Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FYIIf any of this is true........Damn, It leaves me speechless.
If so, it is clearly an impeachable offense.
Your statement makes it perfectly clear that you don't know what an impeachable offense is.
Abuse of power is an impeachable offense. We'll soon learn how involved trump was.
Indeed...We'll soon discover that Trump bribed Ukrainian officials, to the tune of $1.5 billion of Murican taxpayer money, to cover up his good-for-nothing crack head son's criminal malfeasance.
Oh wait....
People said Obama and Hillary are harming out nation. You giggle.I don't think it would be simple opposition research if it was understood to be a quid pro quo, for personal benefit of Trump in an upcoming election, who is an elected government official, using or holding back directly or indirectly, a government action approved by congress, so to get the foreign entity to do this personal action for such gvt elected official....What plot? Its simple "oppo research"? Like Hillary did with the "Steele Dossier". Not a problem like the dems have been saying all along...
18 U.S. Code § 201 - Bribery of public officials and witnesses
but we do NOT know at this point, if any of this happened.... there is speculation, and unsourced leaks etc....
The president and the DNI needs to stop breaking the law, allow the whistle blower's complaint go to the Intel committees as the law states... then the check on this would take place.
The Trump administrations hand picked Inspector General, stated that the whistle blower's complaint is a valid complaint, and said it was an URGENT National security RISK..... those type of whistle blower complaints SHALL go to congress, as per the law, for them to know about.... as it should be.
We do not know for certain if the whistle blower complaint was really about a "beautiful" phone conversation between Trump and the Ukraine president... that is just leaked sourcing.
but if the president really has nothing to hide, the whistle blower complaint, won't be any kind of problem for him.
the IG said this was URGENT and this stonewalling of the admin could HARM our nation, when it is labeled URGENT.... they need to send it to congress, as the law REQUIRES.
F for wit.No I doubt oddball ever supported Clinton or "the one\"You mean, you will gobble up a manufactured,nonsensical myth to soothe yourself and to maintain your embarrasing cultism.Indeed...We'll soon discover that Trump bribed Ukrainian officials, to the tune of $1.5 billion of Murican taxpayer money, to cover up his good-for-nothing crack head son's criminal malfeasance.Abuse of power is an impeachable offense. We'll soon learn how involved trump was.If so, it is clearly an impeachable offense.
Your statement makes it perfectly clear that you don't know what an impeachable offense is.
Oh wait....
I bet you gobble up the manufactured, nonsensical myth of the Clinton bought Steele DossierF for wit.No I doubt oddball ever supported Clinton or "the one\"You mean, you will gobble up a manufactured,nonsensical myth to soothe yourself and to maintain your embarrasing cultism.Indeed...We'll soon discover that Trump bribed Ukrainian officials, to the tune of $1.5 billion of Murican taxpayer money, to cover up his good-for-nothing crack head son's criminal malfeasance.Abuse of power is an impeachable offense. We'll soon learn how involved trump was.Your statement makes it perfectly clear that you don't know what an impeachable offense is.
Oh wait....
Actually, what Corn said was....Uh, no, it wasn't.did Obama ask Steele to investigate Russia and Tramp, NO. Do you get upset about tramp enriching himself and his kids enriching themselves-no, and do get upset about Kushner enriching himself =no and do you get upset when Kushner and tramps dtr are in the WH, NO
So your words are null and void-empty.
Well maybe he played a part but the DNC and the Hillary campaign did pay for the phony Steele dossier and the corrupt and Trump spying Obama Administration did have Steele on the payroll from what I've heard so far.
.
The Steele dossier was ordered initially by a Republican trump political rival....so get off that soap box....
David Corn reported in 2017that a trump rival initially ordered the dossier. Hillary picked it up after the rival stopped payment. The rival was never named.
The Dirty Truth About the Steele Dossier
A veteran spy has given the FBI information alleging a Russian operation to cultivate Donald Trump
In June, the former Western intelligence officer—who spent almost two decades on Russian intelligence matters and who now works with a US firm that gathers information on Russia for corporate clients—was assigned the task of researching Trump’s dealings in Russia and elsewhere, according to the former spy and his associates in this American firm. (Before the former spy was retained, the project’s financing switched to a client allied with Democrats.) “It started off as a fairly general inquiry,” says the former spook, who asks not to be identified.
