frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 46,228
- 9,791
- 2,030
It IS the topicSo, how many people need to go to Central Park and camp out there?
Doesn't matter. The park is well run and the management company makes money on the concessions it runs in the park
The same thing can work in National Parks.
Saying it won't is knee jerk at best.
We have a dire problem with our National parks so we either raise taxes to cover the 10 billion dollars in repairs needed and keep taxes up to fund the parks or we can do what we used to do and allow logging in the parks to get the revenue needed. OR we can establish a public private partnership to do it.
So we either have to close parks and campgrounds as they become more deteriorated or fix the fucking problem
I didn't say it wouldn't "work", that's not the point. It's WHO it works for is the point. You increase the costs and then all of a sudden it only benefits... wait... get this, it benefits the RICH, yeah, what a shocker, Trump doing things to BENEFIT THE RICH once again. The working man's guy, bullshit is he.
Well, I'm sure there are people who would like the parks to spend more money, but, er... Trump defunded them.
FYI almost half of US Forest Service lands are privately operated and are just as busy as ever and you know why?
Because they are cleaner, better maintained and provide better customer focus than those places run by government employees
Okay, and what does this have to do with this topic?
you think private management of national parks is wrong
We're talking about private management of the campsites within the park...