Trump should delay State of the Union until impeachment trial ends

[Ame®icano]

They have failed to impeach him, to this point.
They still may.
They voted to, they simply are having second thoughts, or doubts, or sobered up, I dunno.

The * will be that he fought a coup ( that took different forms) for his entire first term and was elected to a second term by an even greater margin than the first.

they impeached him. it's a done deal. poor you. poor donny. he will forever be in the history books as the 3rd prez to be impeached. tutt tutt.

It doesn't bother you lefties to still celebrate Clinton who was impeached for actual crime. Trump was impeached because you lefties are still butthurt over 2016 election. I say, keep dilating, cause more butthurt is coming in November.

What was Clinton’s crime? Perjury? Was he convicted of that crime in a court of law?

It didn't go to the court of law dummy. If it did, he would be convicted. Enough to get him disbarred from practicing law in front of high court.

No indictment. No conviction. No crime. Right?

Wrong. It's in different order. Crime, indictment, conviction.

The difference in between Clinton and Trump impeachment is that Clinton committed perjury, it's proven he lied, so there is a crime. He wasn't indicted because he was a sitting president, and according to DOJ rules, sitting president cannot be indicted. Being acquitted in Senate, doesn't clear him from perjury, or crime. He could've been indicted and convicted after presidency, but nobody went after him, except he paid fines and got disbarred.

Unlike Clinton, Trump hasn't committed any crime, and even if he did, the House failed to prove it, but they impeached him anyways.

 

[LoneLaugher]

they impeached him. it's a done deal. poor you. poor donny. he will forever be in the history books as the 3rd prez to be impeached. tutt tutt.

It doesn't bother you lefties to still celebrate Clinton who was impeached for actual crime. Trump was impeached because you lefties are still butthurt over 2016 election. I say, keep dilating, cause more butthurt is coming in November.

What was Clinton’s crime? Perjury? Was he convicted of that crime in a court of law?

It didn't go to the court of law dummy. If it did, he would be convicted. Enough to get him disbarred from practicing law in front of high court.

No indictment. No conviction. No crime. Right?

Wrong. It's in different order. Crime, indictment, conviction.

The difference in between Clinton and Trump impeachment is that Clinton committed perjury, it's proven he lied, so there is a crime. He wasn't indicted because he was a sitting president, and according to DOJ rules, sitting president cannot be indicted. Being acquitted in Senate, doesn't clear him from perjury, or crime. He could've been indicted and convicted after presidency, but nobody went after him, except he paid fines and got disbarred.

Unlike Clinton, Trump hasn't committed any crime, and even if he did, the House failed to prove it, but they impeached him anyways.

Please. He wasn’t indicted for obstruction because he’s the sitting president. And his fat ass wouldn’t answer questions under oath about what he ate for breakfast because he simply cannot speak honestly.

Fuck off.

 

[Ame®icano]

It doesn't bother you lefties to still celebrate Clinton who was impeached for actual crime. Trump was impeached because you lefties are still butthurt over 2016 election. I say, keep dilating, cause more butthurt is coming in November.

What was Clinton’s crime? Perjury? Was he convicted of that crime in a court of law?

It didn't go to the court of law dummy. If it did, he would be convicted. Enough to get him disbarred from practicing law in front of high court.

No indictment. No conviction. No crime. Right?

Wrong. It's in different order. Crime, indictment, conviction.

The difference in between Clinton and Trump impeachment is that Clinton committed perjury, it's proven he lied, so there is a crime. He wasn't indicted because he was a sitting president, and according to DOJ rules, sitting president cannot be indicted. Being acquitted in Senate, doesn't clear him from perjury, or crime. He could've been indicted and convicted after presidency, but nobody went after him, except he paid fines and got disbarred.

Unlike Clinton, Trump hasn't committed any crime, and even if he did, the House failed to prove it, but they impeached him anyways.

