Trump is right to call it "treason"...

[Seawytch]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

Save of course that treason only consist of levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. Neither of which matches your made up definition.

Second, a impeachment isn't 'overthrowing' a president. Its part of a process laid out in the constitution itself to legally and constitutionally remove them.

For just cause, not because you don't like the outcome of an election. You are correct, it isn't treason unless we can prove they are doing pootins, or the Chinese bidding, but it IS sedition.

For cause....according to the House of Representatives. Not you.

Yeah, and they have trotted out manufactured crime after manufactured crime.

The Dems are the law breakers. Not trump

Nothing has been "trotted out" at all. No articles of impeachment have been introduced or voted on yet. Relax. Let the process play out.

 

[OldLady]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

Non-democratic means? You mean using the Constitution? Funny...

Democrats use the Constitution for ass wipe. They modified the Whistleblower form to enable this latest travesty.

President Donald Trump and his allies advanced a conspiracy theory about the Ukraine whistleblower over the last few days alleging that the intelligence community had recently changed the rules requiring whistleblowers to base their claims on first-hand information.

But the law hasn’t changed, and there is no requirement that whistleblowers stick to first-hand information in their complaints precisely because those filings are designed to trigger official investigations that would uncover such first-hand information, three attorneys who represent whistleblowers told NBC News.

“The whistleblower does not need to prove right off the bat with direct evidence what they’re claiming,” explained Eric Bachman, an attorney with Zuckerman Law who represents whistleblowers. “That type of direct evidence is frankly hard to come by. Instead, the whistleblower needs to have a reasonable belief that something illegal has occurred, and then it’s up to the inspector general to investigate.”
Fact check: Were the whistleblower rules changed before Ukraine complaint?

 

[mudwhistle]

The Russian collusion thing was a gigantic lie created by your fascist masters.

It was a valid inquiry handled by an incompetent Congress. I still believe he's guilty as hell of obstruction, thus he's a product of an illegitimate election and candidate. Fuck yo *pResident.

Now they're pitching the Ukraine phone call as grounds for impeachment and you are happy to throw justice and our democracy out the window only because you personally dislike Trump.

Dude, I've personally disliked the Orange Virus since the 80s and I've made no secret about that. I wish we could just skip the impeachment process and throw him and this entire administration in prison and be done with the scum, but that wouldn't be very 'Democratic' of me, would it? So, I await the outcome of the process (justice), which Cult45 mouth breathers seem to be reticent to do. Asking foreign countries for aid in our elections is a big 'no no' even when a Republican does it, sparky. So save the partisan 'virtue signalling' for yourself. You openly support corrupt candidates. Don't try and put your delusion on me.

So you admit you are a biased twat who doesn't give a flying toss for the truth.

Don't talk to me about truth, Cult45 scumbag. You aren't qualified.

Colt45 sucks ass.....

 

[mudwhistle]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

Non-democratic means? You mean using the Constitution? Funny...

Just how "constitutional" is Pelosi's changing the House rules in order to stifle the votes of the House Republicans, and fast track her little "impeachment" fantasy? Remember what happened to you idiots after Harry Reid fucked with the Senate rules?

You probably don't believe this, but you people are setting yourselves up for some major disappointment.

House rules are not a part of the Constitution. They can do it however they like. Republicans will never see a majority in the House unless they change their ways

No, motherfucker, they can't change the constitution without a Constitutional convention, and you need a two thirds vote to amend the constitution.

Nobody is changing the constitution. Everything the Democrats are doing is Constitutional.

Thus it ain't a fucking impeachment....

 

[mudwhistle]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

This is most definitely not "treason". They are attempting to remove a criminal President, using the impeachment provisions of the Constitution. This is the Constitutional removal of a criminal President who should never have been allowed to run for President because of his history and temperment.

"Treason" is defined as aiding and abetting the enemy in the time of war declared by Congress. Unless Democrats are aiding and abetting the Talaban in Afghanistan, they are not committing treason.

treason
noun
trea·son | \ ˈtrē-zᵊn \
Definition of treason


1: the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign's family
2: the betrayal of a trust : TREACHERY

Trumpybear is not the Government. Impeachment of elected government officials is a constitution process of our government.

