tyroneweaver
Platinum Member
Jakes problem is he went to a college that stole BYU's colors.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't trust Trump to respect the Constitutional way of the US.
I expect him to try to break it in every way he can.
I am not willing to find out if he is containable.
Sure, he could. Ever why not? You are a fool if you think otherwise.Little doubt exists that Donnie is a threat to the American Republic.
______
Donald Trump may be a threat to rule of law. Gary Herbert and Orrin Hatch visit Bears Ears. Bernie Sanders goes for the whole enchilada.
Happy Friday. Legal scholars from across the political spectrum are worried that a Donald Trump presidency would be a step, maybe a large step, toward authoritarianism, with his calls for a ban on Muslims, restrictions on the press and his threats toward judges. [NYTimes]
News roundup: Legal scholars fear an authoritarian Trump presidency
Tribune Political Reporters
First Published Jun 03 2016 07:21AM • Last Updated Jun 03 2016 09:24 am
News roundup: Legal scholars fear an authoritarian Trump presidency
No president could ruin our country you god damn loon.
I don't trust Trump to respect the Constitutional way of the US.
I expect him to try to break it in every way he can.
I am not willing to find out if he is containable.
We see that F & B is not fair and balanced. Obama respected the system enough to accept when the courts said no a and let the issues be litigated.
Double Down Donald has made it quite clear he has no respect for anything or any institution, certainly not the Constitution.
The American electorate will rejecthim by at least a 60 to 40% margin.
No, you have no balance. Your opinions are immaterial and mean nothing if you cannot back them up. You have not been to do such so far, and obviously based on the context of your comments, you won't be able to back them up.We see that F & B is not fair and balanced. Obama respected the system enough to accept when the courts said no a and let the issues be litigated.
Double Down Donald has made it quite clear he has no respect for anything or any institution, certainly not the Constitution.
The American electorate will rejecthim by at least a 60 to 40% margin.
What are you babbling about Jake?
I'm quite fair and balanced. You are stupid, and clearly the one who is deranged here. If Trump were elected POTUS he would have NO choice but to respect the checks and balances of this nation, no different than any other POTUS.
No, you have no balance. Your opinions are immaterial and mean nothing if you cannot back them up. You have not been to do such so far, and obviously based on the context of your comments, you won't be able to back them up.We see that F & B is not fair and balanced. Obama respected the system enough to accept when the courts said no a and let the issues be litigated.
Double Down Donald has made it quite clear he has no respect for anything or any institution, certainly not the Constitution.
The American electorate will rejecthim by at least a 60 to 40% margin.
What are you babbling about Jake?
I'm quite fair and balanced. You are stupid, and clearly the one who is deranged here. If Trump were elected POTUS he would have NO choice but to respect the checks and balances of this nation, no different than any other POTUS.
However, since Trump won't be POTUS, all of this does not matter.
Not too worry, soggy: Trump won't , in the end, get 40% of the vote.
Not too worry, soggy: Trump won't , in the end, get 40% of the vote.
You have given nothing but opinions, but tell me I am wrong for doing so.Not too worry, soggy: Trump won't , in the end, get 40% of the vote.
Be that as it may (and that is quite clearly your OPINION rather than fact) you made the claim that he would destroy this country. How so. You seem disinclined to answer.
I don't have to because you have simply said he can't hurt the country. We both know better.Not too worry, soggy: Trump won't , in the end, get 40% of the vote.
So, as usual you can't back up your absurd claim. You're such a numbnut... you and Rdean should hook-up.
You have given nothing but opinions, but tell me I am wrong for doing so.Not too worry, soggy: Trump won't , in the end, get 40% of the vote.
Be that as it may (and that is quite clearly your OPINION rather than fact) you made the claim that he would destroy this country. How so. You seem disinclined to answer.
Trump is a clear and present danger to the country, and that will become more evident, much more evident, during the remainder of the campaign season.
I don't have to because you have simply said he can't hurt the country. We both know better.Not too worry, soggy: Trump won't , in the end, get 40% of the vote.
So, as usual you can't back up your absurd claim. You're such a numbnut... you and Rdean should hook-up.