Please. He wasn’t indicted for obstruction because he’s the sitting president. And his fat ass wouldn’t answer questions under oath about what he ate for breakfast because he simply cannot speak honestly.

Fuck off.

Under executive privilege, he doesn't have to answer questions. You got that, right?

And your reaction tells all. I just love to piss off lefties.

 

[LoneLaugher]

What was Clinton’s crime? Perjury? Was he convicted of that crime in a court of law?

It didn't go to the court of law dummy. If it did, he would be convicted. Enough to get him disbarred from practicing law in front of high court.

No indictment. No conviction. No crime. Right?

Wrong. It's in different order. Crime, indictment, conviction.

The difference in between Clinton and Trump impeachment is that Clinton committed perjury, it's proven he lied, so there is a crime. He wasn't indicted because he was a sitting president, and according to DOJ rules, sitting president cannot be indicted. Being acquitted in Senate, doesn't clear him from perjury, or crime. He could've been indicted and convicted after presidency, but nobody went after him, except he paid fines and got disbarred.

Unlike Clinton, Trump hasn't committed any crime, and even if he did, the House failed to prove it, but they impeached him anyways.

Please. He wasn’t indicted for obstruction because he’s the sitting president. And his fat ass wouldn’t answer questions under oath about what he ate for breakfast because he simply cannot speak honestly.

Fuck off.

Under executive privilege, he doesn't have to answer questions. You got that, right?

And your reaction tells all. I just love to piss off lefties.

Dude. I’m reclining on my deck with a cigar and a glass of JW Black. I ain’t pissed.

You are desperate.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Called ID, douchebag and I don't trust the *67 BS. Sorry, I don't trust Leftists. We can chat right here about how people like you are ruining this country by labeling those who disagree with you politically as Trump "worshipers". Loser.

Boring. Let’s talk.

NEVER. Nice try though...

OK. Shorty.

Dude, I am taller than you. Man, you have major issues.

You are? How tall am I?

6’2 at best and you weigh like 230 cause you’re fat.

 

[Ame®icano]

It didn't go to the court of law dummy. If it did, he would be convicted. Enough to get him disbarred from practicing law in front of high court.

No indictment. No conviction. No crime. Right?

Wrong. It's in different order. Crime, indictment, conviction.

The difference in between Clinton and Trump impeachment is that Clinton committed perjury, it's proven he lied, so there is a crime. He wasn't indicted because he was a sitting president, and according to DOJ rules, sitting president cannot be indicted. Being acquitted in Senate, doesn't clear him from perjury, or crime. He could've been indicted and convicted after presidency, but nobody went after him, except he paid fines and got disbarred.

Unlike Clinton, Trump hasn't committed any crime, and even if he did, the House failed to prove it, but they impeached him anyways.

Please. He wasn’t indicted for obstruction because he’s the sitting president. And his fat ass wouldn’t answer questions under oath about what he ate for breakfast because he simply cannot speak honestly.

Fuck off.

Under executive privilege, he doesn't have to answer questions. You got that, right?

And your reaction tells all. I just love to piss off lefties.

Dude. I’m reclining on my deck with a cigar and a glass of JW Black. I ain’t pissed.

You are desperate.

"I ain't pissed"

LOL

Fuck off.

Not at all.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Boring. Let’s talk.

NEVER. Nice try though...

OK. Shorty.

Dude, I am taller than you. Man, you have major issues.

You are? How tall am I?

6’2 at best and you weigh like 230 cause you’re fat.

You nailed my height. I must have told you at some point. Good memory.

You’re way off on the weight, though. Sad for you.

 

[LoneLaugher]

No indictment. No conviction. No crime. Right?

Wrong. It's in different order. Crime, indictment, conviction.

The difference in between Clinton and Trump impeachment is that Clinton committed perjury, it's proven he lied, so there is a crime. He wasn't indicted because he was a sitting president, and according to DOJ rules, sitting president cannot be indicted. Being acquitted in Senate, doesn't clear him from perjury, or crime. He could've been indicted and convicted after presidency, but nobody went after him, except he paid fines and got disbarred.

