🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Trump to deploy up to 100,000 National Guard troops to round up illegals

One day after Donald Trump read the riot act to the fakers and liars in the news media, they have responded with more misleading Fake News.

Every administration of nearly every country always puts together contingency plans in case they are ever needed, from invading their neighbors to declaring martial law to rounding up lawbreakers. Some unnamed staff put them together and stick them in file cabinets, and never look at them again.

But here we have some government source pulling such a form out of the cabinet again and leaking it to the sycophantic press , who immediately writes a misleading article as though the President himself was actively considering doing it. And using alarming phrases such as "mobilizing", "unprecedented", "millions", "militarization" etc. It's a classic example of Fake News.

The one is about using 100,000 National Guard troops to supposedly "round up" illegal aliens in many states. If it hadn't been that, it would have been something else, maybe a plan to invade Iran or something (I'm sure the govt has had that plan in their files for years too).

-----------------------------------------

AP Exclusive: DHS weighed Nat Guard for immigration roundups

AP Exclusive: DHS weighed Nat Guard for immigration roundups

Feb. 17, 2017
GARANCE BURKE,
Associated Press

The Trump administration considered a proposal to mobilize as many as 100,000 National Guard troops to round up unauthorized immigrants, including millions living nowhere near the Mexico border, according to a draft memo obtained by The Associated Press.

Staffers in the Department of Homeland Security said the proposal had been discussed as recently as Friday.

The 11-page document calls for the unprecedented militarization of immigration enforcement as far north as Portland, Oregon, and as far east as New Orleans, Louisiana.

Four states that border on Mexico were included in the proposal — California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas — but it also encompasses seven states contiguous to those four — Oregon, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisiana.

White House spokesman Sean Spicer said Friday the document was "not a White House document."

"There is no effort to do what is potentially suggested," he said. Spicer called the AP report "100 percent not true, adding that there was "no effort at all to utilize the National Guard to round up unauthorized immigrants."

A DHS official described the document as a very early draft that was not seriously considered and never brought to the secretary for approval.
 
Last edited:
Just heard Chuckie Schuma said he hoped it wasn't true and it's appalling that it could be considered true. As if somebody else is responsible for what his putrid little brain might consider true.
 
100,000 National Guard troops to round up illegal aliens nationwide. Sounds like good idea. Only question is why aren't they doing it already ? The sooner the illegal are evicted, the sooner we have 8 million jobs opened up for AMERICANS, and the sooner the pillaging of our economy ($133 Billion/year) from remittances stops.
 
This is a similar mistake to the Left trying to FORCE universal health care through govt,
INSTEAD OF CREATING INCENTIVES that are so cost effective that people CHOOSE to participate in nationalized coops organizing resources
and services voluntarily using free market approaches.

With immigration, why not set up INCENTIVES for people to come forward
and be rewarded for cooperating with authorities to resolve any past violations on their records?
If it is set up right, no coercion would be needed; people want the chance to become legal citizens if a track is set up that they can register for.

4-5 cities could be set up along the border that will represent
bases for legal residency for the 12-30 est. "Mexican nationals" undocumented in the US.
Then reward participants with dual citizenship and a chance to work off credits owed for
any lapses in VISAs or gaps in legal status they incurred, as long as they cooperate in full and report all their history accurately.
If they misreport or misrepresent, they have more time or penalties to make up, or may lose applications altogether in case of criminal
intent they refuse to correct and offer restitution for (which would be invested in developing these community bases).

Creating business and campus housing developments would reward law abiding residents for cooperating with authorities
and business/nonprofit organizations that help to manage registration for these populations to make the transition to legal status.
For security, military bases, prisons and teaching hospitals can be set up along the border, also creating jobs, educational
training and health/social services so that immigrant workers are no longer pressured to break laws to access opportunities
but can do so legally. Again, any restitution for wrongdoing, whether civil or criminal violations, can be worked out and invested
in building factories, housing, and job/education facilities in the very regions struggling with traffickers taking advantage of the poor.

www.earnedamnesty.org
They SHOULD NOT BECOME legal citizens. The country is way too overpopulated to begin with. Our ancestors provided us with immigration law to protect us from foreigners swamping us with their numbers, and creating a list of harms to the American people.

Harms of Immigration

1. Americans lose jobs.

2. Wage reduction.

3. Tax $ lost (due to off books work + lower wages paid).

4. Remittance $$$ lost. ($123 Billion year).

5. Tax $$ lost to immigrants on welfare.

6. Increased crime.

7. Increased traffic congestion.

8. Increased pollution.

9. Overcrowding in hospital ERs.

10. Overcrowding in recreational facilities.

11. Overcrowding in government offices.

12. Overcrowding in schools.

13. Decrease in funds available for entitlements.

14. Cultural erosion.

15. Overuse of scarce resources (oil, gasoline, fresh water, jobs, electricity, food, etc)

16. Introduction of foreign diseases.

17. Influx of terrorists.
 
Last edited:
What's fake about it? Did they or did they not consider this?

If the article is wrong, can you provide evidence to refute it?
 
And using alarming phrases such as "mobilizing", "unprecedented", "millions", "militarization" etc. It's a classic example of Fake News.

Not an example of fake news, but descriptors like can be a red flag to be more critical of the article. You guys ever tried applying it to Brietbart articles?
 
How would deploying 100,000 National Guard troops to round up illegal aliens be a "smear" ? Sounds like great idea. Only question is > why haven't they been doing it already ?
 
The Associated Press has had a rough few months, caught time and again openly lying in their war on Donald Trump.

The AP is at it again, and lied about National Guard Troops being used to round up illegal aliens. The AP claimed the White House signed an order deploying 100,000 troops to round up illegals. Of course no such order was issued, but in their zeal to smear the President, the AP ran it as fact and many news agencies repeated the fake news story as fact.

White House Quickly Debunks AP Report That They Were Sending National Guard Troops to Find Illegal Immigrants

the right wingers labeling all non-bubble news as 'fake' is a desperate gambit

only Cheetolini lovers drone on and on with this rubbish, it ain't flyin so far
What other word would be fitting for "made up bullshit?"
Anything out of nutsacks mouth.
 
You think that a President ordering a mass deployment of National Guard troops to kick in doors and round people up on American Soil would be a good thing?

Thank god this is a bullshit claim since the police state we have now is already bad enough.

I think it would be the best thing I've seen in years, if it was actually true.

We don't have anything like a police state. I wish we did.
have you ever thought of actually moving to one instead of just talking?...
Naah...he's just a blowhard.
 
What's fake about it? Did they or did they not consider this?

If the article is wrong, can you provide evidence to refute it?
The White House and the President had nothing what so ever to do with the suggestion, that is what is fake. But then you like repeating lies and misinformation so keep on claiming otherwise.
 
Seems like we're making much ado about nothing. The real question is > when is the Trump administration going to get on with the business of getting rid of the millions of illegal aliens in the US ? (ALL of them), whether using the National Guards or whatever.

It shouldn't be such a big task as the media makes it out to be. Eisenhower got rid of 2 million (another million fled on their own), when his INS agents went house to house in southwestern states, hunting down illegal aliens and deporting them, in Operation Wetback (1954)
 

Forum List

Back
Top