And yes, the rival was named. It was the Washington Free Beacon. And Steele was hired after they dropped Fusion GPS.
And exactly what does that have to do with what is going on with the trump admin holding back, illegally, the whistle blower's urgent and valid whistle blower complaint from Congress that the Trump appointed IG stated was a valid complaint and urgent???People said Obama and Hillary are harming out nation. You giggle.I don't think it would be simple opposition research if it was understood to be a quid pro quo, for personal benefit of Trump in an upcoming election, who is an elected government official, using or holding back directly or indirectly, a government action approved by congress, so to get the foreign entity to do this personal action for such gvt elected official....What plot? Its simple "oppo research"? Like Hillary did with the "Steele Dossier". Not a problem like the dems have been saying all along...
18 U.S. Code § 201 - Bribery of public officials and witnesses
but we do NOT know at this point, if any of this happened.... there is speculation, and unsourced leaks etc....
The president and the DNI needs to stop breaking the law, allow the whistle blower's complaint go to the Intel committees as the law states... then the check on this would take place.
The Trump administrations hand picked Inspector General, stated that the whistle blower's complaint is a valid complaint, and said it was an URGENT National security RISK..... those type of whistle blower complaints SHALL go to congress, as per the law, for them to know about.... as it should be.
We do not know for certain if the whistle blower complaint was really about a "beautiful" phone conversation between Trump and the Ukraine president... that is just leaked sourcing.
but if the president really has nothing to hide, the whistle blower complaint, won't be any kind of problem for him.
the IG said this was URGENT and this stonewalling of the admin could HARM our nation, when it is labeled URGENT.... they need to send it to congress, as the law REQUIRES.
Harm is subjective.
And i bet you are a racist, science denying, religious fundamentalist.I bet you gobble up the manufactured, nonsensical myth of the Clinton bought Steele DossierF for wit.No I doubt oddball ever supported Clinton or "the one\"You mean, you will gobble up a manufactured,nonsensical myth to soothe yourself and to maintain your embarrasing cultism.Indeed...We'll soon discover that Trump bribed Ukrainian officials, to the tune of $1.5 billion of Murican taxpayer money, to cover up his good-for-nothing crack head son's criminal malfeasance.Abuse of power is an impeachable offense. We'll soon learn how involved trump was.
Oh wait....
Who didn't see that confession of surrender coming?And i bet you are a racist, science denying, religious fundamentalist.I bet you gobble up the manufactured, nonsensical myth of the Clinton bought Steele DossierF for wit.No I doubt oddball ever supported Clinton or "the one\"You mean, you will gobble up a manufactured,nonsensical myth to soothe yourself and to maintain your embarrasing cultism.Indeed...We'll soon discover that Trump bribed Ukrainian officials, to the tune of $1.5 billion of Murican taxpayer money, to cover up his good-for-nothing crack head son's criminal malfeasance.
Oh wait....
There, now we know what we think of each other.
Who didn't see your declaration of victory coming? If declarations of victory were actual victories, you would be a 12 star general by now.Who didn't see that confession of surrender coming?And i bet you are a racist, science denying, religious fundamentalist.I bet you gobble up the manufactured, nonsensical myth of the Clinton bought Steele DossierF for wit.No I doubt oddball ever supported Clinton or "the one\"You mean, you will gobble up a manufactured,nonsensical myth to soothe yourself and to maintain your embarrasing cultism.
There, now we know what we think of each other.
It's not been proven Biden did that for his son. There were several groups other than the U.S. who wanted Shokin ousted. And the U.S. wanted him out from the day he became the prosecutor general, though some news outlets are ignoring that and trying to make it appear that Biden acted alone and only when Shokin was fired. And there's also conflicting news stories about whether or not Shokin's investigation into Burisma Holdings was even active.Biden Used U.S. Aid as Weapon to Force Ukraine to Fire Prosecutor Looking Into His Son’s Business.NO Quid Pro Quo....Say who? WaPo is reporting that the secret source says there was no quid pro quo. Except for Biden of course, Biden bragged that he, with Obama's baclking threatened to withhold a Billion US taxpayer olloars unless they fired the prosecutor who was investigating Hunter Biden, and they fired him. Are you claiming that Biden and Obama committed a crime? Impeachable offenses?Trump wants an investigation as to whether JOE BIDEN intervened with the government of the Ukraine to end the investigation of Hunter Biden.