Fabricating a crime and then framing Trump for it in order to make it "legal" to remove him from power is treason. If it's not, then there is no such thing as treason.

The call to the Ukrainian President and Trump’s demand they investigate the Biden’s in exchange for American military aid, wasn’t the Democrats fabricating anything. This was Trump behaving in a criminal manner.

Trump has confessed to doing this. So it’s hardly the Democrats framing Trump for something he didn’t do.

Treason is narrowly defined under the US Constitution as “aiding and abetting the enemy during a time of war declared by Congress”. The Founders feared foreign powers messing in American politics and they wanted Americans to remove anyone from office who sought aid from foreign.

In other words, the Constitution was written in anticipation of a Trumpian Presidency.

Nope, this is Democrats influencing our election thru deception.

There is no law that says you can't ask for or accept aid from foreign countries. There's a word for that completely legal and ethical practice. It's called a TREATY. You fucking DUMBASS.

 

[westwall]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

Save of course that treason only consist of levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. Neither of which matches your made up definition.

Second, a impeachment isn't 'overthrowing' a president. Its part of a process laid out in the constitution itself to legally and constitutionally remove them.

For just cause, not because you don't like the outcome of an election. You are correct, it isn't treason unless we can prove they are doing pootins, or the Chinese bidding, but it IS sedition.

For cause....according to the House of Representatives. Not you.

Yeah, and they have trotted out manufactured crime after manufactured crime.

The Dems are the law breakers. Not trump

Says you, citing you. I'll stick with the Constitution. And the Constitution puts the judgment of crimes committed by the President of the United States in determining impeachment.......in the hands of the House.

You v. the Constitution has the same winner very time. And its not you.

Remember, disagreeing with you isn't a crime. Its not treason. Its not sedition. Its not anything.

You fuckers have been wiping your ass with the COTUS for years so spare me the histrionics.

 

[jc456]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

Non-democratic means? You mean using the Constitution? Funny...

which part? there isn't any words about starting a coup.

 

[Skylar]

Save of course that treason only consist of levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. Neither of which matches your made up definition.

Second, a impeachment isn't 'overthrowing' a president. Its part of a process laid out in the constitution itself to legally and constitutionally remove them.

For just cause, not because you don't like the outcome of an election. You are correct, it isn't treason unless we can prove they are doing pootins, or the Chinese bidding, but it IS sedition.

For cause....according to the House of Representatives. Not you.

Yeah, and they have trotted out manufactured crime after manufactured crime.

The Dems are the law breakers. Not trump

Says you, citing you. I'll stick with the Constitution. And the Constitution puts the judgment of crimes committed by the President of the United States in determining impeachment.......in the hands of the House.

You v. the Constitution has the same winner very time. And its not you.

Remember, disagreeing with you isn't a crime. Its not treason. Its not sedition. Its not anything.

You fuckers have been wiping your ass with the COTUS for years so spare me the histrionics.

Says you, citing you. And you're nobody.

If you're going to talk about violations of the law, you're going to need far more than sniveling and whining. As the constitution clearly delegates the determination of crimes suitable for impeachment to the House.

Not you.

So....is you citing yourself as the law and constitution the limit of your entire argument? Because you're neither.

 

[Skylar]

This is most definitely not "treason". They are attempting to remove a criminal President, using the impeachment provisions of the Constitution. This is the Constitutional removal of a criminal President who should never have been allowed to run for President because of his history and temperment.

"Treason" is defined as aiding and abetting the enemy in the time of war declared by Congress. Unless Democrats are aiding and abetting the Talaban in Afghanistan, they are not committing treason.

treason
noun
trea·son | \ ˈtrē-zᵊn \
Definition of treason


1: the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign's family
2: the betrayal of a trust : TREACHERY

Trumpybear is not the Government. Impeachment of elected government officials is a constitution process of our government.

