Trump readies impeachment defense with eye on scoring political wins

[ABikerSailor]

Again, you Trump supporters need to review how impeachment happens. The House has the authority to impeach, and if they impeach a president, it then goes to the Senate, where the Senate votes to keep him or no. The House has zero say in keeping the president or not, they can only vote to impeach. The Senate has zero say in whether or not the president is impeached, they can only vote to keep them or not.

Trump's best case scenario is to end up like Clinton, impeached, but allowed to remain in office.

 

[Nostra]

Trump readies impeachment defense with eye on scoring political wins
Pat Cipollone, the top White House lawyer, spent the weekend working from his office on the second floor of the West Wing, preparing to defend a client who, at one point, was on the second floor of the executive residence suggesting the impeachment charges against him should be dismissed outright.

Local : 2020-01-13(Monday) 21:02:10
Found via nicer.app/news

Looks like the Dems are shooting themselves in the feet with their impeachment crusade..

He doesn’t need much defense when the Republicans in the Senate have decided that they just want a show trial.

A show trial would have a lot of witnesses, like Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, Ciaramella, Schiff, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, the Ohrs, Lynch, Barr, Durham, and the other deep state folks that got caught in the coup plots against Trump.
OTOH, the dems could call Bolton, Mulvaney, Pompeo and anyone else who would just claim executive privilege. That's the "show trial" view.

The "short trial" view just throws out all the 2nd hand evidence, and Article-2, and just dismisses them for lack of evidence and lack of constitutionality. Article-2 is thrown out because the USSC just took the Trump vs. House subpoena for his tax records, so Trump does in-fact have the right to appeal to the courts and that is NOT "obstruction of the House". Supreme Court ruling pulls rug out from under article of impeachment

That doesn’t make any sense. None of those people you listed have anything to do with the actual allegations or impeachment against Trump. They’re just a list of people that Trump supporters want to get revenge on.

On the other hand, Mulvaney, Bolton, Giuliani and Pompeo are all relevant witnesses. If they want to claim executive privilege, then it’ll be an interesting test case to see if that claim stands up since its never been used before in this context.

You sound desperate.
Well, you should be!

I’m not the one here desperately trying to hide the truth.

You just deny it.

 

[Nostra]

On the other hand, Mulvaney, Bolton, Giuliani and Pompeo are all relevant witnesses. If they want to claim executive privilege, then it’ll be an interesting test case to see if that claim stands up since its never been used before in this context.

How do you figure?

What would those 4 men testify to, that proves anything in this matter of impeachment ?

Further, Mr. Giuliani is the President's attorney, having a defendant's attorney testify in a trial is highly unusual.

Why bother even calling them to testify, Dems and the fake news are just going to make shit up anyway regardless of what they say.

You mean like when Trump repeatedly lied about his phone call with Zelinsky?

Can’t wait for Trump to be forced to defend that call

He already has, idiot.

 

[BluesLegend]

Again, you Trump supporters need to review how impeachment happens. The House has the authority to impeach, and if they impeach a president, it then goes to the Senate, where the Senate votes to keep him or no. The House has zero say in keeping the president or not, they can only vote to impeach. The Senate has zero say in whether or not the president is impeached, they can only vote to keep them or not.

Trump's best case scenario is to end up like Clinton, impeached, but allowed to remain in office.

The Dem House impeachment has ED, Schiff needs to take a handful of blue pills.

 

[rightwinger]

Overwhelming majority of Americans feel that call to Zelensky was inappropriate

Let Trump defend it on the campaign trail

 

[rightwinger]

On the other hand, Mulvaney, Bolton, Giuliani and Pompeo are all relevant witnesses. If they want to claim executive privilege, then it’ll be an interesting test case to see if that claim stands up since its never been used before in this context.

How do you figure?

What would those 4 men testify to, that proves anything in this matter of impeachment ?

Further, Mr. Giuliani is the President's attorney, having a defendant's attorney testify in a trial is highly unusual.

Why bother even calling them to testify, Dems and the fake news are just going to make shit up anyway regardless of what they say.

You mean like when Trump repeatedly lied about his phone call with Zelinsky?

Can’t wait for Trump to be forced to defend that call

He already has, idiot.

Oh yes

Let him explain how it was “perfect”
Perfect enough to get impeached

 

[Polishprince]

Again, you Trump supporters need to review how impeachment happens. The House has the authority to impeach, and if they impeach a president, it then goes to the Senate, where the Senate votes to keep him or no. The House has zero say in keeping the president or not, they can only vote to impeach. The Senate has zero say in whether or not the president is impeached, they can only vote to keep them or not.

Trump's best case scenario is to end up like Clinton, impeached, but allowed to remain in office.