Trump cancelled the defence aid to the Ukraine after the President refused to investigate Joe Biden, and then re-instated the aid when Congress got wind of his requests to the Ukraine, but the whistle blower has direct knowledge of the phone call, and Congress should be told too.
If Biden wants to be President, he needs to get used to investigations of both he and his family members, and anyone he has associated with over the years.
Personally, I think Ukraine should investigate the whole family. And if they ask President Trump to extradite them, I think he should. Biden deserves a chance to face justice on these charges, no?
You realize of course that the Ukrainian President is coming to Washington next week, and that the Congress Leaders can meet with him directly and get his version of events. That's precisely WHY Trump reinstated the aid. Failure to give the promised aid to the Ukrainians would have exposed his extortion...
That was a sham cooked up by Hillary and Obama partisans in the DOJ and IC.... the Russia investigation...
What Biden brags about sounds to me like it's worth an investigation, why wouldn't we cooperate?... The American people do NOT want foreign leaders investigating American political rivals of the sitting American President...
From April 2019:
Two years after leaving office, Joe Biden couldn't resist the temptation last year to brag to an audience of foreign policy specialists about the time as vice president that he strong-armed Ukraine into firing its top prosecutor.
In his own words, with video cameras rolling, Biden described how he threatened Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in March 2016 that the Obama administration would pull $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees, sending the former Soviet republic toward insolvency, if it didn’t immediately fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin.
“I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion.’ I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money,’” Biden recalled telling Poroshenko.
“Well, son of a bitch, he got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time,” Biden told the Council on Foreign Relations event, insisting that President Obama was in on the threat.
Interviews with a half-dozen senior Ukrainian officials confirm Biden’s account, though they claim the pressure was applied over several months in late 2015 and early 2016, not just six hours of one dramatic day. Whatever the case, Poroshenko and Ukraine’s parliament obliged by ending Shokin’s tenure as prosecutor. Shokin was facing steep criticism in Ukraine, and among some U.S. officials, for not bringing enough corruption prosecutions when he was fired.
The prosecutor he got fired was leading a wide-ranging corruption probe into the natural gas firm Burisma Holdings that employed Biden’s younger son, Hunter, as a board member.
Ukranian officials began looking into why this investigation was shut down, and offered information to US Attorney General Bill Barr.
[A]s Biden's 2020 campaign ramped up over the past year, Lutsenko — the Ukrainian prosecutor that Biden once hailed as a "solid" replacement for Shokin -- began looking into what happened with the Burisma case that had been shut down...
Lutsenko said some of the evidence he knows about in the Burisma case may interest U.S. authorities and he'd like to present that information to new U.S. Attorney General William Barr, particularly the vice president’s intervention.
"Unfortunately, Mr. Biden had correlated and connected this aid with some of the HR (personnel) issues and changes in the prosecutor's office," Lutsenko said.
Ukraine did in fact re-open the case -- without any bidding by Trump.
It's an impeachable offense against... Trump?!?!!... here are good and valid reasons why Trump attempting to extort the Ukrainian government for his own political gain, is an impeachable offence....
Trump urged the Ukranians to look into a case of official corruption and unethical exertion of political pressure openly boasted of by Joe Biden himself and the guy who needs investigating is... Trump?!!?
By the way: the Deep State source who illegally leaked this to the media (of course) doesn't even allege there was any quid pro quo -- just what xhe claims was an improper "urging" of action.
It's now illegal and impeachable for a president to urge a foreign leader to open a corruption probe?
The things one learns from our very educated and very rational NeverTrump Genius Brigade.
No Crime for Trump...
Now Biden on the other hand is in deep shit because his Quid Pro Quo has been admitted to on tape and from official transcripts from about 9 different officials. But its Trump who is wrong for investigating a DEMOCRAT LIAR....
Liberal logic is absent here... They got there wittle fewings hurt....