Unlike Clinton, Trump hasn't committed any crime, and even if he did, the House failed to prove it, but they impeached him anyways.

Please. He wasn’t indicted for obstruction because he’s the sitting president. And his fat ass wouldn’t answer questions under oath about what he ate for breakfast because he simply cannot speak honestly.

Fuck off.

Under executive privilege, he doesn't have to answer questions. You got that, right?

And your reaction tells all. I just love to piss off lefties.

Dude. I’m reclining on my deck with a cigar and a glass of JW Black. I ain’t pissed.

You are desperate.

"I ain't pissed"

LOL

Fuck off.

Not at all.

You might be a little sensitive.

 

[Ame®icano]

Wrong. It's in different order. Crime, indictment, conviction.

The difference in between Clinton and Trump impeachment is that Clinton committed perjury, it's proven he lied, so there is a crime. He wasn't indicted because he was a sitting president, and according to DOJ rules, sitting president cannot be indicted. Being acquitted in Senate, doesn't clear him from perjury, or crime. He could've been indicted and convicted after presidency, but nobody went after him, except he paid fines and got disbarred.

Unlike Clinton, Trump hasn't committed any crime, and even if he did, the House failed to prove it, but they impeached him anyways.

Please. He wasn’t indicted for obstruction because he’s the sitting president. And his fat ass wouldn’t answer questions under oath about what he ate for breakfast because he simply cannot speak honestly.

Fuck off.

Under executive privilege, he doesn't have to answer questions. You got that, right?

And your reaction tells all. I just love to piss off lefties.

Dude. I’m reclining on my deck with a cigar and a glass of JW Black. I ain’t pissed.

You are desperate.

"I ain't pissed"

LOL

Fuck off.

Not at all.

You might be a little sensitive.

Sensitive to what? Your "fuck off"? On the contrary, that proves your insensitivity and incapability to make an argument. And that you're moron.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Please. He wasn’t indicted for obstruction because he’s the sitting president. And his fat ass wouldn’t answer questions under oath about what he ate for breakfast because he simply cannot speak honestly.

Fuck off.

Under executive privilege, he doesn't have to answer questions. You got that, right?

And your reaction tells all. I just love to piss off lefties.

Dude. I’m reclining on my deck with a cigar and a glass of JW Black. I ain’t pissed.

You are desperate.

"I ain't pissed"

LOL

Fuck off.

Not at all.

You might be a little sensitive.

Sensitive to what? Your "fuck off"? On the contrary, that proves your insensitivity and incapability to make an argument. And that you're moron.

Nah. It’s simply part of my lexicon. You might need to get out more.

 

[Ame®icano]

Under executive privilege, he doesn't have to answer questions. You got that, right?

And your reaction tells all. I just love to piss off lefties.

Dude. I’m reclining on my deck with a cigar and a glass of JW Black. I ain’t pissed.

You are desperate.

"I ain't pissed"

LOL

Fuck off.

Not at all.

You might be a little sensitive.

Sensitive to what? Your "fuck off"? On the contrary, that proves your insensitivity and incapability to make an argument. And that you're moron.

Nah. It’s simply part of my lexicon. You might need to get out more.

Just because you got out of closet, doesn't mean everyone else is faggot.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

NEVER. Nice try though...

OK. Shorty.

Dude, I am taller than you. Man, you have major issues.

You are? How tall am I?

6’2 at best and you weigh like 230 cause you’re fat.

You nailed my height. I must have told you at some point. Good memory.

You’re way off on the weight, though. Sad for you.

I do not believe so. But whatever. When you learn to listen and not point fingers and judge you may actually evolve, little man.