That's exactly what is going to happen. Trump was impeached by the extremist partisan House, but will be exonerated by the Senate

 

[BluesLegend]

Overwhelming majority of Americans feel that call to Zelensky was inappropriate

Let Trump defend it on the campaign trail

And then you woke up from your dream lib.

 

[BluesLegend]

Again, you Trump supporters need to review how impeachment happens. The House has the authority to impeach, and if they impeach a president, it then goes to the Senate, where the Senate votes to keep him or no. The House has zero say in keeping the president or not, they can only vote to impeach. The Senate has zero say in whether or not the president is impeached, they can only vote to keep them or not.

Trump's best case scenario is to end up like Clinton, impeached, but allowed to remain in office.

That's exactly what is going to happen. Trump was impeached by the extremist partisan House, but will be exonerated by the Senate

Hell they couldn't even get all the House Dems to vote yes then several Senate Dems rolled their eyes.

 

[Polishprince]

How do you figure?

What would those 4 men testify to, that proves anything in this matter of impeachment ?

Further, Mr. Giuliani is the President's attorney, having a defendant's attorney testify in a trial is highly unusual.

Why bother even calling them to testify, Dems and the fake news are just going to make shit up anyway regardless of what they say.

You mean like when Trump repeatedly lied about his phone call with Zelinsky?

Can’t wait for Trump to be forced to defend that call

He already has, idiot.

Oh yes

Let him explain how it was “perfect”
Perfect enough to get impeached

The Partisan House was destined to impeach him since the D's got a majority.

What he did, or didn't do, was inconsequential.

 

[kyzr]

First Impeached President ever to run for re election

Should make for some nice debates

The debates should be great TV, especially after Barr and Durham prove the biggest scandal in US history against the democrats, that being the "break into" the Trump campaign by the Obama admin using the intel agencies, foreign assets, the FBI, DOJ, and falsified FISA warrants. Those debates should be hilarious.

 

[Nostra]

Nazi Pelousy spent the past month desperately trying to figure out how to make this go away.

She couldn't come up with anything, so she is about to slink over to MItch with her clusterfuck.

 

[Polishprince]

Overwhelming majority of Americans feel that call to Zelensky was inappropriate

Let Trump defend it on the campaign trail

President Trump will try squeeze something in about the call. But he is more interested in talking about how al-Baghdadi begged for mercy and crapped himself, before he got whacked- very similar to when Frank Lopez was killed.

And Mr. Trump will also be talking a lot about the texts between Strzok and Page.

 

[Polishprince]

The debates should be great TV, especially after Barr and Durham prove the biggest scandal in US history against the democrats, that being the "break into" the Trump campaign by the Obama admin using the intel agencies, foreign assets, the FBI, DOJ, and falsified FISA warrants. Those debates should be hilarious.

What will happen during the Biden-Trump debate is that Vice President Biden will repeat Reagan's line to Mondale about not "taking advantage of Trump's youth and inexperience"

After that, the rest of the campaign will be the libs insisting that the remark was a Sleepy Joe original and not stolen from Reagan.

 

[kyzr]

Trump readies impeachment defense with eye on scoring political wins
Pat Cipollone, the top White House lawyer, spent the weekend working from his office on the second floor of the West Wing, preparing to defend a client who, at one point, was on the second floor of the executive residence suggesting the impeachment charges against him should be dismissed outright.

Local : 2020-01-13(Monday) 21:02:10
Found via nicer.app/news

Looks like the Dems are shooting themselves in the feet with their impeachment crusade..

He doesn’t need much defense when the Republicans in the Senate have decided that they just want a show trial.

A show trial would have a lot of witnesses, like Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, Ciaramella, Schiff, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, the Ohrs, Lynch, Barr, Durham, and the other deep state folks that got caught in the coup plots against Trump.
OTOH, the dems could call Bolton, Mulvaney, Pompeo and anyone else who would just claim executive privilege. That's the "show trial" view.

The "short trial" view just throws out all the 2nd hand evidence, and Article-2, and just dismisses them for lack of evidence and lack of constitutionality. Article-2 is thrown out because the USSC just took the Trump vs. House subpoena for his tax records, so Trump does in-fact have the right to appeal to the courts and that is NOT "obstruction of the House". Supreme Court ruling pulls rug out from under article of impeachment

That doesn’t make any sense. None of those people you listed have anything to do with the actual allegations or impeachment against Trump. They’re just a list of people that Trump supporters want to get revenge on.

On the other hand, Mulvaney, Bolton, Giuliani and Pompeo are all relevant witnesses. If they want to claim executive privilege, then it’ll be an interesting test case to see if that claim stands up since its never been used before in this context.