MORE:
Joe Biden recently admitted he used his position as vice president to get an investigation squashed that had been launched into his son’s crooked business.
One of the things liberals say that makes Joe Biden qualified to become president is that he has foreign policy experience, but one of Uncle Joe’s stories about that experience is getting another look because it appears that Biden admitted using U.S. foreign aid as a weapon to stop an investigation into his son’s shady business dealings.
Biden himself seemed to have confirmed that he used his position as vice president to force the Ukrainian government to fire a prosecutor who was looking into son Hunter Biden’s business.
Biden forced Ukraine to fire a prosecutor who was going to investigate the corrupt oligarch his son Hunter worked for by threatening to withhold $1B. Biden brags about it on video
Jim Hanson
✔@Uncle_Jimbo
· Sep 20, 2019
Replying to @Uncle_Jimbo
Trump has every right to ask a foreign leader to investigate corrupt actions of a former US VP
It would be wrong to let Biden slide because he is running for office again. His abuse of power previously is a matter that deserves investigation regardlesshttps://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/09/world/europe/corruption-ukraine-joe-biden-son-hunter-biden-ties.html …
Joe Biden, His Son and the Case Against a Ukrainian Oligarch
As the vice president aims to curb corruption in Ukraine, Hunter Biden sits on the board of a Ukrainian company accused of having “illicit assets.”
nytimes.com
Well you did take the road to surrender by declaring 'racist'Who didn't see your declaration of victory coming? If declarations of victory were actual victories, you would be a 12 star general by now.Who didn't see that confession of surrender coming?And i bet you are a racist, science denying, religious fundamentalist.I bet you gobble up the manufactured, nonsensical myth of the Clinton bought Steele DossierF for wit.No I doubt oddball ever supported Clinton or "the one\"
There, now we know what we think of each other.
Oh, spying took place on President Trump's campaign during the 2016 presidential election as the Justice Department makes moves to investigate the origins of the Russia probe.I've seen no evidence Democrats spied on trump's campaign. Even trump eventually admitted when he accused Obama of spying on him in trump tower, he made it up.Nation Review writers are largely anti-Trumpers.Shit, even rightwing media is admitting this is a problem for trump...Say who? WaPo is reporting that the secret source says there was no quid pro quo. Except for Biden of course, Biden bragged that he, with Obama's baclking threatened to withhold a Billion US taxpayer olloars unless they fired the prosecutor who was investigating Hunter Biden, and they fired him. Are you claiming that Biden and Obama committed a crime? Impeachable offenses?You realize of course that the Ukrainian President is coming to Washington next week, and that the Congress Leaders can meet with him directly and get his version of events. That's precisely WHY Trump reinstated the aid. Failure to give the promised aid to the Ukrainians would have exposed his extortion...
That was a sham cooked up by Hillary and Obama partisans in the DOJ and IC.... the Russia investigation...
What Biden brags about sounds to me like it's worth an investigation, why wouldn't we cooperate?... The American people do NOT want foreign leaders investigating American political rivals of the sitting American President...
From April 2019:
Two years after leaving office, Joe Biden couldn't resist the temptation last year to brag to an audience of foreign policy specialists about the time as vice president that he strong-armed Ukraine into firing its top prosecutor.
In his own words, with video cameras rolling, Biden described how he threatened Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in March 2016 that the Obama administration would pull $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees, sending the former Soviet republic toward insolvency, if it didn’t immediately fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin.
“I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion.’ I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money,’” Biden recalled telling Poroshenko.
“Well, son of a bitch, he got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time,” Biden told the Council on Foreign Relations event, insisting that President Obama was in on the threat.
Interviews with a half-dozen senior Ukrainian officials confirm Biden’s account, though they claim the pressure was applied over several months in late 2015 and early 2016, not just six hours of one dramatic day. Whatever the case, Poroshenko and Ukraine’s parliament obliged by ending Shokin’s tenure as prosecutor. Shokin was facing steep criticism in Ukraine, and among some U.S. officials, for not bringing enough corruption prosecutions when he was fired.
The prosecutor he got fired was leading a wide-ranging corruption probe into the natural gas firm Burisma Holdings that employed Biden’s younger son, Hunter, as a board member.
