Trump is currently addressing the March against Women's Reproductive Rights

[TNHarley]

The Constitution says otherwise.

No, a majority of unelected judges said otherwise.

That's the same thing you moron.

No, it isn't. The proper term would be "They say that the Constitution says otherwise"

For the Constitution to say it the document would have to be amended and the words "Abortion is a right" or something similar would have to be added.

So the right of an individual to own a gun isn't a constitutional right, it's just a mere interpretation made by unelected judges?

The right to bear arms is stated specifically in the Constitution. Please find me the part of the constitution where killing a human being is listed as a right.

Find me science that says an unborn fetus is a human being.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Seriously, does anyone believe that Donald Trump gives a shit one way or another about whether a woman can get a legal abortion?

Here's a thought, don't get pregnant. Apparently some people lack the discipline.

 

[Leo123]

You didn't answer my question.

So I know therefore what you concede the answer is. This is a march by people who oppose reproductive rights, specifically, and especially, the Constitutional right to an abortion.

Why can't some of you people just tell the truth instead of using 'nicey-nicy' terms....Reproductive rights = The right to kill an unborn child. Try being honest for a change.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

End the life of a human baby is not a reproductive right.

A reproductive right would be the right not to get pregnant


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

The Constitution says otherwise.

No, the SCOTUS said otherwise. The right to private should not give one the right to kill another human being


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

The Supreme Court and its decisions are part of the Constitution you idiot.

No they are not. they are merely interpretations of the Constitution. To be part of the document you have to use the amendment process.

A Supreme Court decision is every bit part of the Constitution. They are binding and the supreme law of the land.

Wrong, as usual.

 

[Eaglewings]

Donald Trump: "I'm Very Pro Choice," Partial Birth Abortion is OK

 

[NYcarbineer]

No, a majority of unelected judges said otherwise.

That's the same thing you moron.

No, it isn't. The proper term would be "They say that the Constitution says otherwise"

For the Constitution to say it the document would have to be amended and the words "Abortion is a right" or something similar would have to be added.

So the right of an individual to own a gun isn't a constitutional right, it's just a mere interpretation made by unelected judges?

The right to bear arms is stated specifically in the Constitution. Please find me the part of the constitution where killing a human being is listed as a right.

Find me science that says an unborn fetus is a human being.

The Constitution says otherwise.

No, a majority of unelected judges said otherwise.

That's the same thing you moron.

No, it isn't. The proper term would be "They say that the Constitution says otherwise"

For the Constitution to say it the document would have to be amended and the words "Abortion is a right" or something similar would have to be added.

So the right of an individual to own a gun isn't a constitutional right, it's just a mere interpretation made by unelected judges?

The right to bear arms is stated specifically in the Constitution. Please find me the part of the constitution where killing a human being is listed as a right.

Since the Constitution affords NO rights of personhood, citizenship, or any such other relevant condition to fetuses,
the right to terminate a fetus has nothing to do with killing humans as far as the law of the land is concerned.

 

[Leo123]

Seriously, does anyone believe that Donald Trump gives a shit one way or another about whether a woman can get a legal abortion?

Of course he doesn't give shit. He's a salesman and salesmen know what their audience wants to hear. So they say it. And these turnips eat it up.

Oh look, the butt hurt continues..

 

[NYcarbineer]

You didn't answer my question.

So I know therefore what you concede the answer is. This is a march by people who oppose reproductive rights, specifically, and especially, the Constitutional right to an abortion.

Why can't some of you people just tell the truth instead of using 'nicey-nicy' terms....Reproductive rights = The right to kill an unborn child. Try being honest for a change.

It's dishonest to say that when a woman gives birth, she has 'reproduced'?

lol, good one .

 

[Harpy Eagle]

No, a majority of unelected judges said otherwise.

That's the same thing you moron.

No, it isn't. The proper term would be "They say that the Constitution says otherwise"

For the Constitution to say it the document would have to be amended and the words "Abortion is a right" or something similar would have to be added.

So the right of an individual to own a gun isn't a constitutional right, it's just a mere interpretation made by unelected judges?

The right to bear arms is stated specifically in the Constitution. Please find me the part of the constitution where killing a human being is listed as a right.

Find me science that says an unborn fetus is a human being.

What else can it be? Is it a chicken? or is is a penguin? or is is frog? NOPE the only possible answer is that the results of two humans mating is that they created another human.

Science tells us that each kind begets its own.

 

[Leo123]

Since the Constitution affords NO rights of personhood, citizenship, or any such other relevant condition to fetuses,
the right to terminate a fetus has nothing to do with killing humans as far as the law of the land is concerned.

You don't need a piece of paper telling you that abortion is the killing of a developing human being. Just be honest for once.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The Constitution says otherwise.