 

[Billiejeens]

they impeached him. it's a done deal. poor you. poor donny. he will forever be in the history books as the 3rd prez to be impeached. tutt tutt.

It doesn't bother you lefties to still celebrate Clinton who was impeached for actual crime. Trump was impeached because you lefties are still butthurt over 2016 election. I say, keep dilating, cause more butthurt is coming in November.

What was Clinton’s crime? Perjury? Was he convicted of that crime in a court of law?

It didn't go to the court of law dummy. If it did, he would be convicted. Enough to get him disbarred from practicing law in front of high court.

No indictment. No conviction. No crime. Right?

Wrong. It's in different order. Crime, indictment, conviction.

The difference in between Clinton and Trump impeachment is that Clinton committed perjury, it's proven he lied, so there is a crime. He wasn't indicted because he was a sitting president, and according to DOJ rules, sitting president cannot be indicted. Being acquitted in Senate, doesn't clear him from perjury, or crime. He could've been indicted and convicted after presidency, but nobody went after him, except he paid fines and got disbarred.

Unlike Clinton, Trump hasn't committed any crime, and even if he did, the House failed to prove it, but they impeached him anyways.

They haven't impeached him yet.
They did vote to impeach him, but for whatever reason, or no reason they have failed to do so to this point.
This is buttressed by the face that the house is supposedly going to impeach this week.

Idiots - he is impeached.
Non-idiots - technically not impeached yet.
Idiots - yes he is.
Non-idiots - technically not impeached yet.
Idiots - yes he is.
Non-idiots - then why has the house scheduled impeachment for this week?
Idiots - he is impeached.
Non-idiots - well you should tell Pelosi, she doesn't seem to know.

 

[playtime]

that's a lie. wtf are you talking about? he was in on that call AND the so called transcript donny tried peddling is edited per the testimony of the first hand direct knowledge of that phone call.

Keep telling yourself that. The transcript speaks for itself. The only “editing” is from you uninformed idiots. You still have nothing. Try again loser.

you do understand what a memorandum is, right? what verbatim means, right?

<ahem>

CAUTION: A Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation.· (TELCON) is not a verbatim transcript of a discussion. The text in this document records the notes and recollections of Situation Room Duty "Officers and-NSC policy staff assigned t_o listen.and memorialize the conversation in written form as the conversation takes place. A numper of factors can affect 'the accuracy of the reco�d, including poor telecommunications connections and variations in accent and/or interpretation. The word "inaudible" is used to indifate portions of a conversation that the notetaker was unable to hear.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

White House Ukraine Expert Sought to Correct Transcript of Trump Call
Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, who heard President Trump’s July phone call with Ukraine’s president and was alarmed, testified that he tried and failed to add key details to the rough transcript.
White House Ukraine Expert Sought to Correct Transcript of Trump Call

Pathetic attempt at deflection by a drunk, uneducated idiot. You’re getting your ass kicked all over here. Gee, you haven’t come up with ONE legitimate argument. No surprise there. If that’s from an official site (doubtful given the multitude of errors there, you probably typed that yourself.). Caught lying again.

sooooooooooooo................ the actual 'transcript' that donny released, straight from the white house site isn't good enough? yep, you have cheeto dust all over you from being that far up donny's colon.

Remove yourself from Michael Obozo’s ass, the echo is confusing people. Try again, you’re failing badly and being laughed at by all. Your pathetic deflection because, as always, you have NOTHING, is noted. Perhaps I’ll let my 3 year old slap you around. She knows more than you do.

yaaaaaa - just as i thought - - - you got nuthin' to refudiate. better luck next time.

 

[playtime]

Yep. That means I am a “worshipper”

You will vote for him again?

Still waiting for you to find one post where I “worship” Trump. You cannot because it doesn’t exist. You’re a typical Leftist and I enjoy the fact that he triggers you. I hope he wins again so that you and people like Lone Leftist have four more years of misery.

haaaaaaaa.............. listen to you................... you spiral in yer own little way.... bless yer heart.