Ukranian officials began looking into why this investigation was shut down, and offered information to US Attorney General Bill Barr.
[A]s Biden's 2020 campaign ramped up over the past year, Lutsenko — the Ukrainian prosecutor that Biden once hailed as a "solid" replacement for Shokin -- began looking into what happened with the Burisma case that had been shut down...
Lutsenko said some of the evidence he knows about in the Burisma case may interest U.S. authorities and he'd like to present that information to new U.S. Attorney General William Barr, particularly the vice president’s intervention.
"Unfortunately, Mr. Biden had correlated and connected this aid with some of the HR (personnel) issues and changes in the prosecutor's office," Lutsenko said.
Ukraine did in fact re-open the case -- without any bidding by Trump.
It's an impeachable offense against... Trump?!?!!... here are good and valid reasons why Trump attempting to extort the Ukrainian government for his own political gain, is an impeachable offence....
Trump urged the Ukranians to look into a case of official corruption and unethical exertion of political pressure openly boasted of by Joe Biden himself and the guy who needs investigating is... Trump?!!?
By the way: the Deep State source who illegally leaked this to the media (of course) doesn't even allege there was any quid pro quo -- just what xhe claims was an improper "urging" of action.
It's now illegal and impeachable for a president to urge a foreign leader to open a corruption probe?
The things one learns from our very educated and very rational NeverTrump Genius Brigade.
Wrong.
Another lie debunked-Biden & the Ukraine
Trump Whistleblower Complaint: The Obvious Problem with Rudy Giuliani's Spin on Ukraine | National Review
RUNNING INTERFERENCE FOR JOE BIDEN’S UKRAINE DEALS: The ‘Whistleblower’ Is the Deep State Interfering in Trump’s Ukraine Policy.
Related:
Biden openly admits that he forced the firing of the prosecutor that was investigating his son and leveraged $1B in US aid to get him fired.It's not been proven Biden did that for his son...Biden Used U.S. Aid as Weapon to Force Ukraine to Fire Prosecutor Looking Into His Son’s Business.NO Quid Pro Quo....Say who? WaPo is reporting that the secret source says there was no quid pro quo. Except for Biden of course, Biden bragged that he, with Obama's baclking threatened to withhold a Billion US taxpayer olloars unless they fired the prosecutor who was investigating Hunter Biden, and they fired him. Are you claiming that Biden and Obama committed a crime? Impeachable offenses?If Biden wants to be President, he needs to get used to investigations of both he and his family members, and anyone he has associated with over the years.
Personally, I think Ukraine should investigate the whole family. And if they ask President Trump to extradite them, I think he should. Biden deserves a chance to face justice on these charges, no?
You realize of course that the Ukrainian President is coming to Washington next week, and that the Congress Leaders can meet with him directly and get his version of events. That's precisely WHY Trump reinstated the aid. Failure to give the promised aid to the Ukrainians would have exposed his extortion...
That was a sham cooked up by Hillary and Obama partisans in the DOJ and IC.... the Russia investigation...
What Biden brags about sounds to me like it's worth an investigation, why wouldn't we cooperate?... The American people do NOT want foreign leaders investigating American political rivals of the sitting American President...
From April 2019:
Two years after leaving office, Joe Biden couldn't resist the temptation last year to brag to an audience of foreign policy specialists about the time as vice president that he strong-armed Ukraine into firing its top prosecutor.
In his own words, with video cameras rolling, Biden described how he threatened Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in March 2016 that the Obama administration would pull $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees, sending the former Soviet republic toward insolvency, if it didn’t immediately fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin.
“I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion.’ I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money,’” Biden recalled telling Poroshenko.
“Well, son of a bitch, he got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time,” Biden told the Council on Foreign Relations event, insisting that President Obama was in on the threat.
Interviews with a half-dozen senior Ukrainian officials confirm Biden’s account, though they claim the pressure was applied over several months in late 2015 and early 2016, not just six hours of one dramatic day. Whatever the case, Poroshenko and Ukraine’s parliament obliged by ending Shokin’s tenure as prosecutor. Shokin was facing steep criticism in Ukraine, and among some U.S. officials, for not bringing enough corruption prosecutions when he was fired.
