frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 46,398
- 9,887
- 2,030
The way the separation of powers work is that the Supreme Court gets to interpret the laws, if the President or Congress don't like their interpretation they're free to write ones that are clearer or fall within the boundaries of the interpretations of the US Constitution.
It doesn't matter how a law is written if you have activists judges lying about what the law means. Here is what Trump did, and you tell me how this can be misconstrued so badly that the little Commie in Hawaii could interpret this any different way than it's written:
View attachment 155532
Now you tell me that this law can be read any differently than above. Of course it can't. This moron activist judge decided he wasn't going to adhere to this law. There is nothing ambiguous about it. It's just that he is a buddy of Obama's.
I didn't say the Supreme Court don't change laws, interpretation of laws is a very important part of the whole process.
The only difference between a bastardized interpretation and rewriting the law is putting it into words. Other than that, you get the same results either way.
Well, it does matter how a law is written. Yes, different judges are going to interpret the law. But again, once you start playing dirty games and when YOU approve of those dirty games, you can't complain when dirty games come back against you.