If you cannot find one post then it is proof that you're a liar. Stop trolling.

perhaps they are with all them thar posts where i say i drink 'eh?

 

[Billiejeens]

Keep telling yourself that. The transcript speaks for itself. The only “editing” is from you uninformed idiots. You still have nothing. Try again loser.

you do understand what a memorandum is, right? what verbatim means, right?

<ahem>

CAUTION: A Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation.· (TELCON) is not a verbatim transcript of a discussion. The text in this document records the notes and recollections of Situation Room Duty "Officers and-NSC policy staff assigned t_o listen.and memorialize the conversation in written form as the conversation takes place. A numper of factors can affect 'the accuracy of the reco�d, including poor telecommunications connections and variations in accent and/or interpretation. The word "inaudible" is used to indifate portions of a conversation that the notetaker was unable to hear.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

White House Ukraine Expert Sought to Correct Transcript of Trump Call
Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, who heard President Trump’s July phone call with Ukraine’s president and was alarmed, testified that he tried and failed to add key details to the rough transcript.
White House Ukraine Expert Sought to Correct Transcript of Trump Call

Pathetic attempt at deflection by a drunk, uneducated idiot. You’re getting your ass kicked all over here. Gee, you haven’t come up with ONE legitimate argument. No surprise there. If that’s from an official site (doubtful given the multitude of errors there, you probably typed that yourself.). Caught lying again.

sooooooooooooo................ the actual 'transcript' that donny released, straight from the white house site isn't good enough? yep, you have cheeto dust all over you from being that far up donny's colon.

Remove yourself from Michael Obozo’s ass, the echo is confusing people. Try again, you’re failing badly and being laughed at by all. Your pathetic deflection because, as always, you have NOTHING, is noted. Perhaps I’ll let my 3 year old slap you around. She knows more than you do.

yaaaaaa - just as i thought - - - you got nuthin' to refudiate. better luck next time.

Were you ever able to answer any of my questions, from yesterday?

 

[playtime]

Still waiting for you to find one post where I “worship” Trump. You cannot because it doesn’t exist. You’re a typical Leftist and I enjoy the fact that he triggers you. I hope he wins again so that you and people like Lone Leftist have four more years of misery.

haaaaaaaa.............. listen to you................... you spiral in yer own little way.... bless yer heart.

Still waiting...nice try in changing the subject. Deflection will not work. You’ve been exposed as a liar.

prove i drink.

Your incoherent posts. Unless you mean them to be that way, in that case you're a 57 year old woman acting like she is 13. I gave you the benefit of the doubt and assumed you were a drunk.

to you, incoherent = political facts with linked sources when it's important to do so? that's typical & not at all surprising. i'll continue to file that reasoning under 'stuuuuuuuuuuupid' & cross reference under 'basket dweller'.



anyhoo, your deductive reasoning & personal opinion based on bias just doesn't cut it zogster.

 

[LoneLaugher]

It doesn't bother you lefties to still celebrate Clinton who was impeached for actual crime. Trump was impeached because you lefties are still butthurt over 2016 election. I say, keep dilating, cause more butthurt is coming in November.

What was Clinton’s crime? Perjury? Was he convicted of that crime in a court of law?

It didn't go to the court of law dummy. If it did, he would be convicted. Enough to get him disbarred from practicing law in front of high court.

No indictment. No conviction. No crime. Right?

Wrong. It's in different order. Crime, indictment, conviction.

The difference in between Clinton and Trump impeachment is that Clinton committed perjury, it's proven he lied, so there is a crime. He wasn't indicted because he was a sitting president, and according to DOJ rules, sitting president cannot be indicted. Being acquitted in Senate, doesn't clear him from perjury, or crime. He could've been indicted and convicted after presidency, but nobody went after him, except he paid fines and got disbarred.

