Your actions caused a shooter to be able to kill 17 people without anyone able to fight back.
YOU owe US the explanation, Zoonie. What's wrong with what you are doing?
I'm not sure I know what you are complaining about. The kid in Florida was well trained to defend himself. In fact, he was trained by the NRA, and was probably the best shot in his class.He was trained to shoot targets the size of a coin. My best guess is that if the school were looking for a skilled marksman to protect the students, he would have been high on this list. Of course, the guy in Las Vegas was also highly trained. He had even worked out the trajectory of bullets with the wind velocity at the time of the shooting.
I'm complaining that no one was shooting back, dumb ass. Here's how you know that. It's what I said. What about that confused you?
You write like you skipped high school.
And yeah, I'd like him trading fire with skilled marksmen, not marksman. That would take all of his time rather than your plan where the shooter aims at unarmed person, fires, repeats
So, who would you select to be trained to shoot back? If you would encourage everyone to come armed and to shoot back, how do you know that you don't have a school full of mass murderer wannabes? In fact, I am sure that kids like the Columbine shooters would be delighted to be told to bring their firearms to school for a "show and tell" day...
Gawd, inner city leftists are so ignorant.
I wouldn't select anyone to train and the stupid hyperbole of "encourage everyone to come armed." You're so mind numbingly simplistic that everyone or no one needs to be armed there is nothing in the middle. Then you call Republicans black and white. Sheesh.
I would simply allow the people who care enough to get trained and want to be able to protect themselves to do so. You don't need or want "everyone" to do it. I can't get over how stupid you are to say such a ridiculous thing. All you need is the shooter to not know who's armed. I bet this has been explained to you many times before
So, what you're really saying is that you only would allow some to use their 2nd amendment rights?
How did you possibly get that out of what I said? I'm thinking it's because you're stupid