Fabricating a crime and then framing Trump for it in order to make it "legal" to remove him from power is treason. If it's not, then there is no such thing as treason.

The call to the Ukrainian President and Trump’s demand they investigate the Biden’s in exchange for American military aid, wasn’t the Democrats fabricating anything. This was Trump behaving in a criminal manner.

Trump has confessed to doing this. So it’s hardly the Democrats framing Trump for something he didn’t do.

Treason is narrowly defined under the US Constitution as “aiding and abetting the enemy during a time of war declared by Congress”. The Founders feared foreign powers messing in American politics and they wanted Americans to remove anyone from office who sought aid from foreign.

In other words, the Constitution was written in anticipation of a Trumpian Presidency.

Nope, this is Democrats influencing our election thru deception.

There is no law that says you can't ask for or accept aid from foreign countries. There's a word for that completely legal and ethical practice. It's called a TREATY. You fucking DUMBASS.

The FEC chair disagrees.

“It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept, or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election.”

 

[Skylar]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

Non-democratic means? You mean using the Constitution? Funny...

which part? there isn't any words about starting a coup.

And by 'coup', you mean an impeachment?

You may want to look up the meaning of Coup. As it has nothing to do with impeachments.

 

[westwall]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

Non-democratic means? You mean using the Constitution? Funny...

which part? there isn't any words about starting a coup.

And by 'coup', you mean an impeachment?

You may want to look up the meaning of Coup. As it has nothing to do with impeachments.

Spreading false information to make impeachment seem proper is indeed a coup you ignorant twerp.

 

[Skylar]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

Non-democratic means? You mean using the Constitution? Funny...

which part? there isn't any words about starting a coup.

And by 'coup', you mean an impeachment?

You may want to look up the meaning of Coup. As it has nothing to do with impeachments.

Spreading false information to make impeachment seem proper is indeed a coup you ignorant twerp.

Says you, citing you.

And you're nobody. Meanwhile, back in reality, the ACTUAL constitution grants the House the authority to determine if crimes suffecient for impeachment have occured. It doesn't matter if YOU agree with the House, just like it doesn't matter if YOU agree with a law that they pass.

Constitutionally, you play no role in impeachment. Thus, your personal opinion has no constitutional or legal relevance.

Is this really it? Just you, citing yourself as the law, making up meaningless pseudo-legal nonsense?

No wonder Trump is shitting his pants at this impeachment inquiry.

 

[Faun]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

Non-democratic means? You mean using the Constitution? Funny...

which part? there isn't any words about starting a coup.

And by 'coup', you mean an impeachment?

You may want to look up the meaning of Coup. As it has nothing to do with impeachments.

Spreading false information to make impeachment seem proper is indeed a coup you ignorant twerp.

Oh? What false information?

 

[wamose]

This whole thing has been a coup since our rogue FBI admitted to it. (Crossfire hurricane). Anyone in the FBI who ever said the words crossfire hurricane needs to be executed. Anyone in our totally useless media that promoted their treasonous narrative needs to be executed. Here's the deal. if we can execute all the Democrats we'll let you execute all the neocons.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Just how "constitutional" is Pelosi's changing the House rules in order to stifle the votes of the House Republicans, and fast track her little "impeachment" fantasy?

Well, the constitution says each house shall set their own rules. So, if Pelosi has a majority of the House behind her in changing the rules, then it's 100% constitutional. Any other questions?

 

[Vandalshandle]

This whole thing has been a coup since our rogue FBI admitted to it. (Crossfire hurricane). Anyone in the FBI who ever said the words crossfire hurricane needs to be executed. Anyone in our totally useless media that promoted their treasonous narrative needs to be executed. Here's the deal. if we can execute all the Democrats we'll let you execute all the neocons.

Wow! Three Trump words in one sentence! Coup, treasonous, and execute. He may have also used "rouge" but that sounds more like Palin.