Unlike Clinton, Trump hasn't committed any crime, and even if he did, the House failed to prove it, but they impeached him anyways.

They haven't impeached him yet.
They did vote to impeach him, but for whatever reason, or no reason they have failed to do so to this point.
This is buttressed by the face that the house is supposedly going to impeach this week.

Idiots - he is impeached.
Non-idiots - technically not impeached yet.
Idiots - yes he is.
Non-idiots - technically not impeached yet.
Idiots - yes he is.
Non-idiots - then why has the house scheduled impeachment for this week?
Idiots - he is impeached.
Non-idiots - well you should tell Pelosi, she doesn't seem to know.

She knows. He was impeached. The house has not scheduled impeachment for this week. You’re wrong.

That doesn’t make you an idiot. Idiots are sometimes not wrong. But you are wrong.

 

[playtime]

You will vote for him again?

Well I was considering Tulsi Gabbard but now 100% yes. So if I vote for someone it makes me a “worshipper”? So were you a Barack Obama worshipper? LOL.

It’s a clue. He’s such a shitty president that anyone who STILL supports him has a 25% chance of being a worshipper of his.

Let’s find out? A few questions.

Do you think he lies more than any president in the history of this nation?

Hold on. You are biased based on you first statement. I stated before that people like you are ruining this country and no one triggers you more than Trump. I disagree with him on his policy regarding debt and of course our healthcare is a mess. I like his policies regarding fewer regulations, lower corporate tax rate, fewer tax loopholes, stronger military, ardent Israel support, self reliance in terms of energy and fair trade deals. What really puts him over the top however, is that he triggers you. I have no idea who lied more or less. I assume Clinton lied more as he was impeached for lying. Trump is also highly hyperbolic. You consider those lies, I do not. But Trump would agree with me that biological males should not play contact sport vs biological females at age 13 in an all girls basketball league. You disagree. I find that abhorrent. I find you to be an uniformed and fat loser. Does that make me a Trump worshipper? If so, explain how.

You are a Trump worshipper. You will not acknowledge that he is the most prolific liar to ever serve as this nations leader. That means that you cannot see him for what he is. You worship him.

Thanks for playing.

Bullshit. Listen, Leftist, your opinion doesn't equal fact. It is just an opinion. I am glad he triggers you because people like you are ruining this country. Funny how you never acknowledge that comment. You're a primitive fool. When you evolve, ping me.

^^^

 

[Billiejeens]

What was Clinton’s crime? Perjury? Was he convicted of that crime in a court of law?

It didn't go to the court of law dummy. If it did, he would be convicted. Enough to get him disbarred from practicing law in front of high court.

No indictment. No conviction. No crime. Right?

Wrong. It's in different order. Crime, indictment, conviction.

The difference in between Clinton and Trump impeachment is that Clinton committed perjury, it's proven he lied, so there is a crime. He wasn't indicted because he was a sitting president, and according to DOJ rules, sitting president cannot be indicted. Being acquitted in Senate, doesn't clear him from perjury, or crime. He could've been indicted and convicted after presidency, but nobody went after him, except he paid fines and got disbarred.

Unlike Clinton, Trump hasn't committed any crime, and even if he did, the House failed to prove it, but they impeached him anyways.

They haven't impeached him yet.
They did vote to impeach him, but for whatever reason, or no reason they have failed to do so to this point.
This is buttressed by the face that the house is supposedly going to impeach this week.

Idiots - he is impeached.
Non-idiots - technically not impeached yet.
Idiots - yes he is.
Non-idiots - technically not impeached yet.
Idiots - yes he is.
Non-idiots - then why has the house scheduled impeachment for this week?
Idiots - he is impeached.
Non-idiots - well you should tell Pelosi, she doesn't seem to know.

She knows. He was impeached. The house has not scheduled impeachment for this week. You’re wrong.

That doesn’t make you an idiot. Idiots are sometimes not wrong. But you are wrong.

(pats head)