Here you go, idiot. There were also lots of other references to it:
"With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account."
Except no where does he state that her actions exposed any secrets to our enemies. Without any evidence he asserted what was possible. That also means that is was possible that no hostile actors gained access to her personal e-mail account.
Jesus liberals are stupid. Exposing our secrets means she made them available, it doesn't mean they did or didn't get them. Comey also said we wouldn't know and he said her server was well known. If they didn't get them, he's saying it was a fluke.
Seriously, what difference does it make if they got them or not? Exposing them was betraying her country. You actually consider this defending her? That maybe despite her handing them our secrets on a silver platter it's possible though unlikely they didn't find them?
He never claimed she exposed our secrets. He never claimed she handed them our secrets. He never said it was a fluke if they didn't. These things are all in your head.
READ HIS STATEMENT. He clearly did say she exposed our secrets. What he said he could not prove is whether they got them or not.
And who gives a shit regarding her if they did or not? Exposing them was the crime and it was the betrayal of her country. To argue she exposed them but they didn't get them is irrelevant to her actions.
And again, Comey clearly said they probably did and if they did we probably would not know. READ HIS STATEMENT
Nor did he call her actions with regards to her private server a crime.
I've posted the link to his statement many times. You are still making up stuff he didn't say. But in this post fact era of the Groper Elect, par for the course. The one thing he did conclude was that someone close to her did have a commercial email account hacked. I think we all know who that was. How many of our secrets did they get from that?
Yes, you keep posting the link that says you are a liar. She clearly exposed our secrets. Then you ask if the Russians or other enemies got them as if that contradicts her crimes. And in that endeavor you ignore Comey saying they probably did and if they did we wouldn't know it.
You're blind, but not like justice, like a partisan hack