 

[wamose]

This whole thing has been a coup since our rogue FBI admitted to it. (Crossfire hurricane). Anyone in the FBI who ever said the words crossfire hurricane needs to be executed. Anyone in our totally useless media that promoted their treasonous narrative needs to be executed. Here's the deal. if we can execute all the Democrats we'll let you execute all the neocons.

Wow! Three Trump words in one sentence! Coup, treasonous, and execute. He may have also used "rouge" but that sounds more like Palin.

Still fantasizing about Sarah, eh? She's available if you have the right kind of "rogue" personality. "rouge"? WTF. And you're trying to set yourself up as the smart guy. Too funny

 

[mudwhistle]

treason
noun
trea·son | \ ˈtrē-zᵊn \
Definition of treason


1: the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign's family
2: the betrayal of a trust : TREACHERY

Trumpybear is not the Government. Impeachment of elected government officials is a constitution process of our government.

Fabricating a crime and then framing Trump for it in order to make it "legal" to remove him from power is treason. If it's not, then there is no such thing as treason.

The call to the Ukrainian President and Trump’s demand they investigate the Biden’s in exchange for American military aid, wasn’t the Democrats fabricating anything. This was Trump behaving in a criminal manner.

Trump has confessed to doing this. So it’s hardly the Democrats framing Trump for something he didn’t do.

Treason is narrowly defined under the US Constitution as “aiding and abetting the enemy during a time of war declared by Congress”. The Founders feared foreign powers messing in American politics and they wanted Americans to remove anyone from office who sought aid from foreign.

In other words, the Constitution was written in anticipation of a Trumpian Presidency.

Nope, this is Democrats influencing our election thru deception.

There is no law that says you can't ask for or accept aid from foreign countries. There's a word for that completely legal and ethical practice. It's called a TREATY. You fucking DUMBASS.

The FEC chair disagrees.

“It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept, or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election.”

Well...SHITFORBRAINS.......THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH AN ELECTION, THIS IS TRUMP'S GOD DAMNED JOB!

 

[Faun]

Trumpybear is not the Government. Impeachment of elected government officials is a constitution process of our government.

Fabricating a crime and then framing Trump for it in order to make it "legal" to remove him from power is treason. If it's not, then there is no such thing as treason.

The call to the Ukrainian President and Trump’s demand they investigate the Biden’s in exchange for American military aid, wasn’t the Democrats fabricating anything. This was Trump behaving in a criminal manner.

Trump has confessed to doing this. So it’s hardly the Democrats framing Trump for something he didn’t do.

Treason is narrowly defined under the US Constitution as “aiding and abetting the enemy during a time of war declared by Congress”. The Founders feared foreign powers messing in American politics and they wanted Americans to remove anyone from office who sought aid from foreign.

In other words, the Constitution was written in anticipation of a Trumpian Presidency.

Nope, this is Democrats influencing our election thru deception.

There is no law that says you can't ask for or accept aid from foreign countries. There's a word for that completely legal and ethical practice. It's called a TREATY. You fucking DUMBASS.

The FEC chair disagrees.

“It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept, or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election.”

Well...SHITFORBRAINS.......THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH AN ELECTION, THIS IS TRUMP'S GOD DAMNED JOB!

Trying to eliminate Democrat candidates from the election has nothing to do with an election???

 

[Dragonlady]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

Non-democratic means? You mean using the Constitution? Funny...

which part? there isn't any words about starting a coup.

And by 'coup', you mean an impeachment?

You may want to look up the meaning of Coup. As it has nothing to do with impeachments.

Spreading false information to make impeachment seem proper is indeed a coup you ignorant twerp.

What false information? Trump has already confessed to the asking the Ukrainians for "a favour" in the transcript. He can't take that back, but he's now trying to say that the transcript doesn't say, what it says.

Trump has Barr going around the world investigating the FBI, the CIA, and the NSA. Do you know how STUPID that is? He is asking foreign security agencies to investigate American security agencies, to help Trump's campaign. What do you think other governments are making of these requests?

Your president is unfit for office. Removing him from office is a necessity for the safety and security of the country, and the rest of the free world as well.