The defense witnesses list can be used to prove the various conspiracies against Trump, plus the Bidens cash cow, Burisma, and how the whistle-blower was used against Trump as a deep state plant, put there by Brennan and and coached by Schiff, and especially the impeachment "coup" as just one more plot in a sequence of plots against Trump. The defense witnesses are all about motive and the various conspiracies against Trump. No other president has had anything close to the level of hatred and opposition that Trump has had. The "impeachment" was not warranted and was only done to inflict political damage.
The "Executive Privilege" claim would take years to litigate, so basically there are no witnesses that are of any use to the democrats.

 

[mudwhistle]

First Impeached President ever to run for re election

Should make for some nice debates

And that's the only reason he was really impeached.
Not because he did something worthy of impeachment.....but they needed a talking-point during the campaign.
thanks for the admission

Primary reason was they all know their candidates suck ass.

 

[colfax_m]

Trump readies impeachment defense with eye on scoring political wins
Pat Cipollone, the top White House lawyer, spent the weekend working from his office on the second floor of the West Wing, preparing to defend a client who, at one point, was on the second floor of the executive residence suggesting the impeachment charges against him should be dismissed outright.

Local : 2020-01-13(Monday) 21:02:10
Found via nicer.app/news

Looks like the Dems are shooting themselves in the feet with their impeachment crusade..

He doesn’t need much defense when the Republicans in the Senate have decided that they just want a show trial.

A show trial would have a lot of witnesses, like Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, Ciaramella, Schiff, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, the Ohrs, Lynch, Barr, Durham, and the other deep state folks that got caught in the coup plots against Trump.
OTOH, the dems could call Bolton, Mulvaney, Pompeo and anyone else who would just claim executive privilege. That's the "show trial" view.

The "short trial" view just throws out all the 2nd hand evidence, and Article-2, and just dismisses them for lack of evidence and lack of constitutionality. Article-2 is thrown out because the USSC just took the Trump vs. House subpoena for his tax records, so Trump does in-fact have the right to appeal to the courts and that is NOT "obstruction of the House". Supreme Court ruling pulls rug out from under article of impeachment

That doesn’t make any sense. None of those people you listed have anything to do with the actual allegations or impeachment against Trump. They’re just a list of people that Trump supporters want to get revenge on.

On the other hand, Mulvaney, Bolton, Giuliani and Pompeo are all relevant witnesses. If they want to claim executive privilege, then it’ll be an interesting test case to see if that claim stands up since its never been used before in this context.

The defense witnesses list can be used to prove the various conspiracies against Trump, plus the Bidens cash cow, Burisma, and how the whistle-blower was used against Trump as a deep state plant, put there by Brennan and and coached by Schiff, and especially the impeachment "coup" as just one more plot in a sequence of plots against Trump. The defense witnesses are all about motive and the various conspiracies against Trump. No other president has had anything close to the level of hatred and opposition that Trump has had. The "impeachment" was not warranted and was only done to inflict political damage.
The "Executive Privilege" claim would take years to litigate, so basically there are no witnesses that are of any use to the democrats.

The impeachment has nothing to do with “various” conspiracies against Trump.

No one has ever claimed executive privilege in an impeachment trial. Nixon couldn’t even claim it in an impeachment investigation. I don’t think the claim would get very far but I’d love to see how it all goes down.

 

[beagle9]

Trump readies impeachment defense with eye on scoring political wins
Pat Cipollone, the top White House lawyer, spent the weekend working from his office on the second floor of the West Wing, preparing to defend a client who, at one point, was on the second floor of the executive residence suggesting the impeachment charges against him should be dismissed outright.

Local : 2020-01-13(Monday) 21:02:10
Found via nicer.app/news

Looks like the Dems are shooting themselves in the feet with their impeachment crusade..

He doesn’t need much defense when the Republicans in the Senate have decided that they just want a show trial.

A show trial would have a lot of witnesses, like Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, Ciaramella, Schiff, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, the Ohrs, Lynch, Barr, Durham, and the other deep state folks that got caught in the coup plots against Trump.
OTOH, the dems could call Bolton, Mulvaney, Pompeo and anyone else who would just claim executive privilege. That's the "show trial" view.

The "short trial" view just throws out all the 2nd hand evidence, and Article-2, and just dismisses them for lack of evidence and lack of constitutionality. Article-2 is thrown out because the USSC just took the Trump vs. House subpoena for his tax records, so Trump does in-fact have the right to appeal to the courts and that is NOT "obstruction of the House". Supreme Court ruling pulls rug out from under article of impeachment

That doesn’t make any sense. None of those people you listed have anything to do with the actual allegations or impeachment against Trump. They’re just a list of people that Trump supporters want to get revenge on.

