-cutting philosophy. ...

-----

Lots of words, all bullshit.

 

[zaangalewa]

Unhinged nonsense. Grow up.

Again: Donald Trump is a high traitor. It's very clear that he tried to destroy your hundreds of years old tradition of a peaceful handover of power.

 

[Votar Roja]

Again: Donald Trump is a high traitor. It's very clear that he tried to destroy your hundreds of years old tradition of a peaceful handover of power.

You're an imbecile

 

[zaangalewa]

!. Without rich powerful people there are only peons fighting for scraps of food, or territory. ...

Cesar, undear superidiot mine, murdered about 50% of all Celts in the teritorry which is today called "France". In the end he, his wife and his children had been murdered. He was one of the greatest losers of world history. Nevertheless exist in masses idiots who like to be like him with slogans like "Make Rumtata great again".

 

[Votar Roja]

Cesar, undear superidiot mine, murdered about 50% of all Celts in the territory which is today called "France". In the end he, his wife and his children had been murdered. He was one of the greatest losers of world history. Nevertheless exist in masses idiots who like to be like him with slogans like "Make Rumtata great again".

 

[zaangalewa]

You're an imbecile

I never understood why Donald Trump got more than one vote. But when I see your "argument" ... What is it what you try to say here? ...

 

[zaangalewa]

View attachment 832987

Sure

 

[Votar Roja]

And the first post has yet to be refuted:

Trump: 'I will bring back free speech in America'

OP COMMENT: The greatest president ever, and the next president: Donald Trump! He spoke at the Pray Vote Stand Summit. He talked about BidenFlation, border control, talks child trafficking, More to come in following posts.

 

[Curried Goats]

And the first post has yet to be refuted:

Trump: 'I will bring back free speech in America'

OP COMMENT: The greatest president ever, and the next president: Donald Trump! He spoke at the Pray Vote Stand Summit. He talked about BidenFlation, border control, talks child trafficking, More to come in following posts.

These Simp ass cosplayers. Let's all nevermind the education Trump himself is getting in free speech and it's limits with the multimillion dollar defamation lawsuit he just lost against E. Jean Carroll.

They make believe because they're too fragile for the real world.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Trump is a loser, and one of his loser followers is Votar Roja.

 

[dudmuck]

If they restrict political speech, shouldn't the government regulate them?

invisible hand of the free market.

 

[Care4all]

If they restrict political speech, shouldn't the government regulate them?

No silly one! That doesn't break constitutionally protected free speech!

 

[Votar Roja]

WAR ON FREE SPEECH: Journalist slams modern media’s standards​

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Trump attacks the rule of law by undermining free speech

 

[WEATHER53]

That would be great. Far too many lib loon feelings and perceptions have limited truthful fact speech

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

examples, please

 

[Votar Roja]