No, the SCOTUS said otherwise. The right to private should not give one the right to kill another human being


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

The Supreme Court and its decisions are part of the Constitution you idiot.

No they are not. they are merely interpretations of the Constitution. To be part of the document you have to use the amendment process.

A Supreme Court decision is every bit part of the Constitution. They are binding and the supreme law of the land.

Wrong, as usual.

Gee, what an argument.

 

[koshergrl]

Donald Trump: "I'm Very Pro Choice," Partial Birth Abortion is OK

He changed his mind, and that's a good thing.
That's why we educate people. To change their minds.

 

[g5000]

Trump is speaking at the March for Life now, the first president to do so

Reagan and both Bushes spoke to the March for Life.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Seriously, does anyone believe that Donald Trump gives a shit one way or another about whether a woman can get a legal abortion?

Easiest votes he’ll ever get

You just wave your magic Bible wand at the fundies, and abracadabra, you own them.

Ironic that Clinton and Gore tried that....they didn't get them...hmmmmmmmmmm

 

[NYcarbineer]

That's the same thing you moron.

No, it isn't. The proper term would be "They say that the Constitution says otherwise"

For the Constitution to say it the document would have to be amended and the words "Abortion is a right" or something similar would have to be added.

So the right of an individual to own a gun isn't a constitutional right, it's just a mere interpretation made by unelected judges?

The right to bear arms is stated specifically in the Constitution. Please find me the part of the constitution where killing a human being is listed as a right.

Find me science that says an unborn fetus is a human being.

What else can it be? Is it a chicken? or is is a penguin? or is is frog? NOPE the only possible answer is that the results of two humans mating is that they created another human.

Science tells us that each kind begets its own.

You can name it anything you like.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Donald Trump: "I'm Very Pro Choice," Partial Birth Abortion is OK

^^^^ People are allowed to change their mind and opinion on any issue, abortion is one, someone might be Pro Choice and then think about that and decide it's wrong and then become Pro Life, The Donald like everyone else is allowed to change his mind on issues.

 

[martybegan]

End the life of a human baby is not a reproductive right.

A reproductive right would be the right not to get pregnant


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

The Constitution says otherwise.

No, a majority of unelected judges said otherwise.

That's the same thing you moron.

No, it isn't. The proper term would be "They say that the Constitution says otherwise"

For the Constitution to say it the document would have to be amended and the words "Abortion is a right" or something similar would have to be added.

So the right of an individual to own a gun isn't a constitutional right, it's just a mere interpretation made by unelected judges?

No, because the document actually says that the people have the right to keep and bear arms. It's explicit.

What un-elected judges do is chip away at that right, using the same "logic" they use to create ones out of thin air.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

No, a majority of unelected judges said otherwise.

That's the same thing you moron.

No, it isn't. The proper term would be "They say that the Constitution says otherwise"

For the Constitution to say it the document would have to be amended and the words "Abortion is a right" or something similar would have to be added.

So the right of an individual to own a gun isn't a constitutional right, it's just a mere interpretation made by unelected judges?

The right to bear arms is stated specifically in the Constitution. Please find me the part of the constitution where killing a human being is listed as a right.

Find me science that says an unborn fetus is a human being.

What else would it be?

It's an unborn human being....YOU were once a fetus.

 

[Leo123]

It's dishonest to say that when a woman gives birth, she has 'reproduced'?

lol, good one .

No it's dishonest when a woman kills her developing human being and calls it 'reproductive rights.' LOL

 

[Harpy Eagle]

That's the same thing you moron.

No, it isn't. The proper term would be "They say that the Constitution says otherwise"

For the Constitution to say it the document would have to be amended and the words "Abortion is a right" or something similar would have to be added.

So the right of an individual to own a gun isn't a constitutional right, it's just a mere interpretation made by unelected judges?

The right to bear arms is stated specifically in the Constitution. Please find me the part of the constitution where killing a human being is listed as a right.

Find me science that says an unborn fetus is a human being.

No, a majority of unelected judges said otherwise.

That's the same thing you moron.

No, it isn't. The proper term would be "They say that the Constitution says otherwise"

For the Constitution to say it the document would have to be amended and the words "Abortion is a right" or something similar would have to be added.

So the right of an individual to own a gun isn't a constitutional right, it's just a mere interpretation made by unelected judges?

The right to bear arms is stated specifically in the Constitution. Please find me the part of the constitution where killing a human being is listed as a right.

Since the Constitution affords NO rights of personhood, citizenship, or any such other relevant condition to fetuses,
the right to terminate a fetus has nothing to do with killing humans as far as the law of the land is concerned.

A fetus is just one stage in a human's development. It is no different than toddler or adolescent or etc.

Do you think there is some sort of magic thing that happens that transforms the fetus from something other than human to being a human?