On the other hand, Mulvaney, Bolton, Giuliani and Pompeo are all relevant witnesses. If they want to claim executive privilege, then it’ll be an interesting test case to see if that claim stands up since its never been used before in this context.

The defense witnesses list can be used to prove the various conspiracies against Trump, plus the Bidens cash cow, Burisma, and how the whistle-blower was used against Trump as a deep state plant, put there by Brennan and and coached by Schiff, and especially the impeachment "coup" as just one more plot in a sequence of plots against Trump. The defense witnesses are all about motive and the various conspiracies against Trump. No other president has had anything close to the level of hatred and opposition that Trump has had. The "impeachment" was not warranted and was only done to inflict political damage.
The "Executive Privilege" claim would take years to litigate, so basically there are no witnesses that are of any use to the democrats.

The impeachment has nothing to do with “various” conspiracies against Trump.

No one has ever claimed executive privilege in an impeachment trial. Nixon couldn’t even claim it in an impeachment investigation. I don’t think the claim would get very far but I’d love to see how it all goes down.

Says you.... Rotflmbo.... It has everything to do with all the attempts to get Trump, and the American people know it. One thing about the American's, and that is that they ain't dumb about all that's went down since 2016 and before. Hopes for them to be dumb about it all ain't happening. They are more politically in tune now than ever before in this country.

 

[SAYIT]

Trump readies impeachment defense with eye on scoring political wins
Pat Cipollone, the top White House lawyer, spent the weekend working from his office on the second floor of the West Wing, preparing to defend a client who, at one point, was on the second floor of the executive residence suggesting the impeachment charges against him should be dismissed outright.

Local : 2020-01-13(Monday) 21:02:10
Found via nicer.app/news

Looks like the Dems are shooting themselves in the feet with their impeachment crusade..

It's a can of worms that will boomerang nicely on them. Karma is a bitch.

 

[mudwhistle]

He doesn’t need much defense when the Republicans in the Senate have decided that they just want a show trial.

A show trial would have a lot of witnesses, like Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, Ciaramella, Schiff, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, the Ohrs, Lynch, Barr, Durham, and the other deep state folks that got caught in the coup plots against Trump.
OTOH, the dems could call Bolton, Mulvaney, Pompeo and anyone else who would just claim executive privilege. That's the "show trial" view.

The "short trial" view just throws out all the 2nd hand evidence, and Article-2, and just dismisses them for lack of evidence and lack of constitutionality. Article-2 is thrown out because the USSC just took the Trump vs. House subpoena for his tax records, so Trump does in-fact have the right to appeal to the courts and that is NOT "obstruction of the House". Supreme Court ruling pulls rug out from under article of impeachment

That doesn’t make any sense. None of those people you listed have anything to do with the actual allegations or impeachment against Trump. They’re just a list of people that Trump supporters want to get revenge on.

On the other hand, Mulvaney, Bolton, Giuliani and Pompeo are all relevant witnesses. If they want to claim executive privilege, then it’ll be an interesting test case to see if that claim stands up since its never been used before in this context.

The defense witnesses list can be used to prove the various conspiracies against Trump, plus the Bidens cash cow, Burisma, and how the whistle-blower was used against Trump as a deep state plant, put there by Brennan and and coached by Schiff, and especially the impeachment "coup" as just one more plot in a sequence of plots against Trump. The defense witnesses are all about motive and the various conspiracies against Trump. No other president has had anything close to the level of hatred and opposition that Trump has had. The "impeachment" was not warranted and was only done to inflict political damage.
The "Executive Privilege" claim would take years to litigate, so basically there are no witnesses that are of any use to the democrats.

The impeachment has nothing to do with “various” conspiracies against Trump.

No one has ever claimed executive privilege in an impeachment trial. Nixon couldn’t even claim it in an impeachment investigation. I don’t think the claim would get very far but I’d love to see how it all goes down.

Says you.... Rotflmbo.... It has everything to do with all the attempts to get Trump, and the American people know it. One thing about the American's, and that is that they ain't dumb about all that's went down since 2016 and before. Hopes for them to be dumb about it all ain't happening. They are more politically in tune now than ever before in this country.

The primary reason the media has been trashing Trump since the day he was elected was for one purpose.....to get everyone to agree that these unethical and illegal impeachment tactics would be acceptable to the American people. They turned Trump into a monster that everyone could hate....then they made up a reason to impeach him.

Now we discover that Pelosi is planning more impeachments......literally giving away the purpose for the impeachment in the first place. Somebody has to stop this massive waste of time and money and start charging these people with criminal conspiracy under RICO predicates.