The prosecutor he got fired was leading a wide-ranging corruption probe into the natural gas firm Burisma Holdings that employed Biden’s younger son, Hunter, as a board member.
Ukranian officials began looking into why this investigation was shut down, and offered information to US Attorney General Bill Barr.
[A]s Biden's 2020 campaign ramped up over the past year, Lutsenko — the Ukrainian prosecutor that Biden once hailed as a "solid" replacement for Shokin -- began looking into what happened with the Burisma case that had been shut down...
Lutsenko said some of the evidence he knows about in the Burisma case may interest U.S. authorities and he'd like to present that information to new U.S. Attorney General William Barr, particularly the vice president’s intervention.
"Unfortunately, Mr. Biden had correlated and connected this aid with some of the HR (personnel) issues and changes in the prosecutor's office," Lutsenko said.
Ukraine did in fact re-open the case -- without any bidding by Trump.
It's an impeachable offense against... Trump?!?!!... here are good and valid reasons why Trump attempting to extort the Ukrainian government for his own political gain, is an impeachable offence....
Trump urged the Ukranians to look into a case of official corruption and unethical exertion of political pressure openly boasted of by Joe Biden himself and the guy who needs investigating is... Trump?!!?
By the way: the Deep State source who illegally leaked this to the media (of course) doesn't even allege there was any quid pro quo -- just what xhe claims was an improper "urging" of action.
It's now illegal and impeachable for a president to urge a foreign leader to open a corruption probe?
The things one learns from our very educated and very rational NeverTrump Genius Brigade.
No Crime for Trump...
Now Biden on the other hand is in deep shit because his Quid Pro Quo has been admitted to on tape and from official transcripts from about 9 different officials. But its Trump who is wrong for investigating a DEMOCRAT LIAR....
Liberal logic is absent here... They got there wittle fewings hurt....
MORE:
Joe Biden recently admitted he used his position as vice president to get an investigation squashed that had been launched into his son’s crooked business.
One of the things liberals say that makes Joe Biden qualified to become president is that he has foreign policy experience, but one of Uncle Joe’s stories about that experience is getting another look because it appears that Biden admitted using U.S. foreign aid as a weapon to stop an investigation into his son’s shady business dealings.
Biden himself seemed to have confirmed that he used his position as vice president to force the Ukrainian government to fire a prosecutor who was looking into son Hunter Biden’s business.
Biden forced Ukraine to fire a prosecutor who was going to investigate the corrupt oligarch his son Hunter worked for by threatening to withhold $1B. Biden brags about it on video
Jim Hanson
✔@Uncle_Jimbo
· Sep 20, 2019
Replying to @Uncle_Jimbo
Trump has every right to ask a foreign leader to investigate corrupt actions of a former US VP
It would be wrong to let Biden slide because he is running for office again. His abuse of power previously is a matter that deserves investigation regardlesshttps://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/09/world/europe/corruption-ukraine-joe-biden-son-hunter-biden-ties.html …
Joe Biden, His Son and the Case Against a Ukrainian Oligarch
As the vice president aims to curb corruption in Ukraine, Hunter Biden sits on the board of a Ukrainian company accused of having “illicit assets.”
nytimes.com
Biden claims that he and Obama acted in concert.... trying to make it appear that Biden acted alone and only when Shokin was fired...
If any of this is true........Damn, It leaves me speechless.
Yes, there are many roads to surrender,in the mind of a message board 12 star general. Good for you. Enjoy.Well you did take the road to surrender by declaring 'racist'
She hired an Aneeican firm. Your insinuation that she hired them to hire Steele is baseless and unfounded.She paid an American firm. What law says she couldn't do that?A President asking a foreign leader to investigate his rival in exchange for something is not the same as someone doing research.What plot? Its simple "oppo research"? Like Hillary did with the "Steele Dossier". Not a problem like the dems have been saying all along...
In exchange for what? You don't know, do you?
Also, Hillary violated the law by paying money to a foreign agent for the dossier.
She used an American firm to hide where the money was really going.
