TNHarley
Diamond Member
- Sep 27, 2012
- 94,762
- 57,413
- 2,605
- Thread starter
- #21
Actually, I don't. I agree with a lot of it...I'm far more concerned that he'd try to replace the First Amendment.
Start there.
Well Obama and Hillary want to replace the Second Amendment, I think that's even more concerning for the American people.
Well no they don't, and well no it isn't.
The First Amendment is the keystone, upon which all else is built. You can't build anything without it except a dictatorship.
That's why they made it Number One.
And Rump has already declared war on it, in multiple ways.
Now, the Constitution itself has safeguards against a nutjob just taking a hacksaw to it, but that's what he wants to do. That alone should have people running for the exits. But we have a saying, "nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public", popularly attributed to H.L. Mencken (himself a conservative).
No doubt the OP will find this "funny" as well, but without the building block of Free Speech --- you have nothing. And it doesn't frickin' matter who is or isn't the head of the Fed, because you're already, to use the technical term, "fucked".
What makes you think trump would try to attack the first amendment?
What makes you think Obama and Hillary don't/want to?
Have you been living in a cave?
--- doesn't get much more hit-over-the-head direct than that, does it??
Then before that there was the other scam about registering and/or deporting people on the basis of their religion, which is...again.... First Amendment.
Can't possibly be more obvious in its unAmericanality.
Against that, who he'd replace or not replace at the Department of Putting Things on Top of Other Things kinda pales in comparison. And it pales way more than that sickly orange skin.
actual malice?