And that means what.... that they're not a hard core rightwing site? Not everyone sees this as you do. Not even everyone on the right.A hardcore ani-Trump site:LOLOLYou don't want to be objective here, you want to hit trump.Shit, even rightwing media is admitting this is a problem for trump...Say who? WaPo is reporting that the secret source says there was no quid pro quo. Except for Biden of course, Biden bragged that he, with Obama's baclking threatened to withhold a Billion US taxpayer olloars unless they fired the prosecutor who was investigating Hunter Biden, and they fired him. Are you claiming that Biden and Obama committed a crime? Impeachable offenses?
That was a sham cooked up by Hillary and Obama partisans in the DOJ and IC.
What Biden brags about sounds to me like it's worth an investigation, why wouldn't we cooperate?
From April 2019:
Two years after leaving office, Joe Biden couldn't resist the temptation last year to brag to an audience of foreign policy specialists about the time as vice president that he strong-armed Ukraine into firing its top prosecutor.
In his own words, with video cameras rolling, Biden described how he threatened Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in March 2016 that the Obama administration would pull $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees, sending the former Soviet republic toward insolvency, if it didn’t immediately fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin.
“I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion.’ I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money,’” Biden recalled telling Poroshenko.
“Well, son of a bitch, he got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time,” Biden told the Council on Foreign Relations event, insisting that President Obama was in on the threat.
Interviews with a half-dozen senior Ukrainian officials confirm Biden’s account, though they claim the pressure was applied over several months in late 2015 and early 2016, not just six hours of one dramatic day. Whatever the case, Poroshenko and Ukraine’s parliament obliged by ending Shokin’s tenure as prosecutor. Shokin was facing steep criticism in Ukraine, and among some U.S. officials, for not bringing enough corruption prosecutions when he was fired.
The prosecutor he got fired was leading a wide-ranging corruption probe into the natural gas firm Burisma Holdings that employed Biden’s younger son, Hunter, as a board member.
Ukranian officials began looking into why this investigation was shut down, and offered information to US Attorney General Bill Barr.
[A]s Biden's 2020 campaign ramped up over the past year, Lutsenko — the Ukrainian prosecutor that Biden once hailed as a "solid" replacement for Shokin -- began looking into what happened with the Burisma case that had been shut down...
Lutsenko said some of the evidence he knows about in the Burisma case may interest U.S. authorities and he'd like to present that information to new U.S. Attorney General William Barr, particularly the vice president’s intervention.
"Unfortunately, Mr. Biden had correlated and connected this aid with some of the HR (personnel) issues and changes in the prosecutor's office," Lutsenko said.
Ukraine did in fact re-open the case -- without any bidding by Trump.
It's an impeachable offense against... Trump?!?!!
Trump urged the Ukranians to look into a case of official corruption and unethical exertion of political pressure openly boasted of by Joe Biden himself and the guy who needs investigating is... Trump?!!?
By the way: the Deep State source who illegally leaked this to the media (of course) doesn't even allege there was any quid pro quo -- just what xhe claims was an improper "urging" of action.
It's now illegal and impeachable for a president to urge a foreign leader to open a corruption probe?
The things one learns from our very educated and very rational NeverTrump Genius Brigade.
Wrong.
Another lie debunked-Biden & the Ukraine
Trump Whistleblower Complaint: The Obvious Problem with Rudy Giuliani's Spin on Ukraine | National Review
It's bullshit. Nothing to do with trump and everything to do with bullshit tactics being used these days.
It has to stop.
Dumbfuck, I posted a link to a hardcore rightwing site. Even some on the right can see trump is wrong. Open your blinders
Donald Trump -- Conservatives Should Stand against Him | National Review
Actually she laundered the payments through a law firm and reported her efforts to dig up dirt from Kremlin linked to use against Trump as "legal services".She hired an Aneeican firm. Your insinuation that she hired them to hire Steele is baseless and unfounded.She paid an American firm. What law says she couldn't do that?A President asking a foreign leader to investigate his rival in exchange for something is not the same as someone doing research.What plot? Its simple "oppo research"? Like Hillary did with the "Steele Dossier". Not a problem like the dems have been saying all along...
In exchange for what? You don't know, do you?
Also, Hillary violated the law by paying money to a foreign agent for the dossier.
She used an American firm to hide where the money was really going.
